Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0525-00145
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/01/2025 | NPPO Standard | APPROVED | |||
| 07/14/2025 | Traffic Engineering Review Standard | APPROVED | Traffic Engineering has no comments on this development. | ||
| 07/31/2025 | Commercial Plumbing Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. Revise the site drawing to include the proposed point of connection to existing public sewer and the rim elevation of the proposed manhole. Reference: City of Tucson Administrative Manual, Section 2-06.4.8D and Section 107.2.1, IBC 2018. 2. Compare the rim elevation of the proposed sanitary manhole and the first-floor elevation. Determine the need for a backwater valve per Section 714.1, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson. 3. A private sewer collection system that includes a manhole will require a review of the system design by the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality prior to obtaining a building permit from the City of Tucson. In addition, the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality requires the Engineer of Record to conduct specific inspections during construction. Submit the plans that have been approved by the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality for approval. Reference Title 18, R18-9-E302, 4.02 General Permit, Arizona Administrative Code. |
||
| 07/16/2025 | ROW Engineering Review Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | TP-PRE-0525-00145 • 2952 E SPEEDWAY BL 1. Per Sec. 10-01.3.3 of the UDC Technical Standards Manual (UDC TSM), a continuous unobstructed accessible pedestrian circulation path along projects property street frontages must be provided. Sidewalk and a curb access ramp at the alley, in compliance with Sec. 10-01.4.0. of the UDC TSM, must be provided along Bentley Ave. Technical Standards Manual: https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az_udc/0-0-0-12213 2. A driveway apron per PAG Standard Detail 206 shall be provided at the driveway entrance off of Bentley Ave. PAG Standard Details: https://apps.pagregion.com/standardspecifications/ If you have any questions, please contact Richard Leigh at richard.leigh@tucsonaz.gov. |
||
| 08/05/2025 | Site Engineering Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. The use of APCs for commercial development requires Environmental Services approval through a Technical Standards Modification Request. 2. Pedestrian circulation is required to connect all buildings, dumpster areas, common use areas, and the sidewalk on the street frontage per TSM 7-01.3.3. Show a continuous pedestrian path that maintains a 4-ft unobstructed width. 3. Show downspouts for roof runoff. Stormwater from up to a 10-yr storm occurrence must not flow over sidewalks. TSM 7-01.4.3E 4. Provide a trash enclosure detail that shows compliance with TSM 8-01. 5. Include slopes on the enclosure slab and ramp compliant with TSM 8-01.9 Figure 3B. 6. Provide a drainage statement explaining compliance with Detention/Retention requirements per the Design Standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention Manual (DSSDR). Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 08/01/2025 | Site Landscape Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT REVIEWER: CHAD KELLER, RLA SITE LANDSCAPE/NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION SECTION PROJECT: SMALLS SLIDERS FAST-FOOD RESTAURANT ACTIVITY NO: TD-DEV-0525-00145 ADDRESS: 2952 E SPEEDWAY BL ZONING: C-1 COMMERCIAL ZONE This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants, and water harvesting. Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all of the Site Landscape and NPPO Section review comments have been addressed. SITE LANDSCAPE/NPPO SECTION COMMENTS: 1. Revise drawing scale: 1-inch equals 15 feet is not a recognized engineering scale. 2. Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0525-00145, adjacent to the title block on all site landscape sheets, per Administrative Manual 2-06.4.3 Thank you. Chad Keller, RLA Landscape Architect chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov 520.837.4923 |
||
| 08/01/2025 | Site Zoning Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Smalls Sliders – 2910 E. Speedway Blvd. Development Package (1st Review) TD-DEV-0525-00145 TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 1, 2025 DUE DATE: July 31, 2025 COMMENTS: Resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Per UDC Article 3.3.3.G.5.c, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is July 8, 2026. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.3.12 – The index of drawings is not correct and should include all sheets submitted with the DP. 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.B – Provide a brief legal description within the title block. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.D – Provide the The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx) with in the title block. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0525-00145, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.A – Show the subject property approximately centered within the one square mile area of the location map. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.C – Provide the section, township, and range on the location and label the section corners. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.a – Provide the floor area for the proposed building and outdoor patio area. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C – Provide the dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks for Speedway Blvd. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.A – Clarify why the parcel to the west is shown on the DP as it is not part of this site. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.A – Remove the underlying parcel lines shown on the plan. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Provide a access lane width dimension from the southeast corner of the proposed trash enclosure to the curb shown to the southeast. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Until comment 20 is addressed Zoning cannot verify the required number of vehicle parking spaces. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The accessible parking space calculation shall include the number of van accessible parking spaces required and provided. 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Provide a standard and accessible vehicle parking space detail. 15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Provide a detail for the required accessible parking space sign. 16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Until comment 20 is addressed Zoning cannot verify the required number of bicycle parking spaces. 17. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Clearly show the proposed short- & long-term bicycle parking on the plan and provide a detail that clearly shows that all requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9 are met. For your information per UDC Article 7.4.8.B1.a.(1) No long-term bicycle parking is required on a site where there is less than 2,500 square feet of gross floor area. 18. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The 10’ required side street perimeter yard setback shown under General Note 15 is not correct. Review UDC Article 6.4.5.C.2.b and provide the correct required side street perimeter yard setback. 19. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Provide perimeter yard setback dimensions from the proposed building/patio cover to all property lines. 20. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Provide the square footage, height specific use proposed within the footprint of the building. Also, provide the square footage of the proposed outdoor patio area along with the height of the canopy. 21. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Clearly delineate all proposed sidewalks on the plan. 22. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Per TSM Section 7-01.4.1.A At least one sidewalk is required to a project from each street on which the project has frontage. Show the required sidewalk from the proposed building out to the street property line along Bentley Ave. 23. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – As parking vehicles are allowed to overhang what appears to be a sidewalk along the south side of the proposed vehicle parking, Clearly demonstrate that the minimum 4’ sidewalk width, TSM Section 7-01.4.3.A, is maintained. Overhanging vehicles encroach 2’-6”, UDC Article 7.4.6.H.3, into the sidewalk which requires a minimum 6’-6” sidewalk width. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Zone1.desk@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: A revised development package as well as a comment response letter. To resubmit, visit the Tucson Development Center Online at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home. The instructions for resubmittal can be found at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/tdc-faq/new-pdfs/revisions-and-resubmittals.pdf. |
||
| 07/10/2025 | CDRC Review Coordinator Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC added TEP, PAG, USPS, and SWG to the workflow. Review request email sent to TEP. FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. | ||
| 07/10/2025 | External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 07/10/2025 | External Reviewers - Southwest Gas Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 08/01/2025 | External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | 4350 E. Irvington Road Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 July 29, 2025 WO#T156984 City of Tucson Planning and Development Services Attn: CDRC Admin Team Dear CDRC Admin Team Subject: Smalls Sliders Fast-Food Restaurant TD-DEV-0525-00145 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted 7/10/2025. There are no existing facilities within the development.No apparent conflicts with pole line in alley. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. To apply for electric service, please call the New Construction department at (520) 918- 8300. Please submit a final set of plans including approved site, electric load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans. If available, include a PDF version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Should you have any easement questions, please contact our Land Resources Department, LandReviews@tep.com. Should you have any technical questions, please contact the area designer, Martin Salazar (520) 305-6713 msalazar@tep.com Sincerely, Design Admins Design Admins Tucson Electric Power |
||
| 07/10/2025 | External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 07/28/2025 | Fire New Construction Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 07/09/2025 | OK to Submit - Engineering Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 07/14/2025 | ROW Review | REVIEW COMPLETED |