Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.4
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0424-00114
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.4
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/30/2025 | ROW Engineering Review | APPROVED | |||
| 02/12/2025 | Site Zoning | APPROVED | |||
| 02/14/2025 | CDRC Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 02/05/2025 | Commercial Plumbing | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. Comment not addressed. Remove the backwater valve (keynote #2, Sheet D4). [Second comment: The revised grading plan now shows that none of the buildings have a finished floor elevation less than 12” above the rim elevation of the next upstream manhole. A backwater valve shall not be installed.] [Initial comment: The rim elevation of the new next upstream sanitary manhole (2506.80 +/-) is less than 12” below the first floor elevation (2507.60). Provide a backwater valve per Section 714.1, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson. No fixtures located more than 12” above the rim elevation of the next upstream manhole (i.e., on the second floor) may discharge through the backwater valve.] 2. Comment not addressed. Provide a clean out in the building sewer immediately prior to entering the right of way. Show all cleanouts, building sewers smaller than 8-inches shall have cleanouts located at intervals of not more than 100-feet of developed pipe length. Reference: Section 708.1.2, IPC 2018, and Pima County Standard Detail RWRD 401. [Initial comment: Provide a clean out in the building sewer immediately prior to entering the right of way. Reference: Pima County Standard Detail RWRD 401. |
||
| 01/31/2025 | External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | January 31, 2025 WO#T115991 SCC2 City of Tucson Planning and Development Services Attn: CDRC Admin Team Dear CDRC Admin Team Subject: 28 Multifamily Apartments, 7 Buildings TD-DEV-0424-00114 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed and cannot approve the development plan submitted 01/24/2024. TEP facilities including an existing pedestal are not depicted upon the utilities section of submitted plans. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. To apply for electric service, please call the New Construction department at (520) 918- 8300. Please submit a final set of plans including approved site, electric load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans. If available, include a PDF version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Should you have any easement questions, please contact our Land Resources Department, LandReviews@tep.com. Should you have any technical questions, please contact the area designer, Fred Quintero (520) 235-6329 fquintero@tep.com Sincerely, Design Admins Design Admins Tucson Electric Power |
||
| 02/07/2025 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Comment response letter is from a previous review cycle. The following comments must be addressed: 1. Provide a detail for the 1.25' deep detention basin including side slopes, stabilization method, and inlet/outlet design. Provide drawdown calculations or routing hydrographs and ensure the basin will drain within 12 hours. 2. Per DSSDR 4.13.3: Providing first flush retention underground is prohibited, without prior approval of the Floodplain Administrator. The drainage report states that infiltration is poor in this location. No drawdown calculations have been provided. The proposed retention volume is roughly 4 times the required amount based on the calculations in the drainage report. If you wish to proceed with underground retention, floodplain administration shall be added to the next review cycle and you will need to provide a narrative explaining how the requirements of DSSDR 4.13.1 Underground Storage Standards are fully met. It is strongly recommended to remove underground retention from the plans. Mike Ortiz michael.ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 02/14/2025 | Site Landscape | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT REVIEWER: CHAD KELLER, RLA PDSD SITE LANDSCAPE/NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION SECTION PROJECT: 28 MULTIFAMILY APARTMENTS, 7 BUILDINGS ACTIVITY NO: TD-DEV-0424-00114 ADDRESS: 5745 S 6TH AV ZONING: R-2 RESIDENCE ZONE LAND USE: MULTIFAMILY SECOND REVIEW This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants, and water harvesting. Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape/NPPO Review Section comments are addressed. SITE LANDSCAPE/NPPO SECTION COMMENTS: 1. Color construction documents are not appropriate. Update all of the plans in the CD set to be monochromatic (black, white and gray). 2. Update all notes in the plan set that say to see sheet D1 for future ROW and SVTs. The notes should read see sheet D2. 3. On the rainwater harvesting plan, show simple spot elevations (bold numbers) at the inlets, bottom of WHIAs and outlets for simple reference for the contractors and inspectors. 4. Add drainage flow line arrows on the hardscape and within the WHIAs. Add notation referencing curb cut inlets and outlets, downspouts and splash pads, and associated sidewalk scuppers. All of this information should be shown on the grading plan and needs to be replicated on the rainwater harvesting plan. 5. Double check the subwatershed and WHIA correlation. Example: Subwatershed (S-6) is related to WHIA 5 on the plan and in the water demand spreadsheet subwatershed (S-7) is called out in the column related to WHIA 5. This is occurring in other places on the plan as well. 6. The plan would be easier to read and review if the WHIA and Subwatershed numbering had direct correlation to each other. Example: WHIA 1 and S-1, WHIA 2 and S-2, etc. 7. Check dams or weirs appear to be proposed within the north and south WHIAs. Adjust tree locations so that they are not in the middle of the check dam. Label all check dams on all plans in the set. Provide high point elevations for the check dams and low points at the bottom of the associated WHIAs. 8. The west street landscape border requires 4 trees. Currently the plan only shows 2 trees, and those 2 trees are being double counted as part of the north and south interior landscape borders. There are SVTs to contend with. Maybe add two additional trees in the southwest corner WHIA? 9. The parking lot trees adjacent to the building on the south side are located in a very narrow planting area. Can a tree planting curbed diamond/or curbed triangle be added to give the trees more space to grow. 10. Is section D-D on the east property line? Add the D-D cross-section line on the plan view. 11. Add a unique line type that represents root barriers wherever trees are within 5’ of paved surfaces/hardscape. Add leader call outs or keynotes for the root barrier line work, and in the call out refer to the root barrier detail. 12. Remove the PRELIMINARY stamp that is over the Architects seal on all plan sheets in the set prior to approval. Also, remove the red color. 13. Indicate the poly sleeve in-between the planter areas south of the building parking area. 14. Add irrigation lines and sleeves to the planter islands in the parking area to the north of the buildings. 15. Trees and shrubs require different amounts of water. Trees and shrubs need to be on separate valves, thus requiring a dedicated tree poly line and a dedicated shrub poly line. Add the separate lines to the irrigation plan. Thank you. Chad Keller, RLA Landscape Architect chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov 520.837.4923 |