Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: TD-DEV-0626-00149
Parcel: Unknown

Address: Unknown

Review Status: Requires Resubmit

Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1

Permit Number - TD-DEV-0626-00149
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
07/17/2026 NPPO Standard APPROVED PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
REVIEWER: CHAD KELLER, PLA
SITE LANDSCAPE/NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION SECTION

PROJECT: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE ON SITE B TO CONSTRUCT FRONT-END INFRASTRUCTURE FOR FUTURE 10 LOT COMMERCIAL USAGE
ACTIVITY NO: TD-DEV-0626-00149
ADDRESS/PARCEL: 14118602B
ZONING: LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ZONE (I-1)
LAND USE: COMMERCIAL
7.17.2026

THE PROPOSED PLANS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR SITE LANDSCAPE, NATIVE PLANTS, AND RAINWATER HARVESTING, PER-THE-CITY OF TUCSON UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE (UDC), TECHNICAL STANDARDS MANUAL (TSM), AND ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL (AM).

RESUBMIT REVISED DRAWINGS ALONG WITH A DETAILED RESPONSE LETTER, STATING HOW ALL SITE LANDSCAPE AND NPPO SECTION REVIEW COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED.

SITE LANDSCAPE/NPPO SECTION COMMENTS:

1. The NPPO Plan, details and notes are sufficient for this phase of the project. The PDSD Site Landscape Review Section has added the Activity Number (TD-DEV-0626-00149) to the NPPO plans ONLY. It is understood that individual Development Packages will be provided for each parcel as development commences. The individual plans will include compliance with street landscape border planting, parking lot trees, irrigation, commercial rainwater harvesting and all details notes and specifications required to complete each individual project.

Thank you.
Chad Keller, PLA
Landscape Architect
chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov
520.837.4923
07/17/2026 Site Landscape Standard APPROVED PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
REVIEWER: CHAD KELLER, PLA
SITE LANDSCAPE/NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION SECTION

PROJECT: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE ON SITE B TO CONSTRUCT FRONT-END INFRASTRUCTURE FOR FUTURE 10 LOT COMMERCIAL USAGE
ACTIVITY NO: TD-DEV-0626-00149
ADDRESS/PARCEL: 14118602B
ZONING: LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ZONE (I-1)
LAND USE: COMMERCIAL
7.17.2026

THE PROPOSED PLANS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR SITE LANDSCAPE, NATIVE PLANTS, AND RAINWATER HARVESTING, PER-THE-CITY OF TUCSON UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE (UDC), TECHNICAL STANDARDS MANUAL (TSM), AND ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL (AM).

RESUBMIT REVISED DRAWINGS ALONG WITH A DETAILED RESPONSE LETTER, STATING HOW ALL SITE LANDSCAPE AND NPPO SECTION REVIEW COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED.

SITE LANDSCAPE/NPPO SECTION COMMENTS:

1. The NPPO Plan, details and notes are sufficient for this phase of the project. The PDSD Site Landscape Review Section has added the Activity Number (TD-DEV-0626-00149) to the NPPO plans ONLY. It is understood that individual Development Packages will be provided for each parcel as development commences. The individual plans will include compliance with street landscape border planting, parking lot trees, irrigation, commercial rainwater harvesting and all details notes and specifications required to complete each individual project.

Thank you.
Chad Keller, PLA
Landscape Architect
chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov
520.837.4923
07/15/2026 Site Zoning Standard APPROVED
07/15/2026 Commercial Plumbing Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT ACTIVITY NO. TD-DEV-0626-00149

Submit your revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all comments were addressed. Review will not proceed without the response letter. The submitted documents were incomplete and a thorough plan review could not be performed. Please be aware, new comments may arise with the next review.

If you have any questions about these review comments, I can be reached at Sean.Severson@tucsonaz.gov.

COMMENTS:

1. Please revise the plans to add additional private sewer manholes so that the distance between consecutive manholes does not exceed 400 feet. The private sewer shown on Sheet 9 through Lot 7 has manholes spaced more than 400 feet apart. Reference: Section 708.1.2, IPC 2024.
07/14/2026 ROW Engineering Review Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT ROW ENG comment file has been added to attachments.
Driveways shall be concrete from curb line to behind of sidewalk (crosswalk) cross slope should not exceed 2% in crosswalk area.
Radius exceeds 25' require TSMR, submit AutoTurn Movements. See Street Design Guide.
Driveways exceed 30' at P/L, TSMR will be required.
Show other driveways on south side of Old Vail Rd.
Use directional ramps.
07/15/2026 Site Engineering Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT Permit Activity Number: TD-DEV-0626-00149 (1st Review)
Project: Development Package on Site B to construct front-end infrastructure for future 10 lot commercial usage
Location: 14118602B
Review Date: 7/15/2026
Reviewer: Marco Contreras – Engineering Associate
Reviewer Contact Information: marco.contreras@tucsonaz.gov
Related cases: TD-DIV-0626-00038

Plan review for the above-referenced development package has been completed. This review was conducted for compliance with applicable development criteria including the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC), Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-6, and Technical Standards Manual (TSM) sections governing waste management, pedestrian access, hydrology – retention/detention requirements, and all applicable site standards.
The following comments must be addressed prior to approval. To help facilitate a timely resubmittal, please provide updated plans and calculations along with a written response to each comment, indicating what action was taken and where the change can be found on the plans. Do not use revision clouds on resubmittal drawings — clouds are reserved for post-permit revisions only. Submit your response letter and updated plan set & reports as separate files.

Applicable Code Links for quick/direct reference:
City of Tucson Code: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Codes
Floodplain Code: https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az/0-0-0-19333
Drainage Manual Link: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/cot-drainage-manual-searchable.pdf
Design standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention Link:
https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/updated-retention-detention-manual.pdf
City of Tucson Chapter 25: https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az/0-0-0-18593

Site Engineering Administrative Review Comments:
1. Revise general note #16 – the City of Tucson adopted The IBC 2024 with ICC A117.1 2017 edition at the beginning of 2026
2. Provide the development package case number (TD-DEV-0626-00149) adjacent to the title block on each sheet of the plan set. [AM 2-06.3.3]
3. Revise the cover sheet to include the name, registration number, seal, and contact information for the Geotechnical Engineer of Record, along with the name and address of the geotechnical firm. This information shall be presented with the other project registrant contact information on the cover sheet. [AM 2-06.4.1]
4. As the subject property/site is located within a locally mapped floodplain with associated regulatory limits – a floodplain use (FPU) permit application will be administratively begun and processed for the development to assure compliance with establish floodplain regulations and standards. No further action is required for this comment.
PAAL & Site Comments:
5. To review for compliance with the new proposed wheels stops that appear proposed to contain the vehicle use area & access lanes, ensure they are spaced no less than 4-ft and no more than 5-ft separate UDC 7.4.6. Provide a measurement call-out on the site plan as well as update keynote #14 to make this distance differential clear.
Grading & Drainage Comments:
6. The grading plans lack sufficient spot elevation information at key drainage control points necessary to verify design intent and facilitate site inspections during and after construction. Provide spot elevations at all of the following locations:
a. All curb cut inlet locations, showing both the top of curb elevation and the adjacent pavement grade at the inlet opening.
b. All landscaped water harvesting area inlet and overflow points.
c. All curb cut outlet locations, showing outlet invert elevation and the receiving grade immediately downstream.
d. Top of curb versus finished pavement grade at key transitions throughout the site to confirm positive drainage and curb reveal are maintained as designed.
7. On both Site and Grading Plan view sheet – delineate the width of the drainage way, as well as the established COT maintenance access that exists along Rita Ranch South Channel [Drainage Manual 8.5.3]
8. The proposed drainage interim channel outlet into the Rita Ranch South Channel drainage way will be required to be revised.
a. The current proposal includes hand-placed/dumped riprap which appears to be completely within the City of Tucson maintenance access along the channel. It will be required that a concrete spillway be constructed for purposes of discharging into the channel. It is recommended that Eastern developments be referenced as examples for method of spillway so that vehicle access can be maintained.
9. Revise Utility plan sheets – Delineate the associated erosion hazard setback associated with the interim channel on the utility plan sheets.
Drainage Report Comments:
10. The cover sheet does not include a submittal number. Revise to include the submittal number in accordance with [Drainage Manual 2.3.1.1.A]
11. Section 1.2 – Revise “A lot specific drainage statement is required” to a “Site specific drainage document”
12. Section 1.3 – Revise the section to include the objective of “Meeting compliance with Rita Ranch Master Drainage plan”
13. Section 1.6 – Revise Section 1.6 to include an affirmative determination that no watercourse conveying a 100-year peak discharge of 100 cfs or greater traverses or abuts the project site, supported by the hydrologic analysis presented in this report. Per Tucson Code Chapter 26, watercourses with Q100 ≥ 100 cfs constitute regulated floodplains regardless of FEMA or local mapping status; a reference to the Map Tucson GIS website alone is not sufficient to demonstrate compliance.
14. Section I – ensure to include a “Required Permits” section that demonstrated that whether any other or no governmental permits are required for the scope of development. [Drainage Manual 2.3.1.2.F]
a. If the channel experiences regulatory flow (Q100 ≥100 CFS, then a Floodplain Use Permit from the City of Tucson will be required.
15. Erosion Hazard Setback Analysis — Newly Proposed Interim Channel - An Erosion Hazard Setback (EHS) analysis section is absent from the drainage report following City of Tucson standards. Revise Section 3.4 – Remove Pima County Floodplain ordinance relating to erosion hazard setback. In accordance with City of Tucson Drainage Manual Section 7.4, an EHS analysis is required in association with the Channel proposed. The EHS analysis shall be incorporated as a dedicated section within the drainage report. All regulated setback boundaries resulting from this analysis shall be depicted on all applicable plan sheets in a surveyable manner. [Drainage Manual 7.4]
16. A Long-Term Maintenance Responsibility section is absent from the report. This section is required by Drainage Manual Section 2.3.1.2.E and must identify the entity responsible for maintaining all proposed drainage improvements, including the retention/detention basin(s) & Water Harvesting basins, outlet structures such as channels, and any riprap erosion protection. This section should immediately follow the Procedures/Methodology section. [Drainage Manual 2.3.1.2.E]
06/12/2026 CDRC Application Completeness Express REVIEW COMPLETED
06/24/2026 CDRC Review Coordinator Express REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC added Addressing, TEP, PAG, USPS, and SWG to the workflow. Review request email sent to Addressing.  FYI email sent to TEP, PAG, USPS, SWG.
06/24/2026 External Reviewers - Pima County Addressing Standard REVIEW COMPLETED Good morning,

Pima County Addressing approves TD-DEV-0626-00149. Please note the correct admin address for the project is 9915 E Old Vail Rd.


Thank you,







David Wilging

Planner I - Addressing Division

Pima County Development Services

201 N. Stone Avenue 1st Floor

Tucson, Arizona 85701

520-724-6381
07/15/2026 Fire New Construction Standard REVIEW COMPLETED
06/15/2026 OK to Submit - Engineering Fast REVIEW COMPLETED
06/19/2026 OK to Submit - Zoning Fast REVIEW COMPLETED
06/24/2026 ROW Review REVIEW COMPLETED
07/16/2026 Traffic Engineering Review Standard REVIEW COMPLETED Traffic Engineering comments on the TIA are marked up within the document in the Bluebeam Studio Session. Thanks!