Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0324-00080
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/17/2024 | NPPO | NOT REQUIRED | |||
| 05/17/2024 | CDRC Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 04/23/2024 | Commercial Plumbing | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. Revise the site drawing to include the pipe diameter of the public sanitary sewer, the invert and rim elevations of all manholes; along with the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) reference number. Reference: City of Tucson Administrative Manual, Section 2-06.4.8D and Section 107.2.1, IBC 2018 2. Provide the first floor elevation for the proposed restaurant. Reference: City of Tucson Administrative Manual, Section 2-06.4.8D and Section 107.2.1, IBC 2018. 3. Clarify the proposed building sewer for the restaurant. Is the sanitary waste being conveyed to the existing building sewer with only the grease waste being conveyed to the proposed grease interceptor? Reference: Section 1003.2, IPC 2018. 4. The proposed grease interceptor is much larger than is typical even for much larger restaurants and will require special approval from the Pima County Industrial Wastewater Control department. Contact Lucinda.Hyatt@pima.gov for review and assessment. Reference: Section 1003.1, IPC 2018. 5. Provide a vent downstream of the gravity grease separator to protect the seal for the grease separator. Reference: Section 1003.3, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
||
| 04/10/2024 | External Reviewers - Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Good Afternoon, ADOT has the following comments; An Exhibit or Plan Sheets needs to be provided to verify the parking lot contains the queueing space needed for the proposed drive-thru. The SR 77 Encroachment Permit for this Development will need to be updated upon acceptance/approval. The Owner/Developer will need to contact the Southcentral District Permits Office to provide such information. Please contact Michelle Garza at 520-388-4232 or email mgarza@azdot.gov. Thank you! |
||
| 04/08/2024 | Fire New Construction | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | -Verify and indicate if TI will have or require fire sprinklers. If fire sprinklers required, add underground fire service line to DP utility page. john.vincent@tucsonaz.gov 5203495581 |
||
| 04/22/2024 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | TD-DEV-0324-00080 1. Please clearly show the limits of the 100-year floodplain on the site plans. Lianne Evans lianne.evans@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 05/17/2024 | Site Landscape | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT REVIEWER: CHAD KELLER, RLA PDSD LANDSCAPE/NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION SECTION PROJECT: PLAZA VEGA DEVELOPMENT PLANS ACTIVITY NO: TD-DEV-0324-00080 ADDRESS/PARCEL: 5151 N ORACLE RD/10503034G ZONING: C-1 COMMERCIAL ZONE This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants, and water harvesting. Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape/NPPO Review Section comments are addressed. COMMENTS: 1. Ensure that Zoning, Engineering comments and concerns are addressed prior to landscape section approval. 2. Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0324-00080, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.3 3. Outline and call out the limits of work for project clarity. 4. Provide a separate plan sheet for the landscape. The planting details can be on the landscape plan if space allows. See Administrative Manual 2-10.4.2.A 5. Provide shrub planting detail. 6. Provide a separate plan sheet for the irrigation. The irrigation details can be on the irrigation plan if space allows. See Administrative Manual 2-10.4.2.C 7. Provide an emitter placement at shrub detail. 8. Provide a schematic detail of the 6-inch depressed landscape areas. 9. Label irrigation meter on the irrigation plan. See TSM 4-01.6.0 10. Include a construction detail showing root barriers for trees located near hardscape areas. (see Detail 402 located here: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Transportation-Mobility/Landscape/Landscape-Architects If you have any questions about these comments, I can be reached at chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 04/23/2024 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Plaza Vega Development Package (1st Review) TD-DEV-0324-00080 TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 23, 2024 DUE DATE: April 22, 2024 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is Marach 21, 2025. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1 – Provide an email address for the Architect listed on sheet 1. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-1222-00, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – The Use Specific Standards listed for the proposed uses are not correct. Review UDC Table 4.8-4 and provide the correct Use Specific Standards for uses listed under General Note 3. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – The code references listed under General Note 4 for Major Streets and Routes Setback Zone (MS&R) and the Gateway Corridor Zone (GCZ) are not correct. Review UDC Article 5 and provide the correct code references. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Provide the following width dimensions for: a. The area just south of the grease interceptor shown south of the future building between the proposed curb and the existing parking to the east. b. The PAAL between the parking shown south of the future building and the parking south. c. What appears to be a drive-through around the future building. d. What appears to be a drive-through along the proposed restaurant. e. The access lane northwest of the northwest corner of the proposed restaurant. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Provide the required 1’-0” setback from all proposed drive throughs to the adjacent buildings, see UDC Article 7.4.6.F.2.a.(2). 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – As there is a major reconfiguration proposed along the west side of the site clearly demonstrate how vehicles are prevented form driving into the landscape area west to the PAAL along the west side of the western most vehicle use are, UDC Article 7.4.6.H.1. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Clearly demonstrate that there is sufficient vehicle maneuvering for the parking vehicles in the reconfigured area north of Bldg. ‘A’. At a minimum the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.F.4 need to be met including the additional 3’ required by UDC Article 7.4.6.f.4.c, as a parking vehicle is considered and obstruction over 6” in height. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Under the “SHOPPING CENTER” provide a calculation that clearly shows that the site meets the definition of a shopping center, UDC Article 11.3.9.C.3 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The parking space calculation is confusing. Clarify why you are proposing to use a reducing when under “PARKING SUMMARY” you show 146 spaces provided above under “SHOPPING CENTER” you show 98s required. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Based on the total number of vehicle parking spaces shown under the “PARKING SUMMARY”, 146 the required number of accessible parking spaces should be 5, see 2018 IBC Table 1106.1. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Revise the accessible parking space sign detail to show the mounting height requirements as 60” when wall mounted or 84” when located within a pedestrian circulation path. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Either clearly show the required long-term bicycle parking on the plan and provide a detail meeting all requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9.D or remove the future development from the plan. 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Clarify where the public entrance is for the future building as it does not appear that the short-term bicycle parking meets UDC Article 7.4.9.C.2.c. 15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Detail 5 sheet 3 clearly show that a minimum 4’ sidewalk width is maintained at the accessible sign locations If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Martell at Nicholas.Martell@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: A revised development package as well as a comment response letter. To resubmit, visit the Tucson Development Center Online at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home. The instructions for resubmittal can be found at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/tdc-faq/new-pdfs/revisions-and-resubmittals.pdf. |
||
| 03/15/2024 | CDRC Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 03/25/2024 | CDRC Review Coordinator Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | Review request email sent per ADOT. CDRC sent FYI email to PAG, USPS, SWG, TEP. | ||
| 03/25/2024 | External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email to PAG, USPS, SWG and TEP. No further action is required from the customer at this time. | ||
| 03/25/2024 | External Reviewers - Southwest Gas | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email to PAG, USPS, SWG and TEP. No further action is required from the customer at this time. | ||
| 03/25/2024 | External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email to PAG, USPS, SWG and TEP. No further action is required from the customer at this time. | ||
| 03/25/2024 | External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email to PAG, USPS, SWG and TEP. No further action is required from the customer at this time. | ||
| 03/20/2024 | OK to Submit - Engineering Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 03/21/2024 | OK to Submit - Landscape Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 03/22/2024 | OK to Submit - Zoning Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 04/22/2024 | ROW Engineering Review | REVIEW COMPLETED | No Comments David Stiffey David.Stiffey@tucsonaz.gov |