Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0425-00114
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/13/2025 | Commercial Plumbing Standard | APPROVED | |||
| 05/22/2025 | Site Engineering Standard | APPROVED | |||
| 05/16/2025 | NPPO Standard | NOT REQUIRED | |||
| 05/16/2025 | Site Landscape Standard | NOT REQUIRED | |||
| 05/14/2025 | Site Zoning Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Dodge Flower Apartments – Electric Vehicle Gates Development Package (1st Review) TD-DEV-0425-00114 TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 14, 2025 DUE DATE: May 13, 2025 COMMENTS: Resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Per UDC Article 3.3.3.G.5.c, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is April 21, 2026. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.3.12 – An index of sheets in the development package shall be provided on the first sheet. 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.D - The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx) shall be provided in the title block. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0425-00114, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.C – Provide the north arrow for the location map. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.C – The southern most sections, 26, 27 & 28 are not correct. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – Remove General Note 4 from the plan. Dodge is not designated on the MS&R Map in this area. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.b – Provide a lot coverage calculation that meets the requirements of UDC Article 6.4.3. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C – Base on Construction Pla U-99-005, found at: https://maps-and-records.tucsonaz.gov/construction-plans/details/U-99-005, the 27’-0” half right-of-way (ROW) is not correct. Review the construction plan and provide the correct ½ ROW and provide a pavement width dimension. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Based on the last approved plan, T05BU01385, the vehicle parking layout has changed. Either provide an approved plan that matches the vehicle use area that you show on this plan or provide a fully dimensioned vehicle use area so that all requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6 can be verified. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The TOTAL REQ’S 78 (4 ADA) does not appear to be correct. 38 spaces + 20 spaces only equals 58 spaces required. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Per the IBC Table 11.6.1 the required number of accessible parking spaces is based on the number of provided vehicle parking spaces. Based on 62 spaces provided only 3 accessible spaces are required. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – The long-term ratio, .05 is not correct. Review UDC Table 7.4.8-1 and provide the correct ratio. Once corrected revise the required number of long-term bicycle parking spaces. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Provide the heights of all buildings within the footprints. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Zone1.desk@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: A revised development package as well as a comment response letter. To resubmit, visit the Tucson Development Center Online at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home. The instructions for resubmittal can be found at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/tdc-faq/new-pdfs/revisions-and-resubmittals.pdf. |
||
| 04/16/2025 | CDRC Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 04/22/2025 | CDRC Review Coordinator Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | External Reviewers not required. No further action is required from the customer at this time. | ||
| 05/13/2025 | Fire New Construction Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 04/21/2025 | OK to Submit - Engineering Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 04/21/2025 | OK to Submit - Zoning Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 04/28/2025 | ROW Engineering Review Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED |