Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0523-00250
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/28/2023 | Commercial Plumbing | APPROVED | |||
| 07/14/2023 | External Reviewers - Pima County Addressing | APPROVED | [EXTERNAL] Approval TD-DEV-0523-00250 3820 East Fort Lowell Road Nicholas Jordan CDRC Theresa Hadley <thadley@rickengineering.com>;Blake Junak <bjunak@rickengineering.com> Good morning, Pima County Addressing approves TD-DEV-0523-00250 3820 East Fort Lowell Road. Please provide floor plans with proposed unit addressing if you wish to have units issued as part of this project. Since the address does not correspond with the primary access street, a Corner Lot Address Exception is required. Nicholas Jordan Site Review Project Manager - Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-9623 |
||
| 05/30/2023 | Site Landscape | APPROVED | |||
| 05/30/2023 | NPPO | NOT REQUIRED | |||
| 06/27/2023 | Traffic Engineering Review | NOT REQUIRED | |||
| 07/14/2023 | CDRC Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 06/16/2023 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. Pending PDMR approval for 22' PAAL width 2. Show 3' dimension for backup spur (UDC 7.4.6) 3. Delineate existing and future R.O.W for Fort Lowell 4. Addend "8.33% max running slope" or similar to keynote 28 Scott Haseman scott.haseman@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 06/07/2023 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Development Package (1st Review) TD-DEV-0523-00250 TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 11, 2023 DUE DATE: May 11, 2023 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is , 2024. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0523-00250, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – The plan show a PAAL width of 22’, General Note 27. 1) shows the PAAL width at 22.8’ and the PDMR Application is asking for a PAAL width reduction to 22’. Per UDC Article 7.4.10.D.10 the maximum reduction is 5% or 1.2’. The 22’ wide PAAL requires a Board of Adjustment for Variance. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - General Note 27 also shows two other requests, one for parking stall length and a reduction in number of vehicle parking spaces. It doesn’t appear that these request are needed, clarify. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The accessible parking space sign shown for the western most accessible parking space encroaches into the 2’-6” vehicle overhang on both the plan and detail. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – The short-term bicycle parking calculation is not correct. You show 2*0.1 and it should be 14*0.1. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – The long-term bicycle parking calculation is not correct. You show 0.5*12 and it should be 14*0.5. Also the number required should be 7. Under Long-term provided you list 9 SPACE* and then “*ONE LONG-TERM SPACE IS PROVIDED WITHIN EACH UNIT” but there are only 8 units. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Martell at Nicholas.Martell@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package & detailed response letter. |
||
| 06/27/2023 | Traffic Engineering Review | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | TD-DEV-0523-00250 (3820 E FORT LOWELL RD TUCSON, AZ 85716) Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter which states how all comments were addressed. Comments: 1. Please show the future ROW on the Site Plan. 2. MS&R Plan Policy 2.A.5 & COTC 26-10 – Required vehicle, drainage, and landscape features cannot be located in the future right-of-way. 3. TSM 10-01.3.3.D.1.d – Where the sidewalk along N. Winstel Bl meets the new curb access ramp on the corner of N. Winstel and E Fort Lowell, ensure that the sidewalk jogs laterally at a max slope of 3:1, longitudinal to lateral. See P. A. G. SD 207 for an illustration. 4. On the site plan, please add call out #19 (ramp per PAG SD 207) to the new ramp south of the dumpsters. 5. TSM 10-01.5.2.2 - Far side SVT for the building entrance on N Winstel Bl intersects with the southern most trash enclosure. As N Winstel Bl is a neighborhood/local street and has parking on both sides of the street, you can fix this by moving the SVT to the edge of the travel lane (8’ west from Face of Curb). 6. SDG 5-10 - The SDG recommends a 20’ curb radius for the corner of E Fort Lowell and N Winstel Bl. Smaller curb radiuses decrease pedestrian crossing distances and increase pedestrian comfort. Please consider making this a 20’ curb radius. Faffs Riederer Faffs.Riederer@tucsonaz.gov Abbreviations: City of Tucson Code (COTC), Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM), Technical Standards Manual (TSM), Street Design Guide (SDG), Pima Association of Governments Standard Details (P. A. G. SD), Access Management Guidelines (AMG), Major Streets and Routes Plan (MS&R). |
||
| 06/23/2023 | TSMR/PDMR - Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | A reduction of a PAAL width greater than 5% is not permitted for multifamily projects greater than 5 units. | ||
| 05/22/2023 | CDRC Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 05/26/2023 | CDRC Review Coordinator Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 06/05/2023 | External Reviewers - COT Parks & Recreation | REVIEW COMPLETED | Hello CDRC team, On behalf of the City of Tucson Parks and Recreation Department, I have no comments on the above development plan. Tom Fisher Project Manager City of Tucson Parks and Recreation Department 900 S. Randolph Way Tucson, Arizona 85716 (520) 837-8037 |
||
| 05/26/2023 | External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments | REVIEW COMPLETED | Sent FYI email per SOP | ||
| 05/26/2023 | External Reviewers - Southwest Gas | REVIEW COMPLETED | Sent FYI email per SOP | ||
| 05/26/2023 | External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) | REVIEW COMPLETED | Sent FYI email per SOP | ||
| 05/26/2023 | External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) | REVIEW COMPLETED | Sent FYI email per SOP | ||
| 06/12/2023 | Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 05/22/2023 | OK to Submit - Engineering Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 05/23/2023 | OK to Submit - Landscape Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 05/26/2023 | OK to Submit - Zoning Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 06/22/2023 | TSMR/PDMR - Engineering | REVIEW COMPLETED |