Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0424-00126
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/22/2024 | Commercial Plumbing | APPROVED | |||
| 06/12/2024 | CDRC Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 06/12/2024 | NPPO | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Please see Site Landscape/NPPO comments. Thank you. Chad Keller, RLA chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 05/22/2024 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Tucson codes and ordinances can be found online at https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/overview The Design Standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention manual can be found online at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/updated-retention-detention-manual.pdf TD-DEV-0424-00126 1. First flush retention compliant with DSSDR chapter 2 is required for the new impervious surfaces from the expansions. Please provide a drainage statement showing that the first flush requirements are being met. 2. A floodplain use permit will be required for the development. Please apply for a floodplain use permit on the TDC Online portal. For reference, the elevation of the buildings will be required to be certified by a registered land surveyor during the construction of the building, after permitting has been done. Please provide an expansion calculation for the building floor area. If the building floor area expansion is greater than 25%, the entire site must meet standards in TSM sections 7 and 8 as well as UDC section 7. The following comments will apply if the building floor area expansion is greater than 25%: 3. Pedestrian circulation is required to connect all buildings, dumpster areas, and the sidewalk on the street frontage per TSM 7-01.3.3. Show a continuous pedestrian path. 4. The pedestrian circulation path must have adequate protection for pedestrians per TSM 7-01.3.4.2 this must be accomplished with six inch curbing, bollards, or another form of physical separation. 5. Provide waste stream calculations compliant with TSM 8-01.8. Please note that although recycling service is not required, the site must provide capacity for recycling service so a double enclosure or two single enclosures will be required. 6. Provide a detail for the waste enclosure, existing or proposed. Any proposed waste enclosures must meet dimensional standards outlined in TSM 8-01.5.2. Lianne Evans lianne.evans@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 06/12/2024 | Site Landscape | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT REVIEWER: CHAD KELLER, RLA PDSD SITE LANDSCAPE/NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION SECTION PROJECT: PHASE II: 2,065 S.F. STORAGE ADDITION PHASE III: 678 S.F. OFFICE 1,652 S.F. STORAGE ADD'NACTIVITY NO: TD-DEV-0424-00126 ADDRESS/PARCEL: 1315 W MIRACLE MILE/10706035A ZONING: C-2 COMMERCIAL ZONE This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants, and water harvesting. Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape/NPPO Review Section comments are addressed. SITE LANDSCAPE / NPPO COMMENTS: IT APPEARS THAT THE BUILDING EXPANSION IS GREATER THAN 25%. PLEASE PROVIDE AN EXPANSION CALCULATION FOR THE BUILDING FLOOR AREA. IF THE BUILDING FLOOR AREA EXPANSION IS GREATER THAN 25%, THE ENTIRE SITE MUST MEET STANDARDS IN (TM) AS WELL AS (UDC) SECTIONS FOR LANDSCAPE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WILL APPLY IF THE BUILDING FLOOR AREA EXPANSION IS GREATER THAN 25%: 1. Ensure that Zoning, Engineering comments and concerns are addressed prior to landscape section approval. 2. Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0424-00126, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.3 3. An NPPO or an NPPO waiver is required per UDC 7.7.3-B. A Native Plant Preservation Plan, Section 7.7.4, must be submitted and approved or a request for an exception from the Native Plant Preservation requirements shall be approved in accordance with Sections 7.7.3.D.3 & .4 of the UDC and Administrative Manual Section 2-11.0.0 prior to Grading Plan approval. The site was previously developed and will require an NPPO Waiver form. PDSD will provide the applicant with the NPPO Waiver form upon request. 4. A landscape plan is required per UDC 7.6.2.B.1-b. The Unified Development Code requires all new development, or an expansion of greater than 25% of an existing development to submit a landscape plan, UDC 7.6.2. Preparation of the landscape plan shall adhere to UDC 7.6.4 and Administrative Manual 2-10. 5. Provide the required number of trees in all vehicular parking areas (1 tree to 4 parking spaces) per UDC 7.6.4.B.1. Trees are to be distributed evenly throughout the parking area, UDC 7.6.4.1.B.1, UDC Technical Standards Manual 5-01-.3.2 and UDC 7.6.4.B.1.a. 6. A street landscape border is required on W Miracle Mile per UDC 7.6.4.C-2 and Table 7.6.4-1. See UDC 7.6.4.C for landscape border requirements. There are trees and other plants within the existing street landscape border. With this addition to the development, ensure that the landscape border is updated to meet current UDC standards. 7. DTM approval is required for all planting or irrigation in the ROW prior to the approval of the development package. Reach out to David Marhefka (David.marhefka@tucsonaz.gov) if necessary for this project. 8. All landscape plans shall incorporate water conserving design as defined in UDC Section 7.6.6, Use of Water, and as described in the Technical Standards Manual 5.01-5.11. 9. A Commercial Rainwater Harvesting plan is required per UDC Technical Standards Manual – Section 4-01.3.0. and Section 5-01.0.0 Landscaping and Screening. Adherence to the Low Impact Development Standards outlined in Section 5 of the PCRFCD Design Standards is required. See below guidelines (A,B and C) for minimum requirements to meet the intent of the Commercial Rainwater Harvesting Ordinance: A.) Depress all landscape areas 6-9 inches. 6-inch minimum depth to include the 2-inches of organic or in-organic groundcover. B.) With the addition to the building, provide downspouts and splash pads for drainage off the building roof and direct the water to the depressed landscape areas. C.) Provide curb cuts for parking lot drainage into the depressed landscape areas. 10. The Landscape Plan should match the Commercial Rainwater Harvesting Plan as well as the Grading Plan. The Landscape Plan should have spot elevations in the detention/retention areas as well as in all water harvesting areas in the Landscape Plan. 11. Maximize the rainwater harvesting across the site into all landscape areas, including the street landscape borders and planting islands for the required trees in the parking area. 12. The Commercial Rainwater Harvesting Plan must utilize the Site Water Budget. See TSM 4-01.0.0 Exhibit A. The Site Water Budget is how the Water Department tracks the irrigation water use on-site, not first flush retention volume charts. 13. A separate irrigation water meter is required. Please label irrigation meter as “irrigation only”. See TSM 4-01.6.0 If you have any questions about these comments, I can be reached at chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 05/21/2024 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Tucson Trailers – Building Addition Development Package (1st Review) TD-DEV-0424-00126 TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 21, 2024 DUE DATE: May 22, 2024 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is May 6, 2025. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.3.8 – The north arrow shown on sheet 2 is not correct. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.3.12 – The sheet index is not correct. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0424-00126, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.C – The northeast section corner shown on the location map is not correct. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Based on the vehicle parking spaces calculation it appears that two (2) primary uses are proposed, vehicle sales & rental and commercial storage. If this is what is proposed, then include the commercial storage under Zoning Note 3 and provide the applicable Use Specific Standards. If you are not proposing the two (2) primary uses then revise the vehicle parking calculation to show what you are proposing. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - As Miracle Mile is designated as an Arterial on the COT MS&R Map provide a general note on the cover sheet stating “THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R) 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.b – Remove the lot coverage calculation from the plan as per UDC Table 6.3-4.A lot coverage is not applicable. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.c – Provide a building area expansion calculation on the plan. Per UDC Article 7.4.3.E.3 expansions as noted in Section 7.4.3.E.1 and 2 are cumulated over time from April 1, 1969, for the application of motor vehicle parking regulations and from May 9, 1990, for the application of bicycle parking regulations. Once a development is brought into conformance with the provisions of this division, subsequent expansions will begin cumulating as of the date the development was brought into conformance. Building #2 shown on this plan was not shown on the last approved DP19-00126 and will require a permit and is to be included in the calculation. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Provide a PAAL width dimension from the 2 proposed vehicle parking spaces shown west of the loading area shown south of building #2. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Fully dimension the new back-up spur shown at the east end of the vehicle use area north of building #3, UDC Article 7.4.6.F.4. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The 2 proposed vehicle parking spaces shown west of the loading area shown south of building #2 cannot block access to the loading space. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – As new vehicle parking spaces are proposed provide a detail. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.c – Depending on how comment 5 is addressed as commercial storage, that does not have direct vehicle access, requires loading areas, UDC Table 7.5.5-A, a loading area calculation maybe required. 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Provide a short- & long-term bicycle parking space calculation on the plan. 15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Provide the height of all buildings on site within the footprint. 16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Provide a sidewalk that meets the requirements of TSM Sections 7-01.4.2 & .3 between Building 3 and the proposed vehicle parking space to the north, TSM Section 7-01.4.1.C. 17. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Also provide a general note stating that all signage requires separate permitting. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Martell at Nicholas.Martell@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: A revised development package as well as a comment response letter. To resubmit, visit the Tucson Development Center Online at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home. The instructions for resubmittal can be found at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/tdc-faq/new-pdfs/revisions-and-resubmittals.pdf. |
||
| 04/15/2024 | CDRC Application Completeness | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 05/08/2024 | CDRC Review Coordinator | REVIEW COMPLETED | Review request email sent per ADOT. CDRC sent FYI email to PAG, USPS, SWG, and TEP. | ||
| 06/04/2024 | External Reviewers - Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) | REVIEW COMPLETED | TD-DEV-0424-00126 Jay Gomes CDRC Good Afternoon, Thank you for your patience. ADOT has reviewed this DEV and has the following comments; No TIS/TIS is required for this DEV. Should work be required within the ADOT R/W, the Developer/Owner will need to submit an ADOT Encroachment Permit for review. The submittal appears acceptable. Thank you for the opportunity to review. |
||
| 05/08/2024 | External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email to PAG, USPS, SWG and TEP. No further action is required from the customer at this time. | ||
| 05/08/2024 | External Reviewers - Southwest Gas | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email to PAG, USPS, SWG and TEP. No further action is required from the customer at this time. | ||
| 05/08/2024 | External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email to PAG, USPS, SWG and TEP. No further action is required from the customer at this time. | ||
| 05/08/2024 | External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email to PAG, USPS, SWG and TEP. No further action is required from the customer at this time. | ||
| 05/21/2024 | Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 04/22/2024 | OK to Submit - Engineering | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 05/07/2024 | OK to Submit - Landscape | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 04/22/2024 | OK to Submit - Zoning | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 05/22/2024 | ROW Engineering Review | REVIEW COMPLETED | No Comments David Stiffey David.Stiffey@tucsonaz.gov |