Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: TD-DEV-0524-00163
Parcel: 13734001A

Review Status: Requires Resubmit

Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2

Permit Number - TD-DEV-0524-00163
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
09/11/2024 NPPO APPROVED
09/11/2024 Site Landscape APPROVED
09/11/2024 CDRC Post Review PENDING ASSIGNMENT
09/09/2024 Commercial Plumbing REQUIRES RESUBMIT Comment not resolved. A fire hydrant shall not be located downstream of either a water meter or a backflow preventer of any size. Run a separate water service for the convenience store. Reconsider the size of the water meter and backflow preventer that will be serving the convenience store (the main Walmart store is served by a 2” water meter). [Initial comment: The proposed fire hydrant is fed by a 2” pipe, downstream of the proposed water meter and backflow preventer. The minimum connection for a fire hydrant shall be to a 6-inch nominal inside diameter pipe. A water meter and backflow preventer would create an unacceptable pressure drop for the fire hydrant. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/city-services/tucson-water/documents/1430_-_fire_hydrants.pdf]
09/09/2024 Site Engineering REQUIRES RESUBMIT Site Engineering review notes are as follows:
1. Ensure that trash enclosure meets requirements. Show bollard locations and opening dimensions on trash enclosure detail. The minimum slope for the trash enclosure apron shall be 2% per TSM 8-01.5.2.
2. There are two pages labeled C 5.2. Ensure page numbering is correct.

Ryan Insalaco
Engineering Associate
City of Tucson
Planning & Development Services Department
Email: ryan.insalaco@tucsonaz.gov
09/05/2024 Site Zoning REQUIRES RESUBMIT PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: PDSD Zoning Review

PROJECT: Walmart Store #1612 – Fuel Station
Development Package (2nd Review)
TD-DEV-0524-00163

TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 5, 2024

DUE DATE: September 7, 2024

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is June 9, 2025.

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

1. This comment has not been addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6 – As Walmart is considered a Large Retail Establishment following discussions with staff, Nichloas Ross, Development Services/Neighborhood Resources Section Manager, the proposed convenience store and fuel stations is considered an expansion of the Large Retail Establishment and requires a Mayor and Council Special Exception Procedure, Section 3.4.4, see UDC Table 4.8-4. Provide the special exception case number adjacent to the title block on all sheets and provide a general note that states the case number, date of approval and if applicable any conditions of approval.

2. This comment was not addressed correctly. You removed the required reference to “UDC ARTICLE 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R)” from what was note 3 and is not note 5. The not should reference “THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R) & UDC ARTICLE 5.5 GATEWAY CORRIFOR ZONE (GCR)”. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – As Valencia Rd is designated as an Arterial/Gateway on the COT MS&R Map revise Zoning and Land Use note 3 to include “ARTICLE 5.5 GATEWAY CORRIFOR ZONE (GCR)”.

3. This comment was not addressed. 2-06.4.7.A.8.d – All applicable notes and calculations shall include the entire site which includes the following parcels: 137-34-001A, 137-34-001D, 137-34-001E, 137-34-0030, 137-27-6510 & 13-72-7652A.

2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:

4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.b – Per PAD-3 Development Standard Section D.1.c.(2), pg. IC-37, provide a Floor Area Ration that meets the requirements of UDC Article 6.4.6.

5. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.c – Provide a building area expansion calculation on the plan. This calculation is cumulative and shall include any building additions for the entire site, see comment 10.

2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions
The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

6. This comment was not fully addressed. Zoning acknowledges that a 24.3’ dimension was provide for the north access lane and a 23.3 dimension was provided for the south access lane on sheet C4.1 but nothing was provided for the west PAAL. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Provide PAAL/access lane widths from the proposed constructure to the existing site work for the PAALs/access lanes to the north, south and west of the proposed convenience store and fuel stations.

7. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The vehicle parking space calculation shall include the entire site, see comment 10.

8. This comment was not addressed. Clearly show that the required 10’ distance is provided to the air/water pedestal COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Provide a parking space width dimension for the space directly north of the proposed air/water pedestal called out under Keynote 17, see UDC Article 7.4.6.D.2.b.

9. This comment was not fully addressed. Provide the proposed spacing of the bollards. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – It appears that the pavement is flush with the sidewalk along the east side of the proposed convenience store. If this is the case clearly demonstrate how the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.H.1 are met.

10. This comment was not addressed correctly. Detail 13 sheet C5.2 does not address UDC Articles 7.4.9.B.1.d, .e, 7.4.9.B.2.a, & .f., and provide a long-term bicycle detail. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Provide a detail for both the short- and long-term bicycle parking that clearly demonstrates how the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9 are met.

11. This comment was not fully addressed. No sidewalk connection has been provided to Valenica or Oak Tree. A Technical Standards Modification Request (TSMR) will be required to utilize the sidewalks located withn the ROW. Contact Nick Ross prior to submitting the TSMR to ensure that he will support the TSMR. Nick can be reached at (520) 837-4029 or email Nicholas.Ross@tucsonaz.gov. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Clearly demonstrate that the requirements of TSM Section 7-01.4.1.A is met. At least one sidewalk is required to a project from each street on which the project has frontage, unless there is no vehicular access from a street because of a physical barrier, such as a drainageway or an unbroken security barrier (e.g., a wall or fence). The sidewalk should be located to minimize any conflict with vehicular access to the project. Zoning may consider using the sidewalk connection shown out to the Midvale Park and the sidewalks and use the sidewalks in the ROWs to meet this requirement.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Martell at Nicholas.Martell@tucsonaz.gov.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: A revised development package as well as a comment response letter. To resubmit, visit the Tucson Development Center Online at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home. The instructions for resubmittal can be found at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/tdc-faq/new-pdfs/revisions-and-resubmittals.pdf.
08/08/2024 Traffic Engineering Review REQUIRES RESUBMIT No comments on DP from DTM Traffic Engineering Division. As per past correspondence and agreed upon in the comment-response form, we await submittal of the Traffic Impact Analysis to confirm that the existing roadway network can accommodate for the new traffic generated and/or make recommendations of ROW improvements needed to accommodate for the development's traffic.
08/07/2024 CDRC Application Completeness REVIEW COMPLETED