Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.1
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0523-00238
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/25/2023 | NPPO | APPROVED | |||
| 06/05/2023 | Site Engineering | APPROVED | |||
| 05/25/2023 | Site Landscape | APPROVED | Conditionally Approved. Condition: Include the correct Development Package # on all landscape plans with zoning/engineering resubmittal. If you have any questions about these comments, I can be reached at Matthew.Carlton@tucsonaz.gov or 520-837-4988 |
||
| 06/21/2023 | CDRC Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 06/21/2023 | Commercial Plumbing | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. Revise the site drawing to include existing HCS (keynote 6 not found), the invert and rim elevations of the manholes upstream and downstream of the connections to the public sewer. Include the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) reference number. Reference: City of Tucson Administrative Manual, Section 2-06.4.8D and Section 107.2.1, IBC 2018. 2. Provide the first-floor elevation. Determine the need for a backwater valve per Section 714.1, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
||
| 06/13/2023 | ROW Engineering Review | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | TD-DEV-0523-00238 (6610 E TANQUE VERDE RD TUCSON, AZ 85715) Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter which states how all comments were addressed. Comments: 1. AM 2-06.4.8.C – Dimension the width of driveways and sidewalks in the ROW . 2. Confirm the 150’ R/W dimension. It looks closer to 140’ on my map. If existing is less than 150’, show future R/W on plan. 3. Show pedestrian circulation path connection to N Camino Serna. 4. Clarify intention to use new aprons or curb returns on Tanque Verde. Keynote indicates new apron per PAG SD 206, drawing shows curb returns. If using aprons, consult Street Design Guide page 3-15 for preferred designs. If using curb returns, please include radiuses. Alternative, smaller pedestrian friendly curb return radiuses are listed in the Tucson Street Design Guide 5-10. 5. If constructing new curb return on N Camino Serna, include detail with radius and sidewalk ramp. Clarify if the existing wedge curb and apron will be removed and replaced with asphalt. If so, show planned pavement cuts and demonstrate ADA compliance across the driveway. 6. Please include a detailed drawing of the northern corner of the property showing how new on-site circulation path will connect to the sidewalk. Show ADA landings and proposed ramp design. 7. Where adjoining sidewalk from the property ties to sidewalk along the ROW frontage, a 60” X 60” ADA landing is required. Landings shall be 60” X 60” and not to exceed a 2% cross slope in all directions. 8. 10-01.3.2 - Any existing curb, sidewalk, curb access ramps which are not compliant with current standards will be modified or replaced to meet current standards. Existing ramps will need to be updated with a detectable warning strip, including ramp on the corner of E Tanque Verde Rd and N Camino Serna. Faffs Riederer Faffs.Riederer@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 06/02/2023 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Scented Leaf Development Package (1st Review) TD-DEV-0523-00238 TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 02, 2023 DUE DATE: June 17, 2023 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is May 11, 2024. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0523-00238, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Review UDC Table 4.8-4 and provide the applicable Use Specific Standards within General Note 2. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - As Tanque Verde Rd. is designated as an Arterial on the COT MS&R Map provide a general note on the cover sheet stating “THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R)”. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C – Provide the following information for both Tanque Verde Rd. & Camino Serna Dr., dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Fully dimension the back-up spur shown at the south end of the eastern most vehicle use area, see UDC Article 7.4.6.F.4. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Cleary demonstrate that the PAAL providing access to the southern two (2) vehicle parking spaces along the west property line meets the minimum width of 24’, UDC Article 7.4.6.D.1, Figure 7.4.6-A & Table 7.4.6-1. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Provide a dimension from the southeast corner of the proposed refuse bin east to the curb. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Clarify what the 23’4” dimension shown south of the proposed refuse bin is for. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Provide spot elevations for the proposed accessible vehicle parking spaces and access aisle so that the requirements of ICC A117.1-2009 Section 502.5 can be verified. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Provide a width dimension for the access aisle so that the requirements of ICC A117.1-2009 Section 502.4.2 can be verified. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The MS&R vehicle parking reduction used in not correct. The required vehicle parking for a Food Service use is based on Gross Floor Area (GFA) not seating, UDC Table 7.4.4-1. Clarify how any MS&R reduction of vehicle parking is applicable as Tanque Verde Rd is already at full width and none of this site is located within the future right-of-way, UDC Article 5.4.6.D. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The proposed additional short-term bicycle parking reduction shows 31 addition short-term bicycle parking spaces but you appear to be providing 32 additional spaces. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – The proposed location of the short-term bicycle parking does not appear to meet the requirements of UDC Article 7.6.9.C.2.a & .c. 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – The provided short- & long-term bicycle parking details do not match what is shown on the plan. 15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – For the short-term bicycle parking clearly demonstrate how the requirements of UDC Articles 7.4.9.B.1.e, .g, 7.4.9.B.2.g, & .h are met. 16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – For the long-term bicycle parking clearly demonstrate how the requirements of UDC Articles 7.4.9.B.1.g, & 7.4.9.D.5 are met. 17. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The street perimeter yard setbacks listed are not correct. Review the recent amendments to the UDC found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/development-code-update, and provide the correct setbacks. 18. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Also, provide a note on the plans stating all signs require separate permits. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Martell at Nicholas.Martell@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package & detailed response letter. |
||
| 05/11/2023 | CDRC Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 05/15/2023 | CDRC Review Coordinator Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | No external reviewers nor added. | ||
| 05/15/2023 | Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 05/15/2023 | OK to Submit - Engineering Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 05/12/2023 | OK to Submit - Landscape Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 05/12/2023 | OK to Submit - Zoning Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED |