Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0623-00279
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/18/2023 | Commercial Plumbing | APPROVED | |||
| 06/22/2023 | NPPO | APPROVED | |||
| 06/22/2023 | Site Landscape | APPROVED | |||
| 07/17/2023 | Traffic Engineering Review | APPROVED | No Comments David Stiffey David.Stiffey@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 07/18/2023 | CDRC Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 07/07/2023 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Tucson codes and ordinances can be found online at https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/overview 1. If the sidewalk shown along the south side of the walk-in’s is to remain it shall meet the requirements of TSM Section 7.01.4.3.A. Lianne Evans lianne.evans@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 06/29/2023 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Sweet Tomatoes – Walk-in Coolers Additions Development Package (1st Review) TD-DEV-0623-00279 TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 29, 2023 DUE DATE: July 23, 2023 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is June 19, 2024. 2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.2.2 – Remove sheet 2 from the DP set as it is not applicable. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1 – Provide an email address for the owner listed on the DP. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0623-00279, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.2 – It is not clear if the gross site area listed under Site Area is correct. This plan references Building #4 MIMI’S CAFÉ”. Mimi’s was demolished back in 2018, T18BU00127. The old Mimi’s site is now a stand-alone Dutch Brothers and is not included in this site, DP18-0042. Remove all references to Mimi’s from this plan. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – As Broadway Bl. is designated on the COT MS&R map as an Arterial Gateway and Wilmot Rd. is designated as an Arterial provide a general note on the cover sheet stating “THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R) & UDC ARTICLE 5.5 GATEWAY CORRIFOR ZONE (GCR)” 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.c – Provide a building area expansion calculation on the plan. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.F – The zoning listed for the parcel to the west is not correct and should be C-2. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The vehicle parking space calculation is not correct. As it appears you are using the allowed Shopping Center parking ratio per UDC TABLE 7.4.4-1: MINIMUM NUMBER OF MOTOR VEHICLE SPACES REQUIRED, RETAIL TRADE USE GROUP, Shopping Center, the parking ratio is 1 space per 300 sq. ft. GFA. Clearly demonstrate that the site meetings the definition of a Shopping Center, UDC Article 11.3.9.C.3. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – The maximum building height listed under General Note 13 is not correct and should be 30’ 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – If the sidewalk shown along the south side of the walk-in’s is to remain it shall meet the requirements of TSM Section 7.01.4.3.A. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Martell at Nicholas.Martell@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package & detailed response letter. |
||
| 06/16/2023 | CDRC Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 06/21/2023 | CDRC Review Coordinator Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | No external reviewers nor added | ||
| 07/11/2023 | Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 06/17/2023 | OK to Submit - Engineering Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 06/20/2023 | OK to Submit - Landscape Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 06/20/2023 | OK to Submit - Zoning Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED |