Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: TD-DEV-0623-00271
Parcel: 136080330

Review Status: Requires Resubmit

Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1

Permit Number - TD-DEV-0623-00271
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
07/13/2023 Commercial Plumbing APPROVED
07/17/2023 CDRC Post Review PENDING ASSIGNMENT
07/06/2023 Fire New Construction REQUIRES RESUBMIT -South driveway, from golf links, shall be 20' wide per IFC 503.2.1. Fire access road shall not be less than 20'.
-Include type of construction. This will determine your fire flow requirement per IFC Appendix B Table B105.1(2). Most probably will need a second fire hydrant within the required distances IFC 507.5.1
-If the building exceeds 30' it will require aerial access road per IFC D105. The east side road meets the requirement of 26' width. You will need to post no parking signs per 2018 IFC amendments 503.3 along this road.

john.vincent@tucsonaz.gov
5203495581
07/13/2023 NPPO REQUIRES RESUBMIT See Landscape Comments.
07/06/2023 Site Engineering REQUIRES RESUBMIT Tucson codes and ordinances can be found online at https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/overview
The Stormwater Retention-Detention Manual can be found online at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/updated-retention-detention-manual.pdf
TD-DEV-0623-00271
1. Sidewalks must have a unobstructed width of 4 feet per TSM 7-01.4.3. Provide wheel stops for the parking spaces on the west side of the building to prevent parked vehicles from encroaching on the sidewalk space or show that the sidewalk is 6.5 feet or wider to accommodate 2.5 feet of vehicle encroachment.
2. Proposed retaining wall will require an additional building permit.
3. Provide a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan for during construction (https://azdeq.gov/AZPDES/SWPPP).
4. Provide an existing conditions hydrologic data sheet for Watershed 2.
5. Provide figures similar to Tables 2.2 and 2.3 in the Stormwater Detention-Retention Manual to demonstrate that first flush requirements are calculated correctly and are being met.
6. Show proposed roof drainage for each building. Roof drainage may not be directed over sidewalks and must be either routed around sidewalks or under sidewalks through use of scuppers (TSM 7-01.4.3.D).
7. Maximize water harvesting to landscaped areas through use of flush curbs and curb cuts.
8. Indicate on grading plan that the slab of the trash enclosure and the apron are sloped at least 2% away from the enclosure (TSM 8-01.5.2 G).
9. Indicate the slopes of the retention/detention basins’ sides.
10. Retention basin 2 appears to be a noncontributing basin as there is no stormwater from other areas directed towards it. Show how runoff from other areas is being directed into the basin or revise retention/detention calculations to show that basin 2 is noncontributing.
11. Provide a waste stream calculation compliant with TSM 8-01.
12. From recent clarification from Environmental Services per TSM section 8, although recycling service isn’t required the site needs to provide at minimum the enclosure space for both solid waste and recycling. A single enclosure won’t be sufficient and a double enclosure or additional single enclosures will be needed to meet this requirement. It is also important to point out per TSM section 8-01.4.I - required parking may be reduced for existing development when solid waste and recycling enclosures are provided.

Lianne Evans
lianne.evans@tucsonaz.gov
07/13/2023 Site Landscape REQUIRES RESUBMIT PROJECT: CAP GOLF LINKS INDOOR STORAGE FACILITY
ACTIVITY NO. TD-DEV-0623-00271
ADDRESS/PARCEL: 10129 E GOLF LINKS RD/136-08-0330
ZONING: PAD-25

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section and PAD-12 for landscape, native plants, and water harvesting.

Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape/NPPO Review Section comments are addressed.

UDC/TSM COMMENTS:
1. Ensure that Zoning, Engineering comments, and concerns are addressed prior to landscape section approval.
2. Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0623-00271, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.3
3. Label sight visibility triangles and ROWs (existing and future) to all landscape plans.
4. Identify the site monitor for the NPPO sheets.
5. Include spot elevations on the landscape plan for the water harvesting basins.
6. If using d.g at a 2” depth, ensure the rainwater harvesting basins are 8” in depth to account for the d.g.
7. Include a construction detail for trees planted near plazas/sidewalks/concrete paths for the trees planted near the stabilized dg paths. See Detail #402 here: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/tdot/landscape-architects
8. Ensure the Grading Plan matches the Commercial Rainwater Harvesting Plan & the Landscape Plan.
9. Show all curb cuts/downspouts/splash pads on the commercial rainwater harvesting plan.
10. Include directional arrows for all roofs on the commercial rainwater harvesting plan.

PAD-25 COMMENTS:
1. ‘Interior landscape orders and setbacks otherwise require by the UDC are not required between parcel within the PAD when developed under separate plats and/or development plans.’ (pg 72 of PAD, III.J2 Internal Landscape) – None provided – This was met by the applicant
2. Paking Ares Trees – 1 tree to four spaces & trees species are to be medium size trees of native or low water use species - (pg 72 of PAD, III.J2 Internal Landscape) – This was met by the applicant.
3. Exhibit IIIG: Landscape Border Plan clearly shows/states that a 30” screen is required at the parking areas. The applicant used a vegetative screen, which is allowed. Clearly indicate on the planset where this vegetative screeining is.

If you have any questions about these comments, I can be reached at Matthew.Carlton@tucsonaz.gov or 520-837-4988
06/26/2023 Site Zoning REQUIRES RESUBMIT PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: PDSD Zoning Review

PROJECT: CAP Storage Golf Links
Development Package (1st Review)
TD-DEV-0623-00271

TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 26, 2023

DUE DATE: July 15, 2023

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is June 08, 2024.

CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1 – Provide an email address for the Geotechnical Engineer provided on sheet 1.

2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, T TD-DEV-0623-00271D-DEV-1222-00, adjacent to the title block on all sheets.

3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.6 – As this project is located within the boundaries of PAD-25, provide a reduced-scale map of the PAD on the first sheet, indicating the location of the portion being developed.

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Review PAD-25 and provide the applicable use standards that apply to Personal Storage adjacent to the use listed under Site Date.

5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - As Golf Links Rd is designated as an Arterial Gateway on the COT MS&R Map provide a general note on the cover sheet stating “THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R) & UDC ARTICLE 5.5 GATEWAY CORRIFOR ZONE (GCR)”

2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions
The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided.

6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.A – The existing site boundary perimeter information is not readable.

7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C – For Golf Links Rd. provide the following information regarding existing right-of-way width, dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.A – Clarify what the dashed line with distance an bearings shown along the east property line is. Is this a proposed land split, access easement?

9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined.

10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section.

11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Provide the required number of accessible parking spaces within the calculation. This calculation shall also indicate the number of van accessible spaces required & provided.

12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.c – Fully dimension the proposed loading spaces shown on the plan.

13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Revise the number of provided bicycle parking spaces to clearly shown what type, short- or long-term is provided.

14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – The bicycle detail on sheet 9 does not addressed UDC Articles 7.4.9.B.1.e, 7.4.9.B.2.a, .g. Also, the required 2’-6’ space is measured from the edge of rack not the center, see UDC Figure 7.4.9-C.

15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.J – Per the COT MS&R Map the future right-of-way (ROW) for Golf Links Rd. is 200’. As the existing ROW is not at full width show the future ROW line, future curb and sidewalk location fully dimensioned.

16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Once comment 15 is addressed provide a setback dimension form future curb to the building. Also, revise the street setback shown under Site Date to show as measured from future curb.

17. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Provide the propose height of the building within the footprint of the building.

18. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Provide width dimensions for all sidewalks on the plan.

19. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – As parking vehicles are allowed to overhang the sidewalk along the west side of the building clearly demonstrate that a 4’-0” wide sidewalk is maintained.

20. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met.

Additional Comments:

21. COMMENT: - Per PAD-25 Part III.V provide a copy of the required letter from the Design Review Committee with the next submittal.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Martell at Nicholas.Martell@tucsonaz.gov.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package & detailed response letter.
07/10/2023 Traffic Engineering Review REQUIRES RESUBMIT TD-DEV-0623-00271 (10129 E GOLF LINKS RD TUCSON, AZ 85730)

Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter which states how all comments were addressed.

Comments:

1. AM 2-06.4.9.H.4 Please fully dimension offsets between right of way limits, sidewalks, curbs and other improvements. Please include the current and future ROW on the site plan.
2. TSM 10-01.5.1 – Please provide sight visibility triangles. Reference TSM 10-01.5.1 for instructions.
3. SDG 10-5 – The Tucson Street Design Guide recommends the smallest feasible radius should be used on curb returns to increase pedestrian comfort. For a PAAL on a Suburban Thoroughfare, like E Golf Links Rd, the SDG recommends a 20’ radius on curb returns.
4. Please provide a detail of ramp design on the proposed pedestrian refuge median in the RI / RO driveway. See P. A. G. SD 207 for design considerations.
5. Please clarify the call out for ‘18” CURB AND GUTTER. SEE DETAIL 209’ throughout the site plan. Could this mean 6”? You can reference Type (1), Type (1)-G, or Type (2) from Detail 209.
6. Please label the wash maintenance responsibility as either private or public. Our map indicates that this wash is private and that maintenance is the responsibility of the owner. Please clarify the responsibility for the existing storm drain inlet in the southeast corner of the property and show it one the site plan.
7. Please contact City of Tucson Landscape Architect David Marhefka regarding native plants in the right of way. David.Marhefka@tucsonaz.gov

Faffs Riederer
Faffs.Riederer@tucsonaz.gov

Abbreviations: City of Tucson Code (COTC), Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM), Technical Standards Manual (TSM), Street Design Guide (SDG), Pima Association of Governments Standard Details (P. A. G. SD), Access Management Guidelines (AMG), Major Streets and Routes Plan (MS&R).
06/08/2023 CDRC Application Completeness REVIEW COMPLETED
06/15/2023 CDRC Review Coordinator REVIEW COMPLETED
06/16/2023 External Reviewers - COT Parks & Recreation REVIEW COMPLETED Hello CDRC team,

On behalf of the City of Tucson Parks and Recreation Department, I have no comments on the above development plan.

Tom Fisher
Project Manager
City of Tucson Parks and Recreation Department
900 S. Randolph Way
Tucson, Arizona 85716
(520) 837-8037
06/15/2023 External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments REVIEW COMPLETED FYI email sent per SOP.
07/17/2023 External Reviewers - Pima County Addressing REVIEW COMPLETED **PDSD WILL REQUIRE CUSTOMER TO APPLY FOR AN ADDRESS CHANGE VIA TDC ONLINE, AS THE CURRENT ADDRESS IN THE SYSTEM IS INCORRECT PER PIMA CO ADDRESSING.** ONCE ADDRESS HAS BEEN CHANGE IN THE SYSTEM, PLEASE UPDATE ALL DOUCMENTS TO REFLECT CORRECT ADDRESS PRIOR TO RESUBMITTAL.**

[EXTERNAL] TD-DEV-0623-00271
Nicholas Jordan
CDRC
Lisa Bowers <lisa@sonorandc.com>
Good morning,
This project does not require review by Pima County Addressing. The correct address for the facility is 10155 E Golf Links RD.
Nicholas Jordan
Site Review Project Manager - Addressing Official
Pima County Development Services Department
201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor
Tucson, AZ 85701
(520) 724-9623
06/15/2023 External Reviewers - Southwest Gas REVIEW COMPLETED FYI email sent per SOP.
06/15/2023 External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) REVIEW COMPLETED FYI email sent per SOP.
06/15/2023 External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) REVIEW COMPLETED FYI email sent per SOP.
06/09/2023 OK to Submit - Engineering REVIEW COMPLETED
06/09/2023 OK to Submit - Landscape REVIEW COMPLETED
06/09/2023 OK to Submit - Zoning REVIEW COMPLETED