Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.3
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0526-00126
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.3
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/23/2026 | NPPO Standard | NOT REQUIRED | |||
| 06/09/2026 | Real Estate Standard | NOT REQUIRED | The Real Estate Division has no comments. Please contact if any property rights need to be addressed 520-791-4181. | ||
| 06/09/2026 | Commercial Plumbing Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Provide a site drawing to include the following existing utility information: a. The location and size of water lines and fire hydrants. b. The location and size of sanitary and storm sewers, including the pipe diameter and the invert and rim elevations of all manholes and cleanouts; along with the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) reference number. c. The points of connection to existing public sewers. d. The locations of gas lines, electric and telephone lines, poles, and communications cables, on-ground junction boxes, and street lights. e. Any existing or proposed utility easements f. The first floor elevation for the building Reference: City of Tucson Administrative Manual, Section 2-06.4.8D and Section 107.2.1, IBC 2024 If you have any questions about this review comment, I can be reached at Robert.Sherry@tucsonaz.gov. |
||
| 06/04/2026 | Design Review Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | The proposed changes will require a major revision of the Design Package, previously approved under T20SA00218 , DP20-0082. The new Design Package Activity # SD-1223-00146 was created under a subrecord of DP20-0082. If you have any questions, please let me know: maria.gayosso@tucsonaz.gov. Thank you. | ||
| 06/11/2026 | External Reviewers - COT Environmental Services Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Include the current trash/recycle service provisions to include size and frequency. TSM 8-01.0 requires the containers to be located within private property and screened from public view. Provide details of proposed storage/enclosure area with all dimensions. Feel free to contact me regarding my review comments. Andy Vera (520) 837-3798 Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 06/04/2026 | External Reviewers - Pima County Addressing Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Report Date: 06/03/2026 Description : Addressing Review TD-DEV-0526-00126 - Addressing Review TD-DEV-0526-00126 Address : , , , Record Type : Addressing Document Filename : Site Plan Reviewer Contact Information: Corrections in the following table need to be applied before a plan is approved Review Report - Resubmittal Requested Application Number: P26AD00452 Comment ID Comment Date Corrections Needed Page Ref Reviewer : Department Review Comments DSD Addressing 1 06/03/262026 Yes 2 David Wilging : DSD Addressing Building 1 2 06/03/262026 Yes 2 David Wilging : DSD Addressing Building 2 General Comments Pima County Public Works 201 N. Stone Ave. Tucson, AZ 85701 If you have any questions please call 520- 724-6490 for an appointment to discuss this notice. If following discussions with staff you still disagree with the below listed deficiencies, you may appeal to the Building Official in accordance with Pima County Code 15.04.060 by submitting the form posted on our web site with payment of appeal fee prior to permit application expiration. Disputes about the interpretation of the Zoning Code may be appealed to a Pima County Board of Adjustment under A.R.S. § 11 -816 and P.C.C. § 18.93.060. Please submit all plans, calculations and specifications to us electronically via the Digital Projects page in the online portal. Re-Submittal Procedures Please submit all documents using Citizen Access at permits.pima.gov (i.e. plans, drawings, calculations, quantities, exhibits, photographs, letters, etc.). 1. Please go to permits.pima.gov and login to your account to access review comments and resubmit. 2. If you have questions or need clarification regarding comments, please contact the reviewer. 3. Provide a response to each correction comment. 4. To resubmit, upload revised full plan set. Should the resubmittal not completely address this request for corrections, the application maybe denied requiring a new application and payment all applicable review fees in accordance withA.R.S. § 11-1605. |
||
| 06/10/2026 | External Reviewers - Tucson Airport Authority Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | June 10, 2026 Planning and Development Services City of Tucson 201 North Stone Avenue Tucson, AZ. 85701 RE: TD-DEV-0526-00126, 1st Submittal, TheHUT, Large Bar addition, 305 N. 4th Av, Tucson, AZ. 85705, Received June 3, 2026 To whom this may concern, Thank you for the opportunity to comment on TD-DEV-0526-00126, 1st Submittal, a development plan for a new large bar at 305 N 4th Ave. This development is located in the N.W. quarter of the S.E. quarter of Section 12, Township 14S, Range 13E, of the Gila and Salt River Meridian. The development site occupies parcel number 117-05-0810, covers approximately 0.49 ± acres, and is zoned as Light Industrial Zone (I-1) and Commercial 3 Zone (C-3). The nearest major roadway intersection is East 8th Street and South 4th Avenue, approximately 50 feet to the southeast of the subject development. This site does lie within the Tucson International Airport avigation easement requirements and public disclosure area, FAA traffic pattern airspace, and FAA Part 77 airspace. The Tucson Airport Authority does not object to the first submittal of this project and is not requiring a resubmittal. Although this project does not propose a change in plan designation or zoning the Tucson Airport Authority highly recommends the applicant add the following notes into the general notes of the revised development plan. This project is located approximately 2 miles west of Tucson International Airport and is within FAA traffic pattern airspace, an area which would be subject to aircraft overflight and noise due to being in close proximity to Tucson International Airport. The proposed notes would provide a means of assuring that future owners and tenants of the property are aware they are in proximity an airport and further assures the continued right of the City of Tucson, Tucson Airport Authority, and all persons lawfully utilizing the Tucson International Airport the right to utilize the airspace above or near the property. This would be accomplished through the property owner recording the Avigation Easement and providing the Airport Disclosure Statement to the new residents of all residential uses. The Tucson Airport Authority believes the proposed note helps to support the City of Tucson Airport Environs Overlay Zone and supports Plan Tucson – Land Use 26. 1. "That prior to the City's approval of the proposed development, the property owner must record the Avigation Easement that discloses the existence and operational characteristics of the Tucson International Airport to future owners or tenants of the property and further conveys the right to the public to lawfully use the airspace above the property. The Avigation Easement shall be recorded in a manner with the Pima County recorder which shall document it as having title liability. The content of such documents shall be according to the form and instructions provided.” The current property owner or person authorized to sign on behalf of the current property owner must complete, sign, and record the Avigation Easement. Please record the Avigation Easement with the Pima County Recorder’s Office. Then send a complete copy of the recorded easement document to Tucson Airport Authority by either email (send to srobidoux@flytucson.com) or to the mailing address provided below. Scott Robidoux Manager of Planning Tucson Airport Authority 7250 South Tucson Blvd, Suite 300 Tucson, AZ 85756” 2. Applicable to residential uses only “The property owner/developer/applicant must provide the Airport Disclosure Statement form, at time of sale, to the new property owners with all new unit purchases. In the event the development of any residential uses does not involve the sale of new units but is instead offering rental residential units to the public, the new tenant of the rental unit must be provided a copy of the Airport Disclosure Statement form. The intent of the Airport Disclosure Statement form is to educate and notify the new residents that they are living near an airport. The content of such documents shall be according to the form and instructions provided.” The property owner (for itself or its tenants) shall forward a signed copy of the Airport Disclosure Statement form to the Tucson Airport Authority within ten (10) days of signature, using the Scott Robidoux mailing address provided above. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this comment letter. I can be reached by email at srobidoux@flytucson.com or by telephone at 520- 573-4811. Respectfully, Scott Robidoux, C.M. Manager of Planning |
||
| 06/16/2026 | Historic | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | HISTORIC REVIEW REQUIRED: This property is located within the Infill Incentive District (IID) and is contributing to the Fourth Avenue Commercial Historic District (listed on the National Register of Historic Places). Historic Review is required per UDC 5.12.6.B.2.e. PRE-APPLICATION MEETING: It is highly recommended that all Full Historic Reviews go through a pre-application meeting with Historic Preservation staff prior to submittal. To request a pre-application meeting, email your assigned Historic Preservation planner. APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS: IID and Historic Review requires a supplemental application called a Design Package. Please see the Historic & Special Districts Application Instructions for more information about submittal requirements: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/special_districts_application_instructions_3.3.2025.pdf. As part of your Design Package, please include the following: project description, site plan showing existing and proposed, floor plan showing existing and proposed, roof plan showing existing and proposed, elevations showing existing and proposed, window and door schedule, photographs of existing conditions, product names/specifications/brochures, and a Development Zone map as described in instructions along with precedent photographs. All materials required as part of your Design Package should be combined into a single PDF. CREATE SUB-RECORD AND SUBMIT DESIGN PACKAGE: Submit your Design Package as a single PDF by uploading it to the Special District Sub-Record for IID review (How to Create a Sub-Record: https://tucsonpdsd.info/TDCOnlineHistoricSubRecord). NEXT STEPS IN REVIEW PROCESS: Your Design Package will be reviewed by staff. Once the package is deemed complete and fees are paid, staff will schedule a Full Review with the Tucson-Pima County Historical Commission, Plans Review Subcommittee (PRS). **Please notify your assigned Historic Preservation Planner via email once you pay your fees.** Following PRS review, comments will be forwarded to the PDSD Director, who makes a final decision. Conditions of approval are common and revisions to the Design Package will be required before final Historic approval is granted. QUESTIONS: For questions or to set up a meeting with Historic staff, please contact: desiree.aranda@tucsonaz.gov. Historic Property Inventory Form can be accessed here: https://maps2.tucsonaz.gov/preservation/inventoryforms/N4th-58.pdf |
||
| 06/29/2026 | ROW Engineering Review Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Add Sight Vibility Traingle for new building. Add scuppers for valley gutter drainage. ADA ramp on Herbert will need to be reconstucted to meet current standards. |
||
| 06/11/2026 | Site Engineering Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Permit Activity Number: TD-DEV-0526-00126 (1st Review) Project: The HUT, Large Bar addition Location: 305 N 4TH AV Review Date: 6/9/2026 Reviewer: Marco Contreras – Engineering Associate Reviewer Contact Information: marco.contreras@tucsonaz.gov Related cases: Plan review for the above-referenced development package has been completed. This review was conducted for compliance with applicable development criteria including the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC), Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-6, and Technical Standards Manual (TSM) sections governing waste management, pedestrian access, hydrology – retention/detention requirements, and all applicable site standards. The following comments must be addressed prior to approval. To help facilitate a timely resubmittal, please provide updated plans and calculations along with a written response to each comment, indicating what action was taken and where the change can be found on the plans. Do not use revision clouds on resubmittal drawings — clouds are reserved for post-permit revisions only. Submit your response letter and updated plan set & reports as separate files. Applicable Code Links for quick/direct reference: City of Tucson Code: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Codes Floodplain Code: https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az/0-0-0-19333 Drainage Manual Link: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/cot-drainage-manual-searchable.pdf Design standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention Link: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/updated-retention-detention-manual.pdf City of Tucson Chapter 25: https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az/0-0-0-18593 Site Engineering Review Comments: 1. Revise General note #6 on the cover sheet, the note should read as - No structure or vegetation shall be located or maintained so as to interfere with the sight visibility triangles in accordance with Section 10-01.5.0, Sight Visibility, of the Technical Standards Manual. 2. Revise general note #11 & 18 – the City of Tucson adopted The IBC 2024 with ICC A117.1 2017 edition at the beginning of 2026 3. Revise the Flood Insurance rate map information table: a. The denoted community ID number is incorrect – The city of Tucson’s Community ID is 040076 b. The panel # provided is incorrect – The project site’s associated Panel # is 04019C2277 4. The development package consists of more than one sheet; provide a sheet index on the cover sheet identifying all sheets included in the plan set. [AM 2-06.3.12] 5. Provide the development package case number (TD-DEV-0526-00126) adjacent to the title block on each sheet of the plan set. [AM 2-06.3.3] 6. Provide an earthwork table that provides: preferably on the cover sheet a. Cut & Fill quantities associated with the proposed grading & construction b. Total area of disturbance in both square footage & acres. 7. Revise legal Description provided: a. The final plat is recorded in Book 3 of maps, page 71 8. The plan set is missing a legend, provide the following: a. A legend identifying all symbols, line-types, and abbreviations used in the plan set. [AM 2-06.3.10] 9. Provide the following General note: Any work within City of Tucson Right-Of-Way will require a right-of-way permit, or a private improvement agreement. 10. Provide the general note, “A floodplain use permit and/or finished floor elevation certificates are required.” AM 2-06.4.7.B.2.b 11. Revise General note #10 to be consistent with plan view – sheet 2 shows the new building to be 30’ but the general note states 25’ is proposed. 12. The grading plan sheets are missing required floodplain information. Per AM 2-06.4.8.I, provide the following: a. Water surface elevation (WSEL) contour cross sections associated with all floodplains and washes on or adjacent to the site. b. Peak discharge rates (CFS) denoted at all points where floodplains and washes enter and exit the site. 13. Waste stream calculations have not been provided. Provide the required waste stream calculations for the entire development in accordance with TSM 8-01.8.0. The calculations must be presented in table format and must: a. Break down waste generation by use type and unit count (e.g., number of residential units, commercial square footage, etc.) using the generation rates prescribed in TSM 8-01.8.0. b. Identify the total estimated solid waste and recycling volumes generated by the development on a periodic basis (weekly or per collection cycle). c. Demonstrate that the number, size, and configuration of the proposed enclosures and dumpster containers are adequate to accommodate the calculated waste volumes between collection intervals. d. State how solid waste and recyclables will be handled and collected, including the proposed collection frequency. 14. Provide keynotes and call-outs identifying all new and existing structure downspouts and sidewalk scupper locations on the grading plan sheets. This information is required to demonstrate compliance with TSM 7-01.4.1.E and 7-01.4.3.E, and to ensure coordination with building permit plan review. Sidewalks shall be flood free for all storm discharges up to and including a ten-year frequency flood event, and drainage flowing across any pedestrian circulation path shall be conveyed under the path for up to and including the ten-year frequency flood events. 15. Shift the FFE and PAD elevations to the left or right so they are not potentially blocked/mis-interpreted due to the cross-section line bisecting the information/text. 16. Revise the cross-section details provided on sheet 3 to include the associated WSEL’s at each subsequent view. 17. Revise the plan set to include previously provided cross-section details on most current submission plan set. 18. Demonstrate how the flow is managed from the valley gutter, so as to not conflict with standards TSM 7-01.4.1.E and 7-01.4.3.E. 19. Clarification will be required – The plan set V2 shows keynote #26 as “Concrete Trench Drain,” but the drainage statement states drainage will be managed by a valley gutter. Revise accordingly so that consistency is demonstrated. a. If a trench drain is proposed – provide a dimensioned construction detail b. If the valley gutter is proposed – revise plan set and include the construction detail previously provided. 20. Provide a close-up construction detail regarding the northeast corner of the new building – ensure the detail highlights compliance with applicable accessible requirements. 21. Provide surfacing keynote regarding the surfacing material around the structure associated with the site – only on-site surfacing keynote calls out washed sand fill. Drainage Statement comments: It is suggested that review of section 2.3.2 of the City of Tucson Drainage Design Manual be referred to as these comments are reviewed/addressed 22. Provide a description of the amount of runoff expected on, or near the site [Drainage Manual 2.3.2.B] 23. Provide all City of Tucson Hydrologic Data sheets within the drainage document used for computing the 2-, 10-, & 100-year peak discharges for both existing and proposed conditions. [Drainage Manual 2.3.2.D] 24. The drainage statement does not contain a Finished Floor Elevation (FFE) analysis section addressing the FEMA Zone AE floodplain that affects this site. Per Tucson City Code § 26-5.2(9), the lowest floor — including basement — of any structure within the floodway fringe shall be placed a minimum of one (1) foot above the Base Flood Elevation (BFE). Additionally, per City Code § 26-5.2, prior to the pouring of the first slab or lowest floor installation, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer a certification by a state-registered land surveyor or professional civil engineer that the elevation of the lowest floor framework is in compliance with the approved elevation, in the form of a FEMA Elevation Certificate (Building Under Construction and Finished Construction). Provide a dedicated FFE section within the drainage statement that includes the following: a. The applicable FEMA FIRM panel number and effective date. b. The BFE at the project site as determined from the FIS profile or FIRM. c. The proposed FFE and a demonstration that it meets or exceeds BFE + 1 foot per § 26-5.2(9). d. A narrative explaining the methodology used to determine the proposed FFE relative to existing site grades and the Zone AE floodplain boundary. 25. The report clearly denotes that the addition will alter stormwater surface flow but provides no technical justification nor analysis to reinforce the assertion that no adverse impacts are created from this new proposed development. The hydraulic assessment is incomplete and must be significantly expanded in accordance with Drainage Manual Section 2.3.1.4.F. The project site encroaches into a mapped FEMA AE floodplain area — confirmed by the submitted FEMA FIRMette — and this encroachment demands a detailed analysis demonstrating no adverse hydraulic impact. The following must be addressed: a. Diversion of Flows: Provide analysis demonstrating that the proposed improvements do not divert off-site flows in a manner that creates new or worsened flooding conditions on adjacent properties. The southeast culvert discharge path must be traced through the site under proposed grading conditions. b. Flow Velocities Within and Downstream of the Development: Provide calculated flow velocities at all outlet structures, within conveyance swales or channels, and at the point of discharge from the site. Demonstrate that velocities are non-erosive or that appropriate erosion protection is provided. c. Adverse Hydraulic Impacts: Provide a comprehensive encroachment analysis demonstrating that the proposed development does not adversely impact upstream or downstream properties through changes in velocity, depth, direction of flow, or increased scour potential. Note that adjacent properties include both Pre-FIRM and Post-FIRM structures. Pre-FIRM properties may not have elevated building pads and are particularly vulnerable to adverse hydraulic changes. This analysis must comply with Tucson City Code Chapter 26, Section 26-5.2. |
||
| 06/23/2026 | Site Landscape Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT REVIEWER: CHAD KELLER, PLA SITE LANDSCAPE/NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION SECTION PROJECT: THE HUT, LARGE BAR ADDITION ACTIVITY NO: TD-DEV-0526-00126 ADDRESS: 305 N 4TH AV ZONING: LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ZONE (I-1) LAND USE: COMMERCIAL 6.23.2026 THE PROPOSED PLANS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR SITE LANDSCAPE, NATIVE PLANTS, AND RAINWATER HARVESTING, PER-THE-CITY OF TUCSON UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE (UDC), TECHNICAL STANDARDS MANUAL (TSM), AND ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL (AM). RESUBMIT REVISED DRAWINGS ALONG WITH A DETAILED RESPONSE LETTER, STATING HOW ALL SITE LANDSCAPE AND NPPO SECTION REVIEW COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED. SITE LANDSCAPE/NPPO SECTION COMMENTS: 1. Landscaping development standards are not met with this proposal. These requirements can be modified through an Infill Incentive District (IID) and Design Review Board approval. This site has an expansion of 59 percent and will be required to be brought up to current code standards or receive appropriate modifications through the IID. 2. Provide a landscape plan set that includes a planting plan, irrigation plan, commercial rainwater harvesting plan and all applicable detailing, specifications and notes required for construction. 3. Commercial rainwater harvesting is required on all commercial sites at which landscape plantings are required. With that being said, include a separate irrigation water meter. Please label irrigation meter as “irrigation only”. See TSM 4-01.6.0. Or see City of Tucson Ordinance 10597 -- Sec. 6-182. Rainwater Harvesting Plan: Number 3 (a) A separate water meter connected to the main water supply; or (b) An irrigation sub-meter. Also include a typical note to see the civil grading plan for drainage scheme, hardscape and drainage structures related to commercial rainwater harvesting. 4. DESIGN REVIEW STANDARD comments state this project is opting into the Infill Incentive District. Include a summary on the site plan that outlines how all of the IID site landscape requirements are being met. See below IID requirements. 5. Per the IID comments below a landscape planting plan as well as a shade study that provides 50 percent shade coverage to pedestrian circulation paths is required. 6. Prior to site landscape approval, ensure that Site Zoning and Site Engineering comments are fully addressed. 7. Include the Activity Number TD-DEV-0526-00126 on all sheets in the plan set. UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE, INFILL INCENTIVE DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS: 8. 5.12.8 GENERAL IID ZONING OPTION DESIGN STANDARDS An IID Plan under the IID zoning option design standards must demonstrate compliance with the following: 9. 5.12.8.B Streetscape Design Streetscape design must comply with the street design standards in the Technical Manual and the Streetscape Design Policy. 10. Pedestrian-orientation Projects shall be pedestrian-oriented and comply with all of the following standards: a. New construction shall have architectural elements/details at the first two floor levels b. Buildings shall provide windows, window displays, or visible activity on the ground floor for at least 50 percent of frontage c. A single plane of façade shall be no longer than fifty feet without architectural detail d. Front doors shall be visible or identifiable from the street and visually highlighted by graphics, lighting, or similar features e. Uses that encourage street level pedestrian activity are preferred on the first floor of a structure of a multistory building. This may include, but is not limited to, Commercial Services, Retail Trade uses, etc.; It is encouraged to have a greater floor-to-floor height (14' recommended) for the first level than the floors above f. Construction and maintenance of sidewalks must be done in compliance with the City's Streetscape Design Policy. Existing sidewalk widths shall be maintained so as to provide effective, accessible, connectivity to adjoining properties. Sidewalks may be widened to accommodate a project's design characteristics. Where no sidewalks exist, sidewalks shall be provided. Outdoor seating and dining areas and landscaping may be located in the sidewalk area where safe and effective sidewalk width around the design feature can be provided g. To the extent practicable, bus pull-outs shall be provided where bus stops are currently located; and h. If drive-through service is proposed, it shall not interfere with pedestrian access to the site from the right-of-way 11. 5.12.8.B.2.a Shade a. Except as provided below, shade shall be provided for at least 50% of all sidewalks and pedestrian access paths as measured at 12:00 p.m. on June 21 when the sun is 80 degrees above the horizon. Shade may be provided by trees, arcades, canopies, or shade structures provided their location and design characteristics are compatible with the historic and design context of the street and the architectural integrity of the building. The use of plantings and shade structures in the City right-of-way is permitted to meet this standard with the approval of the Transportation Department. The shade provided by a building may serve to meet this standard. b. Exception The PDSD Director may approve an IID Plan providing less than 50% shade where compliance is not feasible due to a project site's location and/or building orientation and the applicant has made a reasonable attempt to comply with this standard. 12. UDC 5.12.11. DOWNTOWN LINKS SUBDISTRICT (DLS) **5. To encourage innovative design solutions, Section 5.12.8.C may be used for an urban design best practice option. **6. Open space refers to public, private, and common area locations. Balconies are not considered open space. Common areas may include areas used by tenants or customers and/or the public where practicable. The percentage of open space in all Area and Sub- Area developments may be calculated as a combination of all three types of open space. Open space is encouraged at the street level. Pedestrian access to open space may be required as determined practicable by the PDSD Director. Thank you. Chad Keller, PLA Landscape Architect chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 06/24/2026 | Site Zoning Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Jeffrey W. Cassidy, Planner Planning & Development Services Department – Current Zoning Review Section PROJECT: The Hut – Large Bar Addition 305 N 4TH AV TUCSON, AZ 85705; C-3, I-1 Development Package (1st Review) TD-DEV-0526-00126 TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 24, 2026 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is May 13, 2027. COMMENT 1: 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. These comments are applicable. Once the IID process is complete provide the case number adjacent to the title block on all sheets and provide a general note stating the case number, date of approval, what was modified and if applicable and conditions of approval. COMMENT 2: 2-06.4.7.A.6 - It appears that one of the three following process will need to be completed prior to approval of this development package; 1) Special Exception Use - Mayor and Council Special Exception Procedure, Section 3.4.4, 2) Downtown Area Infill Incentive District (IID) or 3) Board of Adjustment for Variance. Once the process is complete provide the case number adjacent to the title block on all sheets and provide a general note stating the case number, date of approval, what was modified and if applicable and conditions of approval. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. COMMENT 3: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Required parking for the Large Bar is 543, provided is zero. A 1) Special Exception Use - Mayor and Council Special Exception Procedure, Section 3.4.4, 2) Downtown Area Infill Incentive District (IID) or 3) Board of Adjustment for Variance is required. COMMENT 4: 2-06.4.9.H.5.c -This comment is still applicable please show the loading zone on the site plan. Per UDC Article 7.5.4.A.1 A loading area must be located on the same site or lot as the use they serve. Proposed loading space is located offsite. A 1) Special Exception Use - Mayor and Council Special Exception Procedure, Section 3.4.4, 2) Downtown Area Infill Incentive District (IID) or 3) Board of Adjustment for Variance is required. COMMENT 5: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Short-term bicycle parking required for the Large Bar is 14, provided 6. A 1) Special Exception Use - Mayor and Council Special Exception Procedure, Section 3.4.4, 2) Downtown Area Infill Incentive District (IID) or 3) Board of Adjustment for Variance is required. COMMENT 6: 2-06.4.9.O - As E 8th St is a named street the proposed is required to meet the requirements of UDC Article 6.4.5.C.2.b For nonresidential and multifamily development abutting a Local Street : the minimum required street perimeter yard is 20 feet, as measured from the street property line ., the street perimeter yard is 20 feet, proposed 0’-0”. A 1) Special Exception Use - Mayor and Council Special Exception Procedure, Section 3.4.4, 2) Downtown Area Infill Incentive District (IID) or 3) Board of Adjustment for Variance is required. COMMENT 7: 2-06.4.9.O - As N 4th Av is a named street the proposed is required to meet the requirements of UDC Article 6.4.5.C.2.a For nonresidential and multifamily development abutting a Collector : the minimum required street perimeter yard is 10 feet, as measured from the street property line ., the street perimeter yard is 10 feet, proposed 0’-0”. A 1) Special Exception Use - Mayor and Council Special Exception Procedure, Section 3.4.4, 2) Downtown Area Infill Incentive District (IID) or 3) Board of Adjustment for Variance is required. COMMENT 8: Include the Activity Number TD-DEV-0526-00126 on all sheets in the plan set. COMMENT 9: Remove expired permit number DP20-0082 from sheet 1 of 2. COMMENT 10: Additional comments may be forthcoming on the next review based on responses to Zoning and other PDSD reviewer comments RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package To resubmit visit Tucson Development Center at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home . Instructions for resubmittal - https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/tdc-faq/old-pdfs/double-old/resubmittals.pdf If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact jeffrey.cassidy@tucsonaz.gov The Unified Development Code (UDC) can be found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Codes/Zoning-Code . |
||
| 06/03/2026 | CDRC Review Coordinator Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC added Real estate, Historic, Design Review, Environmental Services, Addressing, TAA, ADOT, TEP, PAG, USPS, and SWG to the workflow. Review request email sent to Design Review, Environmental Services, Addressing, TAA, ADOT, and TEP. FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. | ||
| 06/04/2026 | Entitlements Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | Large Bar use allowed through IID Approval Process, Mayor & Council Special Exception not required. | ||
| 06/17/2026 | External Reviewers - Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | Fwd: TDC External Review PERMIT: TD-DEV-0526-00126Please Sign-In DUE: 6/29/2026 rfreije@azdot.gov on behalf of ADOT SC Traffic Engineering - ADOT<adotsctrafficengineering@azdot.gov> CDRC ADOT has no comments. Thanks, Rick Freije |
||
| 06/03/2026 | External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 06/03/2026 | External Reviewers - Southwest Gas Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 06/22/2026 | External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | June 18, 2026 WO#T185832 City of Tucson Planning and Development Services Attn: CDRC Admin Team Dear CDRC Admin Team Subject: THE HUT, LARGE BAR ADDITION TD-DEV-0526-00126 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted 6/3/2026. There are no existing facilities within the development.No apparent conflicts Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. To apply for electric service, please call the New Construction department at (520) 918- 8300. Please submit a final set of plans including approved site, electric load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans. If available, include a PDF version of the plans. Questions regarding Land, ROW, Easement, etc., please contact the TEP Land Department Liz Boehler Right of Way Agent Consultant 520-686-1341 Landreviews@tep.com Should you have any technical questions, please contact the area designer, Martin Salazar (520) 305-6713 msalazar@tep.com Sincerely, Design Admins Design Admins Tucson Electric Power |
||
| 06/03/2026 | External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 06/20/2026 | Fire New Construction Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 06/03/2026 | MITZ District Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 05/29/2026 | OK to Submit - Engineering Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 06/03/2026 | OK to Submit - Zoning Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 06/15/2026 | ROW Review | REVIEW COMPLETED |