Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: TD-DEV-0524-00143
Parcel: 13323164A

Review Status: Requires Resubmit

Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2

Permit Number - TD-DEV-0524-00143
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
06/06/2024 External Reviewers - COT Parks & Recreation APPROVED Approved
TD-DEV-0524-00143
Address: (7150 E SPEEDWAY BL TUCSON, AZ 85710) City of Tucson Parks and Recreation has no additional requirements for the Development Plan.
Regards,
Joe Barr
Project Manager
Tucson Parks and Recreation
06/28/2024 External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) APPROVED June 28, 2024
WO#T117727
City of Tucson
Planning and Development
Attn: CDRC Admin Team
Dear CDRC Admin Team
Subject: WALMART- 7150 E SPEEDWAY BLVD, GSTA- LINE EXT
TD-DEV-0524-00143
Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed and approved the development
plan submitted 6/5/2024. There are no existing facilities within the development and
therefor are no apparent conflicts at this time.
Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the
existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer.
To apply for electric service, please call the New Construction department at (520) 918-
8300. Please submit a final set of plans including approved site, electric load, paving
off-site improvements and irrigation plans. If available, include a PDF version of the
plans.
If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Should you
have any easement questions, please contact our Land Resources Department,
LandReviews@tep.com.
Should you have any technical questions, please contact the area designer,
Andres Martinez
(520) 349-0377
amartinez@tep.com
Sincerely,
Design Admins
Design Admins
Tucson Electric Power
06/28/2024 NPPO APPROVED
07/02/2024 CDRC Post Review PENDING ASSIGNMENT
07/02/2024 Commercial Plumbing REQUIRES RESUBMIT The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (2540.66’) is more than 12”below the first floor elevation (2544.25). A backwater valve shall not be installed per Section 714.1, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson.
06/27/2024 Site Engineering REQUIRES RESUBMIT Tucson codes and ordinances can be found online at https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/overview
The Design Standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention manual can be found online at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/updated-retention-detention-manual.pdf
TD-DEV-0524-00143
1. Show that sidewalks in front of parking spaces maintain a minimum 4 foot unobstructed width per TSM 7-01.4.3 A. The parking spots must have wheel stops or the sidewalk must be 6.5 feet in total width to ensure that vehicles do not obstruct the 4 foot width.
2. Provide a detail for the proposed trash enclosure on the plan set provided with this submittal. The detail must show trash enclosure compliance with TSM 8-01.5.2.
3. Show locations of roof downspouts. Stormwater from roof drains may not pass over ADA sidewalks per TSM 7-01.4.3D.

Lianne Evans
lianne.evans@tucsonaz.gov
06/28/2024 Site Landscape REQUIRES RESUBMIT CDRC TRANSMITTAL
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
REVIEWER: CHAD KELLER, RLA
PDSD SITE LANDSCAPE/NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION SECTION

PROJECT: NEW FUEL STATION WITH 10 FUELING POSITIONS AND A 1,440 S.F. CONVENIENCE STORE WITHIN THE EXISTING PARKING LOT OF A WALMART SUPERCENTER
ACTIVITY NO: TD-DEV-0524-00143
ADDRESS/PARCEL: 7150 E SPEEDWAY BL/13323164A
ZONING: PAD-3 GATEWAY CENTER PAD

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants, and water harvesting.

Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape/NPPO Review Section comments are addressed.

SITE LANDSCAPE/NPPO SECTION COMMENTS:

1. Ensure that Zoning, Engineering comments and concerns are addressed prior to landscape section approval.

2. Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0524-00143, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.3

3. Adjust the location of the AZ 811 on sheet 16 of 21.

4. Include a construction detail showing root barriers for trees located near hardscape areas. (see Detail 402 located here: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Transportation-Mobility/Landscape/Landscape-Architects

5. Do subwatershed #3, #4, #5 and #6 flow to the storm drain and move off site? Is there any opportunity to incorporate this drainage into the north and east large landscape areas on site? Add a note that explains what is happening with the excess storm drainage from SW 3, 4, 5, and 6, and refer to the civil plans for reference.

6. Add additional leader call outs to the north and east bordering landscape areas on the planting plan if the intentions is to preserve all of the plants in place.

If you have any questions about these comments, I can be reached at chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov
06/21/2024 Site Zoning REQUIRES RESUBMIT PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: PDSD Zoning Review

PROJECT: Walmart Store #1291 – Fuel Station
Development Package (1st Review)
TD-DEV-0524-00143

TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 21, 2024

DUE DATE: June 30, 2024

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is June 3, 2025.

2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS

1. COMMENT: 2-06.3.12 – The Sheet Index does not appear to be correct. There are only 21 sheets listed in the index but 28 sheets were submitted.

2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1 – Provide email address for all listed under the Project Team.

3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.D – The total number of sheets 21 listed on all sheets is not correct, see comment 1. Page 25 does not have the total number of sheets. Also, provide the page number on sheets 22 – 28.

4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0524-00143, adjacent to the title block on all sheets.

5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.6 – As the proposed site is located within PAD-3 include a reduced-scale map of the PAD on the first sheet, indicating the location of the portion being developed.

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – Remove the reference to “AIRPORT ENIVIRONS (DAVIS MONTAN AIR FORCE BASE VINCINTY) PER UDC 5.6” as the “VICINITY “ is not part of the AEZ requirements.

2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:

7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.b – Per PAD-3 Development Standard Section D.1.c.(2), pg. IC-37, provide a Floor Area Ration that meets the requirements of UDC Article 6.4.6.

8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.b – Per PAD-3 Development Standard Section D.1.c.(3), pg. IC-37, provide a Building Coverage calculation.

9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.c – Provide a building area expansion calculation on the plan. This calculation is cumulative and shall include the building addition shown on DP21-0112.

2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions
The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided.

10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.B – Show all existing easements on the plan along with the recordation information.

11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C – Provide the following information for both Speedway and Finance Center Dr., right-of-way width, dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.A – Sheet C4.1 shows lines with distance and bearing that appear to divide the parcel into 4 pieces. Clarify what these lines are and what this sheet is for.

13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined.

14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The vehicle parking space calculation is not correct. Per PAD-3 Development Standard Section D.1.c.(4), pg. IC-37 the parking is per LUC section 3.3.0. As the LUC is not longer applicable it would be per UDC Table 7.4.4-1.

15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Provide a parking space width dimension for the space directly east of the proposed long-term bicycle parking.

16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The accessible parking space sign mounting height is not correct and should be listed as 60” if wall mounted and 84” if with a pedestrian way.

17. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – The short- & long-term bicycle parking calculation is not correct. The calculation shall include the entire site and show the number of required and provided.

18. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Provide a detail for both the short- and long-term bicycle parking that clearly demonstrates how the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9 are met.

19. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Provide perimeter yard setback dimensions on the plan. Until comment ## is addressed Zoning cannot determine setback requirements.

20. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Provide the height and square footage of the proposed building and canopy within the footprint.

21. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Clearly demonstrate that the requirements of TSM Section 7-01.4.1.A is met. At least one sidewalk is required to a project from each street on which the project has frontage, unless there is no vehicular access from a street because of a physical barrier, such as a drainageway or an unbroken security barrier (e.g., a wall or fence). The sidewalk should be located to minimize any conflict with vehicular access to the project. Zoning may consider using the sidewalk connection show out to the Speedway sidewalk and using the sidewalks in the ROWs to meet this requirement. A Technical Standard Modification Request (TSMR) would be required Prior to submittal of the TSMR contact Nicholas Ross at (520) 837-4029 or email Nicholas.Ross@tucsonaz.gov. to determine if he can support this request.

22. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Clearly demonstrate that the requirements of TSM Section 7-01.4.1.A is met. The sidewalk must connect the proposed building to the existing building. Zoning may consider using the sidewalk connection show out to the Speedway sidewalk and using the sidewalks in the ROWs to meet this requirement. A Technical Standard Modification Request (TSMR) would be required Prior to submittal of the TSMR contact Nicholas Ross at (520) 837-4029 or email Nicholas.Ross@tucsonaz.gov. to determine if he can support this request.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Martell at Nicholas.Martell@tucsonaz.gov.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: A revised development package as well as a comment response letter. To resubmit, visit the Tucson Development Center Online at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home. The instructions for resubmittal can be found at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/tdc-faq/new-pdfs/revisions-and-resubmittals.pdf.
06/28/2024 Traffic Engineering Review REQUIRES RESUBMIT Based on the ITE Trip Generation Manual, more than 100 new peak hour trips are anticipated with a new 10 fueling position gas station/convenience store (in both the AM and PM peak hours). Based on exceeding this threshold, a Traffic Impact Analysis should be produced, as per the COT Access Management Guidelines. The TIA should prove that the existing roadway network can accommodate for the new traffic generated and/or make recommendations of improvements needed to accommodate for the development's traffic. A significant portion of new trips may occur as pass-by trips, which could lower the NEW peak hour generation from the development. However, this will need to be documented in at least a traffic memorandum in support of the project.
05/30/2024 CDRC Application Completeness REVIEW COMPLETED
06/05/2024 CDRC Review Coordinator REVIEW COMPLETED
06/26/2024 Entitlements REVIEW COMPLETED Conforms to land use standards for Development Area 1a, PAD-3 page IX-37
06/05/2024 External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments REVIEW COMPLETED Per SOP, FYI email has been sent.
06/05/2024 External Reviewers - Southwest Gas REVIEW COMPLETED Per SOP, FYI email has been sent.
06/05/2024 External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) REVIEW COMPLETED Per SOP, FYI email has been sent.
06/21/2024 Fire New Construction REVIEW COMPLETED Separate permits required for:
- Underground storage tank (fire construction permit)
- Flammable and combustible liquids (operational permit)
Contact inspector Jesus Silva - 520.837.7094 / jesus.silva@tucsonaz.gov
06/04/2024 OK to Submit - Engineering REVIEW COMPLETED
06/28/2024 ROW Engineering Review REVIEW COMPLETED Add general note: ROW permit required prior to working in the ROW.
Label "Finance Center Dr" as a private roadway.