Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0524-00161
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/06/2024 | CDRC Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 09/06/2024 | NPPO | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | SEE SITE LANDSCAPE COMMENTS. Thank you. Chad Keller, RLA chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 08/26/2024 | ROW Engineering Review | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | TD-DEV-0524-00161 • 3959 N ORACLE RD 1. Revise drawing to indicate that a pedestrian circulation path will be provided along Roger Rd. In accordance with Sec. 10-01.3.3 and 4.0. of the UDC Technical Standards Manual. 2. Provide a general note indicating that all offsite improvements will require a separate Right-of-Way use permit. If you have any questions, please contact Richard Leigh at 520-403-0970 or email arnold.leigh@tucsonaz.gov. |
||
| 09/03/2024 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. Thank you for providing waste stream calculations. Please provide the weekly waste stream volumes to justify the size of the containers. The waste enclosure will need to meet specs in TSM Section 8 including a minimum of 1% slope for the slab and minimum 2% slope for the apron. Please provide a detail compliant with TSM Section 8. Mike Ortiz michael.ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 09/06/2024 | Site Landscape | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT REVIEWER: CHAD KELLER, RLA PDSD SITE LANDSCAPE/NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION SECTION PROJECT: RENOVATION OF EXISTING BUILDING TO AN AUTO BODY PAINT & REPAIR SHOP WITH FENCED OUTDOOR VEHICLE STORAGE ACTIVITY NO: TD-DEV-0524-00161 ADDRESS: 3959 N ORACLE RD ZONING: I-1 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ZONE LAND USE: COMMERCIAL This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants, and water harvesting. Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape/NPPO Review Section comments are addressed. ** SITE ZONING HAS DETERMINED THAT THE FENCED PARKING AREA CONSTITUTES A 25 PERCENT EXPANSION TO THE SITE, REQUIRING FULL LANDSCAPE CODE COMPLIANCE. SEE COMPLIANCE COMMENTS BELOW. SITE LANDSCAPE/NPPO SECTION COMMENTS: 1. Ensure that Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to landscape section approval. 2. Since the inventory method was chosen for the NPPO and there are two protected native trees (Mesquites) chosen to be removed from the site due to low viability determined by the salvage contractor, please provide a NPPO Waiver to go along with your re-submittal as verification that the two Mesquites are not viable. Otherwise, the Mesquites need to be mitigated at a 2:1 ratio and shown as part of the planting plan. If a copy of the exception to the NPPO is needed, contact me at the email below and I will email a copy for your use. 3. The parking area canopy shade tree requirement of 1 tree for every 4 parking spaces has not been met. The fenced vehicle storage area does not need additional shade trees. The north parking areas have 26 spaces combined, requiring 7 total trees. Please add one additional shade tree. 4. Provide curb cuts on the upstream side of the tree planter islands and depress the landscape areas 6 to 9 inches to provide rainwater harvesting within the parking area. City of Tucson Standard Details for rainwater harvesting basins located here for reference: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Transportation-Mobility/Landscape/Landscape-Architects 5. Provide depressed landscape areas within the street landscape borders and hatch the area like the other WHIA’s shown in the parking area. Call the Water Harvest Infiltration Areas out on all plan sheets within the landscape package. 6. The heavy dashed line (edge of drainage basin area) should be the sub-watershed area, and the sub-watershed border areas should be represented on the plan with total square footage. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR THE ABOVE COMMENT: If CRWH calculations are going to be provided, then please use the site water budget table. If a copy of the water budget table is needed, email me and I will send the excel spreadsheet for your use. If an example set of Commercial Rainwater Harvesting plans is needed for reference, please let me know and I will send you a set of approved plans. 7. The typical drainage basin section on the water harvesting sheet is effective. Add tree and shrub placement within the cross-section graphic for contractor clarity during construction. 8. Label sight visibility triangles as well as existing and future ROWs at the entry on W Roger Rd. on all landscape plans. 9. If you feel that the project needs more details for successful construction, see City of Tucson Standard landscape details here: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Transportation-Mobility/Landscape/Landscape-Architects If you have any questions about these comments, I can be reached at chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 08/29/2024 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Fernando L. García PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: TD-DEV-0524-00161 3959 N Oracle Rd, Tucson, AZ 85705 Development Package (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 29, 2024 DUE DATE: September 1, 2024 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year expiration date is May 28, 2025. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE 2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section. COMMENT 1: 2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. COMMENT 2: Indicate width of parking area access lane (PAAL) along eastern border of the property. A two-way PAAL is required to be 24’ per UDC Table 7.4.6-2. Indicate direction of travel within the eastern property line PAAL. Indicate how vehicles using these parking spaces would be able to enter and exit the parking area. If maneuverability requires access into and through the gated vehicle storage area, indicate that a sign will be installed that states that the vehicle storage gates are to remain open during operating hours. The width of the northeast PAAL (between Lucky Wishbone and the parking spaces) appears to reduce from 24’ to 20’. A two-way PAAL is required to be 24’. The four-foot striped walkway to the front of these parking spaces is not required. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided. COMMENT 3: Per UDC Section 7.4.9.C.2, short-term bicycle spaces must be located within 50’ feet of public entrances. It appears that the bicycle racks are located within 37’ of the Caliber Collision public entrance, but 112’ from the Lucky Wishbone public entrance. Consider relocation – or splitting – of the short-term bicycle racks to meet the distance requirements. Indicate (interior and/or exterior) location of long-term bicycle storage locations per UDC Section 7.4.9.B and 7.4.9.D. Show a detail that shows type(s) of long-term bicycle storage that meet UDC Section 7.4.9. 2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual. COMMENT 4: Indicate how pedestrian circulation on site will connect to Roger Rd. per UDC TSM Section 7-01.4.0. Indicate pedestrian circulation to trash enclosures. Ensure pedestrian circulation is separated from travel lanes per standards indicated in UDC TSM Section 7-01.4.2. COMMENT 5: Final approval by Site Zoning will be contingent upon approval of the submitted TSMR and IPP requests. ***For additional information on the any standard presented in this memo, please refer to the City of Tucson “Unified Development Code” – Administrative Manual Section 2-06 or Technical Standards noted in the comments. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/all-codes-plans-determinations If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact Fernando García by email fernando.garcia2@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package and comment response letter. To resubmit visit Tucson Development Center at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home. Instructions for resubmittal - https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/website/Resubmittals.pdf. |
||
| 08/30/2024 | TSMR/PDMR - Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | see zoning comments | ||
| 08/29/2024 | TSMR/PDMR - Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | A TSMR can only modify or reduce a requirement in the code, not eliminate one. Zoning would support a reduction of the required space needed for a backup spur, but does not support removing it. | ||
| 08/09/2024 | Zoning Modifications - IPP | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | An Individual Parking Plan (IPP) is an option that can be used to reduce the required number of vehicle parking spaces. The IPP Narrative, sealed by a design professional licensed by the State of Arizona, must include the information as outlined in UDC Section 7.4.5.A.4.a – m. This project is located within 400’ of R-2 zone and is subject to the 400’ Notice Procedure (UDC Section 3.3.5). A pre-application meeting and neighborhood meeting is required prior to submittal of an application. To request a pre-application meeting, please apply for "Pre-Application Conference" at TDC Online. If you have questions, you can email me at Mark.Castro@tucsonaz.gov | ||
| 08/02/2024 | CDRC Application Completeness | REVIEW COMPLETED |