Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: TD-DEV-0326-00053
Parcel: 10607030A

Address:
1351 W PRINCE RD

Review Status: Requires Resubmit

Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1

Permit Number - TD-DEV-0326-00053
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
03/27/2026 NPPO Standard APPROVED
03/24/2026 Commercial Plumbing Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT ACTIVITY NO. TD-DEV-0326-00053
ADDRESS/PARCEL: 1351 W PRINCE RD TUCSON, AZ 85705

Submit your revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all comments were addressed. Review will not proceed without the response letter. The submitted documents were incomplete and a thorough plan review could not be performed. Please be aware, new comments may arise with the next review.

If you have any questions about these review comments, I can be reached at Sean.Severson@tucsonaz.gov

COMMENTS:
1. Please include the following utility information:
a. The location and size of both the existing water meter and the reduced pressure backflow preventer assembly, water lines, and fire hydrants.
b. The location and size of sanitary and storm sewers, including the pipe diameter and the invert and rim elevations of all manholes and cleanouts; along with the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) reference number.
c. The points of connection to existing public sewers.
Reference: City of Tucson Administrative Manual, Section 2-06.4.8D and Section 107.2.1, IBC 2024.
03/19/2026 ROW Engineering Review Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT Per presubmittal meeting comments
TIA (Traffic Impact Analysis) required.
Driveways shall be concrete from curb line to back of sidewalk.
Bring sidewalk ramps up to ADA standards.
03/12/2026 Site Engineering Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT Permit Activity Number: TD-DEV-0326-00053 (1st Review)
Project: McDonald's Prince & Flowing Wells – Site, Landscaping, Grading, Drainage
Location: 1351 W PRINCE RD
Review Date: 3/12/2026
Reviewer: Marco Contreras – Engineering Associate - Site Engineering
Related Cases: TP-PRE-1025-00205

*This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-6 and Technical Standards Manual (TSM) Section for waste management, Pedestrian Access, Hydrology -Retention/Detention Requirements, and all site standard code. *
City of Tucson Code: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Codes
Floodplain Code: https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az/0-0-0-19333
Drainage Manual Link: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/cot-drainage-manual-searchable.pdf
Design standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention Link:
https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/updated-retention-detention-manual.pdf
Site Engineering Review Comments:
1. Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0326-00053, adjacent to the title block on all sheets.
2. Subject lot in the general notes should be adjusted to include the work on parcels 106-07-030A and 106-07-028A.
3. Both N Flowing Wells and W Prince Rd are designated as Arterials with future ROW widths of 100ft (per MS&R 10-8-25 amended map). Update the plan sheets to show current designations as MS&R, along with current and proposed ROW widths.
4. Remove General Note #16 as it appears to be a duplicate of #14.
5. Provide the Zoning and Land Use General Note: “This project is designed to meet the Overlay zone(s) criteria, UDC Article 5.4 Major Streets and Routes Setback Zone (MS&R) AM 2-06.4.7.A
6. Please add general note “Any wastewater discharged into the public sanitary sewerage system shall meet the requirements of Pima County Ordinance No. 1991-140, or as amended.” AM 2-06.4.7.A
7. Revise the plan set to provide Sight visibility triangles for all the site entrances, along Flowing Wells RD and Prince RD in compliance with TSM 10-01.5.0. NOTE: Flowing Wells & Prince RD are designated as Arterial Rds. This designation will be used for Table 5.3.
8. Delineate/show the required 1-ft setback of the structure from the drive-through lane in compliance with UDC 7.4.6.F.2.2
9. Notice: Based on Site Zoning determination – it may be required that the entirety of parcel 10607029B be included within the scope of compliance and the development package plans. This would mean that full code compliance would need to be shown for the “Site” as a whole. Refer to Site Zoning for determination. Contact Site Engineering if questions arise regarding what exactly the full compliance would entail.
Waste Management Comments:
10. Delineate the required minimum clearance areas for within the enclosures on the details (Sheet 4) in compliance with TSM 8-01.0.0
11. Revise trash enclosure details and grading plan sheets to show the ramps slope being 2% away from enclosure as well as the enclosure slab sloping 1% to the gate.
12. Revise Trash Enclosure Wall detail 4/SD1 to meet TSM 8-01.9.0 Figure 2.
Pedestrian Circulation & Vehicle Use Area Comments:
13. Pedestrian circulation is required to connect all buildings, dumpster areas, common areas, and the sidewalk on all the street frontages per TSM 7-01.3.3. Demonstrate how this requirement is addressed for connecting the site to parcel 10607029B as these buildings are all associated with the same site.
14. Dimension all existing and proposed curb return radii on site and at roadway accesses.
15. For the southeast site entrance along Wetmore RD, demonstrate throat length compliance in accordance with access management guidelines 5.11 The length must be 60 feet or greater. Based on current measurements done with the scaling provided, it appears to southwest most customer parking space conflicts with said compliance.
Grading Comments:
16. Call out and provide dimensions of the existing channel to the south, west, & north of the site on the site plans. Include side-slope treatments.
17. Provide a keynote/call-out for all structures downspouts locations on the grading sheets. This is to ensure compliance with building permit plan reviews.
18. Provide required setbacks of the water harvesting basin side slopes to the back of the parking lot vertical curb, trash enclosures, and sidewalk. See geotechnical report recommendations in Drainage section 6.7.
19. Please provide existing channel 100yr flow, outfall, and spot elevations in the grading plans.
20. The basin to the southeast shows a 1:1 slope but does not contain a keynote referring to the selected slope treatment. Revise according through line work and keynote usage.
Drainage Comments:
21. Please add Drainage General Note: “Maintenance - (a) The owner or owners shall be solely responsible for operation, maintenance, and liability for drainage structures. (b) The owner or owners shall have an Arizona registered professional civil engineer prepare a certified inspection report for the drainage facilities at least once each year, and that these regular inspection reports will be on file with the owner for review by city staff, upon written request; City staff may periodically inspect the drainage facilities to verify that scheduled and unscheduled maintenance activities are being performed adequately; and (d) That the owner or owners agree to reimburse the city for any and all costs associated with maintaining the drainage facilities, should the city find the owner or owners deficient in their obligation to adequately operate and maintain their facilities.” 
22. Provide a descriptor box adjacent to the proposed basins (Includes water harvesting basins) and the stormwater chambers on the grading plan. Include a leader arrow to the basin or provide a label for the basin and reference the label on the top of the descriptor box. This can be done through an additional detail sheet or included on current basin detail sheet if the grading plans appear too narrow for such details. Include the following applicable information in the descriptor box:
a. Total volume, cubic feet or acre feet;
b. detention volume, cubic feet or acre feet;
c. retention volume, cubic feet; d.
d. first-flush retention volume, cubic feet; (It is understood these values do not account towards drainage requirements for the underground chambers, this is for documentation)
e. Q100 in, cubic feet per second;
f. Q100 out, cubic feet per second;
g. Basin top elevation, feet;
h. 100-year water surface elevation, feet;
i. 100-year ponding depth, (measured from the lowest elevation of the basin), feet. DSSDR 11.1.3.
23. Revise Detail 3 “Slope Protection” (Sheet C800) to follow DSSDR Chapter 4.7 Figure 4.4.
24. Show that the retention/detention basins (Water harvesting basins as well) are the minimum required 10 feet setback from structures (Includes trash enclosures). DSSDR 5.3.1.11 If they are to be proposed within that setback, Geotechnical justification must be included in the provided Geotech report to provide recommendations on possible reduced setback requirements.
Drainage Report Comments:
25. Add to section 1.2 of the drainage report that “the project is located within the City of Tucson city limits and the Ruthrauff Wash Watershed which is part of the Tucson Stormwater Management Study Master Plan (TSMS). This watershed is designated as critical watershed management area and adopted in 2020 as a Critical Basin Management Plan Area.”
26. Include within the purpose section (1.2) the objectives of the report, which should include
a. Compute the peak onsite discharges under existing and proposed conditions
b. Provide detailed calculations for onsite conveyance improvements
c. Provide calculations for first flush retention and critical basin detention drainage requirements
27. Revise the report to show compliance with critical basin detention requirements, which requires the post-development peak discharge reduction of 15% from Pre-Development levels. This should especially be shown/demonstrated in Table 1: Summary. As this development is a complete redevelopment of an existing site, it would be allowable that the PRE-Existing values used can be the current existing rather than assuming no development at all.
28. Include within section 3.3, a table similar to Table 2.2 in DSSDR 2.2. This should break down how the first flush requirement was determined as well as demonstrate how much each drainage improvement achieves.
29. Revise the conclusion to demonstrate that full compliance with City of Tucson First Retention / critical basin detention requirements being addressed and achieved. This should also contain the engineers’ statement assuring the drainage design falls in compliance with the applicable drainage manuals (i.e., City of Tucson’s Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management and City of Tucson’s Amendments to Design Standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention (DSSDR)
30. Provide existing and proposed 100yr flow and drainage flow patterns for and adjacent to the concrete channel onto site onto Appendix A Figure 3 & 4 exhibits.
31. Show flow coming from the adjacent parcel to the east (106-07-029B) onto site onto Appendix A Figure 3 & 4 exhibits.
32. Provide An inspection and maintenance protocol including frequency of inspection, a checklist of items to be inspected and recommended maintenance when an inspection identifies a maintenance requirement shall be prepared by an Arizona registrant should be included at the end of the provided drainage report. DSSDR 4.1.1. This should be included within the drainage report.
33. Please discuss the outfall/infall of the following: Sheet 301 of the Development Package plan set shows inlet/outlet of basin, please clarify that grades shown in the vicinity of the inlet/outlet reflect the drainage patterns shown in the “Planned Conditions Drainage Map” (Figure 4).
34. Provide scupper and curb opening hydraulic calculations.
35. Provide all proposed inlet and outlet locations and flow paths within the Planned Conditions Drainage Map within the drainage report.
36. Include if the existing channels were included within all drainage calculations.

If you have any questions or concerns, please contact Marco Contreras at Marco.contreras@tucsonaz.gov or Joe Macaulay at Joe.Macaulay@tucsonaz.gov
03/27/2026 Site Landscape Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
REVIEWER: CHAD KELLER, PLA
SITE LANDSCAPE/NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION SECTION

PROJECT: MCDONALD'S PRINCE & FLOWING WELLS
ACTIVITY NO: TD-DEV-0326-00053
ADDRESS: 1351 W PRINCE RD
ZONING: COMMERCIAL ZONE (C-2)
LAND USE: COMMERCIAL RESTAURANT
03.27.2026

THE PROPOSED PLANS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR SITE LANDSCAPE, NATIVE PLANTS, AND RAINWATER HARVESTING, PER-THE-CITY OF TUCSON UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE (UDC), TECHNICAL STANDARDS MANUAL (TSM), AND ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL (AM).

RESUBMIT REVISED DRAWINGS ALONG WITH A DETAILED RESPONSE LETTER, STATING HOW ALL SITE LANDSCAPE AND NPPO SECTION REVIEW COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED.

SITE LANDSCAPE/NPPO SECTION COMMENTS:

1. Include flowline arrows on the commercial rainwater harvesting plan that matches the flowlines on the grading plan.

2. Include a few spot elevations at curb cut inlets, bottom of basin and curb cut outlets. This is for quick reference for site inspections.

3. Coordinate with the civil engineer to make sure downspouts, splashpads and scuppers are shown on the grading plan where applicable around the building. Include the same information on the landscape plan set.

4. Can the new building footprint roof top drainage be added to one or a few subwatershed? This will only increase your percentage from the 51 percent that is currently calculated on the plan.

5. Prior to site landscape approval, ensure that Site Zoning and Site Engineering comments are fully addressed.

6. Include the Activity Number, TD-DEV-0326-00053 on all sheets in the plan set.


Thank you.
Chad Keller, PLA
Landscape Architect
chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov
520.837.4923
03/25/2026 Site Zoning Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT CDRC TRANSMITTAL

FROM:
Bobby Parsons
PDSD Zoning Review Section

PROJECT:
New McDonald’s - 1351 W. Prince Rd. Tucson, AZ 85705
Development Package (1st Review)
TD-DEV-0326-00053

TRANSMITTAL DATE: 3/25/2026
DUE DATE: 3/24/2026

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is March 3, 2027.

SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS)

CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet:

2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0326-00053, adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

Zoning and Land Use Notes

2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses.

2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Please include all Use Specific Standards applicable as noted by the standard above. Food Service (Excluding Soup Kitchen) in the C-2 zone (UDC Table 4.8-4) has 4.9.M.1 and 4.9.13.P as the applicable Use Specific Standards.

2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan.

3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6 – Please include a note stating “this project is designed to meet the overlay zone(s) criteria. UDC Article 5.4 Major Streets and Routes Setback Zone (MS&R) as noted by the standard above.

2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:

2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions
The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided.

2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks.

4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C – Please include the information as noted by the standard above for both Flowing Wells Road and Prince Road including across the street. Also, please update the plans to show the future ROW widths of 100’ (MSR 10-8-25).

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

2-06.4.9.A - Draw in all proposed lot lines with approximate distances and measurements.

5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.A – Due to the shared access with parcel 10607029B and both these parcels functioning as a unified site, please submit a recorded Covenant Regarding Development and Use of Real Property with your next submittal. The Covenant can be found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/submission-documents/covenant-regarding-development-and-use-of-real-property-udc-with-release.pdf.

2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section.

6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.2 – Please show the site visibility triangles for all site entrances along Flowing Wells Road and Prince Road as noted by the standard above.

2-06.4.9.H.5 - If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Demonstrate compliance with the 1’ setback of the structure from the drive thru lane per UDC 7.4.6.F.2.

2-06.4.9.J - If street dedication is not required or proposed and the project site is adjacent to a Major Street or Route, draw the Major Street right-of-way lines for those streets. (Add the MS&R future sidewalk, right-of-way lines, sight visibility triangles, etc.)

8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.J – Please include the future ROW information as noted by the standard above.

2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s).

9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Please include the proposed use and the height within the footprint of the building as noted by the standard above.

2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual.

10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Please demonstrate onsite pedestrian connectivity to the adjacent parcel as it is considered part of this unified site.

***For additional information on the any standard presented in this memo, please refer to the City of Tucson “Unified Development Code” – Administrative Manual Section 2-06 or Technical Standards noted in the comments. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/all-codes-plans-determinations ***

If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact Bobby Parsons at Robert.Parsons@tucsonaz.gov.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package and comment response letter. To resubmit visit Tucson Development Center at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home.
Instructions for resubmittal - https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/website/Resubmittals.pdf.
03/02/2026 CDRC Application Completeness Express REVIEW COMPLETED
03/03/2026 CDRC Review Coordinator Express REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC added Addressing, ADOT, TEP, PAG, USPS, and SWG to the workflow. Review request email sent to Addressing, ADOT, and TEP. FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG.
03/25/2026 External Reviewers - Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) Standard REVIEW COMPLETED ADOT has no comments.
03/03/2026 External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments Standard REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required.
03/04/2026 External Reviewers - Pima County Addressing Standard REVIEW COMPLETED Good afternoon,

This project does not require review by Pima County Addressing. 1351 W Prince RD is an appropriate address for the project.









Nicholas Jordan

Addressing Official

201 N. Stone Avenue, 1st Floor

Tucson, Arizona 85701

520-724-9623

www.pima.gov/developmentservices
03/03/2026 External Reviewers - Southwest Gas Standard REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required.
03/10/2026 External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) Standard REVIEW COMPLETED March 10, 2026
WO#T178192
City of Tucson
Planning and Development Services
Attn: CDRC Admin Team
Dear CDRC Admin Team
Subject: McDonald's Prince & Flowing Wells
TD-DEV-0326-00053
Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed and approved the development
plan submitted 3/3/2026. There are existing facilities within the development which are
depicted upon the plan. There are no apparent conflicts at this time.
Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the
existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer.
To apply for electric service, please call the New Construction department at (520) 918-
8300. Please submit a final set of plans including approved site, electric load, paving
off-site improvements and irrigation plans. If available, include a PDF version of the
plans.
If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Should you
have any easement questions, please contact our Land Resources Department,
LandReviews@tep.com.
Should you have any technical questions, please contact the area designer,
Chuck Leon
(520) 400-6133
cleon@tep.com
Sincerely,
Design Admins
Design Admins
Tucson Electric Power
03/03/2026 External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) Standard REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required.
03/24/2026 Fire New Construction Standard REVIEW COMPLETED
03/02/2026 OK to Submit - Engineering Fast REVIEW COMPLETED
03/03/2026 OK to Submit - Zoning Fast REVIEW COMPLETED