Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: TD-DEV-0523-00256
Parcel: 138244260

Review Status: Requires Resubmit

Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2

Permit Number - TD-DEV-0523-00256
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
10/17/2023 Commercial Plumbing APPROVED
10/13/2023 External Reviewers - Tucson Airport Authority APPROVED October 11, 2023
Planning and Development Services
City of Tucson
201 North Stone Avenue
Tucson, AZ. 85701
RE: TD-DEV-0523-00256, 3.161 acre self-storage development/ 6555 S Midvale Park Rd,
Tucson, AZ 85746, Received September 26, 2023
To whom this may concern,
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on TD-DEV-0523-00256, the development plan for a
self-storage development at 6555 S Midvale Park Rd. This development is located in the N.E.
quarter of the N.E. quarter of Section 15, Township 15S, Range 13E, of the Gila and Salt River
Meridian. The development site occupies parcel number 138-24-4260, covers approximately
3.16 ± acres, and is zoned as Commercial Zone 2 (C-2). The nearest major roadway
intersection is West Commerce Court and South Midvale Park Road, approximately 75 feet to
the southwest of the subject development.
This site does lie within the Tucson International Airport avigation easement requirements and
public disclosure area, FAA traffic pattern airspace, and FAA Part 77 airspace.
The Tucson Airport Authority approves the proposed project and is not requiring a resubmit of
this project.
Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this
comment letter. I can be reached by email at srobidoux@flytucson.com or by telephone at 520-
573-4811.
Respectfully,
Scott Robidoux, C.M.
Manager of Planning
10/18/2023 NPPO APPROVED
10/18/2023 CDRC Post Review PENDING ASSIGNMENT
10/18/2023 External Reviewers - Pima County Addressing REQUIRES RESUBMIT Good afternoon,
Pima County Addressing is returning TD-DEV-0523-00256 DP for Storage 365 for corrections. Please see the attached plan for corrections.
Thank you
Nicholas Jordan
Site Review Project Manager – Addressing Official
Pima County Development Services Department
201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor
Tucson, AZ 85701
(520) 724-9623
09/28/2023 Fire New Construction REQUIRES RESUBMIT -Provide measurements from hydrants to furthest portions of every building. Measurements shall be as the hose lays and not a straight line. Shall comply with IFC 507.5. 600' max for the sprinklered building and 400' max to the unsprinklered buildings.
-Provide the building type of construction. This will determine the required fire flow and required number of fire hydrants. IFC Table B105.1(2)
john.vincent@tucsonaz.gov
5203495581
10/16/2023 Site Engineering REQUIRES RESUBMIT Tucson codes and ordinances can be found online at https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/overview
The Design Standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention manual can be found online at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/updated-retention-detention-manual.pdf
TD-DEV-0523-00256
1. The drainage report says that on the north side of the property the drainage will be directed to a dry well. The site plan shows an inlet or an outlet to an underground water storage unit labeled dry well. Please clarify whether this structure is a dry well that the underground water storage is draining to. See also Section 4.19 of the Design Standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention for requirements for dry wells and contact Stephen Blood at Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov for approval for the dry well. Provide his approval email with the next submittal
2. The drainage report indicates that peak discharge for the site increases with development. The rezoning of the site requires that detention onsite be designed so that the 2-, 10-, and 100-year event peak discharges are reduced by 15% post-development when compared to pre-development. Revise the drainage design to include more retention and detention.
3. The City of Tucson does not practice 5-year threshold retention. The City of Tucson practices retaining the first 0.5 inches of every rainfall event. Please see section 2 of the DSSDR and provide tables similar to Tables 2.2 and 2.3 to show that first flush requirements are being calculated and met correctly.
4. The drainage report says the retention volume is retained in the dry well. If the dry well is the outlet of the proposed underground water storage, the DSSDR section 4.13.2.3 (COT edit) prohibits the use of underground water retention as first flush retention. All first flush retention must be satisfied by aboveground basins. As a note, the conditions of rezoning require that the site provide an additional 50% of the retention volume required by the DSSDR.
5. Provide the hydrograph data and peak discharge output pages from generating the data in Table 1 in the appendices of the drainage report.
6. There is proposed underground water storage. Please see section 4.13 of the DSSDR for requirements for underground water storage. Some important requirements include: underground storage systems shall provide 1.5 times the required 100-year detention volume (4.13.1.4); a separate covenant which specifies inspection and maintenance responsibilities shall be recorded when a project includes an underground storage system (4.13.1.7). Contact Stephen Blood for approval of the system. Include his approval email in your next submittal.
7. Maximize water harvesting to landscaped areas by providing curb cuts or flush curbs. Show the curb cuts on the site plan.
8. Provide waste stream calculations compliant with TSM 8-01.8.
9. Provide pedestrian complete pedestrian circulation, including to the dumpster enclosure and to all street frontages, compliant with TSM 7-01.3.3.
10. Provide a fully dimensioned detail of the proposed double dumpster enclosure.
11. Show the location of roof downspouts. Stormwater from roof drains may not pass over ADA sidewalks per TSM 7-01.4.3D.

Lianne Evans
lianne.evans@tucsonaz.gov
10/18/2023 Site Landscape REQUIRES RESUBMIT ACTIVITY NO. TD-DEV-0523-00256
PROJECT: STORAGE 365 – MIDVALE PARK
ADDRESS/PARCEL: 6555 S MIDVALE PARK RD/138-24-4260
ZONING: O-3

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants, and water harvesting.
Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape/NPPO Review Section comments are addressed.

COMMENTS:
1. Ensure that Zoning, Engineering comments, and concerns are addressed before landscape section approval.
2. Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0523-00256, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.3
3. Label all site visibility triangles & ROWs on all sheets.
4. DTM approval is required for any planting or irrigation in the ROW before the approval of the development package. Reach out to David Marhefka (David.marhefka@tucsonaz.gov) , if necessary for this project
5. Add a construction detail showing planting in the WHIAs.

If you have any questions about these comments, I can be reached at Matthew.Carlton@tucsonaz.gov or 520-837-4988
10/09/2023 Site Zoning REQUIRES RESUBMIT PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: PDSD Zoning Review

PROJECT: Storage 365 – Midvale Park
Development Package (1st Review)
TD-DEV-0523-00256

TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 9, 2023

DUE DATE: October 14, 2023

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is September 20, 2024.

2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS

1. COMMENT: 2-06.3.12 – The sheet index shall include all sheets submitted in the development package, to include the landscapes plans.

CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.D – The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx) shall include all pages submitted.

3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0523-00256, adjacent to the title block on all sheets.

4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.C – Label the section corners within the location map.

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.1 – The existing zoning listed under General Construction Note 1 is not correct and should be O-3.

6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.2 -

7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.3 – Provide a note on the plan stating proposed zoning is C-2.

8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.3 – Provide all conditions of rezoning on the plan.

9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.3 – Provide the rezoning case number, TP-ENT-1222-00009, adjacent to the title block on all sheets.

2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:

2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions
The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided.

10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.B – Per the OTB – Midvale & Valencia final plat found at: https://onbase.pima.gov/publicaccess/DS_NextGen_Single/etc/cq/results.html?cqid=240&OBKey__138_1=20221990768, there is a 15’ Public Water Easement that runs along the north property line. Show this easement on the plan.

11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.B – The existing Access Easement that runs on the property to the north does not appear to extend all the way south to the property line. Clarify that the easement extends all the way to the property or a new easement may be required.

12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C – Provide the following information for both Midvale Park Rd. & Commerce Court, right-of-way width, dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined.

14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Provide an access lane width from the northeast corner of Building D north to Building C.

15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Provide an access lane width from the northeast corner of Building A north to Building B.

16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Provide an access lane width from Building B south to what appears to be either curb or sidewalk near the proposed access gate.

17. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Clearly demonstrate that the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.F.2.b are met from the access lane to the EX. WALL shown along the east side of the access lane that runs along the east side of Building A.

18. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Once comment 29 is addressed provide PAAL and access lane width dimensions.

19. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Provide a vehicle parking spaces calculation. This calculation shall include the number required and provided along with the ratio used and the number of accessible spaces required and provided along with number of required and provided van accessible spaces.

20. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Provide a fully dimensioned detail for both standard parking spaces and accessible parking spaces.

21. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Provide a mounting height for the accessible sign.

22. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Provide a wheel stop location dimension for the proposed wheel stops, see UDC Article 7.4.6.H.3.

23. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.c – Provide a loading space calculation that includes the number required and provided along with the type.

24. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.c – Fully dimension the proposed loading spaces.

25. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Provide a short- bicycle parking spaces calculation that includes the number required and provided.

26. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Provide a short-term bicycle parking space detail that clearly shows how all requirements of UDC Articles 7.4.9.B & .C are met.

27. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Provide a perimeter yard setback dimension from the northwest corner of Building A west to the street property line.

28. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Provide the height within the footprint for all buildings.

29. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Per TSM Section 7-01.4.1.B A sidewalk is required adjacent and parallel to any access lane or PAAL on the side where buildings are located. Clearly show the required sidewalk around Building A.

30. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Clearly demonstrate how access from the accessible access aisle to the sidewalk is provided.

31. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.U - Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of rezoning.

32. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Also provide a general note stating all signs require separate permits.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Martell at Nicholas.Martell@tucsonaz.gov.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package & detailed response letter.
09/14/2023 CDRC Application Completeness REVIEW COMPLETED
09/26/2023 CDRC Review Coordinator REVIEW COMPLETED Addressing review required, review request email sent per ADOT, TAA. FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG & TEP
10/13/2023 External Reviewers - Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) REVIEW COMPLETED [EXTERNAL] Re: DUE OCT 14TH, 2023 / 3.161 ACRE SELF-STORAGE DEVELOPMENT / TD-DEV-0523-00256

Jay Gomes
CDRC
Good Morning,

ADOT has no comments on this DEV.

Thank you for the opportunity to review.
09/26/2023 External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments REVIEW COMPLETED FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG & TEP
09/26/2023 External Reviewers - Southwest Gas REVIEW COMPLETED FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG & TEP
09/26/2023 External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) REVIEW COMPLETED FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG & TEP
09/26/2023 External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) REVIEW COMPLETED FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG & TEP
09/15/2023 OK to Submit - Engineering REVIEW COMPLETED
09/20/2023 OK to Submit - Landscape REVIEW COMPLETED
09/21/2023 OK to Submit - Zoning REVIEW COMPLETED
10/17/2023 Traffic Engineering Review REVIEW COMPLETED No Comments

David Stiffey

David.Stiffey@tucsonaz.gov