Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0324-00079
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/23/2024 | Commercial Plumbing | APPROVED | |||
| 04/19/2024 | External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) | APPROVED | April 18, 2024 WO#T109893 City of Tucson Planning and Development Services Attn: CDRC Admin Team Dear CDRC Admin Team Subject: NEW MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TD-DEV-0324-00079 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted 3/29/2024. There are no existing facilities within the development and thus, are no apparent conflicts at this time. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. To apply for electric service, please call the New Construction department at (520) 918- 8300. Please submit a final set of plans including approved site, electric load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans. If available, include a PDF version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Should you have any easement questions, please contact our land Resources Department, TEPDEVREV@tep.com. Should you have any technical questions, please contact the area designer, Chuck Leon (520) 400-6133 cleon@tep.com Sincerely, Design Admins Design Admins Tucson Electric Power |
||
| 05/17/2024 | NPPO | APPROVED | |||
| 04/22/2024 | ROW Engineering Review | APPROVED | No Comments David Stiffey David.Stiffey@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 04/22/2024 | Site Engineering | APPROVED | |||
| 05/17/2024 | CDRC Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 04/01/2024 | External Reviewers - Pima County Addressing | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Good morning, Pima County Addressing is returning NEW MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL / TD-DEV-0324-00079 for corrections. Please see the attached documents for comments. Nicholas Jordan Site Review Project Manager – Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-9623 |
||
| 04/14/2024 | Fire New Construction | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | -Include notes on site plan that address the FD knox requirements. Electric Vehicle gates shall have FD knox key switch. Ped gates shall have FD knox key boxes. john.vincent@tucsonaz.gov 5203495581 |
||
| 05/17/2024 | Site Landscape | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT REVIEWER: CHAD KELLER, RLA PDSD LANDSCAPE/NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION SECTION PROJECT: NEW MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ACTIVITY NO: TD-DEV-0324-00079 ADDRESS/PARCEL: 3037 N BALBOA AV/ 10711146L ZONING: O-3 OFFICE ZONE This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants, and water harvesting. Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape/NPPO Review Section comments are addressed. COMMENTS: 1. Ensure that Zoning comments and concerns are addressed prior to landscape section approval. 2. Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0324-00079, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.3 3. Label the project property lines/project limits on all landscape sheets. 4. Label irrigation meter as “irrigation only”. See TSM 4-01.6.0 5. The current zoning is O-3, and the proposed multi-family 2-story building is a commercial land use. Commercial land use adjacent to O-3 triggers interior landscape borders on the north and south property lines. Please revise the plans to reflect the required landscape borders. See Table 7.6.4-1. 6. Call out any areas on the planting plan that should reference the civil plans for coordination. 7. Show the outline of the CRWH Basins on the planting and irrigation plans for reference and add 3:1 side slope maximum leader callout to all the basins. 8. Add Commercial Rainwater Harvesting schematic detail for contractor constructability. 9. Add leader callout to depress all landscape areas 6 to 9 inches including organic or inorganic groundcover to all landscape areas that are not part of the CRWHP. If you have any questions about these comments, I can be reached at chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 04/26/2024 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: 3037 N. Balboa Ave - Multifamily Development Package (1st Review) TD-DEV-0324-00079 TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 25, 2024 DUE DATE: April 22, 2024 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is March 21, 2025. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0324-00079, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.5 – The residential density calculation is not correct. Per UDC Article 6.4.7.B.2.a the calculation is, multiply the area of the site, in acreage, by the density (units per acre ratio) permitted by the underlying zoning or 0.65 x 22 = 14.3 or 14 units allowed. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.a - 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.b – Under General Note 17 you show “SITE COVERAGE” requirement of “MAXIMUM = 75%”. Based on UDC Table 6.3-3.A there is no site coverage maximum, remove the calculation from the plan. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Clearly show that the proposed accessible signs shown adjacent to the two (2) accessible vehicle parking spaces meet the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.F.2.b. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Clearly show that the proposed accessible sign shown adjacent to the single accessible parking space is not located within the 2-6” proposed vehicle overhang. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Zoning acknowledges that the UDC is quite on height clearance for bicycle parking but following conversations with the Zoning Administrator, Elisa Hamblin, it as been determined that a minimum overhead clearance of 6’-0’ from design grade is required at all short-term bicycle parking. Clearly demonstrate that there is a minimum 6’ from design grade to the bottom of stairs for the short-term bicycle parking shown under the stairs. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – The “MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT = 25’” listed under General Note 17 is not correct. Review UDC Table 6.3-3.A and provide the correct allowed height. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – It is not clear if the two structures shown on the plan are a single building connected in some way or not. Clarify what is proposed. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Martell at Nicholas.Martell@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: A revised development package as well as a comment response letter. To resubmit, visit the Tucson Development Center Online at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home. The instructions for resubmittal can be found at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/tdc-faq/new-pdfs/revisions-and-resubmittals.pdf. |
||
| 03/15/2024 | CDRC Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 03/22/2024 | CDRC Review Coordinator Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | Review request email sent per ADOT, Addressing & TEP. CDRC sent FYI email to PAG, USPS, SWG. | ||
| 04/10/2024 | External Reviewers - Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) | REVIEW COMPLETED | Good Afternoon, ADOT has no comments on this DEV. Thank you for the opportunity to review. |
||
| 03/22/2024 | External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required from the customer at this time. | ||
| 03/22/2024 | External Reviewers - Southwest Gas | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required from the customer at this time. | ||
| 03/22/2024 | External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required from the customer at this time. | ||
| 03/20/2024 | OK to Submit - Engineering Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 03/20/2024 | OK to Submit - Landscape Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 03/22/2024 | OK to Submit - Zoning Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED |