Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.1
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0523-00242
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/21/2023 | Commercial Plumbing | APPROVED | |||
| 07/13/2023 | External Reviewers - Pima County Addressing | APPROVED | [EXTERNAL] Approval TD-DEV-0523-00242 Nicholas Jordan CDRC kletendre@psomas.com Good morning, Pima County Addressing approves TD-DEV-0523-00242. If you wish to have units assigned as part of this project please provide floor plans with proposed unit addressing. Nicholas Jordan Site Review Project Manager - Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-9623 |
||
| 05/24/2023 | NPPO | APPROVED | |||
| 07/26/2023 | CDRC Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 05/21/2023 | Design Review | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Your property is within the boundaries of the Rio Nuevo Area (RNA) overlay zone, and will need to demonstrate compliance with the requirements of the RNA. Please submit a Special Districts application as a sub-record of this permit. Please see the Special District Application Instructions and the Rio Nuevo Area Design Review process guides for a complete list of requirements: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/forms/Special_Districts_Application_Instructions.pdf https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/Process_Handouts/RNA_Application_and_Review_Process.pdf If you have any questions and/or have submitted the Design Package for RNA review, please send me an email to maria.gayosso@tucsonaz.gov. Thank you. |
||
| 06/26/2023 | External Reviewers - Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Good Morning, ADOT Traffic Engineering has reviewed this DEV; especially the Traffic Impact Analysis and Development Site Plan, and has the following comments; - The Left-Out access from the development to Congress Street should not be allowed and restricted access may be provided. According to ADOT RDG Section 506, Right-in, Right-out access should only be provided after 660' from the return radius of the I10 Westbound Offramp / Frontage Road Intersection. Considering the property restraints, right-in and right-out may be considered. - It is recommended that the center median on the east side of the WB Offramp / Frontage Road & Congress intersection be extended to restrict the left-out movement from the proposed access point. - There are future plans to extend the EL Paso / Southwestern Greenway in this area, consideration should be made to determine how the crossing of Congress by this facility will interact with this proposed development and access. The TIA should discuss this item. - Secondary access to the east or south should be considered/required for site circulation and emergency access and discussed in the TIA. This should also assist improving the Level Of Service for the access to this parcel. In the Development Site Plan there is a stub-out for future access to the south, but it is not discussed in the TIA. Please feel free to contact me should you have any questions or concerns regarding these comments. |
||
| 06/20/2023 | External Reviewers - COT Environmental Services | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Hello, ES comments are as follows: Page 5, Site Plan: Indicates under key note 22, new dumpster enclosures (within bldg.) by separate plan. Must include detail description, within general notes, of proposed method of collection of service for both trash and recycle. TSM 8-01.1.0 & 8-01.8.0 No enclosure detail provided. Include detail drawings of enclosure with dimensions. TSM 8-01.4.A & 8-01.5.2 Depict 14’x40’ approach in front of enclosure area. TSM 8-01.5.3.B, and include turning radii for service vehicle maneuverability to and from enclosure area. TSM 8-01.5.3.E Feel free to contact if you have any questions regarding this review. Thanks, Andy Vera City of Tucson -Environmental Services Accounts Representative Supervisor (520) 837-3798 |
||
| 06/08/2023 | Fire New Construction | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Provide Aerial access in accordance with IFC 2018, D105. Hydrants shall be placed in accordance with IFC 2018, 507.5.1 & 507.5.1.1, current layout does not meet these requirements. Questions: patricia.shelton@tucsonaz.gov / 520.837.7082 |
||
| 06/15/2023 | Historic | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Proposed project is located within the Archaeological Sensitivity Zone and adjacent to an eligible site. Encroachment on to the parcel with the eligible site will require an archaeological monitor during any grading, trenching, digging. Disturbance of the historic tracks or alignment will also require mitigation. An archaeological consultant should be contracted through the city's Historic Preservation Office prior to the start of any work at the site. |
||
| 07/26/2023 | Real Estate | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Real Estate has the comment below. There is a M&C approved Master Plan for the EP&SW Greenway which appears in conflict with the project's design. The Greenway runs from Broadway to Granada. The Greenway team at the Dept. of Transportation & Mobility should approve the plan or request a revision to design. Please see Page 30 of the link below. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/living-and-working/parks-and-recreation/documents/masterplandocument_final_may2012.pdf Thank you, Phil Paige Senior Property Agent Real Estate Division Dept. Transportation and Mobility City of Tucson 520-342-4024 cell philip.paige@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 06/21/2023 | ROW Engineering Review | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | TD-DEV-0223-00242 471 W. Congress St. Comments: 1. Please provide the plan for the relocation of the bus stop. David Stiffey DTM Project Coordinator David.Stiffey@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 06/08/2023 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. Clarify if a lot split is being conducted South of the wash 2. The 20' PAAL east of the building needs to be marked as one-way, or widened to 24' for 2-way traffic (UDC 7.4.6) 3. Show points of roof drainage on site plan, ensure roof drainage up to the 10-yr storm is directed away from/under adjacent sidewalks through the use of gutters/scuppers (TSM 7-01) 4. Please provide a parking plan for the garage to confirm Motor Vehicle Use Area criteria are met per UDC 7.4.6 5. Clarify how waste will stored. If interior compactors are used, this will need to be shown in the garage parking plan. Reach out to Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov, and provide proof of his approval vis a screenshot of his approval email in your next submittal 6. Append "Maximum 8.3% running slope" or similar to keynote 9 7. Append "Maximum 5% running slope and 2% cross slope" or similar to keynote 8 8. Clarify top grade of basin north of building, ensure 6-9" of retention (9" max) 9. Ensure a pedestrian circulation path from the building to any waste enclosure 10. Any pedestrian circulation PAAL crossings should be striped 11. Per the geotechnical report 6.7, grade should slope away from the structure for at least 10 ft. Show all the proposed basins adjacent to the building do not pond within 10 ft, or provide a letter from the geotechnical firm approving the current design. Scott Haseman scott.haseman@tucosnaz.gov |
||
| 05/26/2023 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Nick Ross Section Manager PROJECT: Development Package (1st Review) TD-DEV-0523-00242 TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 26, 2023 DUE DATE: June 18, 2023 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year expiration date is May 26, 2024. 1. 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. COMMENT: Please add “TD-DEV-0523-00242” to all sheets in plan set. 2. 2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile, and provide the following information. COMMENT: Per 2-06.4.4.A - Show the subject property approximately centered within the one square mile area; 3. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. COMMENT: Provide information for I-10 Frontage Rd. 4. 2-06.4.9.E - Proposed land splits or existing lot lines shall be drawn on the plan with dimensions and the identification number and approximate square footage of each lot. (Please be aware that, if land division occurs and the number of lots falls within the definition of subdivision, a subdivision plat is required.) Land splits require a separate permit and review. COMMENT: The southern parcel boundary does not appear to be accurate. If land division is part of this proposal, a separate permit application will be required. 5. 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. The basis for this requirement is that some zoning requirements on a project are based on the zoning classification of adjacent property. Also, in some instances, each zone has to be taken into consideration on property that is split by two or more zoning classifications, as each may have different requirements. COMMENT: This standard has not been addressed. 6. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. COMMENT: Zoning cannot confirm PAALs within parking structures are compliant with this section. Please provide a parking layout for each level of the parking garage. A 20ft PAAL is being proposed within the dropoff area of the project. This dimension only works if it is for one-way traffic and must be labeled as such. 7. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. COMMENT: See Comment 7 AND show compliance with required number of electric vehicle supply equipment outlined in Section 7.4.11 & .12. 8. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided. COMMENT: Short term bicycle parking must be located within 50ft of a public entrance to the building. Additionally, the number of short term bicycle parking spaces are not being met. Please provide a note that long term bicycle parking is located within the units. 9. 2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. COMMENT: The only zoning setback information provided on the site plan is for the north property line. Please provide setback information for all sides of the property. While Zoning acknowledges this project is going through IID review and can have modified setbacks, the required 10ft setback on the north and west property lines does not appear to be met. 10. 2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s). COMMENT: Please provide separate height information within the footprint of the parking structure. 11. 2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual. COMMENT: Striping must be provided where pedestrian path crosses access lanes/PAALs/ ingress and egress to parking structure. 12. 2-06.4.9.T - Show refuse collection areas, including locations of dumpsters, screening location and materials, and vehicle maneuverability, fully dimensioned, and access route. If dumpster service is not proposed, indicate type of service. For specific information on refuse collection, refer to Section 8-01.0.0, Solid Waste and Recycle Disposal, Collection, and Storage, of the Technical Standards Manual. Refuse collection on all projects shall be designed based on that section, even if collection is to be contracted to a private firm. COMMENT: Indicate graphically the location of refuse collection and provide dimensions. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Nicholas.Ross@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 549-8255. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
||
| 06/21/2023 | Traffic Engineering Review | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | TD-DEV-0223-00242 471 W. Congress St. Comments: 1. Please provide the plan for the relocation of the bus stop. David Stiffey DTM Project Coordinator David.Stiffey@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 06/22/2023 | Transportation Landscape Review | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Please address comments on the plans | ||
| 05/12/2023 | CDRC Application Completeness | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 05/16/2023 | CDRC Review Coordinator | REVIEW COMPLETED | Added external reviewers, sent emails and sent FYI emails per SOP. | ||
| 07/13/2023 | Entitlements | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 05/16/2023 | External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments | REVIEW COMPLETED | Sent FYI emails per SOP. | ||
| 05/16/2023 | External Reviewers - Southwest Gas | REVIEW COMPLETED | Sent FYI emails per SOP. | ||
| 05/16/2023 | External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) | REVIEW COMPLETED | Sent FYI emails per SOP. | ||
| 05/16/2023 | External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) | REVIEW COMPLETED | Sent FYI emails per SOP. | ||
| 05/15/2023 | OK to Submit - Engineering | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 05/15/2023 | OK to Submit - Landscape | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 05/15/2023 | OK to Submit - Zoning | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 06/14/2023 | Site Landscape | REVIEW COMPLETED | PROJECT: 17-STORY RESIDENTIAL COMPLEX ACTIVITY NO. TD-DEV-0523-00242 ADDRESS/PARCEL: 471 W CONGRESS ST/116-20-1350 ZONING: OCR-2, DOWNTOWN CORE. IID, RNA This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section and PAD-12 for landscape, native plants, and water harvesting. Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape/NPPO Review Section comments are addressed. UDC/TSM COMMENTS: 1. Ensure that Zoning, Engineering comments, and concerns are addressed prior to landscape section approval. 2. Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0523-00242, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.3 3. You must have a permit from the Department of Transit and Mobility for any planting being done in the right of way. Please reach out to David Marhefka (david.marhefka@tucsonaz.gov) if this is the case. 4. Label sight visibility triangles and ROWs (existing and future) to all landscape plans. 5. A separate irrigation water meter is required. Please label the new irrigation meter as “irrigation only”. UDC Technical Standards 4-01.-.2. A.1. 6. Show all curb cuts/downspouts/splashpads on the commercial rainwater harvesting plan. 7. If using d.g at a 2” depth, ensure the rainwater harvesting basins are 8” in depth to account for the d.g. 8. Can the proposed dog park be graded so that it can be included in the WHIAs? 9. While not required, can the grand total of the percentage of rainwater harvesting be added to the project notes on the Water Harvesting Plan? RNA Comments: 1. This landscape plan meets or exceeds the requirements laid out in the open space requirements by more than double. 2. The street shade requirement is met by more than 30% If you have any questions about these comments, I can be reached at Matthew.Carlton@tucsonaz.gov or 520-837-4988 |