Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0525-00146
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/11/2025 | Real Estate Standard | NOT REQUIRED | Any proposed improvements located outside property lines and into public rights-of-way require a right-of-way permit and Private Improvement Agreement with the Department of Transportation & Mobility or Temporary Revocable Easement with the Real Estate Division (separate processes). If any action is required to address property rights (dedications, easements, etc), please contact the Real Estate Division 520-791-4181. | ||
| 07/03/2025 | Site Landscape Standard | NOT REQUIRED | |||
| 07/10/2025 | Fire New Construction Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | -Please be more specific on exactly where fire dept access will be. WIll it be both drives, north and west? john.vincent@tucsonaz.gov 5203495581 |
||
| 07/08/2025 | ROW Engineering Review Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | TD-DEV-0525-00146 • 120 W KENNEDY ST Provide a general note stating that the pedestrian circulation path along the development's street frontage will be brought into compliance with Sec. 10-01.4.0, Construction Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual. If you have any questions, please contact Richard Leigh at richard.leigh@tucsonaz.gov. |
||
| 07/17/2025 | Site Engineering Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. The Tentative Plat needs to comply with requirements found in the Administrative Manual Section 2-06.4.8 and 2-06.4.9 – including but not limited to: a. Existing conditions within 50 feet of the site. 2-06.4.8 b. Right-of-Way information, proposed traffic circulation, such as access points (driveways), and any existing or proposed pedestrian circulation along abutting Right-of-Way. 2-06.4.8.C, 2-06.4.9.H, 2-06.4.9.I, 2-06.4.9.J, and 2-06.4.9.S. c. Utility connections, dimensions, and storage areas. 2-06.4.8.D, 2-06.4.9.L, 2-06.4.9.P, and 2-06.4.9.T. d. Site ground elevation and contours. 2-06.4.8.E. e. Existing significant conditions on site, such as walls and fences. 2-06.4.8.G. f. Existing zoning classifications adjacent to the project. 2-06.4.9.F. g. A drainage plan. 2-06.4.9.N. h. Building setback lines and sight visibility triangles. 2-06.4.9.O. i. Grouped location of mail service. 2-06.4.9.V. Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 07/18/2025 | Site Zoning Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Loran Shamis PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: Tentative Plat for Barrio Solona Subdivision Development Package (1st Review) TD-DEV-0525-00146 TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 18, 2025 DUE DATE: July 11, 2025 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is June 12, 2026. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.3.12 – Provide an index of sheets in the development package on the first sheet. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1 – Provide an email address for the primary owner/developer of the site. If applicable, provide any registrant(s) or other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package including their name, mailing and email addresses and phone numbers along with their registration or license number. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines. 2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet: 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.B – The title block shall include a brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a re-subdivision are to be provided. On re-subdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat; The legal description appears to be incorrect as the proposed subdivision is a re-subdivision of Lot 7 and a portion of Lot 4 of Rollings Barrio (SEQ 20192670609). 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.C – Include the number of proposed lots and common area (if applicable) in the title block. It does not appear the proposed subdivision is meeting the requirements of a Flexible Lot Development, nor does it appear it is necessary to accomplish the land division as each lot is meeting the minimum lot size for the classified zone. Remove the note in the title block stating “A FLD SUBDIVISION” 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.D – Include the page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e. sheet xx of xx) in the title block. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0525-00146, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. Additionally, include C9-74-20 and the Special Districts case number adjacent to the title block as well. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. Zoning and Land Use Notes 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.1 – General Note #1 is incorrect. The Existing Zoning HC-3 and HO-3. Update the general note to state the correct zoning. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.2 – Clarify the gross area of the subdivision. Per S19-022. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – General Note #2 identifies the proposed use is Single Family, Attached; however, the plans are demonstrating Single Family, Detached. Additionally, the note calls the development a Flexible Lot Development but does not appear to be meeting the FLD standards in 8.7.3. Please clarify. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - The site is within a Historic Preservation Zone (HPZ) and per UDC 5.8.8, review and approval through Special Districts is required before Zoning can approve. Once approved, provide the Special Districts case number in the lower right corner of each sheet. As a General Note, provide a statements that the project meets the conditions of the Historic Preservation Zone, the case number, date of approval, what was approved and the conditions of approval, if any. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – Remove General Note #19 as the site is not within the Major Streets and Routes overlay. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.b – The maximum permitted lot coverage for residential uses in O-3 is 75% (UDC Table 6.3-3.A) and 80% for residential uses in C-3 (UDC Table 6.3-4.A). Lot Coverage is area of a lot covered by buildings, storage areas, and vehicular use areas. For specific application standards, refer to Section 6.4.3. Demonstrate compliance for each lot. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.F – All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project including across the right of way shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. The subdivision has split zoning which should be clearly defined on the site plan. 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 - Indicate if existing streets are public or private; provide street names, widths, curbs, sidewalks, and utility locations, all fully dimensioned. 15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Demonstrate compliance with UDC 7.4.4 – REQUIRED NUMBER OF MOTOR VEHICLE PARKING SPACES by showing all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided. 16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.L – Provide the recordation information for the easement labeled “Access Easement for Parcel ‘F’”. All proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. The easements may have to be recorded and the recordation information added to the development package prior to approval. 17. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Demonstrate the proposed Single Family Residential, detached units are meeting the minimum setback requirements per UDC Table 6.3-3.A and 6.3-3.4. The minimum setback requirement is based on the height of the proposed structure wall. Zoning cannot determine if the proposed structures are meeting the minimum setback requirement in relation to the proposed lot lines without the adjacent structure wall height. 18. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Demonstrate the proposal meets the maximum residential density per UDC Table 6.3-3.A and 6.3-4.A. 19. COMMENT: General Note #16 states the mail service will be grouped and individual mail service will not be provided. Demonstrate where the mail services will be provided. 20. COMMENT: General Note #12 states the Dimensional Standards for FLD per UDC Sec 8.7.3 for Alternative B Low Income Housing in R-2 appears to be incorrect. The site is not zoned R-2 and the proposal does not appear to be adhering to UDC 8.7, in that there is no Functional Open Space provided and the lot are meeting the minimum lot size requirement for the classified zone. Please clarify. ***For additional information on the any standard presented in this memo, please refer to the City of Tucson “Unified Development Code” – Administrative Manual Section 2-06 or Technical Standards noted in the comments. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/all-codes-plans-determinations If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact Loran Shamis by email Loran.Shamis@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package and comment response letter. To resubmit visit Tucson Development Center at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home. Instructions for resubmittal - https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/website/Resubmittals.pdf. |
||
| 06/18/2025 | CDRC Review Coordinator Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | EXTERNAL REVIEWERS CDRC added TEP TAA, ADOT, and Addressing, PAG, USPS, SWG to the workflow. Review request email sent to TEP TAA, ADOT, and Addressing. FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. |
||
| 07/10/2025 | Commercial Plumbing Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 07/11/2025 | External Reviewers - Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | Good Afternoon, ADOT has no comments on this DEV. Thank you for the opportunity to review. |
||
| 07/15/2025 | External Reviewers - COT Environmental Services Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | ES Comments: 1. General note 17 suggest TP is proposing centralized trash and recycle collection and storage. Refer to TSM 8-01.0 for all applicable Solid Waste and Recycle Disposal, Collection, and Storage Requirements. Andy Vera (520) 837-3798 Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 06/18/2025 | External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | FYI CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. |
||
| 08/12/2025 | External Reviewers - Pima County Addressing Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | Good morning, Pima County Addressing approves TD-DEV-0525-00146. Nicholas Jordan Site Review Project Manager II – Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-9623 |
||
| 06/18/2025 | External Reviewers - Southwest Gas Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | FYI CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. |
||
| 07/02/2025 | External Reviewers - Tucson Airport Authority Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | July 1, 2025 Planning and Development Services City of Tucson 201 North Stone Avenue Tucson, AZ. 85701 RE: TD-DEV-0525-00146, 1st Submittal, Final Plat for lot 7A, 7B, 7C, 7E, 7F being a minor resubdivision of lot 7 in block 241 of the city of Tucson, recorded in book 3 of maps and plats page 70. / 120 W Kennedy Street, Tucson, AZ. 85701, Received June 18, 2025 To whom this may concern, Thank you for the opportunity to comment on TD-DEV-0525-00146, 1st Submittal, a development plan for five new lots for future residential uses at 120 West Kennedy Street. This development is located in the S.E. quarter of the N.W. quarter of Section 13, Township 14S, Range 13E, of the Gila and Salt River Meridian. The development site occupies parcel number 117-14-517A, covers approximately 0.66 ± acres, and is zoned as Office Zone 3 (O-3). The nearest major roadway intersection is South Meyer Avenue and West Kennedy Street, approximately 175 feet to the northwest of the subject development. This site does lie within the Tucson International Airport avigation easement requirements and public disclosure area, FAA traffic pattern airspace, and FAA Part 77 airspace. The Tucson Airport Authority approves the proposed project is and not requiring a resubmittal. Although this project does not propose a change in plan designation or zoning the Tucson Airport Authority highly recommends the applicant add the following notes into the general notes of the revised development plan. This project is located approximately 5.6 miles northwest of Tucson International Airport and is within FAA traffic pattern airspace, an area which would be subject to aircraft overflight and noise due to being in close proximity to Tucson International Airport. The proposed notes would provide a means of assuring that future owners and tenants of the property are aware they are in proximity an airport and further assures the continued right of the City of Tucson, Tucson Airport Authority, and all persons lawfully utilizing the Tucson International Airport the right to utilize the airspace above or near the property. This would be accomplished through the property owner recording the Avigation Easement and providing the Airport Disclosure Statement to the new residents of all residential uses. The Tucson Airport Authority believes the proposed note helps to support the City of Tucson Airport Environs Overlay Zone and supports Plan Tucson – Regional and Global Positioning policy 4 (RG-4). 1. "That prior to the City's approval of the proposed development, the property owner must record the Avigation Easement that discloses the existence and operational characteristics of the Tucson International Airport to future owners or tenants of the property and further conveys the right to the public to lawfully use the airspace above the property. The Avigation Easement shall be recorded in a manner with the Pima County recorder which shall document it as having title liability. The content of such documents shall be according to the form and instructions provided.” The current property owner or person authorized to sign on behalf of the current property owner must complete, sign, and record the Avigation Easement. Please record the Avigation Easement with the Pima County Recorder’s Office. Then send a complete copy of the recorded easement document to Tucson Airport Authority by either email (send to srobidoux@flytucson.com) or to the mailing address provided below. Scott Robidoux Manager of Planning Tucson Airport Authority 7250 South Tucson Blvd, Suite 300 Tucson, AZ 85756” 2. Applicable to residential uses only “The property owner/developer/applicant must provide the Airport Disclosure Statement form, at time of sale, to the new property owners with all new unit purchases. In the event the development of any residential uses does not involve the sale of new units but is instead offering rental residential units to the public, the new tenant of the rental unit must be provided a copy of the Airport Disclosure Statement form. The intent of the Airport Disclosure Statement form is to educate and notify the new residents that they are living near an airport. The content of such documents shall be according to the form and instructions provided.” The property owner (for itself or its tenants) shall forward a signed copy of the Airport Disclosure Statement form to the Tucson Airport Authority within ten (10) days of signature, using the Scott Robidoux mailing address provided above. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this comment letter. I can be reached by email at srobidoux@flytucson.com or by telephone at 520-573-4811. Respectfully, Scott Robidoux, C.M. Manager of Planning cc file |
||
| 08/01/2025 | External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | 4350 E. Irvington Road Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 August 1, 2025 WO#T154720 City of Tucson Planning and Development Services Attn: CDRC Admin Team Dear CDRC Admin Team Subject: Barrio Subdivision lot 7A, 7B, 7C, 7E, 7F TD-DEV-0525-00146 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted 6/18/2025. There are no existing facilities within the development. There are no apparent conflicts at this time. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. To apply for electric service, please call the New Construction department at (520) 918- 8300. Please submit a final set of plans including approved site, electric load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans. If available, include a PDF version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Should you have any easement questions, please contact our Land Resources Department, LandReviews@tep.com. Should you have any technical questions, please contact the area designer, Fred Quintero (520) 235-6329 fquintero@tep.com Sincerely, Design Admins Design Admins Tucson Electric Power |
||
| 06/18/2025 | External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | FYI CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. |
||
| 08/14/2025 | Historic Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | No historic review for a replat. Any future new construction on replats will require full historic review. | ||
| 07/03/2025 | NPPO Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | Prior to any development within this subdivision, please submit a NPPO and mitigation plant for protected native plants that might be disturbed or destroyed. A NPPO waiver is an option if there is no evidence of protected native plants, or if there are but won't be disturbed. If a copy of the NPPO waiver is needed, please reach out and I will provided a copy for your use. Thank you. Chad Keller, RLA chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 06/17/2025 | OK to Submit - Engineering Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 06/16/2025 | OK to Submit - Zoning Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 06/23/2025 | ROW Review | REVIEW COMPLETED |