Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: TD-DEV-0526-00137
Parcel: 12703079A

Review Status: Requires Resubmit

Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2

Permit Number - TD-DEV-0526-00137
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
06/26/2026 NPPO Standard NOT REQUIRED
06/30/2026 Site Landscape Standard NOT REQUIRED These improvement do not trigger any site landscape requirements.

Thank you.
Chad Keller, PLA
chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov
06/11/2026 Site Engineering Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT Permit Activity Number: TD-DEV-0526-00137 (1st Review)
Project: 1. Existing Site Conditions & History Structures: Two metal carports and one (1) 6-foot yard wall were originally constructed in 2023 without a building permit. The metal carports were manufactured and placed on wheels, functioning as temporary or mobile units. 2. Purpose & Public Safety Justification Hazard Identification: Because the existing metal carports are on wheels, they lack structural anchoring. This poses a significant safety risk regarding wind-uplift, shifting, and potential structural failure, which could result in property damage or personal injury. Proposed Corrective Action: The primary purpose of this Minor Development Plan is to bring the unpermitted 2023 structures into full code compliance. The proposed scope of work includes: Retrofitting and securing both metal carports onto engineered, permanent concrete footings to ensure long-term structural integrity and public safety. Performing necessary structural and cosmetic improvements to the carports to align with local building and aesthetic standards.
Location: 5712 E SPEEDWAY BL
Review Date: 6/11/2026
Reviewer: Marco Contreras – Engineering Associate
Reviewer Contact Information: marco.contreras@tucsonaz.gov
Related cases:

Plan review for the above-referenced development package has been completed. This review was conducted for compliance with applicable development criteria including the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC), Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-6, and Technical Standards Manual (TSM) sections governing waste management, pedestrian access, hydrology – retention/detention requirements, and all applicable site standards.
The following comments must be addressed prior to approval. To help facilitate a timely resubmittal, please provide updated plans and calculations along with a written response to each comment, indicating what action was taken and where the change can be found on the plans. Do not use revision clouds on resubmittal drawings — clouds are reserved for post-permit revisions only. Submit your response letter and updated plan set & reports as separate files.

Applicable Code Links for quick/direct reference:
City of Tucson Code: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Codes
Floodplain Code: https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az/0-0-0-19333
Drainage Manual Link: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/cot-drainage-manual-searchable.pdf
Design standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention Link:
https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/updated-retention-detention-manual.pdf
City of Tucson Chapter 25: https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az/0-0-0-18593

Site Engineering Review Comments:
1. Provide the development package case number (TD-DEV-0626-00137) adjacent to the title block on each sheet of the plan set. [AM 2-06.3.3]
2. Provide the Zoning and Land Use General note: “The developer, any successors and assigns, will hold the City of Tucson, its officers, employees, and agents harmless from any and all claims for damages related to the use of this development as shown hereon, now and in the future, by reason of flooding, flowage, erosion, or damage caused by water, whether surface flood or rainfall.” [AM 2-06.4.7.B.1]
3. Provide the Zoning and Land Use General Note: “Any relocation or modification of existing utilities and/or public improvements necessitated by the proposed development will be at no expense to the public.” [AM 2-06.4.7.D]
4. Provide the Zoning and Land Use General Note: “No structure or vegetation shall be located or maintained so as to interfere with the sight visibility triangles in accordance with Section 10-01.5.0, Sight Visibility, of the Technical Standards Manual.” [AM 2-06.4.7.C.2]
5. Provide the general note: “Any Proposed signs will be approved per separate permit”
6. It is required that the required the canopy either follow the required height clearance of 15 – feet or be setback one foot or greater from the PAAL. Provide a height call-out showing the clearance or show on the site plan that the 1-foot setback is addressed. Address this by: [UDC §7.4.6.F.1 and §7.4.6.E.2]
a. Provide a labeled height call-out on the elevation or section view indicating the finished clearance height from the PAAL surface to the underside of the canopy structure and/or provide a dimensioned setback callout on the site plan clearly measuring the distance from the canopy edge to the PAAL edge.
b. Provide plan-view dimensions for all PAALs depicted on the site plan, including width and length, to allow for verification of applicable setbacks and required minimum clearances.
c. Provide a dimensioned construction detail — at sufficient scale — illustrating the canopy structure in relation to the adjacent PAAL, demonstrating compliance with the applicable height clearance or setback requirement.
07/06/2026 Site Zoning Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT CDRC TRANSMITTAL

FROM:
Bobby Parsons
PDSD Zoning Review Section

PROJECT:
Tire Club – 5712 E. Speedway Blvd. Tucson, AZ 85712
Development Package (1st Review)
TD-DEV-0526-00137

TRANSMITTAL DATE: 7/6/2026
DUE DATE: 7/3/2026

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is June 11, 2027.

SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS)

CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet:

2-06.4.2.B - A brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a re-subdivision are to be provided. On re-subdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat;

1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.B – Please include a brief legal description as noted by the standard above. Per Pima County GIS, the legal description should read “MITMAN LOTS 1 & 2 BLK 7”.

2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0526-00137, adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

Zoning and Land Use Notes

2-06.4.7.A.1 - List as a general note: "Existing zoning is ____."

3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.1 – As this lot has split zoning, please include both R-1 and C-2 for the existing zoning as noted by the standard above.

2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses.

4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – The proposed use listed is Retail – General Merchandise Sales (excluding large retail establishment). Please include the Use Specific Standards associated with this use as noted by the standard above. Per UDC Table 4.8-4, the Use Specific Standards for the C-2 zone are 4.9.9.B.1.

2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan.

5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6 – Please include a note stating “this project is designed to meet the overlay zone(s) criteria. UDC Article 5.4 Major Streets and Routes Setback Zone (MS&R).

2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:

2-06.4.7.A.8.c - Percentage of building, lot area, or vehicular use area expansion. If the building(s) or lot area have been previously expanded, those calculations shall be included; and,

6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.c – Please include the expansion calculation for the 2 unpermitted metal carports as noted by the standard above.

2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions
The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided.

2-06.4.8.A - Provide site boundary/subdivision perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or other functional reference system.

7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.A – Please provide the entire site boundary perimeter information as noted by the standard above.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. The basis for this requirement is that some zoning requirements on a project are based on the zoning classification of adjacent property. Also, in some instances, each zone has to be taken into consideration on property that is split by two or more zoning classifications, as each may have different requirements.

8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.F – The zoning classifications shown adjacent to the subject parcel on the West is incorrect. As this property has split zoning (R-1 and C-2), please show all existing zoning classifications adjacent to the property as noted by the standard above.

2-06.4.9.H.4 - Indicate if existing streets are public or private; provide street names, widths, curbs, sidewalks, and utility locations, all fully dimensioned.

9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.4 – Please label each of the adjacent streets (IE; Speedway, Van Buren, 1st St.) as being public as noted by the standard above.

2-06.4.9.H.5 - If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Please dimension the PAAL’s, indicate if the PAAL is one way, and include directional arrows if necessary to demonstrate vehicle flow. Lastley, demonstrate compliance with UDC 7.4.6.E.2 and 7.4.6.F.2 as noted by the standard above for both carport structures.

2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The provided parking ratio is incorrect. Based on the proposed use of Retail – General Merchandise Sales, the minimum required parking ratio is 1 space per 300sf GFA. Please update the parking calculations as noted by the above standards. If the minimum parking required cannot be met, an Individual Parking Plan (IPP) may be applied for to reduce the minimum parking requirements. For more information about the IPP requirements, please reach out to Mark Castro at Mark.Castro@tucsonaz.gov. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/planning-amp-zoning/individual_parking_plan_handout.pdf

2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided.

12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Please provide the minimum required bicycle parking information as noted by the standard above. Per UDC Table 7.4.8-1, the minimum short term bicycle parking requirement are 1 space per 5,000 sq. ft. GFA (Minimum requirement is 2 spaces). The minimum long term bicycle parking requirements for long term are 1 space per 12,000 sq. ft. GFA (Minimum requirement is 2 spaces).

2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s).

13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Please provide the square footage and the height within the footprint of the building for Carport 1 and Carport 2 to ensure the minimum setbacks are met. Per UDC Table 6.3-2.A, the minimum required setback in the R-1 zone for nonresidential use to a residential zone is the greater of 10’ or ¾ (Height).
2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required.

14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.W – Please draw and label the existing free standing sign located in the front parking lot on your plans. A separate sign permit will be required if you wish to update the sign. Please reach out to Georgia Pennington at Georgia.Pennington@tucsonaz.gov if you have questions about the sign permitting process.

***For additional information on the any standard presented in this memo, please refer to the City of Tucson “Unified Development Code” – Administrative Manual Section 2-06 or Technical Standards noted in the comments. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/all-codes-plans-determinations ***

If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact Bobby Parsons at Robert.Parsons@tucsonaz.gov.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package and comment response letter. To resubmit visit Tucson Development Center at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home.
Instructions for resubmittal - https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/website/Resubmittals.pdf.
06/09/2026 CDRC Application Completeness Express REVIEW COMPLETED
06/11/2026 CDRC Review Coordinator Express REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC added Addressing, TEP, PAG, USPS, and SWG to the workflow. Review request email sent to Addressing.  FYI email sent to TEP, PAG, USPS, SWG.
07/02/2026 Commercial Plumbing Standard REVIEW COMPLETED No plumbing or utility work proposed
06/11/2026 External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments Standard REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC sent FYI email sent to TEP, PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required.
06/12/2026 External Reviewers - Pima County Addressing Standard REVIEW COMPLETED Good afternoon,

TD-DEV-0526-00137 does not require from Pima County Addressing.


Thank you,







David Wilging

Planner I - Addressing Division

Pima County Development Services

201 N. Stone Avenue 1st Floor

Tucson, Arizona 85701

520-724-6381
06/11/2026 External Reviewers - Southwest Gas Standard REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC sent FYI email sent to TEP, PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required.
06/11/2026 External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) Standard REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC sent FYI email sent to TEP, PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required.
06/11/2026 External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) Standard REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC sent FYI email sent to TEP, PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required.
06/21/2026 Fire New Construction Standard REVIEW COMPLETED
06/09/2026 OK to Submit - Engineering Fast REVIEW COMPLETED
06/11/2026 OK to Submit - Zoning Fast REVIEW COMPLETED
07/13/2026 ROW Engineering Review Standard REVIEW COMPLETED
06/15/2026 ROW Review REVIEW COMPLETED