Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.4
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0325-00084
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.4
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/06/2026 | Site Landscape Standard | APPROVED | |||
| 02/10/2026 | Site Engineering Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Permit Activity Number: TD-DEV-0325-00084 (2nd Review) Project: Pennsylvania Outdoor Storage Location: 1214 E PENNSYLVANIA ST Review Date: 2/10/2026 Reviewer: Marco Contreras – Engineering Associate - Site Engineering Related cases: *This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-6 and Technical Standards Manual (TSM) Section for waste management, Pedestrian Access, Hydrology -Retention/Detention Requirements, and all site standard code. * City of Tucson Code: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Codes Drainage Manual Link: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/cot-drainage-manual-searchable.pdf Design standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention Link: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/updated-retention-detention-manual.pdf Site Engineering Review Comments: 1. After reviewing the plan set and comment response file. It does not appear that the previous review cycle comments were entirely acknowledged or addressed. Please see to it that all previous cycle comments completed on 9/18/2025 are addressed and acknowledge in an associated comment response letter. FOR PERMIT RESUBMISSION, IT IS REQUIRED THAT: Corrected/Revised Plan set and a detailed response letter document that clearly shows how you addressed all of Site Engineering’s and other reviewers’ comments for the completed review cycle. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact Marco Contreras at Marco.contreras@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 03/04/2026 | Site Zoning Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Bobby Parsons PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: Development Package 1214 E Pennsylvania St, Tucson, AZ TD-DEV-0325-00084 (3rd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: 3/4/2026 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. ******Previous comments were not addressed completely, and the comment response letter refers to the first review. Please address previous review comments dated 9/22/2025. The previous review comments have been included below again for reference. ****** Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is March 18, 2026. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.3.12 - An index of sheets in the development package shall be provided on the first sheet. 1. COMMENT: 2-06.3.12 – Please include sheet numbers in the index (IE: CS01 – sheet 1, DT01 – sheet 2). Also, please organize the sheets in order as noted by the standard above. This comment was not fully addressed. Reorganize sheets into the correct order per individual page numbers, or relabel sheet numbers. Zoning and Land Use Notes 2-06.4.7.A.2 - List the gross area of the site/subdivision by square footage and acreage. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.2 – The overall site parcel(s) listed is incorrect. Please include the correct parcel numbers associated with this project (IE: 132-17-133K, 132-17-133J, 132-17-133L, 132-17-133F, and 132-17-133D). Also, please update the existing building GFA with the correct buildings as noted by the standard above. This comment was not addressed fully. UDC 11.4.20 defines a site as: “The land area consisting of a portion of a lot , an entire lot , or contiguous lots , not including dedicated public property, designated for development as a single entity.” These parcels meet the definition of a site since they share parking, access to the public right-of-way, and in the case of three of the parcels, common ownership under Cuber LLC. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Identify the existing uses for the site as noted by the standard above. The proposed use says “Livaway Suite Hotel Facility Subject To Use Specific Standard 4.9.9.B.1”. Please clarify if this is a change of use. This comment was not addressed. Light Industrial is a description of the I-1 zone, but is not a zoning use per the UDC. See UDC Table 4.8-5 for a list of permitted uses within the I-1 zone here: https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az_udc/0-0-0-2105. Indicate both existing and new proposed uses on site. The submittal still incorrectly states that the proposed use is “Livaway Suite Hotel…”. Please correct. The proposed new use of outdoor storage should be classified as: “Commercial Storage, subject to use-specific standard 4.9.10.A and 4.9.13.Q” 2-06.4.7.A.6.b - If there is more than one lot within the site, the note should specify which lots are affected by the additional applications or overlay zones. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.b – As this site is composed of multiple lots, please show all buildings on the site and list their existing uses. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 2-06.4.7.A.8.b - Percentage and area in square feet of building and accessory building coverage; 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.b – Please show the percentage and area in in square feet of all buildings as noted by the standard above. This comment was not addressed. No requested information was found on the cover page as indicated in the comment response letter. 2-06.4.7.A.8.c - Percentage of building, lot area, or vehicular use area expansion. If the building(s) or lot area have been previously expanded, those calculations shall be included; and, 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.c – Please include the information as noted by the standard above (IE: vehicular use expansion). If no expansion of gross floor area is planned, indicate that no expansion of GFA is proposed. Indicate area of outdoor storage as a percentage of the existing Cuber LLC GFA in a separate general note. 2-06.4.7.A.8.d - When the proposed site is part of a larger site, the calculations encompass the entire site, whether existing or proposed. If the project is being phased, calculations must show that, at each phase, requirements are being met. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.d – Please include the information as noted by the standard above as this site includes 4 existing buildings and their associated parking. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a –Although the comment response letter refers to cover sheet for required parking, no updated motor vehicle parking calculations table is provided. Provide an updated motor vehicle parking calculation table for the site. See UDC Table 7.4.4-1 for additional parking required for the proposed outdoor commercial storage area. Show required parking on the site map. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Provide bicycle parking requirements as part of the parking calculations table requested in comment 2-06.4.9.H.5.a. ***For additional information on the any standard presented in this memo, please refer to the City of Tucson “Unified Development Code” – Administrative Manual Section 2-06 or Technical Standards noted in the comments. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/all-codes-plans-determinations If you have any questions about this transmittal, contact Site Zoning Reviewer Bobby Parsons at Robert.Parsons@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package and comment response letter. To resubmit visit Tucson Development Center at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home. Instructions for resubmittal - https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/website/Resubmittals.pdf. |
||
| 02/13/2026 | TSMR/PDMR - Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | See Engineering comments and verify if TSMR is necessary | ||
| 03/09/2026 | ROW Engineering Review Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED |