Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: TD-DEV-0524-00167
Parcel: 116277620

Review Status: Requires Resubmit

Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2

Permit Number - TD-DEV-0524-00167
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
07/16/2024 Commercial Plumbing APPROVED
08/20/2024 External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) APPROVED 4350 E. Irvington Road
Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702
August 20, 2024
WO#T118886
City of Tucson
Planning and Development Services
Attn: CDRC Admin Team
Dear CDRC Admin Team
Subject: Gonzalez Residence
TD-DEV-0524-00167
Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed and approved the development
plan submitted 6/17/2024. There are no existing facilities within the development and
thus no apparent conflicts at this time.
Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the
existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer.
To apply for electric service, please call the New Construction department at (520) 918-
8300. Please submit a final set of plans including approved site, electric load, paving
off-site improvements and irrigation plans. If available, include a PDF version of the
plans.
If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Should you
have any easement questions, please contact our Land Resources Department,
LandReviews@tep.com.
Should you have any technical questions, please contact the area designer,
Fred Quintero
(520) 235-6329
fquintero@tep.com
Sincerely,
Design Admins
Design Admins
Tucson Electric Power
07/01/2024 Site Zoning APPROVED
08/20/2024 CDRC Post Review PENDING ASSIGNMENT
07/03/2024 NPPO REQUIRES RESUBMIT Please see Site Landscape Comments for NPPO Requirements.

Thank you.

Chad Keller, RLA
chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov
07/11/2024 Site Engineering REQUIRES RESUBMIT 1. Please provide documentation from the Starr Pass review committee that demonstrates compliance and preliminary approval for the proposed development.

Mike Ortiz
michael.ortiz@tucsonaz.gov
07/03/2024 Site Landscape REQUIRES RESUBMIT CDRC TRANSMITTAL
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
REVIEWER: CHAD KELLER, RLA
PDSD SITE LANDSCAPE/NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION SECTION

PROJECT: GRADING PLAN FOR GRADING PERMIT
ACTIVITY NO: TD-DEV-0524-00167
ADDRESS/PARCEL: 3206 W TUMAMOC DR/116277620
ZONING: R-1 RESIDENCE ZONE, ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ZONE, HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT ZONE

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants, and water harvesting.

Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape/NPPO Review Section comments are addressed.

SITE LANDSCAPE/NPPO SECTION COMMENTS:
1. Ensure that Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to landscape section approval.

2. Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0524-00167, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.3

HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT ZONE (HDZ) SEE UDC 5.2, ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTES TO THE COVER SHEET:
Vegetation Retention and Revegetation
a. Vegetation Retention
(1) Existing viable and transplantable trees with four inch or greater trunk diameter and cacti shall be preserved in their original locations, except for building sites and access and utilities serving building sites.
(2) When retention of the above trees and cacti in their original locations is not possible due to building site location, the trees and cacti shall be salvaged and replanted in areas requiring revegetation, whenever possible.
b. Revegetation
All cut or fill slopes that are no steeper than three horizontal to one vertical and all utility trenches or septic leaching fields that are not located in parking or driveway areas shall be revegetated in compliance with the following standards:
(1) All plants used in revegetation shall be the same as the native vegetation on the site prior to grading or clearing or any adjacent site; and,
(2) Revegetation shall be accomplished with the following minimum standards for plants:
(a) Desert trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size with a minimum trunk diameter of two inches measured at the soil level, or large specimen cactus shall be placed at the same vegetation density found on the site prior to any clearing, grubbing, or grading; and,
(b) Seeds for trees, desert shrubs, and grasses shall be planted with a density adequate to control erosion and may use one of the following methods of planting: Raked into the soil with appropriate mulch materials; hydroseeding; anchored mulches; or established on jute, rolled straw, or similar material. Another method may be approved by PDSD.
(3) A temporary watering system shall be installed until the revegetation materials are established.
3. Slope Stabilization
All slopes steeper than a ratio of three horizontal to one vertical, with the exception of retaining walls, shall be stabilized with properly engineered stone riprapping or sculptured rock as follows:
a. Stone riprapping shall be hand-placed on the slope;
b. The stabilizing material used shall blend with the natural appearance of the site or lot and the surrounding terrain; and,
c. Vegetation retention and revegetation should be used in conjunction with riprapping.

NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION ORDINANCE COMMENTS:

The site plan does call out natural landscape, See UDC 7.7.4. GENERAL PROVISIONS AND STANDARDS FOR NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION

A. Submittal Requirements: A Native Plant Preservation Plan in accordance with Section 2-12.0.0 of the Administrative Manual is required for all projects under the applicability of this section according to the methodology selected by the applicant as outlined in Section 7.7.5, Plant Preservation Standards. If buffelgrass is present, populations are to be mapped and included as part of the Native Plant Preservation Plan or the Environmental Resource Report. Continued buffelgrass eradication and monitoring methodology, including common areas, is required for developed and undeveloped portions of a site.

1. If the Plant Inventory Methodology is selected, a Native Plant Inventory, an Analysis, and a Plant Preservation and Salvage Plan in accordance with Section 2-11.4.4 of the Administrative Manual must be submitted.

2. If the Plant Appraisal Methodology is selected, a plant appraisal in accordance with Section 7.7.5.A.2 based on a Native Plant Inventory for each plant to be removed from the site in accordance with Section 2-11.4.1, Native Plant Inventory, of the Administrative Manual must be submitted.

3. If the Set Aside Methodology is selected, an Environmental Resource Report in accordance with Section 7.7.5.A.3 and Section 2-11.4.5, Set Aside Submittal, of the Administrative Manual must be submitted.


ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ZONE (ERZ) COMMENTS:
The site is also within the Environmental Resource Zone (ERZ) and may require additional documentation: See ERZ requirements, Section 5.7.3 Development Options: Development subject to ERZ may use one of the two following options.

A.) No encroachment on the floodplain -- Where the owner of a lot or parcel affected by these standards chooses to leave the 100-year floodplain undisturbed, the ERZ does not apply except that temporary fencing shall be placed between the project site and the floodplain area as provided in Section 5.7.5.B, Temporary Fencing Required. Encroachment of the floodplain is limited to utilities, roadway improvements , walkways, or bike paths as provided in Section 5.7.5 , Standards for Roadway /Utility Encroachment. (See Figure 5.7-A.)

B.) Study of Resource Corridor -- The following information is required when an applicant affected by these standards chooses to do a study of the resource corridor: 1.) An Environmental Resource Report (ERR) in accordance with the provisions in the Administrative Manual is required. The ERR is a study of the resource corridor and document’s locations of the resource corridor and critical riparian habitat; 2.) A mitigation plan in accordance with Section 5.7.4.D, Mitigation Plan, is also required if preservation of the critical riparian habitat cannot be accomplished as required by the ERZ standards; 3.) The ERR and, when applicable, the mitigation plan is reviewed and considered for approval in accordance with Section 3.3.3, PDSD Director Approval Procedure; and 4.) Permits for grubbing, grading, construction, or any other improvements shall not be issued until all applicable standards of Section 5.7.4, 5.7.5, and 5.7.6 are met.

If you have any questions about these comments, I can be reached at chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov
06/10/2024 CDRC Application Completeness REVIEW COMPLETED
06/17/2024 CDRC Review Coordinator REVIEW COMPLETED Review request email sent per TEP. CDRC sent FYI email to PAG, USPS, SWG.
06/17/2024 External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC sent FYI email to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required from the customer at this time.
06/17/2024 External Reviewers - Southwest Gas REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC sent FYI email to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required from the customer at this time.
06/17/2024 External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC sent FYI email to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required from the customer at this time.
07/12/2024 Fire New Construction REVIEW COMPLETED
06/14/2024 OK to Submit - Engineering REVIEW COMPLETED
07/10/2024 ROW Engineering Review REVIEW COMPLETED DTM has no comments