Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: TD-DEV-0426-00104
Parcel: 13613001W

Review Status: Requires Resubmit

Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2

Permit Number - TD-DEV-0426-00104
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
05/20/2026 NPPO Standard NOT REQUIRED
05/15/2026 Site Engineering Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT Permit: TD-DEV-0426-00104 – Minor DP – Parking Area and Drive Thru Modifications
Location: 9410 E GOLF LINKS RD
Review Date: 5/15/2026

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-6 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for waste management, Pedestrian Access, Hydrology -Retention/Detention Requirements, and all site standard code.

Drainage Manual Link:
https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/cot-drainage…

Design standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention Link:
https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/updated-rete…

Overall for application submittal requirements, see Administrative Manual Section 2-06

Site Engineering:
1. Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0426-00104, adjacent to the title block on all sheets
Pedestrian Circulation and Vehicle Use Area Comments:
1. Sheet 5 Keynote 4 calls out PAG SD 210 at the proposed location of the ADA parking stall, which would cut off ADA accessibility to the existing path on the west of the building. This is also called out on Sheet 7 as PAG SD 213. Please revise the plans to provide access to the parking stall.
2. Plans show the removal of one parking space from 26 to 25. Please provide additional ADA parking stall as required per 2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design. If the intent is to use the ADA accessible parking space to the south shown as remaining on Sheet 4, that space is for access to adjacent lot business, and not included in the original 26 space count.
3. Please provide ADA accessible ramp access and signing for both required ADA parking spaces. See above comment #2.
Drainage comments:
1. This site lies within a COT floodplain associated with the Rolling Hills Wash. In compliance with COT Floodplain requirements, a floodplain use permit (FPU) will be required for submittal with this proposed development project.

If you have any questions or concerns, please contact: Joe Macaulay at Joe.Macaulay@tucsonaz.gov
05/20/2026 Site Landscape Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
REVIEWER: CHAD KELLER, PLA
SITE LANDSCAPE/NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION SECTION

PROJECT: MINOR MODIFICATIONS TO THE PARKING AREA AND DRIVE THRU OF AN EXISTING DRIVE THRU RESTAURANT
ACTIVITY NO: TD-DEV-0426-00104
RELATED PRE-APPLICATION NO: TP-PRE-1224-00270
ADDRESS: 9410 E GOLF LINKS RD
ZONING: COMMERCIAL ZONE (C-1)
LAND USE: RESTAURANT / PARKING AREA
5.20.2026

THE PROPOSED PLANS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR SITE LANDSCAPE, NATIVE PLANTS, AND RAINWATER HARVESTING, PER-THE-CITY OF TUCSON UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE (UDC), TECHNICAL STANDARDS MANUAL (TSM), AND ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL (AM).

RESUBMIT REVISED DRAWINGS ALONG WITH A DETAILED RESPONSE LETTER, STATING HOW ALL SITE LANDSCAPE AND NPPO SECTION REVIEW COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED.

SITE LANDSCAPE/NPPO COMMENTS:

1. The updated parking and drive-through layout appears to be an expansion in lot coverage and vehicle use area and has provided opportunities for new plant material, shade trees and recessed planting areas. Provide a planting plan, irrigation plan and note on the planting plan to depress all new landscape areas 6 inches for rainwater harvesting. Also include planting and irrigation details as well as any landscape specification necessary for construction. See expansion and compliance requirements per the UDC below.

2. UDC 7.6.2. APPLICABILITY
The provisions of this section apply to the following:
A. All new development; and,
B. Expansion of existing development, as provided below:

2. Buildings 10,000 Square Feet or Less
On sites where the gross floor area of the existing building (s) is 10,000 square feet or less, expansions in square footage of land area, floor area, lot coverage, or vehicular use area as follows.

a. If the expansion is less than 50%, the standards of this section apply only to the proposed expansion. Existing development on the site is subject to the zoning standards in effect at the time the existing development received zoning approval.

3. This work will not require very much asphalt to be removed, but if feasible, provide curb cut inlets and outlets to the new recessed planting areas.

4. Coordinate the Landscape Plan and the Civil Grading Plan to have identical depressed landscape area contouring, grades, spot elevations and curb cut locations.

5. Prior to site landscape approval, ensure that Site Zoning and Site Engineering comments are fully addressed.

6. Include the Activity Number TD-DEV-0426-00104 on all sheets in the plan set.

Thank you.
Chad Keller, PLA
Landscape Architect
chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov
520.837.4923
05/21/2026 Site Zoning Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT CDRC TRANSMITTAL

FROM:
Bobby Parsons
PDSD Zoning Review Section

PROJECT:
Whataburger Minor Modifications - 9410 E. Golf Links Rd. Tucson, AZ 85730
Development Package (1st Review)
TD-DEV-0426-00104

TRANSMITTAL DATE: 5/21/2026
DUE DATE: 5/20/2026

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is April 28, 2027.

SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS)

2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS

CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet:

2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0426-00104, adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. The basis for this requirement is that some zoning requirements on a project are based on the zoning classification of adjacent property. Also, in some instances, each zone has to be taken into consideration on property that is split by two or more zoning classifications, as each may have different requirements.

2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.F – Please label the surrounding zoning classifications as noted by the standard above. This property has C-2 zoning to the South and C-1 zoning to the East, North, and West.

2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Per the provided parking calculations on Sheet 1, 26 spaces are required however Sheet 5 only shows 25 spaces onsite. 2 required ADA spaces were noted in the parking calculations as well, however only 1 is provided onsite. Please ensure the parking calculations provided reflect what is shown in the plans. If the minimum number of onsite parking spaces cannot be met, an Individual Parking Plan (IPP) will be required. Please reach out to Mark Castro at Mark.Castro@tucsonaz.gov if you have questions about the IPP process. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Planning-Zoning-Applications/Zoning-Administration#section-4

2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s).

4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Please provide the proposed use (Food Service) within the footprint of the building as noted by the standard above.

***For additional information on the any standard presented in this memo, please refer to the City of Tucson “Unified Development Code” – Administrative Manual Section 2-06 or Technical Standards noted in the comments. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/all-codes-plans-determinations ***

If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact Bobby Parsons at Robert.Parsons@tucsonaz.gov.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package and comment response letter. To resubmit visit Tucson Development Center at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home.
Instructions for resubmittal - https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/website/Resubmittals.pdf.
04/29/2026 CDRC Review Coordinator Express REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC added TEP, PAG, USPS, and SWG to the workflow. Review request email sent to TEP.  FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG.
05/19/2026 Commercial Plumbing Standard REVIEW COMPLETED
04/29/2026 External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments Standard REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required.
04/29/2026 External Reviewers - Southwest Gas Standard REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required.
05/13/2026 External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) Standard REVIEW COMPLETED May 13, 2026
WO#T183157
City of Tucson
Planning and Development Services
Attn: CDRC Admin Team
Dear CDRC Admin Team
Subject: Whataburger - Golf Links and Harrison
TD-DEV-0426-00104
Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed and approved the development
plan submitted 4/29/2026. There are existing facilities within the development which are
depicted upon the plan.
Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the
existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer.
To apply for electric service, please call the New Construction department at (520) 918-
8300. Please submit a final set of plans including approved site, electric load, paving
off-site improvements and irrigation plans. If available, include a PDF version of the
plans.
Questions regarding Land, ROW, Easement, etc., please contact the TEP Land
Department
Liz Boehler
Right of Way Agent
Consultant
520-686-1341
Landreviews@tep.com
Should you have any technical questions, please contact the area designer,
Martin Rodriguez
(520) 991-5495
mrodriguez@tep.com
Sincerely,
Design Admins
Design Admins
Tucson Electric Power
04/29/2026 External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) Standard REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required.
05/21/2026 Fire New Construction Standard REVIEW COMPLETED
04/28/2026 OK to Submit - Engineering Fast REVIEW COMPLETED
05/14/2026 ROW Engineering Review Standard REVIEW COMPLETED