Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0424-00127
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/22/2024 | Commercial Plumbing | APPROVED | |||
| 06/12/2024 | NPPO | NOT REQUIRED | |||
| 06/12/2024 | CDRC Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 05/21/2024 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | As this parcel was part of Development Package D03-0031, Site Engineering does not consider this a 25% expansion of the site. 1. Provide a Waste Stream calculation for the entire site per TSM 8-01.8.0. 2. Ensure that roof drainage does not cross any pedestrian circulation. Joshua Garcia joshua.garcia@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 06/12/2024 | Site Landscape | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT REVIEWER: CHAD KELLER, RLA PDSD SITE LANDSCAPE/NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION SECTION PROJECT: 712 S.F. STORAGE AREA SOUTH OF EXISTING GALLERY ACTIVITY NO: TD-DEV-0424-00127 ADDRESS/PARCEL: 3035 N SWAN RD/110051310 ZONING: C-1 COMMERCIAL ZONE This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants, and water harvesting. Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape/NPPO Review Section comments are addressed. COMMENTS: 1. Ensure that Zoning, Engineering comments and concerns are addressed prior to landscape section approval. 2. Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0424-00127, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.3 3. After reviewing the aerial imagery on-site, it appears that there are native trees on the south side of the landscape border wall that may be disturbed while constructing the new storage room. Add a note to the Site Development Plan that states: If any of the native trees are disturbed/destroyed, replace at a 1:1 ratio. If you have any questions about these comments, I can be reached at chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 05/21/2024 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Madaras Gallery – Storage Room Addition Development Package (1st Review) TD-DEV-0424-00127 TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 21, 2024 DUE DATE: May 22, 2024 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is May 6, 2025. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.3.12 – The sheet index is not correct. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.D – The page number on sheet 1 is not correct. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0424-00127, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.C – The section corners shown on the location map are not correct and should be located at the corners at Ft. Lowell & Swan and Grant & Swan. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.1 – Under ‘SPECIFIC USE REQUIREMENTS” remove the reference to C-2 zone as none of this site is zoned C-2. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Under Zoning Note 3 you list “GALLERY” as a use. Gallery is not a use that is classified in the UDC. Provide a use as classified in the UDC. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Based on the submitted plan you are also showing Medical Service: Outpatient, excluding blood donor centers, as a use. List this use under existing uses and provide the applicable Use Specific Standards. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Under Zoning Note 3 you list “EDUCATIONAL” as a use. Clarify what type of educational use you are proposing and provide the applicable Use Specific Standards. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Under ‘SPECIFIC USE REQUIREMENTS” remove the statement “THE FOLLOWING RESTRICTIONS APPLY TO ALL USES AND DEVELOPMENT IN THIS ZONE” as the statement is not correct. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - As Swan is designated as an Arterial on the COT MS&R Map provide a general note on the cover sheet stating “THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R) 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.b – Remove the lot coverage calculation from the plan as per UDC Table 6.3-4.A lot coverage is not applicable. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.c - Provide a building area expansion calculation on the plan. Per UDC Article 7.4.3.E.3 expansions as noted in Section 7.4.3.E.1 and 2 are cumulated over time from April 1, 1969, for the application of motor vehicle parking regulations and from May 9, 1990, for the application of bicycle parking regulations. Once a development is brought into conformance with the provisions of this division, subsequent expansions will begin cumulating as of the date the development was brought into conformance. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.d – As this site operates as a single site, vehicle and pedestrian circulation, the calculations encompass the entire site, whether existing or proposed to include but not limited to, vehicle, bicycle, loading etc. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.A – Provide distance and bearings for the internal property lines. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.F – The existing zoning, C-1 & C-2, shown to the south is not correct and should be RX-2. 16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The vehicle parking space calculation shall include all uses on the entire site. 17. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.c – Until all uses are clarified loading area requirements cannot be determined. 18. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Provide a short- & long-term bicycle parking space calculation for the entire site. 19. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Provide perimeter yard setback from the proposed addition to both streets. Additional comments may be forthcoming once provided. 20. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Provide the height of all buildings on site within the footprint. 21. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R - Provide a sidewalk that meets the requirements of TSM Sections 7-01.4.2 & .3 between the proposed addition and the PAAL to the West, TSM Section 7-01.4.1.B 22. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Also provide a general note stating that all signage requires separate permitting. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Martell at Nicholas.Martell@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: A revised development package as well as a comment response letter. To resubmit, visit the Tucson Development Center Online at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home. The instructions for resubmittal can be found at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/tdc-faq/new-pdfs/revisions-and-resubmittals.pdf. |
||
| 04/15/2024 | CDRC Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 05/08/2024 | CDRC Review Coordinator Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | External Reviewers not required. No further action is required from the customer at this time. | ||
| 05/21/2024 | Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 04/23/2024 | OK to Submit - Engineering Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 05/07/2024 | OK to Submit - Landscape Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 04/22/2024 | OK to Submit - Zoning Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 05/22/2024 | ROW Engineering Review | REVIEW COMPLETED | No Comments David Stiffey David.Stiffey@tucsonaz.gov |