Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.1
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0423-00202
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/02/2023 | NPPO | APPROVED | |||
| 05/24/2023 | Traffic Engineering Review | APPROVED | No Comments David Stiffey David.Stiffey@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 06/05/2023 | CDRC Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 05/17/2023 | Commercial Plumbing | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Provide the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manholes (i.e. 8178-34 and 8178-35). Determine the need for backwater valves per Section 714.1, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson. | ||
| 05/10/2023 | Design Review | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Your property is within the boundaries of the Sunshine Mile District (SMD) Urban Overlay Zone. If you are planning to use the SMD as a tool for development/redevelopment, please submit a special districts application as a sub-record of this permit. In addition, please refer to the Special Districts Application Process guide for a complete list of materials required for this project. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/forms/Special_Districts_Application_Instructions.pdf For applicable design standards and guidelines, please utilize the SMD document: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/integrated-planning/SMD_Document_FINAL_9-14-21.pdf |
||
| 05/23/2023 | External Reviewers - COT Environmental Services | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Hello, ES comments regarding Solot Redevelopment are as follows: Trash enclosure detail pg. 8, The proposed double container enclosure detail is substandard to TSM 8-01.9.0 Figure 3A. Include dimension between side wall bollards and ensure a minimum of 17 ft clear, without the center gate post as shown. Also include 10 ft clear between rear bollard and front of enclosure. TSM 8-01.5..2.C Trash enclosure detail pg. 8, Dimensions between bollards up to outside CMU wall equals a total 17.32 ft. Outside CMU wall dimension indicates 18.66 ft. Please correct bollard dimensions which can be assumed should measure to the inside of CMU wall. Trash enclosure detail pg. 8, call out four (4) 1” diameter galvanized pipe, 6” long embedded flush with top of concrete ramp to allow doors to be anchored in the open or closed position. TSM 8-01.5.2.D. Identify overhead vertical clearance at enclosure is at minimum 25 ft and alley travel lane is a minimum of 15 ft. TSM 8-01.6.2.C Let me know if you have any questions regarding this review. Sincerely, Andy Vera City of Tucson -Environmental Services Accounts Representative Supervisor (520) 837-3798 |
||
| 05/02/2023 | Fire New Construction | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | -IFC 507.5. Hydrants need to be within 600' (sprinklered buildings) of the furthest portions of all buildings (as the hose lays). Provide location of hydrants and distances. Take into consideration the new medians on broadway when measuring. -Provide total sqft of each proposed building and construction type. This will be used to determine your fire flow, IFC Table B105.1(2). It's possible you will need more than one hydrant within 600' based on the table. john.vincent@tucsonaz.gov 5203495581 |
||
| 05/16/2023 | Historic | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Properties in question are contributing resources to the Sunshine Mile National Register Historic District. If participating in the Urban Overlay District please provide documents noted in the Historic & Special Districts informational handout (https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/forms/Special_Districts_Application_Instructions.pdf). Once we have a complete submittal, the project will be docketed for review. | ||
| 05/23/2023 | ROW Engineering Review | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | TD-DEV-0423-00202 (2555 E BROADWAY BL TUCSON, AZ 85716) Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter which states how all comments were addressed. Comments: 1. Please add “COMPACTED TO 100% DENSITY” under 4” A.B.C. on detail E/8 on page 8/16. (PAG Standard 302-3.07) 2. Please identify the A.D.A. accessibility from E Broadway Bl. Identify A.D.A. landings at the end of each ramp and where the on-site circulation path meets the sidewalk. 3. If vehicle access lane is 2-way, include a sight visibility triangle. 4. Please show the driveway apron on Broadway Bl and indicate if existing is to remain or be replaced. Faffs Riederer Faffs.Riederer@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 05/15/2023 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Tucson codes and ordinances can be found online at https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/overview TD-DEV-0423-00202 1. Alley waste service must be approved by Environmental Services. Contact Andy Vera at andy.vera@tucsonaz.gov for approval and include his email in the next submittal. 2. An alley, when used for access, must be a minimum of 20 feet wide, free of obstructions, and surfaced with a dust control method that is acceptable to the TDOT City Engineer according UDC 7.4.6 K.2. Contact Blake Richards at blake.richards@tucsonaz.gov to approve the surfacing for the alley being used to access the parking to the north. Include his email in the next submittal. 3. Drainage from the roof cannot be directed over ADA accessible sidewalks. Show locations of roof downspouts and provide scuppers to direct the drainage underneath the sidewalk. Lianne Evans lianne.evans@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 05/02/2023 | Site Landscape | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PROJECT: SOLOT REDEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY NO. TD-DEV-0423-00202 ADDRESS/PARCEL: 2555 E BROADWAY BL/125-09-012A ZONING: C-1 This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section and the Sunshine Mile Overlay (Mid-Century Subdistrict) for landscape, native plants, and water harvesting. Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape/NPPO Review Section comments are addressed. UDC/TSM COMMENTS: 1. Ensure that Zoning, Engineering comments and concerns are addressed prior to landscape section approval. 2. Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0423-00202, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.3 3. You must have a permit from Department of Transit and Mobility for any planting being done in the right of way. Please reach out to David Marhefka (david.marhefka@tucsonaz.gov) if this is the case. 4. Label sight visibility triangles and ROWs (existing and future) to all landscape plans. 5. Include a construction detail showing root barriers for plants located near sidewalks and parking lots. (see Detail 402 located here: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/tdot/landscape-architects) 6. A separate irrigation water meter is required. Please label the new irrigation meter as “irrigation only”. UDC Technical Standards 4-01.-.2. A.1. 7. Show all curb cuts/downspouts/splashpads on the landscape and the commercial rainwater harvesting plan. 8. If using d.g at a 2” depth, ensure the rainwater harvesting basins are 8” in depth to account for the d.g. Sunshine Mile Comments: 1. ARCHITECTURE/CIVIL ENGINEERING/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE COMMENT: Section I. Landscape #3: “Hardscape areas must include variation in materials and design treatment.” (page III-23). Are the pedestrian areas/sidewalks along Broadway new or existing? If new, please show how the above requirement is being met. 2. This landscape plan meets #4 under Section M Environmentally Conscious Design Practices which states “Shade for at least 70% of the pedestrian areas.” If you have any questions about these comments, I can be reached at Matthew.Carlton@tucsonaz.gov or 520-837-4988 |
||
| 05/12/2023 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Wyatt Berger Lead Planner PROJECT: Solot Redevelopment Development Package (1st Review) TD-DEV-0423-00202 TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 12, 2023 DUE DATE: May 17, 2023 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC), Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06.0.0, and the Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Per UDC Section 3.3.3.G.5.c, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year expiration date is May 12, 2024. 1. 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0423-00202, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. COMMENT: Indicate that the proposed “retail” land use is defined as “General Merchandise Sales, excluding Large Retail Establishment” on the cover sheet. Use-specific standards prescribed with UDC Section 4.9 shall not apply to any of the proposed uses if the Sunshine Mile District overlay is pursued (SMD III-B.1). 3. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - List additional applications and overlays, by case number (if applicable), in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note provide the type of application processed or overlays applicable, a statement that the project meets the criteria/conditions of the additional application or overlay, the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any. COMMENT: If pursued, add the Sunshine Mile District overlay case number, date of approval, and conditions of approval in the lower right corner of each sheet. 4. 2-06.4.7.A.8.a – For development package documents provide the floor area of each building. COMMENT: Clarify whether the proposed fences identified as Keynote 23 as well building overhangs are intended to be utilized as outdoor seating and gross floor area for the development. Additional motor vehicle and bicycle parking will be required if these overhangs are intended as gross floor area. 5. 2-06.4.7.A.8.d - When the proposed site is part of a larger site, the calculations encompass the entire site, whether existing or proposed. If the project is being phased, calculations must show that, at each phase, requirements are being met. COMMENT: The proposed access land on the abutting site removes existing motor vehicle parking spaces and connects the two developments as a single site. A separate development package demonstrating that the abutting site meets the required motor vehicle parking spaces with the proposed access lane will be required to be submitted, reviewed, and approved prior to Zoning approval of TD-DEV-0423-00202. 6. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. COMMENT: Ensure that all proposed ends of rows of parking comply with UDC 7.4.6.F.4. 7. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. COMMENT: The project does not meet the total required number of motor vehicle parking spaces as prescribed by UDC Table 7.4.4-1. Additionally, the required number of motor vehicle parking spaces for the proposed Food Service use is incorrect based on the gross floor area provided under the “parking calculations” on the cover sheet. If the Sunshine Mile District overlay is pursued, the project may follow the motor vehicle parking space requirements of Table III-H.1. Each use shall follow its own parking space requirements to avoid a loading area requirement per UDC 7.5.5. Lastly, review UDC 7.4.11 and .12 as Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment (EVSE) is required for this proposal. 8. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short- and long-term bicycle spaces required and provided. COMMENT: Correct “Professional Service” to “Personal Service” within the bicycle parking calculations on the cover sheet. The site plan also appears to show a greater number of short-term bicycle parking spaces than what is provided in the short-term bicycle parking spaces on the cover sheet. Clarify the discrepancy. Additionally, demonstrate that the proposed short-term bicycle parking facilities comply with UDC 7.4.9.B.1.e and UDC 7.4.9.C.2. 9. 2-06.4.9.L - All proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. The easements may have to be recorded and the recordation information added to the development package prior to approval. COMMENT: Ensure the proposed ingress and egress easement is depicted on the site plan. Provide the recordation information as well. 10. 2-06.4.9.O – All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. COMMENT: The proposed building overhangs along the west façade of the development crosses a property line. A recorded easement will be required to allow the proposed overhangs to cross a property line. 11. 2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s). COMMENT: Show the square footage, height, and specific use proposed within the footprint of the “proposed” buildings on the site plan. 12. 2-06.4.9.V - For gang mailboxes indicate location to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping. COMMENT: Indicate whether mail service is to be collected within the building or whether a gang mailbox is proposed for the site. 13. COMMENT: the demolition of buildings and structures requires a separate demolition permit. Buildings and structures 50 years or older require additional approval from the City Historic Preservation Office. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Wyatt.Berger@tucsonaz.gov or at (520) 837-4951. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: A revised development package as well as a comment response letter. To resubmit, visit the Tucson Development Center Online at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home. The instructions for resubmittal can be found at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/website/Resubmittals.pdf. |
||
| 04/10/2023 | CDRC Application Completeness | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 04/12/2023 | CDRC Review Coordinator | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 04/24/2023 | External Reviewers - Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) | REVIEW COMPLETED | Good Afternoon, ADOT has no comments on this item. Thank you for the opportunity to review this development. |
||
| 06/05/2023 | External Reviewers - COT Parks & Recreation | REVIEW COMPLETED | Hello CDRC team, On behalf of the City of Tucson Parks and Recreation Department, I have no comments on the above development plan. Tom Fisher Project Manager City of Tucson Parks and Recreation Department 900 S. Randolph Way Tucson, Arizona 85716 (520) 837-8037 |
||
| 04/12/2023 | External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments | REVIEW COMPLETED | SENT FYI EMAIL PER SOP. | ||
| 04/12/2023 | External Reviewers - Southwest Gas | REVIEW COMPLETED | SENT FYI EMAIL PER SOP. | ||
| 04/12/2023 | External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) | REVIEW COMPLETED | SENT FYI EMAIL PER SOP. | ||
| 04/12/2023 | External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) | REVIEW COMPLETED | SENT FYI EMAIL PER SOP. | ||
| 04/11/2023 | OK to Submit - Engineering | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 04/10/2023 | OK to Submit - Landscape | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 04/10/2023 | OK to Submit - Zoning | REVIEW COMPLETED |