Permit Review Detail
Review Status: In Review
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0626-00162
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Review Status: In Review
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Commercial Plumbing Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | NPPO Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | Site Landscape Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | Site Zoning Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 07/09/2026 | Site Engineering Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Permit Activity Number: TD-DEV-0626-00162 (1st Review) Project: Change of use. There will be a minor TI submitted once this is approved. Location: 3305 N CARDI BL Review Date: 7/9/2026 Reviewer: Marco Contreras – Engineering Associate & Joe Macaulay – Civil Engineer Reviewer Contact Information: marco.contreras@tucsonaz.gov & Joe.Macaulay@tucsonaz.gov Related cases: Plan review for the above-referenced development package has been completed. This review was conducted for compliance with applicable development criteria including the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC), Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-6, and Technical Standards Manual (TSM) sections governing waste management, pedestrian access, hydrology – retention/detention requirements, and all applicable site standards. The following comments must be addressed prior to approval. To help facilitate a timely resubmittal, please provide updated plans and calculations along with a written response to each comment, indicating what action was taken and where the change can be found on the plans. Do not use revision clouds on resubmittal drawings — clouds are reserved for post-permit revisions only. Submit your response letter and updated plan set & reports as separate files. Applicable Code Links for quick/direct reference: City of Tucson Code: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Codes Floodplain Code: https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az/0-0-0-19333 Drainage Manual Link: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/cot-drainage-manual-searchable.pdf Design standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention Link: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/updated-retention-detention-manual.pdf City of Tucson Chapter 25: https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az/0-0-0-18593 Site Engineering Review Comments: 1. Provide the development package case number (TD-DEV-0626-00162) adjacent to the title block on each sheet of the plan set. [AM 2-06.3.3] 2. Provide the Zoning and Land Use General Note: “Any relocation or modification of existing utilities and/or public improvements necessitated by the proposed development will be at no expense to the public.” [AM 2-06.4.7.D] 3. Provide the general note: “Any Proposed signs will be approved per separate permit” [AM 2-06.4.7] 4. Provide the page number and total number of pages within the Development Package plan set (i.e., sheet xx of xx) on the bottom right corner of each page. [AM 2-06.4.2.D] 5. Site plan (a100) - Revise the site plan provided to provide Sight visibility triangles for all site entrances: Country Club RD is designated as an Arterial Road. This designation will be used for Table 5.3. Refer to TSM 10-01.9.0 Figures 16-18 for examples of SVTs. [TSM 10-01.5.0.] a. Confirm that no proposed structures, walls, signs, landscaping, or other vertical elements exceeding the allowable height limit encroach within the established SVT at any site access point. Where conflicts exist, the site design must be revised to achieve full compliance. 6. Revision will be required – Access lanes and PAALs must be setback at least two-feet from a wall over six inches. [UDC7.4.6.F.2.b] 7. Dimension all pathways – Ensure compliance with minimum 4-ft clearance requirements [TSM 7-01.3.3 & 7-01.4.3.A] 8. Provide a construction detail or PAG reference for proposed wheel stops. Waste Management Comments: 9. The plans do not demonstrate compliance with TSM 8-01.5.1.A, which requires that adequate space be provided for both solid waste and recycling collection services. Revise the plans to clearly show that each proposed APC provides designated separate space for solid waste containers and recycling containers. |
||
| 06/29/2026 | CDRC Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 07/08/2026 | CDRC Review Coordinator Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to TEP, PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 07/26/2026 | Fire New Construction Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 06/30/2026 | OK to Submit - Engineering Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 07/02/2026 | OK to Submit - Zoning Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 07/24/2026 | ROW Engineering Review Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 07/10/2026 | ROW Review | REVIEW COMPLETED |