Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: TD-DEV-0624-00182
Parcel: 12513068B

Review Status: Requires Resubmit

Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2

Permit Number - TD-DEV-0624-00182
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
08/19/2024 Commercial Plumbing APPROVED
08/06/2024 ROW Engineering Review APPROVED DTM has no comments.
08/22/2024 Site Landscape APPROVED
08/22/2024 NPPO NOT REQUIRED
08/22/2024 CDRC Post Review PENDING ASSIGNMENT
08/19/2024 Site Engineering REQUIRES RESUBMIT 1. Show locations of roof downspouts from the new additions. Stormwater from roof drains may not pass over ADA sidewalks per TSM 7-01.4.3E.

Mike Ortiz
michael.ortiz@tucsonaz.gov
08/19/2024 Site Zoning REQUIRES RESUBMIT CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO:
Planning & Development Services Department

FROM:
Fernando García
PDSD Zoning Review Section

PROJECT: 800 N Country Club Rd, Tucson, AZ 85716
Development Package (1st Review)
TD-DEV-0624-00182

TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 19, 2024
DUE DATE: August 17, 2024

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is July 18, 2025.

SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS)


2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Annotate this permit number, TD-DEV-0624-00182, adjacent to the title block.


2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses.

2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Proposed uses for the project are listed as “Entertainment” and “Alcoholic beverage service as an accessory use to existing food service”.

These are both permitted uses under the PAD 37 document. However, per PAD 37 and UDC Section 4.9.V.3.b., an accessory alcoholic beverage service area cannot not exceed 25% of the food service floor area in size, including any food service outdoor area. Including the bar area within the monastery footprint as part of the accessory alcoholic beverage service use would appear to be in excess of 25% of the food service area.

Alternatively, the alcoholic beverage service area in the monastery can utilize the separate use of “Alcoholic beverage service, excluding large bar”, which is an approved use in PAD 37. Show the full area to be utilized for the monastery bar (rather than just the enclosed patio addition).

Cite the use-specific standards sections for each use as indicated in the PAD 37 Permitted Uses Section (page 56).

The submission states that the new proposed uses include “Entertainment”. No existing entertainment use is existing on site and although the reference floor plan shows a planned entertainment use, it is not included on the site plan. Correct the DP to include the area to be utilized for entertainment.

Since the proposed alcoholic beverage service as an accessory to food service use within 300 feet of residentially-zoned areas, it requires a liquor mitigation plan to be submitted per UDC Section 4.9.4.V.9.

Zoning acknowledges a separate liquor license application has been submitted for the uses shown on this development package. Based on the seating area depicted on the associated liquor license application, Zoning has determined the application to be generally in compliance with zoning standards and has no objections at this time.


2-06.4.8.A - Provide site boundary/subdivision perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or other functional reference system.

3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.A – TD-DEV-0324-00076 for the “new office use and associated surface parking” is not an approved permit. Please remove this reference from the DP.


2-06.4.9.H.5.a. Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a. – This DP indicates that 54 non-residential spaces are required for a commercial area of 10,435 sf. The last approved DP indicated 26 non-residential spaces were required for that same-sized area.

Per UDC Section 7.4.5.D, any non-residential use within the footprint of the Benedictine Monastery Historic Landmark are exempt from providing a minimum number of motor vehicle spaces.

Per the above comments, correct the total commercial square footage for which parking (required and provided) is being calculated and confirm calculations for the number of motor vehicle parking spaces.


2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided.

5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – As stated in comment 2-06.4.9.H.5.a above, once commercial square footage is confirmed, adjust short and long-term bicycle parking space requirements if necessary.


2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s).

6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Confirm and clarify commercial square footage calculations listed within the general notes. Any outdoor dining/seating associated with this project should be included in these calculations. Although the reference floor plan describes proposed uses, please also annotate specific use of the two building additions on sheet 3.



***For additional information on the any standard presented in this memo, please refer to the City of Tucson “Unified Development Code” – Administrative Manual Section 2-06 or Technical Standards noted in the comments. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/all-codes-plans-determinations


If you have any questions about this transmittal, contact Fernando Garcia by email at fernando.garcia2@tucsonaz.gov or 520-837-4989.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package and comment response letter. To resubmit visit Tucson Development Center at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home.
Instructions for resubmittal - https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/website/Resubmittals.pdf.
07/18/2024 CDRC Application Completeness REVIEW COMPLETED DP is allowed to proceed as they work through handrail inspection issues w/ DP19-0165.
07/31/2024 CDRC Review Coordinator REVIEW COMPLETED External Reviewers not required. No further action is required from the customer at this time.
08/19/2024 Fire New Construction REVIEW COMPLETED
08/15/2024 Historic REVIEW COMPLETED Property is historically designated as a HL and requires review by PRS. Please provide documents noted in Historic & Special Districts Application Instructions (https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/3/pdsd/documents/submission-documents/special_districts_application_instructions_7.18.23.pdf) under Full review. Assembled information should be submitted under the Historic sub-record. Questions? Jodie.Brown@tucsonaz.gov
07/31/2024 OK to Submit - Engineering REVIEW COMPLETED
07/30/2024 OK to Submit - Zoning REVIEW COMPLETED