Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: TD-DEV-0325-00071
Parcel: 119281300

Review Status: Requires Resubmit

Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2

Permit Number - TD-DEV-0325-00071
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
03/26/2025 Traffic Engineering Review Standard APPROVED This project will require a PIA to widen La Cholla to construct the NB left turn lane and complete the three-lane section to Tourney Road.
04/25/2025 CDRC Post Review Express PENDING ASSIGNMENT
04/17/2025 Commercial Plumbing Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT 1. The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole is 12” or more below the first floor elevation for lots 7, 15, 21, 24-27, 30-31, 33, 47, 50, 64, and 67. A backwater valve shall not be installed per Section 714.1, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson.
2. The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole is either higher than the first floor elevation or less than 12” below the first floor elevation for lots 58-56 and 76-82, . Provide a backwater valve per Section 714.1, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson.
04/16/2025 Design Review Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT Flexible Lot Development (FLD) Review:
Date: April 15, 2025
From: Richard Fe Tom, AIA, City of Tucson On-Call Design Professional
To: City Development Review Committee (CDRC)
Re: Design Professional review of the Casas Oestes Flexible Lot Development (FLD),
2980 S La Cholla BL, Development Package # TD-DEV-0325-00071 for compliance with
Uniform Development Code (UDC) Section 8.7.3.M.1: Design Criteria of the and UDC
Sections 2-06.5.3.E of the Administrative Manual.
The following review comments are provided to detail the Design Professional’s recommendation
for approval of this project. The review is based upon Unified Development Code (UDC) Section
8.7.3.M. Design Criteria and Section 2‐ 06.5.3.E, Architectural Variation Plan, of the
Administrative Manual.
Unified Development Code (UDC)
M. DESIGN CRITERIA (Section 8.7.3.M) Design Professional's Comment:
1. Architectural Variation
a. Purpose:
To provide architectural diversity, visual
interest, and to avoid monotony in
architectural design by requiring variations in
such architectural treatments as color,
finished materials, massing and rooflines,
orientation of units, garages and porches.
Meets criteria – An Architectural Variation
Plan (AVP) for the Casas Oestes Flexible Lot
Development (FLD) has been submitted as
part of Development Package # TD-DEV0325-00071. The AVP as submitted meets
the “Purpose” of UDC Section 8.7.3.M.
b. Applicability:
(1) Projects with 20 or more single-family
detached residential units except when
residential units are on lots larger than 10,000
square feet or, where dwelling units are
separated by 30 feet or more; or,
(2) Elevations of single-family detached units
abutting a public street designated as a
collector or arterial street in the Major Streets
and Routes Plan; or, a private or public street
designed and/or designated as a residential
collector street.
Meets criteria – The Casas Oestes FLD will
contain more than 20 single-family detached
residential units. The total number of lots for
the proposed development is 107, not to
exceed a total of 137 lots per Condition No. 9
of Rezoning Case # C9-81-45C.
c. Requirements:
(1) The same architectural elevation shall not be
repeated more often than every fourth lot.
Meets criteria – The AVP narrative states
that a detailed Lot Release Schedule will be
developed and controlled by the future
 the architecture company
2980 S La Cholla BL - FLD Review tac# 25008 COT 2980 La Cholla FLD
Date: 04/15/25
Page 2 of 5
homebuilder, which will direct which home
plans and elevations are sold within the
released group of lots. This schedule will
include potential inventory homes and will be
used to restrict new-build home sites if
needed to ensure the AVP requirement that
the same architectural elevation shall not be
repeated more often than every fourth lot
(UDC 8.7.3.M.1.c.(1).
(2) Architectural variation may be accomplished
by incorporating a minimum of two of the
following design features into the affected
elevations: different building footprint
orientation, building elevation, garage
placement, roof type, orientation, or
architectural style. The applicant shall work
with the City’s Design Professional to ensure
that adequate variation is achieved.
Requires resubmittal – Please submit
proposed floor plans for each of the seven
two-story homes and three single story
homes along with their corresponding
building elevations & color renderings.
The proposed floor plans and elevations are
required to confirm the incorporation of
design elements and features described in
the AVP narrative that are intended to be
used to achieve adequate variation:
(3) Garage Placement. For FLD projects with
over 20 or more single-family detached
residential units, no more than 50% of
detached residential units throughout the FLD
shall be designed with garages that protrude
from or are flush with the front wall of the
living area or front porch of the house.
Requires resubmittal – Please submit
proposed floor plans and side elevations to
clearly demonstrate compliance with the 50%
FLD garage placement requirement.
Include proposed elevations of the five plans
that are proposed to have a layout where the
garage protrudes and the five plans where
the garage is flush with the living area or
front porch of the home. Also include a
sketch or rendering of the courtyard wall
options that are proposed to be offered to
extend in front of the garage to further reduce
garage dominance.
d. Architectural Variation Plan Required
(1) An Architectural Variation Plan (AVP)
demonstrating compliance with the
requirements of this section shall be prepared
in accordance with the Section 2-06.5.3.E,
Architectural Variation Plan, of the
Administrative Manual.
(2) The AVP shall be included with the
subdivision plat, site plan, or building permit
submittal.
Requires resubmittal – An Architectural
Variation Plan (AVP) that requires revisions
has been submitted for review by the Design
Professional prior to issuance of a Building
Permit for the first building plan in accordance
with UDC Section 8.7.3.M.1.d.(3) and as noted
in General Notes #20 and 21 on the Casas
Oestes FLD Development Package, TD-DEV0325-00071, Sheet 1 of 42.
Complies – The AVP has been included with
the Development Plan Submittal.
 the architecture company
2980 S La Cholla BL - FLD Review tac# 25008 COT 2980 La Cholla FLD
Date: 04/15/25
Page 3 of 5
(3) An AVP is reviewed and considered for
approval as part of the subdivision plat, site
plan, or building permit review procedure,
whichever is applicable, with the Design
Professional included as the reviewer of the
AVP. The Design Professional will review
AVPs for compliance with this Section and
forward his or her findings and
recommendation in writing to the PDSD
Director for consideration of approval.
(4) The PDSD Director's decision may be
appealed in accordance with Section 3.9.1,
Design Review Board Appeal Procedure.
(5) Conditions of the approved AVP shall be
included as notes on the approved plat or site
plan, whichever applies, and the building
plan.
(6) An AVP shall be approved prior to issuance of
a building permit.
Approval is pending.
Not Applicable - No Appeals have been filed to
date.
Complies – Notes stating that “The lots on the
western edge of the property and north of the
Enchanted Hills Wash shall be designed with no
more than two 2-story homes in a row have
been added to the Development Plans in
compliance with Condition No. 9 of Rezoning
Case # C9-81-45C.
Approval pending.
2. Transition Edge Treatment and Mitigation for Adjacent Properties
Not Applicable – This section does not apply. There are no existing residential
developments adjacent to the FLD project.
b. Privacy Mitigation:
(1) Applicability: Privacy mitigation as required
by this section is required when multistory
residences are proposed adjacent to existing
single-story residences and the existing
residences are zoned R-2 or more restrictive.
Not Applicable – This project development
proposes multi-story residences to be
constructed adjacent to existing residences
that are zoned R-2 or more restrictive.
3. Solar Access and Passive Solar
a. Solar Access
Dwelling units should be configured to allow
solar access to adjacent structures in
accordance with Section 7.3, Solar
Considerations.
Compliance Recommended – Indicate in the
AVP Plan how this FLD project has been
designed in compliance with UDC Section 7.3
"Solar Considerations" to allow the use of solar
energy collectors (UDC Section 7.3.1) and
indicate what measures have been taken to
minimize the adverse effects of shadows cast
 the architecture company
2980 S La Cholla BL - FLD Review tac# 25008 COT 2980 La Cholla FLD
Date: 04/15/25
Page 4 of 5
from any proposed multistory structure (UDC
Section 7.3.2).
Compliance to be reviewed by the Design
Professional prior to issuance of a Building
Permit.
b. Passive Solar:
FLD projects should incorporate passive solar
design when practicable.
Compliance Recommended – Include in the
AVP narrative a description of what “passive
solar features” have been incorporated into
the design of the homes.

4. Alternative Compliance
Alternative Compliance requests may be
considered for projects requiring compliance
with Section 8.7.3.M.1. These requests shall be
made per Administrative Manual Section 2-
06.5.3.E, Architectural Variation Plan.
No Comment – No Alternative Compliance
requests have been submitted.
UDC Administrative Manual
Section 2-06.5 FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT
(FLD) – Additional Requirements
Design Professional's Comment:
5.3 Additional Information
E. Architectural Variation Plan: When applicable, an Architectural Variation Plan (AVP) is
required in accordance with Section 8.7.3.M.1 of the UDC as follow
1. Identify on the tentative plat or site plan the
lots and/or units that must provide
architectural variation; and.
Complies – General Notes #20 and 21 on
Sheet 1 of 42 of the Development Package, TDDEV-0325-00071, indicates that all units are
subject to providing architectural variation.
2. Provide a written statement and drawings
(such as elevations and building footprints)
demonstrating how the proposed architectural
variation techniques comply with Section
8.7.3.M.1 of the UDC.
Requires additional information – A written
AVP narrative has been provided. Please
submit drawings of all proposed floor plans
and their respective side and rear elevations
shall be submitted to confirm that the
proposed variation techniques comply with
Section 8.7.3.M.1 of the UDC.
3. Alternative Compliance requests require the
following in addition to the Architectural
Variation Plan:
No comment – No Alternative Compliance
requests have been submitted.
 the architecture company
2980 S La Cholla BL - FLD Review tac# 25008 COT 2980 La Cholla FLD
Date: 04/15/25
Page 5 of 5
a. Rationale for Alternative Compliance with
the requirements of Section 8.7.3.M.1;
b. Explanation of how the proposed is a best
practice; and,
c. Photographs and/or graphical illustrations
to support the rationale and best practice.
F. Privacy Mitigation Plan: When applicable, a privacy mitigation plan is required in accordance
with Section 8.7.3.M.2.d of the UDC as follows:
Not Applicable – This section does not apply. There are no existing residential developments
adjacent to the FLD project.
Design Professional's Conclusions:
After review, I have determined that the Architectural Variation Plan (AVP) for Casas Oestes
Flexible Lot Development (FLD), 2980 S La Cholla BL, Development Package # TD-DEV-0325-
00071 requires additional information before I can confirm full compliance with UDC Section 2-
06.5.3.E and that the AVP plan adequately demonstrates compliance with all UDC Section
8.7.3.M, Design Criteria.
End of Review 04/15/2025
Richard Fe Tom, AIA
City of Tucson, Design Professional
04/10/2025 External Reviewers - COT Environmental Services Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT ES Comment:
Include detail, with dimensions, of proposed cul-de-sacs and ensure meet minimum requirements for service vehicle maneuverability and turning radii, for curbside collection services. Refer to TSM 8-01.5.3.

Andy Vera
(520) 837-3798
Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov
03/24/2025 External Reviewers - Pima County Addressing Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT Marianne Kuglmeier Marianna.Kuglmeier@pima.gov 724-6772
Report Date: 03/24/2025
Description : Addressing review of TD-DEV-0325-00071 TP for Casas Oestes Lots 1-114.
Address : , , ,
Record Type : Addressing
Document Filename : SUB1-TP
Reviewer Contact Information:
Corrections in the following table need to be applied before a plan is approved
Review Report - Resubmittal Requested
Application Number: P25AD00205
Comment ID Comment Date Corrections
Needed
Page Ref Reviewer : Department Review Comments
DSD Addressing
1 03/24/252025 Yes 1 Marianne Kuglmeier : DSD
Addressing
VERIFY LOT NUMBERING. PLAT SHOWS 107 LOTS.
2 03/24/252025 Yes 1 Marianne Kuglmeier : DSD
Addressing
PROVIDE PARCEL NUMBERS FOR SUBJECT PROPERTY
General Comments
Pima County Public Works
201 N. Stone Ave.
Tucson, AZ 85701
If you have any questions please call 520- 724-6490 for an appointment to discuss this notice. If following discussions with staff you still disagree with the below listed deficiencies,
you may appeal to the Building Official in accordance with Pima County Code 15.04.060 by submitting the form posted on our web site with payment of appeal fee prior to permit
application expiration. Disputes about the interpretation of the Zoning Code may be appealed to a Pima County Board of Adjustment under A.R.S. § 11 -816 and P.C.C. § 18.93.060.
Please submit all plans, calculations and specifications to us electronically via the Digital Projects page in the online portal.
Comment ID Comment Date Corrections
Needed
Page Ref Reviewer : Department Review Comments
5 03/24/252025 Yes 1 Marianne Kuglmeier : DSD
Addressing
Proposed street name - Proposed street names need to be submitted to
addressing@pima.gov for review. Pima County Addressing must approve
street names before Final Plat approval per Pima County Zoning Code
18.69.050.2.i. Reference Pima County Zoning Code 18.83.040.D for street
naming guidelines.
4 03/24/252025 Yes 7 Marianne Kuglmeier : DSD
Addressing
THIS STREET IS AN ALIGNMENT WITH W SAXONY RD
Re-Submittal Procedures
Please submit all documents using Citizen Access at permits.pima.gov (i.e. plans, drawings, calculations, quantities, exhibits, photographs, letters, etc.).
1. Please go to permits.pima.gov and login to your account to access review comments and resubmit.
2. If you have questions or need clarification regarding comments, please contact the reviewer.
3. Provide a response to each correction comment.
4. To resubmit, upload revised full plan set.
Should the resubmittal not completely address this request for corrections, the application maybe denied requiring a new application and payment all applicable
review fees in accordance withA.R.S. § 11-1605.
04/25/2025 NPPO Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT Please see Site Landscape Comments for NPPO requirements.

Thank you.
Chad Keller, RLA
chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov
04/21/2025 ROW Engineering Review Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT PIA plan set required see https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/government/departments/transportation-and-mobility/engineering/documents/pia_guidelines_rev_6-17-2021.pdf for more information.
Apply for PIA under sub records.
Project coordination with DTM required
DTM Project: La Cholla Blvd Protected Bike Lane
contact lee.miller@tucsonaz.gov for design coordination
DTM Project: Prop 411 Safety Improvement: 36th St
Contact Patrick.Hartley@tucsonaz.gov for design coordination.
Turn around required South of lots 71-72.
DTM Comment file with redlines has been added in attachments
04/25/2025 Site Engineering Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT 1. On the cover sheet, please include the contact information (including name, address, email address, and phone number) for the firm that prepared the geotechnical report per Admin Manual section 2-06.4.1.
2. The title block reads 1-114 lots but only 107 are being shown as proposed. Revise as needed.
3. Include Common Area B in the title block as it shows up on sheet 6 of the tentative plat.
4. Due to the WAPA easement on this site, WAPA review and approval will be required before approval of the Tentative Plat.

Stephen Blood
(520) 837-4958
Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov
04/25/2025 Site Landscape Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT CDRC TRANSMITTAL
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
REVIEWER: CHAD KELLER, RLA
SITE LANDSCAPE/NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION SECTION

PROJECT: CASAS OESTES - TENTATIVE PLAT, GRADING PLAN, AND RELATED SUBMITTALS
ACTIVITY NO: TD-DEV-0325-00071
PRE-APPLICATION NO: TP-PRE-0523-00209
ADDRESS: 2980 S LA CHOLLA BL
ZONING: MH-1 MOBILE HOME ZONE
LAND USE: FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD)

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants, and water harvesting.

Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all of the Site Landscape/NPPO Section review comments have been addressed.

SITE LANDSCAPE/NPPO SECTION COMMENTS:

1. There are a few plants and boulders in a portion of the ROW at the south entry from S La Cholla BL. Any landscape elements placed in the ROW requires Transportation Landscape review. Contact David Marhefka (david.marhefka@tucsonaz.gov) for landscape proposed in the ROW or adjust so that all plants and irrigation are within the property limits.

2. See redline set aside NUOS area to remain in perpetuity comment on sheet L2.0. Add a general note about the set aside area to remain in perpetuity to the landscape plans and the NPPO.

3. HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT ZONE (HDZ), add a general note to the cover sheet that outlines how the Hillside Development Zone landscape revegetation requirements have been met by producing a full inventory NPPO. In the note include any other measures taken to meet the standards for HDZ landscape.

4. Provide the development package activity number, TD-DEV-0325-00071, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.3

Thank you.
Chad Keller, RLA
Landscape Architect
chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov
520.837.4923
04/14/2025 Site Zoning Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: PDSD Zoning Review

PROJECT: Casas Oestes – Lots 1 - 107
Development Package (1st Review)
TD-DEV-0325-00071

TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 14, 2025

DUE DATE: April 10, 2025

COMMENTS: Resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is March 19, 2026.

2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS

1. COMMENT: 2-06.3.7 – Provide a small, project-location map in the upper right corner of the cover sheet that meets the requirements below.

2. COMMENT: 2-06.3.12 – The sheet index only shows 42 sheets but 44 were submitted.

2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1 - Provide an email address for the Owner listed on the cover sheet.

4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.C – The title block shows “LOTS 1-114” but General Note states “NUMBER OF LOTS IS 107” and the tentative plat only shows 107.

5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.C – The title block does not appear to list all the proposed common areas. Sheet 6 shows “CA “B”’ but this common area is not listed in the title block.

6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.D – The total number of pages does not appear to be correct as 44 sheets were submitted. Also, provide the page number and total number of pages on sheets 43 & 44.

7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0325-00071, adjacent to the title block on all sheets.

8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile, and provide the following information.

9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.A – Show the subject property approximately centered within the one square mile area;

10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.B - Identify major streets and regional watercourses within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property; and,

11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.C - Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled.

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.2 – As a general note list the gross area of the site/subdivision by square footage and acreage.

13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Provide a general note that identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. The proposed use should be list as Single-family, Detached, Flexible Lot Development (FLD) subject to UDC Article 8.7.3.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.4 – Sheet 7 near the entrance off of La Cholla there is a Site Keynote 4 calling out concrete wedge curb but the street cross section shown of this area, H sheet 40 show vertical curb.

15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 –

16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Per TSM 10 Figure 1 the typical cross section for “TYPICAL CROSS SECTIN FOR INTERIOR ROADS* PARKING LANES = 0” this cross section can only be used where visitors parking is provided in common area distributed evenly throughout the subdivision.

17. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The required guest vehicle parking space calculation is not correct. The 0.25 per unit is only allowed when on street parking is provided.

18. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – FLD Data note 11 setbacks are not correct. Per UDC Article 8.7.3.K.2 Street perimeter yards along FLD project site boundaries are required in accordance with Section 6.4.5.C, Street Perimeter Yards, unless special zoning requirements dictate a greater distance or different point of measurement.

19. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – For interior streets the required street perimeter yard setbacks are based on UDC Articles 6.4.5.C.1.a & .b, 20’ or 10 respectively. For your information UDC street setback requirements were changed in March of 2023.

20. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The “MINIMUM 8’ BETWEEN BUILDINGS” shown on detail F sheet 40 is not correct and should be 6’-0”.

21. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The 5’ rear setback shown on detail F sheet 40 is not correct and should be per Building Code, 3’-0”.

22. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Show the requirements for setbacks to the proposed garages based on UDC Article 6.4.5.C.d on detail F sheet 40.

23. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Clarify what the 5’ & 10’ dimensions shown on detail F sheet 40 shown on what appears to the side street are. Zoning acknowledges the 10’ would be correct for a side street perimeter yard, UDC Article 6.4.5.C.1.b.

24. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.V – Demonstrate how mail delivery will be handled for this site. For gang mailboxes indicate location to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping.

2-06.5.0 FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS)

2-06.5.3 Additional Information
The following are required in addition to the requirements of the tentative plat or site plan, whichever is applicable:

25. COMMENT: 2-06.5.3.C – Clearly show the requirement functional open space on the plan.

26. COMMENT: 2-06.5.3.D – Provide dimensioned building elevations of all proposed units. The elevations can be preliminary drawings.

27. COMMENT: 2-06.5.3.G.2 - Provide a copy of the protective covenants or common use agreements for any shared areas being established by easements over individually-owned property.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Zone1.desk@tucsonaz.gov.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: A revised development package as well as a comment response letter. To resubmit, visit the Tucson Development Center Online at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home. The instructions for resubmittal can be found at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/tdc-faq/new-pdfs/revisions-and-resubmittals.pdf.
03/21/2025 CDRC Review Coordinator Express REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC added Addressing, ADOT, TEP, PAG, USPS, and SWG to the workflow. Review request email sent to Addressing, ADOT, and TEP. FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG.
04/07/2025 External Reviewers - Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) Standard REVIEW COMPLETED Good Afternoon,

ADOT has no comments on this DEV.

Thank you for the opportunity to review.
03/21/2025 External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments Standard REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required.
03/21/2025 External Reviewers - Southwest Gas Standard REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required.
04/17/2025 External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) Standard REVIEW COMPLETED Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the tentative plat for Casas Oestes - TD-DEV-0325-00071 and has no objections.
03/21/2025 External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) Standard REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required.
04/14/2025 Fire New Construction Standard REVIEW COMPLETED The proposed project shall comply with the following items:
1. Appendix B fire flow requirements , 2021 IFC.
2. Appendix C Fire Hydrants location and distribution.
3. Appendix D Fire Apparatus Access Roads.
sal.erivezjr@tucsonaz.gov
03/20/2025 OK to Submit - Zoning Fast REVIEW COMPLETED
03/26/2025 ROW Review REVIEW COMPLETED
04/11/2025 Transportation Landscape Review Standard REVIEW COMPLETED One comment on plan, does not require resubmit. Informational comment, Use of Set Aside Method of NPPO deems that any portion set aside as NUOS be undeveloped in perpetuity and cannot be developed at a later time.