Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0623-00290
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/17/2023 | External Reviewers - COT Parks & Recreation | APPROVED | Request for 1st Submittal Review: TD-DEV-0623-00290 Tom Fisher CDRC Iliana Gonzales On behalf of the City of Tucson Parks and Recreation Department, I have no comments on the above development plan. Tom Fisher Project Manager City of Tucson Parks and Recreation Department 900 S. Randolph Way Tucson, Arizona 85716 (520) 837-8037 |
||
| 07/06/2023 | NPPO | APPROVED | |||
| 07/06/2023 | Site Landscape | APPROVED | |||
| 08/10/2023 | CDRC Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 08/03/2023 | Commercial Plumbing | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. Provide cleanouts for all horizontal drains; the cleanouts shall not be located greater than 100-feet apart, measured along the developed pipe length from the upstream entrance of the cleanout. Reference: Section 708.1.1, IPC 2018. 2. A separate permit is required for the installation of a private sewer collection system and will require a review of the system design by the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality as well as a building permit from the City of Tucson. Reference Title 18, R18-9-E302, 4.02 General Permit, Arizona Administrative Code. |
||
| 08/10/2023 | External Reviewers - Pima County Addressing | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | [EXTERNAL] RFC TD-DEV-0623-00290 Nicholas Jordan CDRC Natalee Wareham Good morning, Pima County Addressing is returning TD-DEV-0623-00290 for corrections. Please see the plan for comments. Nicholas Jordan Site Review Project Manager – Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-9623 |
||
| 07/26/2023 | Fire New Construction | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Fire department apparatus access lanes shall be 20’ wide. IFC 2018, Chapter 5, Section 503.2.1. Fire apparatus access roads shall have an unobstructed width of 20’, exclusive of shoulders, except for approved security gates (20’ width) in accordance with Section 503.6. Vehicle gates require knox key box/knox key switch. IFC 2018, 506 IFC 2018, Appendix D, D103.4 Dead ends. Dead-end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150’ shall be provided with turnaround provisions in accordance with Table D103.4 Fire hydrants shall be located within 600 ft of new structures (as the hose lays). IFC 2018, Chapter 5, Section 507.5.1 and also in accordance with IFC Appendix D. Questions: patricia.shelton@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 07/27/2023 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. Per UDC article 7.11.1.A – the retention/detention basins need to be located in common area outside the boundaries of a residential lot. Revise as necessary. 2. Per UDC article 7.8.4.C – with the access drive providing access to more than 2 lots it needs to be developed as a street which by definition needs to be a public or private right-of-way and not an ingress/egress easement only. Revise the plans to show the access drive in a common area. 3. The access drive being developed as a street will require sidewalk along at least one side of it. 4. Pedestrian circulation out to street frontage and to the trash enclosure will be required. 5. The north – south section of E Prospect Ln as shown on the plans and labeled as public is actually not E Prospect Ln but a common area owned by River at North Campbell HOA. Revise the plans as necessary. 6. The submitted letter of agreement between La Mesa Properties, LLC and River at North Campbell (RNC) Homeowners Association (HOA) is not the signed recorded version and even has term 7 lined out. Please provide an official copy of the agreement with all terms to agreement included so this review can ensure all required terms are met. Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 07/13/2023 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: La Mesa Property Development Package (1st Review) TD-DEV-0623-00290 TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 13, 2023 DUE DATE: August 5, 2023 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is June 28, 2024. 2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.2.2 – Remove the homes from the plan as individual permits will be required for each lot. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.D – The page number and the total number of pages on sheets 5 & 6 are not correct. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0623-00290, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Provide a general note identifying the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.C – Section A sheet 2 references “C.A. “A” but there are no common areas shown on the plan or mentioned in the title block. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.4 – As the proposed sections A and B do not match any street sections in TSM Section 10 a Technical Standards Modification Request (TSMR) will need to be submitted and approved prior to approval of this DP 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.4 – At a minimum a 4’ sidewalk will be required along the north side of proposed La Mesa Court connecting all homes to the trash enclosure area. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Based on the development shown on this plat there are numerous setbacks that don’t meet the minimum requirements. At a minimum these reduced setbacks will require an approval through the Design Development Option (DDO) process at the time of each individual permit for each lot. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Martell at Nicholas.Martell@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package & detailed response letter. |
||
| 08/10/2023 | Traffic Engineering Review | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | TD-DEV-0623-00290 1511 E. Prospect Ln. Comments: 1. Show dedication language on the plat according to the UDC Administrative Manual. https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az_udc/0-0-0-9000 2. Provide detail information on the plat regarding the turn-around. Per Figure 23 of the City of Tucson Technical Standards Manual. 3. Show the curb return radii on the plat. 18’ radius. 4. Concrete curb per P.A.G. standard 209. 5. Show on the plat, the total roadway length from the center of Prospect Ln (at the south end) to the end of the turn-around. 6. Regarding keynote No. 32 Sheet 3, a. Upon dedication acceptance, should a pedestrian pathway be constructed along Prospect Ln, there will need to be a physical separation between the pathway and the roadway. This physical separation is required to be concrete curb per P.A.G. standard 200. b. Upon dedication acceptance, chip seal walkways are not allowed in the ROW. The pathway can be paved with asphalt. ADA requirements will be expected. 2% maximum cross slope and not to exceed 5% slope in longitudinal run. 7. Concerning key note No. 33, sheet 3, Due to the current degradation of the existing chip seal, a “double” chip seal will be required. 8. 3’ minimum buffer between curb and sidewalk, unless ROW is limited. David Stiffey DTM Project Coordinator David.Stiffey@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 06/29/2023 | CDRC Application Completeness | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 07/03/2023 | CDRC Review Coordinator | REVIEW COMPLETED | Added external reviewers, sent emails and sent FYI emails per SOP. | ||
| 07/03/2023 | External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments | REVIEW COMPLETED | Sent FYI emails per SOP. | ||
| 07/03/2023 | External Reviewers - Southwest Gas | REVIEW COMPLETED | Sent FYI emails per SOP. | ||
| 07/03/2023 | External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) | REVIEW COMPLETED | Sent FYI emails per SOP. | ||
| 07/03/2023 | External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) | REVIEW COMPLETED | Sent FYI emails per SOP. | ||
| 06/29/2023 | OK to Submit - Engineering | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 06/29/2023 | OK to Submit - Landscape | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 06/29/2023 | OK to Submit - Zoning | REVIEW COMPLETED |