Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0523-00231
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/11/2023 | External Reviewers - Tucson Airport Authority | APPROVED | September 9, 2023 Planning and Development Services City of Tucson 201 North Stone Avenue Tucson, AZ. 85701 RE: TD-DEV-0523-00231, 2 nd Submittal, Mesa Ridge Mobile Home Park Additional Units / 1402 W Ajo Way, Tucson AZ 85713, Received August 4, 2023 To whom this may concern, Thank you for the opportunity to comment on TD-DEV-0523-00231, 2 nd Submittal, the development plan for additional units to an existing mobile home park at 1402 W Ajo Way. This development is located in the S.W. corner of the S.W. quarter of Section 26, Township 14S, Range 13E, of the Gila and Salt River Meridian and the S.E. corner of the S.E. quarter of Section 27, Township 14S, Range 13E, of the Gila and Salt River Meridian. The development site occupies parcel number 119-21-052A, covers approximately 40 ± acres, and is zoned as Mobile Home Zone 1 (MH-1). The nearest major roadway intersection is West Ajo Way and South Holiday Isle Boulevard, approximately 1,300 feet to the south of the subject development. This site does lie within the Tucson International Airport avigation easement requirements and public disclosure area, FAA traffic pattern airspace, and FAA Part 77 airspace. The Tucson Airport Authority approves the submitted project and is not requiring a resubmittal. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this comment letter. I can be reached by email at srobidoux@flytucson.com or by telephone at 520- 573-4811. Respectfully, Scott Robidoux, C.M. Manager of Planning |
||
| 09/11/2023 | CDRC Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 09/11/2023 | Commercial Plumbing | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | One section of 6” sewer is still noted as being 100-feet long. [Initial comment: The maximum distance between cleanouts shall be 100-feet, measured along the developed pipe length from the upstream entrance of the cleanout. Reference: Section 708.1.1, IPC 2018.] | ||
| 08/25/2023 | NPPO | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Please reach out to Matthew Carlton at your earliest convenience for the correct NPPO waiver form. If you have any questions about these comments, I can be reached at Matthew.Carlton@tucsonaz.gov or 520-837-4988 |
||
| 08/23/2023 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. Show in the drainage report how first flush regulations are met using tables similar to tables 2.2 and 2.3 from the retention/detention manual 2. Show in the drainage report how the post-developed runoff discharge is attenuated to detention requirements: As a portion of the site is in a critical basin, the resulting critical portion of the site must be attenuated to 85% of the pre-developed discharge, the rest can be attenuated to 100% of the pre-developed flows.Pima County's PC-LID software can be a simple way to show this fact using the existing shallow 6-9" depressed landscaping that is planned, but please note the "critical basin" option in that tool uses 90% instead of 85% 3. To clarify, the calculations and data outputs can be placed in the appendix of the report, but there should be some discussion and quantities shown in the report body that show retention and detention requirements are met. Scott Haseman scott.haseman@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 08/25/2023 | Site Landscape | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Please submit the following missing documents: 1. Landscape Plan 2. Irrigation Plan 3. Commercial rainwater Harvesting Plan. If the landscape architect is from outside of the City of Tucson and unfamiliar with the development code requirements around landscaping, it is HIGHLY recommended they reach out to Matthew Carlton at their earlies convenience to work through any submittal issues that may arise. If you have any questions about these comments, I can be reached at Matthew.Carlton@tucsonaz.gov or 520-837-4988 |
||
| 08/17/2023 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Mesa Ridge – Additional Mobile Home Sites Development Package (2nd Review) TD-DEV-0523-00231 TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 17, 2023 DUE DATE: September 10, 2023 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is May 07, 2024. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.3.12 – The sheet list shows 19 sheets but only 18 were submitted. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2. This comment was not fully addressed. Label the section corners on the location map. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.C - Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 3. This comment was not addressed correctly. The use should be listed as Mobile Home Park. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 4. This comment was not addressed correctly. The lot coverage shall include the entire mobile home park. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.b – Provide a lot coverage calculation on the plan that meets the requirements of UDC Article 6.4.3. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 5. This comment was not addressed correctly. The required vehicle parking for a mobile home park is based on 2 spaces per dwelling unit plus visitor parking required at a ratio of 0.25 space per unit. This calculation shall include the entire mobile home park. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Provide a vehicle parking space calculation on the plan. This calculation shall provide the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. 6. This comment was not addressed correctly. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The setbacks listed under Building Setbacks are not correct. Based on recent amendments to the UDC approved on April 21, 2023 the street perimeter yard setback should be 20’-0”. The setbacks for the perimeter of the mobile home park not adjacent to a street the requirement is based on UDC Article 6.6.3.B & Table 6.3-2.A Nonres Use to Res or Nonres zone the required setback is 10’-0” or ¾(H), greater of the two. Interior setback between structures are based on building code, 6’-0” min. The setbacks shown on the plan are not correct. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Martell at Nicholas.Martell@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package & detailed response letter. |
||
| 08/04/2023 | CDRC Application Completeness | REVIEW COMPLETED |