Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.1
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0323-00194
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/03/2023 | Commercial Plumbing | APPROVED | |||
| 04/07/2023 | NPPO | NOT REQUIRED | |||
| 04/07/2023 | Site Landscape | NOT REQUIRED | |||
| 05/16/2023 | CDRC Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 05/02/2023 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Tucson codes and ordinances can be found online at https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/overview The Stormwater Detention-Retention Manual can be found online at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/updated-retention-detention-manual/updated-retention-detention-manual.pdf TD-DEV-0323-00194 1. According to TSM 8-01.5.3 A, waste removal service must be from within the development. The proposed waste enclosure needs to be accessed from within the development. 2. From recent clarification from Environmental Services per TSM section 8, although recycling service isn’t required the site needs to provide at minimum the enclosure space for both solid waste and recycling. A single enclosure won’t be sufficient and a double enclosure or an additional single enclosure will be needed to meet this requirement. It is also important to point out per TSM section 8-01.4.I - required parking may be reduced for existing development when solid waste and recycle enclosures are provided. Lianne Evans lianne.evans@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 04/28/2023 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: 76 Service Station Development Package (1st Review) TD-DIV-0323-00194 TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 28, 2023 DUE DATE: May 05, 2023 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is April 05, 2024. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, TD-DIV-0323-00194, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.1 – The zoning listed under General Note 3 is not correct and should be C-1. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Remove the references to “AUTOMOTIVE – GASOLINE SALES” from General Note 3 as automotive gasoline sales is not a use classified in the UDC. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – As neither 22nd St. or Pantano Rd. are designated as Gateway on the COT MS&R map remove the Gateway reference from General Note 4. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C – Provide dimensioned width of paving, curbs, and sidewalks for both 22nd St. and Pantano Rd. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Provide a width dimension from the two (2) proposed vehicle parking spaces to the east property line. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The required number of vehicle parking spaces should be 2, see UDC Article 7.4.3.G. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The provided number of vehicle parking spaces is not correct and should be 3. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The Use Group listed within the parking calculation is not correct and should be Retail Trade Use Group. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Demonstrate how the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9.B.1.e are met for the proposed short-term bicycle parking. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Demonstrate how the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9.D.5 are met for the proposed long-term bicycle parking. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.L – As cross access is proposed with the property to the north provide a copy of the recorded agreement/easement with the next submittal. 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The street perimeter yard setbacks listed under General Note 14 are no longer correct. Based on recent UDC amendments adopted April 21, 2023 the required street perimeter yard is 10 feet, as measured from the existing or future property line as determined by the adopted Major Streets and Routes Plan, whichever is greater. 15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Provide the heights for the existing structure within the footprint. 16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Also provide a general note stating all signs require separate permits. 17. COMMENT: Revise General Note 14 to show the correct zoning and max. building height. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Martell at Nicholas.Martell@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
||
| 03/29/2023 | CDRC Application Completeness | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 04/06/2023 | CDRC Review Coordinator | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 04/17/2023 | Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 03/30/2023 | OK to Submit - Engineering | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 04/03/2023 | OK to Submit - Landscape | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 04/06/2023 | OK to Submit - Zoning | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 05/16/2023 | ROW Engineering Review | REVIEW COMPLETED | TD-DEV-0323-00194 (7889 E 22ND ST TUCSON, AZ 85710) Comments: 1. Where adjoining sidewalk from the property ties to sidewalk along the ROW frontage, please provide a 60” X 60” ADA landing with < 2% cross slope in all directions. Existing sidewalk may meet these requirements. Faffs Riederer Faffs.Riederer@tucsonaz.gov |