Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.5
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0623-00273
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.5
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/13/2023 | External Reviewers - Tucson Airport Authority | APPROVED | October 11, 2023 Planning and Development Services City of Tucson 201 North Stone Avenue Tucson, AZ. 85701 RE: TD-DEV-0623-00273, 2 nd Submittal, 50' x 40' x 15' eave height prefabricated steel building addition to existing building / 5318 S Nogales Highway, Tucson, AZ 85706, Received September 21, 2023 To whom this may concern, Thank you for the opportunity to comment on TD-DEV-0623-00273, 2 nd Submittal, the development plan for a 50' x 40' x 15' eave height prefabricated steel building addition to existing building at 5318 S Nogales Highway. This development is located in the N.W. quarter of the S.E. quarter of Section 1, Township 15S, Range 13E, of the Gila and Salt River Meridian. The development site occupies parcel number 137-04-0540 and 137-04-0550, covers approximately 0.483 ± acres, and is zoned as Commercial Zone 2 (C-2). The nearest major roadway intersection is East Nebraska Street and South Nogales Highway, approximately 250 feet to the north of the subject development. This site does lie within the Tucson International Airport avigation easement requirements and public disclosure area, FAA traffic pattern airspace, and FAA Part 77 airspace. The Tucson Airport Authority approves the proposed project and is not requiring a resubmit of this project. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this comment letter. I can be reached by email at srobidoux@flytucson.com or by telephone at 520- 573-4811. Respectfully, Scott Robidoux, C.M. Manager of Planning |
||
| 10/11/2023 | Site Landscape | APPROVED | |||
| 10/17/2023 | CDRC Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 09/15/2023 | Fire New Construction | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | -Did not answer all fire comments. Include a response to every fire comment. Thank you, john.vincent@tucsonaz.gov 5203495581 |
||
| 10/16/2023 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Tucson codes and ordinances can be found online at https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/overview The Design Standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention manual can be found online at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/updated-retention-detention-manual.pdf 1. A refuse enclosure is required. Provide a refuse enclosure compliant with regulations in TSM 8-01.5. 2. Provide waste stream calculations compliant with TSM 8-01.8. 3. There is a sidewalk along S Nogales Highway. Pedestrian circulation is required out to the sidewalk along Nogales Highway per TSM 7-01.3.3. 4. Maximize water harvesting to all landscaped areas by depressing the landscaping 6-9 inches. 5. TSM 7.4.6 I.1.d requires that alternative paving in vehicle use areas (gravel pavement) is approved by City engineering staff. Please contact Stephen Blood at Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov for surfacing approval. Provide his email with approval in your next submittal. 6. Expansions over 2,000 square feet require first flush retention for the new impervious areas per the Stormwater Detention and Retention manual Section 2.1.2b. Provide a drainage statement that shows that first flush retention requirements are met for the impervious surface increase due to the new building. 7. The dimension of the drawing are still not correct. The existing warehouse measures 78 feet long on the aerial photos of the site. The drawing shows that the existing warehouse is only 48 feet long. Correct the length of the existing building. Lianne Evans lianne.evans@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 10/09/2023 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: 5318 S. Nogales Hy. - Expansion Development Package (2nd Review) TTD-DEV-0623-00273 TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 9, 2023 DUE DATE: October 14, 2023 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is August 1, 2024. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 1. This comment was not addressed correctly. The sheet index should only include the sheets submitted with the development package. Only on sheet was submitted. COMMENT: 2-06.3.12 – An index of sheets in the development package shall be provided on the first sheet. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1 – Provide an email address for the Designer & Owner listed on the plan. 3. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.D – The title block shall include the page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx). 4. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0623-00273, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 5. This comment was not addressed. The location map shall be drawn minimum scale of three inch equals one mile. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile, and provide the following information. 6. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.C – Provide the Section, township, and range label the section corners; and scale on the location map. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 7. This comment was not addressed. The A-3 (Assembly) is an occupancy based on the International Building Code. Provide a use as designated per the Unified Development Code (UDC). COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – It is not clear what the proposed use is. Under Area Calculations/Property Date you list the use as “FOOD SERVICE”, under the Parking Calculation you list “COMMERCIAL ASSEMBLY” and the labels within the foot print of the building show “WAREHHOUSE. Also clarify if this food service warehouse is used for the Tire Shop to the south than all four (4) parcels shall be shown on the plan. Once the use is clarified list all applicable Use Specific Standards found in UDC TABLE 4.8-4: PERMITTED USES - COMMERCIAL AND MIXED USE ZONES. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 8. This comment was not addressed. There is no expansion percentage provided. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.c – Provide a building area expansion calculation on the plan and if applicable a vehicle use area expansion calculation. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 9. This comment was not addressed. Based on current aerial photos there is curb and cutter alone with sidewalk provided along Nogales Hy. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C – Provide the following information for Nogales Hv. dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 10. This comment was not addressed. Provide a copy of the approved request form. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.E – As this site is made up of several parcels, 2 or 4 depending on how comment 13 is addressed, a lot combination is required. Provide a copy of the approved Pima County Assessors Combo Request form with the next submittal. 11. This comment was not addressed. There is no vehicle parking shown onsite on the site plan. Based on the “PARKING PLAN” you are proposing to use vehicle parking within the right -of-way and on the adjacent property to the south. As you stated in your response to comment “The new building area is not a part of the tire shop, they are two independent buildings and operation.” If you are going to use the parking within the right-of-way for required parking a Board of Adjustment for Variance and approval by Department of Transportation and Mobility will be required. If you are going to use any of the vehicle parking shown on the site to the south to meet your parking requirements you will need to demonstrate that the site to the south has excess vehicle parking, over and above, what is required for the site to the south. None of the vehicle parking located within the right-of-way along Nogales Hy may count towards the required or provide number of vehicle parking spaces. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 & 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – As it appears that the building expansion exceeds 25% per UDC Article 7.4.3.E.1 the requirements of UDC Article 7.4 apply to the entire site. Per UDC Article 7.4.6.K a street or alley cannot be used for maneuvering directly into or from any parking space located wholly or partially outside the public right-of-way. That said the vehicle use area and vehicle parking located within the right-of-way along Nogales may not count toward required or provided requirements. 12. This comment was not addressed correctly. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Until comment 7 is addressed vehicle parking requirements cannot be determined. 13. This comment was not fully addressed. The required number of accessible spaces is not correct. Per the 2018 IBC Chapter 11, Table 1106.1 when 23 vehicle parking spaces are provided on 1 accessible space is required and this space shall be van accessible, 2018 IBC Chapter 11 Section 1106.5. The provided calculation does not address van accessible spaces. Also the calculation states 23 spaces provided but there are no space shown onsite for this project. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The vehicle parking spaces calculation shall include the number of required and provided accessible parking spaces to include van accessible spaces. 14. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Until comment 7 is addressed electrical vehicle supply requirements cannot be determined, UDC Article 7.4.11.. 15. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.c - Until comment 7 is addressed loading space requirements cannot be determined. 16. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Until comment 7 is addressed bicycle parking requirements cannot be determined. As most uses requirement short- & long-term bicycle parking clearly show the location on the plan and provide a detail that clearly demonstrates that the requirements of UDC article 7.4.9 are met. 17. This comment was not addressed correctly. Per UDC Article 6.4.5.C.2.a For nonresidential and multifamily development abutting an Arterial or Collector Street the minimum required street perimeter yard is ten feet, as measured from the existing or future property line as determined by the adopted Major Streets and Routes Plan, whichever is greater. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The street perimeter yard setback listed is not correct. Review UDC Article 6.4.5.C.2 and provide the correct street perimeter yard setbacks. 18. This comment was not addressed correctly. Based on the height of 16’ shown within the proposed building foot print the required perimeter yard setback to west property line is 24’. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The Rear setback listed is not correct. Review UDC TABLE 6.3-4.A: DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR THE C-1, C-2, C-3, OCR-1, & OCR-2 ZONES, C-2 Zone and provide the correct perimeter yard setback. 19. This comment was not addressed correctly. Provide a setback dimension from the corner that is closest to the property line. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Provide a setback dimension for the corner of the proposed expansion to the west property line. 20. This comment was not addressed. TSM is Technical Standards Manual. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – As it appears that the building expansion exceeds 25% per TSM Section 7-01.2.B.2 the requirements of TSM Section 7 apply to the existing use or structure, as well as the expansion. Clearly demonstrate that all requirements of TSM Section 7 are met. 21. This comment was not addressed. Provide a general note stating all signs require separate permits. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Also provide a general note stating all signs require separate permits. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Martell at Nicholas.Martell@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package & detailed response letter. |
||
| 10/17/2023 | Traffic Engineering Review | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | TD-DEV-0623-00273 5318 S. Nogales Hwy. Comments: 1. Show new driveway apron on the plan per P.A.G. standard 206. Label the driveway accordingly. Show the driveway dimensions. David Stiffey DTM Project Coordinator David.Stiffey@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 09/14/2023 | CDRC Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED |