Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: TD-DEV-0325-00070
Parcel: 116206340

Address:
115 S LINDA AV

Review Status: Requires Resubmit

Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1

Permit Number - TD-DEV-0325-00070
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
03/26/2025 Historic Standard NOT REQUIRED This project is pursuing the Downtown Infill Incentive District (IID) Overlay Zone as a tool for redevelopment. Since there are no historic-designated structures or site within or adjacent to the site, no historic preservation review will be required. If you have any questions, please let me know: maria.gayosso@tucsonaz.gov. Thank you.
04/17/2025 NPPO Standard NOT REQUIRED
04/17/2025 Real Estate Standard NOT REQUIRED If any proposed improvements are located outside property lines in public rights-of-way, it will require a Private Improvement Agreement with the Department of Transportation & Mobility or Temporary Revocable Easement with the Real Estate Division (separate processes). If any action is required to address property rights (dedications, easements, etc), please contact the Real Estate Division 520-791-4181.
04/24/2025 CDRC Post Review Express PENDING ASSIGNMENT
04/16/2025 Commercial Plumbing Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT 1. The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (2350.68) is less than 12” below the first floor elevation (2351.40). Provide a backwater valve per Section 714.1, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson.
2. Verify that no fixtures located more than 12” above the rim elevation of the next upstream manhole (i.e. fixtures located on the 2nd and 3rd floors) discharge through the backwater valve. Reference: Section 714.1, IPC 2018
03/26/2025 Design Review Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT A complete Design Package needs to be submitted as a subrecord of this Development Package, following these instructions: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/3/pdsd/documents/submission-documents/special_districts_application_instructions_7.18.23.pdf. Here's an overview of the IID design review process: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/3/pdsd/documents/planning-amp-zoning/iid-application-and-review-process.pdf. Please let me know if you have any questions: maria.gayosso@tucsonaz.gov. Thank you.
04/10/2025 External Reviewers - COT Environmental Services Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT ES Comments:
1. Must include complete enclosure details with all dimensions. Refer to TSM 8-01.4.0, 8-01.5.2, 8-01.9.0 Figure 3A & 3B, for detail requirements.
2. Enclosure position does not work as shown. Refer to TSM 8-01.5.3 for maneuvering requirements and include 14" x 40" clear approach, and TSM 8-01.9.0 Figure 5, for enclosure positioning within a PAAL.

Feel free to contact me regarding this review.

Andy Vera
(520) 837-3798
Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov
04/07/2025 Fire New Construction Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT -Include the type of construction to determine the fire flow requirement per IFC 2024 Table B105.1(2). This will determine the number of required fire hydrants.
-Indicate the location of aerial fire apparatus access. This area shall comply with all the requirements of IFC D105. No large or overhead obstructions can be in this designated area, including landscaping.
john.vincent@tucsonaz.gov
5203495581
03/28/2025 ROW Engineering Review Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT TD-DEV-0325-00070 • 115 S LINDA AV

1. Include the following general note: Prior to any work within the Sun Link Streetcar (SLS) Operational ROW, the Contractor must submit a Track Access Request to SLS at least seven (7) days prior to scheduling work/access. Track Access Request can be obtained from the SLS Operations and Maintenance Facility by emailing trackaccess@tucsonaz.gov.

2. A temporary revocable easement will be required for any steps placed in the public rights-of-way. Please contact DTM Estate Division for additional information or visit https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Transportation-Mobility/Real-Estate.

3. Per Sec. 10-01.4. the minimum with of a sidewalk along a local street is 5ft with a minimum 1’ setback from any structure.

4. Per Sec. 10-01.4.4.F of the UDC Technical Standards the flood discharge at the NE corner of the site must be conveyed under the sidewalk. Provide sidewalk scupper sizing calculations.

If you have any questions, please contact Richard Leigh at Richard Leigh at richard.leigh@tucsonaz.gov
04/24/2025 Site Engineering Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT 1. Modifications to the trash enclosure standards found in TSM section 8-01 require a TSMR reviewed and approved by ES.
2. As access and trash service vehicle maneuverability are shown on the parcel to the south a cross access agreement will be required.
3. Show a complete pedestrian circulation path including out to the trash enclosure.

Stephen Blood
(520) 837-4958
Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov
04/17/2025 Site Landscape Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT CDRC TRANSMITTAL
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
REVIEWER: CHAD KELLER, RLA
SITE LANDSCAPE/NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION SECTION

PROJECT: NEW 3-STORY MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL BUILDING
ACTIVITY NO: TD-DEV-0325-00070
ADDRESS: 115 S LINDA AV
ZONING: C-3 COMMERCIAL ZONE
LAND USE: MULTIFAMILY

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants, and water harvesting.

Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all of the Site Landscape/NPPO Section review comments have been addressed.

SITE LANDSCAPE/NPPO SECTION COMMENTS:

1. Document how the guidelines set forth for the Rio Nuevo Area are being met. IE: shade, open space, streetscape, plazas and pedestrian nodes, screening of parking. See UDC 5.12.7 Rio Nuevo Area (RNA) Zoning Design Standards.

2. Will the landscape areas be depressed to catch rainfall only? If so, note it on the plans and coordinate the depressed planting areas on the civil grading plan.

3. Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0325-00070, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.3

4. Prior to Site Landscape Development Package approval, make sure Site Zoning and Site Engineering comments are addressed.

Thank you.
Chad Keller, RLA
Landscape Architect
chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov
520.837.4923
04/09/2025 Site Zoning Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: PDSD Zoning Review

PROJECT: Linda Avenue Apartments
Development Package (1st Review)
TD-DEV-0325-00070

TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 9, 2025

DUE DATE: April 11, 2025

COMMENTS: Resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is March 19, 2026.

2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0325-00070, adjacent to the title block on all sheets.

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6 - As you are proposing to use the Infill Incentive District (IID) and Individual Parking Plan (IPP) processes, these processes must be approved prior to approval of the DP.

3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6 – As this site is located within the Rio Nuevo Area (RNA) RNA review is required and must be approved prior to approval of the DP.

4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - As Congress St. is designated as an Arterial on the COT MS&R Map provide a general note on the cover sheet stating “THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R).

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Demonstrate that the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.F.2.b are met from the PAAL east to the trash enclosure.

6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The required number of vehicle parking spaces is 96, proposed is 29. The IPP will need to be approved prior to approval of this DP.

7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - The required number of accessible parking spaces is not correct. Per IBC Table 1106.1 96 parking spaces require 4 accessible parking spaces.

8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The electric vehicle parking calculation is not complete. No provided numbers are shown on the plan.

9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - The bicycle parking calculation is not complete. No provided numbers are shown on the plan.

10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Detail G sheet 6 does not addressed UDC Articles 7.4.9.B.1.d, .e, 7.4.9.B.2.a, ,f.

11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.J - Based on right-of-way dimensions provided on sheet 3 Congress St. is not at it’s full MS&R width. Clearly show the future right-of-way requirements of the section on the plan.

12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.L – As access is proposed across the parcel to the south some type of recorded easement/agreement is required. Provide a copy of the recorded document with the next submittal. If this is done via an easement show the easement on the plan along with the recordation information.

13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The north required street perimeter yard setback 20’ is not correct. Review UDC Article 6.4.5.C.2.a and provide the correct required setback.

14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O –The west required street perimeter yard setback 10’ is not correct. Review UDC Article 6.4.5.C.2.b and provide the correct required setback. Also remove the reference to “(COLLECTOR) as Linda Ave. is not designated on the COT MS&R Map. The required west street perimeter yard setback is 20’ and the proposed is 1.1’. The IID will need to be approved prior to approval of this DP.

Additional Comments

15. COMMENT: - As you are proposing to exceed the allowed density in the C-3 Zone, allowed dwelling units is 44, proposed 49. The IID must be approved prior to approval of the DP

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Zone1.desk@tucsonaz.gov.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: A revised development package as well as a comment response letter. To resubmit, visit the Tucson Development Center Online at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home. The instructions for resubmittal can be found at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/tdc-faq/new-pdfs/revisions-and-resubmittals.pdf.
04/07/2025 Transportation Landscape Review Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT
03/05/2025 CDRC Application Completeness Express REVIEW COMPLETED
03/20/2025 CDRC Review Coordinator Express REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC added Addressing, ADOT, TEP, PAG, USPS, and SWG to the workflow. Review request email sent to Addressing, ADOT, and TEP. FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG.
04/07/2025 External Reviewers - Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) Standard REVIEW COMPLETED Good Afternoon,

ADOT has the following comment on this DEV.

It appears this DEV would generate enough traffic to require a Traffic Impact Statement
Please advise.

Thank you for the opportunity to review.
03/20/2025 External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments Standard REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required.
03/24/2025 External Reviewers - Pima County Addressing Standard REVIEW COMPLETED Good afternoon,



Pima County Addressing approves TD-DEV-0325-00070. The addressing plan under review with Pima County as a separate activity.



Nicholas Jordan

Site Review Project Manager II – Addressing Official

Pima County Development Services Department

201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor

Tucson, AZ 85701

(520) 724-9623
03/20/2025 External Reviewers - Southwest Gas Standard REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required.
04/08/2025 External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) Standard REVIEW COMPLETED [EXTERNAL] RE: [EXTERNAL E-Mail] TDC External Review PERMIT: TD-DEV-0325-00069Please Sign-In DUE: 4/3/2025



Design Admins
​
CDRC
​
​
TEP;
​
Quintero, Fred <FQuintero@tep.com>;
​
Design Admins <DesignAdmins@tep.com>
​
Hello,



Attached is our response letter to the subject line project.





Conor Mahoney



Processing Support Specialist – Design Administrator

520-404-8437

Please forward any work actions to designadmins@tep.com.
03/20/2025 External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) Standard REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required.
03/26/2025 MITZ District Standard REVIEW COMPLETED
03/20/2025 OK to Submit - Engineering Fast REVIEW COMPLETED
03/12/2025 OK to Submit - Zoning Fast REVIEW COMPLETED
03/26/2025 ROW Review REVIEW COMPLETED