Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0524-00161
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/11/2024 | Commercial Plumbing | APPROVED | |||
| 06/27/2024 | External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) | APPROVED | June 26, 2024 WO#T117311 City of Tucson Planning and Development Services Attn: CDRC Admin Team Dear CDRC Admin Team Subject: Caliber Collision 3959 N Oracle TD-DEV-0524-00161 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted 6/6/2024. There are existing facilities within the development which are depicted upon the plan; however, there do not appear to be any apparent conflicts. Further, please add existing land right covering transformer and UG segment Book 8399 Page 1461. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. To apply for electric service, please call the New Construction department at (520) 918- 8300. Please submit a final set of plans including approved site, electric load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans. If available, include a PDF version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Should you have any easement questions, please contact our Land Resources Department, LandReviews@tep.com. Should you have any technical questions, please contact the area designer, Chuck Leon (520) 400-6133 cleon@tep.com Sincerely, Design Admins Design Admins Tucson Electric Power |
||
| 07/03/2024 | NPPO | NOT REQUIRED | |||
| 07/03/2024 | Site Landscape | NOT REQUIRED | |||
| 07/11/2024 | CDRC Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 07/05/2024 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. Please include TD-DEV-0524-00161 on all sheets of the plan set. 2. There are callouts (numbers) on SP1.0 that do not have a corresponding note/detail. Please revise the callouts/notes/details for accuracy. 2. Waste stream calculations and refuse enclosures are required per TSM Section 8. Please provide waste stream calculations and enclosure specifications that account for the new/remodeled business. Environmental Services requires recycling capacity, so multiple enclosures may be required. Mike Ortiz michael.ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 07/09/2024 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Fernando L. García PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: TD-DEV-0524-00161 3959 N Oracle Rd, Tucson, AZ 85705 Development Package (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 8, 2024 DUE DATE: July 8, 2024 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year expiration date is May 28, 2025. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 - Provide the case number, TD-DEV-0524-00161, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 2-06.4.7.A.1 - List as a general note: "Existing zoning is ____." COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.1 – Indicate existing zoning as a general note. 2-06.4.7.A.2 - List the gross area of the site/subdivision by square footage and acreage. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.2 - List the gross area of the site/subdivision by square footage and acreage. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Identify the existing and proposed uses of the site. “Office/Cust” and “Workshop” are not uses recognized within the UDC. Based upon the descriptions provided in the submittal, the primary use of the overall site (including Caliber Collision and other tenants), permitted uses in an I-1 zone appears to be “shopping center” (UDC Section 11.3.9.C.3). The primary uses of the Caliber Collision portion of the site appear to be a combination of “trade service and repair: major (includes auto body shops/paint booths)” (UDC Section 11.3.4.X) and “commercial storage” (UDC Section 11.3.10.A), which includes vehicle storage. 2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6 – COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6 – This site fronts Roger Road to the north, which is part of the Major Streets and Routes Overlay. Include a note stating “this project is designed to meet the overlay zone(s) criteria. UDC Article 5.4 Major Streets and Routes Setback Zone (MS&R). 2-06.4.7.A.8.a - Floor area for each building; COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.a – On the cover sheet, indicate area dedicated to each separate use on the site plan, including for trade service and repair, commercial storage (including the exterior vehicle storage), restaurant (Lucky Wishbone), and any other tenants on site. The overall use of the site will be “shopping center”; this calculation should include the total of all of the individual uses, including the exterior vehicle storage. 2-06.4.7.A.8.b - Percentage and area in square feet of building and accessory building coverage; COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.b – Indicate site coverage for identified uses, including exterior vehicle storage area. 2-06.4.7.A.8.c - Percentage of building, lot area, or vehicular use area expansion. If the building(s) or lot area have been previously expanded, those calculations shall be included; and, COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.c – The new exterior vehicle storage area is considered an expansion of use since the parking area was previously for public use and not for commercial use. Include this expansion in site calculations on the next submittal. 2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – A reorientation of the parking area and/or fenced areas, including of the ornamental fence and vehicle storage area, may be necessary to address the comments below. Although a measurement is not provided, it appears that the fenced vehicle storage area constitutes an expansion of 25% or greater. If so, this constitutes a expansion in use per UDC Section 7.4.3. and parking, pedestrian circulation, and landscaping will need to meet current code requirements. Per UDC Table 7.4.4-1, the minimum number of motor vehicle spaces required for a shopping center is one space per 300 square feet of gross floor area. One of every twenty parking spaces must be ADA accessible. Minimum required electric vehicle supply equipment (EVSE) will be required. Per UDC Table 7.4.11-1, a shopping center also requires 5% of its parking spaces to be “EV Installed” and 10% to be “EV Capable”. Parking spaces that are not accessible to the public – including those within a fenced-in area – cannot count towards the minimum parking requirement. Seventy-seven parking spaces are shown behind access gates and cannot be counted towards the minimum parking requirement. Per UDC Section 7.4.6.F.4, a back-up spur must be provided at the end of a row of parking if no ingress or egress is provided at that end. No back-up spur is present for the parking spaces along the eastern edge of the parcel, including for the three isolated parking spaces in the southeastern corner. The parking area access lane (PAAL) along the eastern edge of the property effectively serves as a one-way PAAL since no adequate back-up spur exists at the end of the PAAL for a vehicle to turn around without the cantilevered gate being open (which cannot be guaranteed at any given time). The parking area pedestrian circulation plan depicted on the site plan does not currently meet the requirements of UDC Technical Standard Manual Section 7-01.4.1., including the requirement of sidewalks adjacent to PAALs and sidewalks which connect all areas of the development. Ensure resubmitted plan meets pedestrian circulation requirements. Per UDC Section 7.4.6.D.2.b., the westernmost of the three isolated parking spaces in the southeastern corner of the property must be ten feet in width given that it abuts a barrier (the vehicle storage fence). The applicant can request a reduction in the minimum parking requirement in accordance with UDC Section 7.4.5 (Reduction and Exceptions), including an Individual Parking Plan, and other modifications, or UDC Section 7.4.10 (Parking Design Modification Request). Per UDC Section 7.4.6.D.2.c., parallel parking spaces must be eight feet wide and 23 feet in length. Width of parallel parking spaces is not indicated on the site plan. Annotate width on next submittal. Per UDC Section 7.4.3.E, sites with an expansion of use of 25% or beyond need to provide short and long-term bicycle parking. Minimum required bicycle parking spaces can be determined from UDC Table 7.4.8-1. based upon the reassessed area of the shopping center, to include the vehicle storage. Revise motor vehicle, bicycle (short and long-term), and EV parking space calculations on the cover sheet on next submittal. Include required number of spaces for use. If proposed number of spaces differs from the requirement, also indicate the proposed or requested number of spaces and how any requested reduction will be addressed, including through any separate application or request. COMMENT: Please also include landscape plans submitted as part of commercial building permit TC-COM-0624-01117 with this submittal. If the inclusion of the vehicle storage area results in an expansion of 25% or more from the existing commercial use area (the building), landscaping and screening will need to meet current code requirements as stated in UDC Section 7.6, including landscape buffers and the provision of canopy trees within the parking area. ***For additional information on the any standard presented in this memo, please refer to the City of Tucson “Unified Development Code” – Administrative Manual Section 2-06 or Technical Standards noted in the comments. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/all-codes-plans-determinations If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact Fernando García by email fernando.garcia2@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package and comment response letter. To resubmit visit Tucson Development Center at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home. Instructions for resubmittal - https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/website/Resubmittals.pdf. |
||
| 05/30/2024 | CDRC Application Completeness | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 06/06/2024 | CDRC Review Coordinator | REVIEW COMPLETED | Review request email sent per ADOT and TEP. CDRC sent FYI email to PAG, USPS, SWG. | ||
| 06/12/2024 | External Reviewers - Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) | REVIEW COMPLETED | Good Afternoon, ADOT has reviewed this DEV, and has the following comments; From review of the Site Plan, ADOT has no comments. Should work within the SR 77 (Oracle Road) R/W be necessary, an ADOT Encroachment Permit will be required and can be submitted to southcentralpermit@azdot.gov |
||
| 06/06/2024 | External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required from the customer at this time. | ||
| 06/06/2024 | External Reviewers - Southwest Gas | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required from the customer at this time. | ||
| 06/06/2024 | External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required from the customer at this time. | ||
| 07/01/2024 | Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 06/04/2024 | OK to Submit - Engineering | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 06/05/2024 | OK to Submit - Landscape | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 06/03/2024 | OK to Submit - Zoning | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 07/08/2024 | ROW Engineering Review | REVIEW COMPLETED | Any pavement repairs that extend into the public ROW will require a Right-of-Way Permit. |