Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: TD-DEV-0524-00150
Parcel: Unknown

Address: Unknown

Review Status: Requires Resubmit

Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2

Permit Number - TD-DEV-0524-00150
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
08/26/2024 CDRC Post Review Express PENDING ASSIGNMENT
08/01/2024 Commercial Plumbing REQUIRES RESUBMIT 1. Verify the need for backwater valves for lots 2, 3, 4, 7, 20,.25, 26, 27, 28, 32, 33, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39 40, 41, 42, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, and 53. No fixtures located more than 12” above the rim elevation of the next upstream manhole may discharge through a backwater valve. Reference: Section 714.1, IPC 2018.
2. Verify the need for a backwater valve for lot 19. The FFE appears to be lower than the rim elevation of the upstream manhole. Reference: Section 714.1, IPC 2018.
08/05/2024 External Reviewers - Pima County Addressing REQUIRES RESUBMIT Good afternoon, Pima County Addressing is returning TD-DEV-0524-00150 for corrections. Please see the attached plan for comments. Nicholas Jordan Site Review Project Manager II – Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-9623
07/31/2024 Fire New Construction REQUIRES RESUBMIT Update plan to include the location of new and existing hydrants, spaced in accordance with the requirements of the 2018 IFC, 507.5.1.
Questions: patricia.shelton@tucsonaz.gov
08/06/2024 NPPO REQUIRES RESUBMIT Please see Site Landscape comments for NPPO requirements.
Thank you.

Chad Keller, RLA
chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov
07/24/2024 ROW Engineering Review REQUIRES RESUBMIT TD-DEV-0524-00150

1. The pedestrian circulation path including the curb access ramp, along Escalante Rd will need to be brought into compliance with Technical Standards Manual (TSM) Sec. 10-01.4.0 in accordance with TSM Sec. 10-01.3.3.

2. The lateral offset and lateral transition of the sidewalk at the SW corner of Escalante Rd and Evergreen Ave and at the proposed driveway on Escalante Rd exceed the maximum allowable allowed. Reference TSM Sec. 10-01.3.3.10.D1.c&d.



3. Revise Construction Keynote #39 to include P.I.A. plan number.

If you have any questions, please contact Richard Leigh. at 520-403-0970 or at arnold.leigh@tucsonaz.gov
08/08/2024 Site Engineering REQUIRES RESUBMIT 1. Page 7 of the drainage report states that “the impervious cover has been estimated to be between 30 and 15 percent for residential development” but the calculations use 70-75% impervious cover, which is more appropriate for the proposed development. Please revise this statement.
2. Please provide a typical AC Pavement detail showing 4" Minimum ABC & 3" AC per page 11 of the geotechnical report.
3. Sidewalk intersections and ramps should have 5'x5' landings. Please show this on plans. Relocate truncated domes as appropriate such as in detail 2 of sheet 3.
4. Identify handrail on sidewalk details such as detail 1 on sheet 7.
5. Detail 9 on sheet 15 appears to discharge across public sidewalk. Either provide scupper or contact DTM regarding direct discharge into catch basin.
6. Provide a typical detail showing pedestrian circulation to front of SFR's. Stairs or steps, handrails, etc.
7. Provide drainage details where circulation is above the Pad grade. Positive drainage required away from foundation.
8. Truncated Domes/warning device shall extend to backside of flush curb.
9. Please provide striping at all pedestrian crossings.
10. Sheet 3 has stars next to transformers on lots 19 & 39. Identify these keynotes.
11. Provide invert and weir elevations for all basins.
12. Provide utility trench details and compaction plan. Separate utility permits required.
13. Provide grading details per geotechnical report. Will complete pad be compacted engineered fill or just the developed area (this will require additional information on the site plans)
14. Provide basin note to prevent compaction of basin bottom, or over excavation and back filling to comply with drainage requirements. This may be modified based on post rough-grading percolation tests per notes.
Joshua Garcia
joshua.garcia@tucsonaz.gov
08/06/2024 Site Landscape REQUIRES RESUBMIT CDRC TRANSMITTAL
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
REVIEWER: CHAD KELLER, RLA
PDSD SITE LANDSCAPE/NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION SECTION

PROJECT: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE FOR A 53 LOT FLD SUBDIVISION WITH PUBLIC SEWER AND PRIVATE ROADS
ACTIVITY NO: TD-DEV-0524-00150
PARCEL: 13628005L
ZONING: SR SUBURBAN RANCH ZONE

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants, and water harvesting.

Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape/NPPO Review Section comments are addressed.

SITE LANDSCAPE/NPPO SECTION COMMENTS:
1. Ensure that Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to landscape section approval.

2. UDC 2-10.4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data - All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan.

3. Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0524-00150, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.3

4. Please identify the site monitor and list contact information on the NPPO.

5. Water harvesting techniques shall be incorporated as part of the landscape design based on the Water Harvesting Guidance Manual prepared for the City of Tucson Transportation Department Stormwater Section. See UDC 8.7.3.H.4. Depressed planting areas at 6 to 9 inches, along with coordination and reference to the civil grading plan for details and construction will meet the intent of the above-mentioned code.

6. Label the project property lines on all boundaries on all landscape sheets.

7. Irrigation sleeves are shown. Please add the shrub and tree lateral lines on the plan, or provide an explanation for not showing the irrigation lines on the plan.

If you have any questions about these comments, I can be reached at chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov
07/29/2024 Site Zoning REQUIRES RESUBMIT PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: PDSD Zoning Review

PROJECT: Evergreen Lots 1 - 53
Development Package (1st Review)
TD-DEV-0524-00150

TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 29, 2024

DUE DATE: July 28, 2024

COMMENTS: Resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is July 04, 2025.

2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS

1. COMMENT: 2-06.3.8 – The north arrows shown on sheet 9 are not correct.

2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0524-00150, adjacent to the title block on all sheets.

3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Remove the reference to C09-06-18 as this rezoning case has expired.

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.1 – The existing zoning listed under Zoning and Land Use Note 1 is not correct and should be SR.

5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.3 – Revise Zoning and Land Use Note 1 to include “PROPOSED ZONING IS R-2”.

2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:

6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.b – The site coverage calculation does not appear to be correct. Per UDC Article 6.4.3.B.3.a the proposed SFR’s are included in the site coverage.

2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions
2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.4 - As the proposed internal streets do not meet of the design requirements of TSM Section 10 a Technical Standards Modification Request (TSMR) will need to be submitted and approved for the following:
a. Width.
b. Sidewalks
c. Vehicle parking backing directly out into the ROW.

8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.4 – Clarify what General Note 20 is for. TSMR DS20-14 is for a site at 5949 E. 29th St.

9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.4 – Demonstrate how vehicles parking at the east end of Emerald Green Dr. will be able to turn around within the ROW.

10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - As you are proposing a back-up spur at the south end of Mint Green Dr. and there is a propose obstruction over six inches in height demonstrate how the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.H.4.a are met.

11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.L - At the northwest corner of the site the sidewalk shown along Evergreen Ave. runs onto this subdivision. An access easement is required.

2-06.5.0 FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS)

12. COMMENT: 2-06.5.2.B – Show the maximum developable area of each lot (i.e., building footprint).

2-06.5.3 Additional Information
The following are required in addition to the requirements of the tentative plat or site plan, whichever is applicable:

13. COMMENT: 2-06.5.3.C – The areas on the plan labeled as Functional Open space where there is only a sidewalk and nothing else, Functional Open Area 1, 2, part of 4 & 5, 6, 7, 8 & 9 do not meet the definition of functional open space, UDC Article 11.4.7, and cannot count toward the required square footage.

14. COMMENT: 2-06.5.3.D – Provide dimensioned building elevations of all proposed units. The elevations can be preliminary drawings.

15. COMMENT: 2-06.5.3.G.2 - Provide two copies of the protective covenants or common use agreements for any shared areas being established by easements over individually-owned property.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Martell at Nicholas.Martell@tucsonaz.gov.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: A revised development package as well as a comment response letter. To resubmit, visit the Tucson Development Center Online at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home. The instructions for resubmittal can be found at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/tdc-faq/new-pdfs/revisions-and-resubmittals.pdf.
06/27/2024 CDRC Application Completeness Express REVIEW COMPLETED
07/05/2024 CDRC Review Coordinator Express REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC added Addressing, TEP, PAG, USPS, SWG to the workflow. Review request email sent to Addressing, and TEP. FYI email to PAG, USPS, SWG.
07/05/2024 External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required.
07/05/2024 External Reviewers - Southwest Gas REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required.
08/26/2024 External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) REVIEW COMPLETED Tucson Electric Power Co. (TEP) has reviewed the plans submitted on July 5, 2024, and has no objections. The customer is responsible for compliance with City Ordinances. Please note a jurisdictional permit for any work on a public road right of way where applicable. Easements are required for TEP facilities if not appropriately recorded on the final plat. They will need to be obtained by a separate instrument.
07/05/2024 External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required.
07/05/2024 OK to Submit - Zoning Fast REVIEW COMPLETED