Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.6
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0623-00273
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.6
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/29/2024 | CDRC Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 04/29/2024 | Fire New Construction | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | -Did not answer all fire comments. Include a response to every fire comment. Thank you, john.vincent@tucsonaz.gov 5203495581 | ||
| 05/28/2024 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Tucson codes and ordinances can be found online at https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/overview The Design Standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention manual can be found online at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/updated-retention-detention-manual.pdf TD-DEV-0623-00273 1. Provide a detail for the waste enclosure, waste enclosures must meet dimensional standards outlined in TSM 8-01.5.2. 2. Because the proposed increase in impervious area is greater than 2000 square feet, first flush retention compliant with Chapter 2 of the DSSDR is required. Please provide a drainage statement that shows that the first half inch of rainfall from the new impervious area is retained onsite in retention basins or water harvesting basins. Lianne Evans lianne.evans@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 05/28/2024 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: 5318 S. Nogales Hy. - Expansion Development Package (3rd Review) TD-DEV-0623-00273 TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 28, 2024 DUE DATE: May 26, 2024 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is August 1, 2024. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1 – Provide an email address for the Designer & Owner listed on the plan. 2. This comment was not fully addressed. Provide the page number and the total number of pages on sheets 2 & 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.D – The title block shall include the page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx). 3. This comment was not addressed correctly. The Section, township, and range was not provided and the sections corners listed on the location map are not correct. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.C – Provide the Section, township, and range label the section corners; and scale on the location map. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 4. This comment was not addressed. The plans now show the use as “ADMINISTRATIVE/OFFICE” as the use, under Scope of Work you list “NEW STROAGE BUILDING”, and your response to this comment states “Use is Storage”, clarify what the use is. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – It is not clear what the proposed use is. Under Area Calculations/Property Date you list the use as “FOOD SERVICE”, under the Parking Calculation you list “COMMERCIAL ASSEMBLY” and the labels within the foot print of the building show “WAREHHOUSE. Also clarify if this food service warehouse is used for the Tire Shop to the south than all four (4) parcels shall be shown on the plan. Once the use is clarified list all applicable Use Specific Standards found in UDC TABLE 4.8-4: PERMITTED USES - COMMERCIAL AND MIXED USE ZONES. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 5. This comment was not addressed. There is no expansion percentage provided. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.c – Provide a building area expansion calculation on the plan and if applicable a vehicle use area expansion calculation. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 6. This comment was not fully addressed. Provide dimensions for the width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. Based on current aerial photos there is curb and cutter alone with sidewalk provided along Nogales Hy. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C – Provide the following information for Nogales Hv. dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 7. This comment was not addressed. Provide a copy of the approved request form. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.E – As this site is made up of several parcels, 2 or 4 depending on how comment 13 is addressed, a lot combination is required. Provide a copy of the approved Pima County Assessors Combo Request form with the next submittal. 8. This comment was not addressed correctly. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Until comment 4 is addressed vehicle parking requirements cannot be determined. 9. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Until comment 4 is addressed electrical vehicle supply requirements cannot be determined, UDC Article 7.4.11. 10. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.c - Until comment 4 is addressed loading space requirements cannot be determined. 11. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Until comment 4 is addressed bicycle parking requirements cannot be determined. As most uses requirement short- & long-term bicycle parking clearly show the location on the plan and provide a detail that clearly demonstrates that the requirements of UDC article 7.4.9 are met. 12. This comment was not addressed. TSM is Technical Standards Manual. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – As it appears that the building expansion exceeds 25% per TSM Section 7-01.2.B.2 the requirements of TSM Section 7 apply to the existing use or structure, as well as the expansion. Clearly demonstrate that all requirements of TSM Section 7 are met. Additional comments based on changes to the plan. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.1 – The zoning listed under Site Note/Zoning/Land Use Note 2 is not correct and should only be C-2. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Based on the info provide you are stating that the tire shop to the south is not part of this project. Please explain how this site is not part of the tire shop if based on current aerial photos this site is covered with used tires. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.a – Provide the floor area for all structures on site. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Provide a PAAL width dimension from the southwest end of the accessible parking space south to the property line. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Demonstrate that the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.F.2.b are met along the south side of the proposed PAAL to the existing block wall. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The vehicle parking space calculation shall include all uses and the total square footage for all structures on the site. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The vehicle parking space calculation shall include the number of van accessible parking spaces required and provided. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Provide a vehicle parking space width dimension for the vehicle parking spaces located adjacent to the small existing storage building on the plan, UDC Article 7.4.6.D.2.b. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The location of the accessible vehicle parking space sign shown on detail 3 sheet 3 encroaches into the 2’-6” vehicle overhang area. Clearly demonstrate that sign does not encroach. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – The short-term bicycle parking space detail does not address UDC Article 7.4.9.B.1.d, .e & .g, 7.4.9.B.2.h. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – It does not appear that the short-term bicycle parking meet the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9.C.2.a, & .c. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – The short-term bicycle parking calculation is not correct. Per UDC Article 7.4.9.B.2.d A single rack is designed and located to accommodate two bicycles which based on 4 racks the provided number should be 8. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Provide the square footage, height and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s). 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Per TSM Section 7-01.4.1.A show the required sidewalk from the building out to the sidewalk along Nogales Hwy. 15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Per TSM Section 7-01.4.1.B show the required sidewalk along the southeast side of the small existing storage. 16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Per TSM Section 7-01.4.1.C show the required sidewalk along the southeast side of the proposed and existing buildings between the proposed building and the proposed vehicle parking spaces. 17. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Per TSM Section 7-01.3.2 clearly demonstrate that there is an accessible route from the accessible entrance of the building out to the sidewalk along Nogales Hwy. and to the proposed accessible vehicle parking space. 18. Clarify why some information has be Xed out on the development package. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Martell at Nicholas.Martell@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package & detailed response letter. |
||
| 05/29/2024 | Traffic Engineering Review | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | TD-DEV-0623-00273 5318 S. Nogales Hwy. 3rd Comments- Comments: 1. Show new driveway apron on the plan per P.A.G. standard 206. Label the driveway accordingly. Show the driveway dimensions. David Stiffey DTM Project Coordinator David.Stiffey@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 04/26/2024 | CDRC Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | Plans do not contain a registrant stamp. |