Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: TD-DEV-0626-00155
Parcel: 11008065A

Review Status: Requires Resubmit

Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1

Permit Number - TD-DEV-0626-00155
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
07/17/2026 NPPO Standard NOT REQUIRED This residential project is part of the VISTA DEL MONTE TRACT SUBDIVISION, MP 05063, RECORDED: JANUARY 4, 1930. This residential parcel pre-dates the NPPO, thus exempt from compliance. There is only one tree on site and it is proposed to be preserved in place.

Thank you.
Chad Keller, PLA
chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov
07/16/2026 Commercial Plumbing Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT ACTIVITY NO. TD-DEV-0626-00155
ADDRESS/PARCEL: 2626 N COLUMBUS BL TUCSON, AZ 85712

Submit your revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all comments were addressed. Review will not proceed without the response letter. The submitted documents were incomplete and a thorough plan review could not be performed. Please be aware, new comments may arise with the next review.

If you have any questions about these review comments, I can be reached at Sean.Severson@tucsonaz.gov

COMMENTS:

1. Show how the sewer connects to the public sewer. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2024.
2. Please show all building sewer cleanouts on the site plan.
a. Show the cleanout at the junction of the building drain and the building sewer. Reference: Section 708.1.3, IPC 2024.
b. Please provide a cleanout in the building sewer prior to entering the right-of-way. Reference: Pima County Standard Detail RWRD 401, 2021.
3. Please show the FFE, finished floor elevation, and the RIM elevation of the nearest upstream manhole on the site plan. Reference: Section 714.1, IPC 2024, as amended by the City of Tucson.
4. Please clarify the location of the existing 5/8-inch water meter. The plans show the meter in front of the adjacent property with the water service crossing onto the property associated with this permit. Revise the plans as necessary. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2024.
06/26/2026 External Reviewers - Pima County Addressing Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT Good afternoon,

Pima County Addressing is returning TD-DEV-0626-00155 with the attached comments.

Thank you,








David Wilging

Planner I - Addressing Division

Pima County Development Services

201 N. Stone Avenue 1st Floor

Tucson, Arizona 85701

520-724-6381
07/06/2026 ROW Engineering Review Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT Columbus is a Collector on the Major Streets and Routes Map, show existing ROW and Future ROW.
Show on-site Vehicular Maneuverability if onsite parking is proposed/required; per TSM 10-01.6.1.D - Where residential driveways front directly on a major street, adequate area will be provided on-site to accommodate a vehicular turnaround area.
Show utility connections in ROW.
Columbus Modernization-Ft Lowell to Broadway project in area.
Status: Design
Construction FY27
Description
Corridor modernization to include repaving, accessible pedestrian facilities, improved bike lanes, lighting, and other safety enhancements
Contact DTM PM
Elizabeth.macias@tucsonaz.gov
06/25/2026 Site Engineering Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT Permit Activity Number: TD-DEV-0626-00155 (1st Review)
Project: (2) duplex
Location: 2626 N COLUMBUS BL
Review Date: 6/25/2026
Reviewer: Marco Contreras – Engineering Associate
Reviewer Contact Information: marco.contreras@tucsonaz.gov
Related cases:

Plan review for the above-referenced development package has been completed. This review was conducted for compliance with applicable development criteria including the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC), Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-6, and Technical Standards Manual (TSM) sections governing waste management, pedestrian access, hydrology – retention/detention requirements, and all applicable site standards.
The following comments must be addressed prior to approval. To help facilitate a timely resubmittal, please provide updated plans and calculations along with a written response to each comment, indicating what action was taken and where the change can be found on the plans. Do not use revision clouds on resubmittal drawings — clouds are reserved for post-permit revisions only. Submit your response letter and updated plan set & reports as separate files.

Applicable Code Links for quick/direct reference:
City of Tucson Code: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Codes
Floodplain Code: https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az/0-0-0-19333
Drainage Manual Link: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/cot-drainage-manual-searchable.pdf
Design standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention Link:
https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/updated-retention-detention-manual.pdf
City of Tucson Chapter 25: https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az/0-0-0-18593

Site Engineering Review Comments:
1. Provide the development package case number (TD-DEV-0626-00155) adjacent to the title block on each sheet of the plan set. [AM 2-06.3.3]
2. The City of Tucson requires that all grading plans have the engineer’s registrant stamp [A.R.S. 32-1121]. For resubmission, ensure that the engineers’ stamp is found on both the cover sheet and grading plan.
3. Grading Plan – The Limits of Grading (LOG) are not clearly depicted on the grading plan. The LOG must be shown using a distinct line type to differentiate it from other plan elements and to clearly define the extent of proposed ground disturbance.
a. Update the legend on Cover Sheet to include and define the Limits of Grading line type. All line types, symbols, and keynotes depicted on the grading plans shall be represented in the legend.
4. Provide a dimensioned cross-section detail transecting the proposed building pads, illustrating the full vertical extent of proposed grading, finished pad elevation, and existing natural ground surface elevations. The cross-section shall include sufficient horizontal and vertical scale, with labeled elevation datums referenced to NAVD 88, to clearly demonstrate the relationship between proposed and existing topography.
5. Provide spot elevations at sufficient density around the perimeter of the proposed structures to substantiate that the Finished Floor Elevation (FFE) complies with the minimum elevation requirement of one foot 11 inches above natural grade elevations. Spot elevations shall be provided at all structure corners, at intermediate perimeter points where grade transitions occur, and at the top of pad. All elevations shall be referenced to NAVD 88 and consistent with the benchmark established on the plan set.
6. Provide drainage flow direction arrows across the entire site to delineate high points, low points, and positive drainage patterns. Flow arrows shall demonstrate that all stormwater runoff is conveyed away from the proposed structure and directed solely toward the applicable adjacent Right-of-Way (ROW) or approved drainage easement. Drainage shall not be directed toward adjacent private parcels. Ensure proposed grades reflect a minimum of 5% gradient away from the structure for a minimum horizontal distance of 10 feet [IRC R401.3]
7. By using the proposed spot elevations at the structure corners & surrounding area, denote the intended FFE elevation determined using said elevations to demonstrate compliance with the 23’ inches above grade. The FFE note provided will not be sufficient, but should remain as a supplemental note on the plan set.
07/23/2026 Site Zoning Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT CDRC TRANSMITTAL

REVIEWED BY: Krista Hansen – Lead Planner
PDSD Zoning Review Section

PROJECT: [PROJECT NAME]
Development Package (1st Review)
TD-DEV-0626-00155 (2626 N COLUMBUS BL – R-2)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: 7/23/2026

Per UDC Section 3.3.3.G.5.c, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year expiration date is June 19, 2027.

SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS)


2-06.4 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

4.1.B A title block on each sheet that includes:

4.1.B.6 The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (DP, subdivision, rezoning, BOA, DDO, PDMR, TSMR, overlay, etc.).

1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1.B.6
a. Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0626-00155 adjacent to the title block on each sheet.
b. Add a Site Note stating, “This site has been designed to comply with the requirements/standards of the Major Streets and Routes overlay, UDC Section 5.4.”

4.2 Required Zoning and land use notes:

4.2.D. Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. Reference all UDC use-specific standards applicable to the proposed uses.

2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.D – Provide the information as listed in the standard above. The proposed use is, “Middle Housing per UDC Use Specific Standards 4.9.7.B.6, .8, & .9.”

4.2.E. On residential projects, list the total number of units or lots that are existing and proposed.

3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.E – Under Project Date, provide the total number of units.


4.4.B List the following note on all development package documents: “No structure or vegetation shall be located or maintained so as to interfere with the sight visibility triangles in accordance with Section 10-01.5.0, Sight Visibility, of the Technical Standards Manual.”

4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.B – Add the note to the Site Notes, as listed in the standard above.


4.4.D List the following note on all development package documents: “Any relocation or modification of existing utilities and/or public improvements necessitated by the proposed development will be at no expense to the public.”

5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.D – Add the note to the Site Notes, as listed in the standard above.


4.7.Q.2 Show sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section.

6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.Q.2 – Show sight visibility triangles on Columbus Blvd.


4.7.V.1 Indicate if streets within or adjacent to the site are public or private, the street names, recordation type, utility locations, and fully dimensioned widths, curbs, and sidewalks.

7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.V.1 – Indicate on the site plan that Columbus Blvd is designated as a Major Street & Route (MS&R) Collector.



RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Please resubmit revised drawings and any corrected plans along with a detailed response letter, stating how all Site Zoning Review comments were addressed.

**Instructions for resubmittal - www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/tdc-faq/new-pdfs/revisions-and-resubmittals.pdf.

***For additional information on the standards presented in this memo, please refer to the City of Tucson Administrative Manual Section 2-06 or Technical Standards noted in the comments.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Krista Hansen at krista.hansen@tucsonaz.gov
06/22/2026 CDRC Application Completeness Express REVIEW COMPLETED
06/25/2026 CDRC Review Coordinator Express REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC added Addressing & TEP to the workflow. Review request email sent to Addressing.  FYI email sent to TEP.
06/25/2026 External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) Standard REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC sent FYI email sent to TEP. No further action is required.
07/16/2026 Fire New Construction Standard REVIEW COMPLETED
06/22/2026 OK to Submit - Engineering Fast REVIEW COMPLETED
06/24/2026 OK to Submit - Zoning Fast REVIEW COMPLETED
06/25/2026 ROW Review REVIEW COMPLETED
07/17/2026 Site Landscape Standard REVIEW COMPLETED The Middle Housing Ordinance landscape requirements have been included on the residential permit (TC-MDP-0426-0024). All middle housing landscape standards should only be shown on the residential building permit detailed site plan.

Thank you.
Chad Keller, PLA
chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov