Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: TD-DEV-0324-00078
Parcel: 13602001Q

Review Status: Requires Resubmit

Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.5

Permit Number - TD-DEV-0324-00078
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.5
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
08/22/2024 Commercial Plumbing APPROVED
08/23/2024 NPPO NOT REQUIRED
08/27/2024 CDRC Post Review PENDING ASSIGNMENT
08/06/2024 ROW Engineering Review REQUIRES RESUBMIT TD-DEV-0324-00078 • 1333 S PANTANO PW

1. The pedestrian circulation path along Pantano PW Rd will need to be brought into compliance with Technical Standards Manual (TSM) Sec. 10-01.4.0 in accordance with TSM Sec. 10-01.3.3. Indicate on drawings if the curb access ramps and sidewalk along the property frontage will need to be replaced.

If you have any questions, please contact Richard Leigh. at 520-403-0970 or at arnold.leigh@tucsonaz.gov
08/27/2024 Site Engineering REQUIRES RESUBMIT 1. Pedestrian circulation striping behind parking spaces is prohibited. Per TSM 7-01.4.1.F sidewalks or pedestrian refuge areas cannot be located between any motor vehicle parking space and the PAAL providing access to that space.
2. Provide waste stream calculations and waste enclosure specifications compliant with TSM Section 8. This applies to the site as a whole, not just the new building.
3. Maximize rainwater harvesting by depressing landscape areas 6-9 inches and using curb cuts and flush curbs were feasible.
4. Show locations of roof downspouts. Stormwater from roof drains may not pass over ADA sidewalks per TSM 7-01.4.3E.
5. Please provide ADA parking spaces compliant with ADA Accessibility Standards Chapters 208 and 502. Show all ADA parking spaces across the site on the plans with dimensions for the spaces and access aisles. At least one space must be van-capable.
6. The area of disturbance on the site measures 1.12 acres. Provide a SWPPP.

Mike Ortiz
michael.ortiz@tucsonaz.gov
08/23/2024 Site Landscape REQUIRES RESUBMIT CDRC TRANSMITTAL
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
REVIEWER: CHAD KELLER, RLA
PDSD SITE LANDSCAPE/NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION SECTION

PROJECT: STORAGE SPACE ADDITION
ACTIVITY NO: TD-DEV-0324-00078
ADDRESS/PARCEL: 1333 S PANTANO PW/13602001Q
ZONING: C-3 COMMERCIAL ZONE

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants, and water harvesting.

Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape/NPPO Review Section comments are addressed.

COMMENTS FROM PRE-APPLICATION MEETING WITH MATT CARLTON (JANUARY 2023):
1. Bring the street landscape border up to code (which currently exists) on S Pantano PKWY per UDC 7.6.4.C-2 and Table 7.6.4-1. See UDC 7.6.4.C for landscape border requirements. See new comments below.
2. Maximize rainwater harvesting into existing landscape areas. See new comments below.

SITE LANDSCAPE/NPPO SECTION COMMENTS:
1. Ensure that Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to site landscape section approval.

2. Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0324-00078, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.3

3. Add street landscape border (required and provided) plant quantity calculations that show that the updates landscape border has been brought up to UDC code requirements per pre-application meeting comments. See UDC 7.6.4 for street landscape border code requirements.

4. Is supplemental irrigation needed for the new trees and other plants in the updated landscape border? If so, please add a new sheet that shows the irrigation layout and the equipment details needed to complete the work. City of Tucson Standard planting and irrigation details can be found here: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Transportation-Mobility/Landscape/Landscape-Architects. For your reference/use in completing your landscape development package.

5. It appears that a tree in the street landscape border may be within 5 feet of hardscape or a curb. Include a construction detail showing root barriers for trees located near hardscape areas. See Detail 402 located here: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Transportation-Mobility/Landscape/Landscape-Architects, or move the tree to the center of the landscape area.

6. It is difficult to retrofit depressed landscape areas on an existing site with already planted street landscape borders, but if an attempt has been made to provide 6-to-9-inch depressed landscape areas, then please provide contouring that matches the civil grading plan and reference the civil grading plan for construction. Also, if the intent was to depress the areas, add a schematic water harvesting infiltration area detail. This is not required but recommended for contractor reference. If an example of this detail is need, reach out and I will email a copy to you.

If you have any questions about these comments, I can be reached at chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov, or at 520.837.4923
08/23/2024 Site Zoning REQUIRES RESUBMIT PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: PDSD Zoning Review

PROJECT: Storewise Tucson
Development Package (1st Review)
TD-DEV-0324-00078

TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 23, 2024

DUE DATE: August 24, 2024

COMMENTS: Resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is July 31, 2025.

2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

1. COMMENT: 2-06.2.4 – Remove all references to building code from the plan, i.e. “SEAL OF BUILDING ENV & DERFERRED SUBMITTALS” reference from the DP.

2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1 – Provide the phone number and email address for the owner listed on the 1st sheet.

3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.D – Provide the page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx) within the title block near the lower right corner of all sheets.

4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-1222-00, adjacent to the title block on all sheets.

5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4 - The project-location map shall be drawn at a minimum scale of three-inch equals one mile

6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.C – The section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled on the location map.

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.2 – As a general note list the gross area of the site/subdivision by square footage and acreage.

8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses.

9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - As Pantano Pw. is designated as an Arterial on the COT MS&R Map provide a general note on the cover sheet stating, “THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R)”.

2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:

10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.c – Provide a building area expansion calculation on the plan.

2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions
The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided.

11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.B – Provide the recordation information for all existing easements shown on the plan.

12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.B – The existing 6’ utility easement shown running under the proposed building will need to be abandoned prior to approval of this DP.

13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C - The following information for Pantano Pw., dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.A – As this site is made up of two (2) parcels, 136-02-001Q & 136-02-001R, a lot combination is required. Provide a copy of the approved Pima County Assessor’s Consolidation Request From, found at: https://www.asr.pima.gov/Forms?tab=Misc, with you next submittal.

15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications.

16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Dimension all parking area access lanes (PAALs) and access lanes, existing and proposed on the plan.

17. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Clearly demonstrate that the 6’ requirement, UDC Article 7.4.6.F.4 are met for the parking area near the southwest corner of the existing building to the fence and from the parking area near the northeast corner of the proposed building from the parking space to the building.

18. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The vehicle parking space calculation shall include the number of accessible parking spaces required and provided and the number of van accessible parking spaces required and provided.

19. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Provide details for both a standard and accessible vehicle parking space.

20. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – It does not appear that the provided accessible parking space meets the requirements of ICC A117.1-2009 Section 502.2.

21. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.c – Provide a loading area calculation that provides the number required and provided.

22. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Provide a bicycle parking space calculation that provides the number required and provided.

23. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Provide a detail for the required short-term bicycle parking that clearly demonstrates how all required of UDC Article 7.4.9 are met.

24. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Remove the reference to “EX. 10.0’ LANDSCAPED SETBACK” from sheet 2 and the reference to “LANDSCAPED” “FRONT – 10’” & “SIDES AND BACK – 0’” on sheet 1 under “SETBACKS” as the UDC has no requirements for “LANDSCAPE SETBACKS”.

25. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The reference to “BUILDING” “ADJACENT TO STREET – 1.5” under the “SETBACKS, sheet 1 is not correct. Review UDC Article 6.4.5.C.2.a and provide the correct street perimeter yard setback.

26. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Remove the reference to “23.25’ BUILDING SETBACK” from sheet 2 as it is no correct and provide an actual building setback dimension from the building to the street property line.

27. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Provide the height and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s).

28. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – For the sidewalk near the northeast corner of the proposed building and the striped area around the southwest corner of the existing building, clearly demonstrate that the width is 6’-6” as parking vehicles are allowed to overhang the sidewalk, UDC Article 7.4.6.H.3 & TSM 7-01.4.3.A.

29. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – The new pedestrian circulation path called out along the east side of the existing building is not allowed to run behind the vehicle parking spaces, TSM Section 7-01.4.1.F.

30. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Per TSM Section 7-01.4.1.C a sidewalk is required between the proposed parking shown along the east end of the existing building and the building.

31. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Clearly demonstrate that the requirements of TSM Section 7-01.4.1.B are met along the east side of the proposed building and the west side of the existing building.

32. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R - Clearly demonstrate that the requirements of TSM Section 7-01.4.2.A, 7-01.4.3.A & 7-01.4.3.C are met for the striped area called out around the southwest corner of the existing building.

33. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – For your information there is not sidewalk requirement along the north and west side of the proposed building.

34. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.W – Provide a general note on the plan stating all signage requires separate permits.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Martell at Nicholas.Martell@tucsonaz.gov.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: A revised development package as well as a comment response letter. To resubmit, visit the Tucson Development Center Online at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home. The instructions for resubmittal can be found at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/tdc-faq/new-pdfs/revisions-and-resubmittals.pdf.
07/25/2024 CDRC Application Completeness REVIEW COMPLETED
08/02/2024 CDRC Review Coordinator REVIEW COMPLETED External Reviewers not required. No further action is required from the customer at this time.
08/19/2024 Fire New Construction REVIEW COMPLETED
08/01/2024 OK to Submit - Zoning REVIEW COMPLETED