Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.9
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0623-00273
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.9
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/06/2024 | Site Engineering | APPROVED | |||
| 11/18/2024 | CDRC Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 11/18/2024 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: 5318 S. Nogales Hy. - Expansion Development Package (5th Review) TD-DEV-0623-00273 TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 18, 2024 DUE DATE: November 6, 2024 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is August 1, 2024. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 4. Zoning acknowledges that the proposed use is Commercial Storage but the Use Specific Standard listed, 4.9.10.1a is not correct. Review UDC Table 4.8-4 and provide the correct Use Specific Standard. Also remove the reference to “ALL LAND USE ACTIVITIES SHALL BE CONDUCTED ON AN ENTIRELY WITHIN AN ENCLOSED BUILDING” as this statement is not correct. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – It is not clear what the proposed use is. Under Area Calculations/Property Date you list the use as “FOOD SERVICE”, under the Parking Calculation you list “COMMERCIAL ASSEMBLY” and the labels within the foot print of the building show “WAREHHOUSE. Also clarify if this food service warehouse is used for the Tire Shop to the south than all four (4) parcels shall be shown on the plan. Once the use is clarified list all applicable Use Specific Standards found in UDC TABLE 4.8-4: PERMITTED USES - COMMERCIAL AND MIXED USE ZONES. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 7. This comment was not addressed correctly. Review UDC Table 7.4.4-1, STORAGE USE GROUP, Commercial Storage, and provide the correct ratio in the vehicle parking calculation. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Until comment 4 is addressed vehicle parking requirements cannot be determined. 8. This comment was not addressed. No loading space calculation was provided. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.c - Until comment 4 is addressed loading space requirements cannot be determined. 9. This comment was not addressed correctly. Review UDC Table 7.4.8-1 STORAGE USE GROUP, Commercial Storage, and correct the required number of short-term spaces. Also clearly show the location of the long-term bicycle parking and provide a detail that clearly demonstrates how all the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9.D are met. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Until comment 4 is addressed bicycle parking requirements cannot be determined. As most uses requirement short- & long-term bicycle parking clearly show the location on the plan and provide a detail that clearly demonstrates that the requirements of UDC article 7.4.9 are met. Additional comments based on changes to the plan. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 4. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Demonstrate that the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.F.2.b are met along the south side of the proposed PAAL to the existing block wall. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.c – The proposed loading space encroaches into the minimum 24’ wide PAAL. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – As the proposed short-term bicycle parking is located within a vehicle use area clearly demonstrate how the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9..B.1.g are met. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Ross at Nicholas.Ross@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package & detailed response letter. |
||
| 10/09/2024 | CDRC Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED |