Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0324-00096
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/20/2024 | Commercial Plumbing | APPROVED | |||
| 09/27/2024 | CDRC Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 09/27/2024 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Per UDC 7-04.2 Physical Separation from Travel Lane Standards A. Sidewalks associated with PAALs must be physically separated from any vehicular travel lane by means of curbing, separation (minimum six inches), barriers, railings, or other means, except at designated crosswalks; B. When bollards or architectural features are used to provide physical separation, the maximum separation between the barriers is five feet clear (See Figure 5); and, C. Barriers must be permanently affixed to the sidewalk by pinning, set in foundations, etc. or when the use of architectural features is proposed such as planters, the containers must be of sufficient weight and size to prevent the removal of such features. Please include this separation everywhere flush curbs are present. Joshua Garcia joshua.garcia@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 08/20/2024 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Wetmore Walmart Expansion Development Package (2nd Review) TD-DEV-0324-00096 TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 20, 2024 DUE DATE: August 21, 2024 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is March 27, 2025. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 1. This comment was not addressed. The note now lists the use as “COMMERCIAL”, Commercial is a use group not a use. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Zoning and Land Use Note 4 lists the existing and proposed use as Retail. Retail is a Use Group not a use as designated in the UDC. This note shall list all existing and proposed uses within the entire shopping center and any applicable Use Specific Standards. 2. Until this comment is addressed Zoning cannot approve this DP. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – This project requires a Mayor and Council Special Exception Procedure, Section 3.4.4 to be submitted and approved prior to approval of this DP. Provide the case number adjacent to the title block on all sheets. Special Exception requirements can be found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Planning-Zoning-Applications. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.a – Clarify why there are differences in the square footage listed within the footprints of all building on this plan compared to DP20-0272. Also when Zoning adds up the square footage listed within the footprints of all existing buildings, excluding the Walmart & expansion the square footage is 169,989 not 44,257. The square footage listed within the footprint of Walmart states 163,789 but under Development Package Calculations note 1 you list it as 163,323, clarify the difference. 4. This comment was not addressed correctly. The expansion calculation should be expressed in square footage not acreage. Also, clarify how there is a lot area expansion when you are not adding any new parcels or lot to the overall site. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.c – Provide a building expansion calculation that clearly shows the square footage that is demolished and proposed and gives a percentage of the square footage of the expansion. 5. This comment was not addressed. It does not appear that the total building square footage for the entire shopping center has been included in the calculations. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.d - When the proposed site is part of a larger site, the calculations encompass the entire site, whether existing or proposed. If the project is being phased, calculations must show that, at each phase, requirements are being met. All applicable calculations shall include the entire site. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.B – The 10’ Natural Gas Easement shown running under the Walmart expansion will need to be abandoned prior to approve of this DP. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 7. Until this comment is addressed Zoning cannot approve this DP. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.A – As the existing property line will be within the proposed building footprint some type of lot line reconfiguration will be required. This process will need to be submitted and approved prior to approval of this DP. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Until comments 3, 4 & 5 are addressed Zoning cannot verify vehicle parking requirements. 9. This comment was not addressed correctly. Provide the, A Parking angle, C Space depth & E Curb length. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Cleary demonstrate that the vehicle parking spaces located adjacent to the proposed landscape diamond meet minimum size requirements per UDC Figure 7.4.6-A & Table 7.4.6-1. 10. This comment was not addressed. Provide a calculation that clearly shows that the requirement is met. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – As it appears you are proposing to use the shopping center vehicle parking space calculation, clearly demonstrate that the site meets the definition of a shopping center, UDC Article 11.3.9.C.3. 11. Zoning acknowledges that this comment was not clear and has revised the comment. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.c - Until comments 3, 4 & 5 are addressed Zoning cannot verify loading space requirements. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Until comments 3, 4 & 5 are addressed Zoning cannot verify bicycle parking requirements. 13. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Clearly demonstrate that the bike rack detail meets all requirements of UDC Articles 7.4.9.B & .C. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Martell at Nicholas.Martell@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: A revised development package as well as a comment response letter. To resubmit, visit the Tucson Development Center Online at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home. The instructions for resubmittal can be found at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/tdc-faq/new-pdfs/revisions-and-resubmittals.pdf. |
||
| 07/22/2024 | CDRC Application Completeness | REVIEW COMPLETED |