Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: TD-DEV-0326-00053
Parcel: 10607030A

Address:
1351 W PRINCE RD

Review Status: Requires Resubmit

Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.3

Permit Number - TD-DEV-0326-00053
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.3
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
08/18/2026 Site Engineering Standard APPROVED
08/17/2026 TSMR/PDMR - Engineering APPROVED
08/21/2026 Site Zoning Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT CDRC TRANSMITTAL

REVIEWED BY: Jeffrey Cassidy – Planner
PDSD Zoning Review Section

PROJECT: McDonald's Prince & Flowing Wells
Development Package (3rd Review)
TD-DEV-0326-00053 1351 W PRINCE RD TUCSON, AZ 85705

TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 21, 2026

Per UDC Section 3.3.3.G.5.c, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year expiration date is March 02, 2027.

SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS)

2-06.4 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

4.1 General content for all submitted plans must include the following:

4.1.B A title block on each sheet that includes:

4.1.B.2 Brief legal description;

1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1.B.2 – Provide missing Legal Description: WLY PTN NW4 NW4 NW4 SW4 EXC RD 1.68 AC SEC 26-13-13

4.1.B.6 The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (DP, subdivision, rezoning, BOA, DDO, PDMR, TSMR, overlay, etc.).

2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1.B.6 – Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV -0326-00053, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. Not all of the sheets have the required permit as requested. Update set to complete this standard.

4.2 Required zoning and land use notes:

4.2.H. Total square feet of each principal or accessory building, including the footprint of open structures. Percentage of building area and vehicular use area lot coverage, as applicable.

3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.H – Provide missing vehicular use area information per 4.2.H standard.

4.2.I. Percentage of building, lot area, or vehicular use area expansion, including previous expansions. When the proposed site is part of a larger site, the calculations encompass the entire site, whether existing or proposed.

4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.I – Provide missing information per 4.2.I standard.

4.4.D List the following note on all development package documents: “Any relocation or modification of existing utilities and/or public improvements necessitated by the proposed development will be at no expense to the public.”

5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.D – Provide missing note on C000 Sheet under General Notes.

4.7.S Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual.

6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.S – Demonstrate connectivity to the adjacent 106-07029B parcel.

Miscellaneous:

7. COMMENT:– There is no record of having submitted a demolition permit for the existing Walgreens building. Indicate if this is forthcoming and if this has already been submitted and/or approved, provide the permit number.

8. COMMENT:– The APN on Sheet SP1 is incorrect. Update to correct parcel number.

9. COMMENT:– Additional comments may be forthcoming on the next review based on responses to Zoning and other PDSD reviewer comments.
RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Please resubmit revised drawings and any corrected plans along with a detailed response letter, stating how all Site Zoning Review comments were addressed.

**Instructions for resubmittal - www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/tdc-faq/new-pdfs/revisions-and-resubmittals.pdf.

***For additional information on the standards presented in this memo, please refer to the City of Tucson Administrative Manual Section 2-06 or Technical Standards noted in the comments.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Jeffrey.cassidy@tucsonaz.gov
08/19/2026 TSMR/PDMR - Zoning REQUIRES RESUBMIT Zoning does not oppose the TSMR request for the trash enclosure. However, the request to use the ROW sidewalk to formally have pedestrian connectivity to APN: 106-07029B cannot be approved as there is no ADA compliant path from the ROW to the existing business on site.