Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0226-00050
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/15/2026 | Commercial Plumbing Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | ACTIVITY NO. TD-DEV-0226-00050 ADDRESS/PARCEL: 4502 S CAMPBELL AV TUCSON, AZ 85714 Submit your revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all comments were addressed. Review will not proceed without the response letter. The submitted documents were incomplete and a thorough plan review could not be performed. Please be aware, new comments may arise with the next review. If you have any questions about these review comments, I can be reached at Sean.Severson@tucsonaz.gov COMMENTS: 1. Show the location and size of the water meter and backflow preventer on the plans. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2024. 2. Provide a cleanout in the building sewer prior to entering the right-of-way. Reference: Pima County Standard Detail RWRD 401, 2021. 3. Provide cleanouts at the junction of the building drain and the building sewer. Reference: Section 708.1.3, IPC 2024. 4. Please provide the specs for the yard hydrant. Freeze-proof yard hydrants using a below-grade stop-and-waste valve are prohibited unless an approved upstream backflow prevention device is used to protect the upstream potable water source and the downstream outlets. Reference: Sections 608.8 and 608.9.1, IPC 2024 5. What is the reason for installing the 4’ manhole after the grease interceptor? a. A private sewer collection system that includes manholes, force mains, or lift stations, will require a review of the system design by the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality prior to obtaining a building permit from the City of Tucson. In addition, the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality requires the Engineer of Record to conduct specific inspections during construction. Submit the plans that have been approved by the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality for approval. Reference Title 18, R18-9-E302, 4.02 General Permit, Arizona Administrative Code. |
||
| 04/20/2026 | Fire New Construction Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | -Could not locate the existing or proposed fire hydrants on the drawings. Hydrant shall be within 400' (nonsprinklered building) or 600' (sprinklered building) to the furthest portion of the building as the hose lays. IFC 507.5.1. Please provide hydrant locations. john.vincent@tucsonaz.gov 5203495581 |
||
| 04/21/2026 | NPPO Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | See Site Landscape comments for additional NPPO requirements. Thank you. Chad Keller, PLA chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 04/22/2026 | ROW Engineering Review Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Intersection imrpovements for new traffic signal should be shown on plans. Driveways should be concrete from curb line to back of sidewalk. Curb return radiuses for driveways and driveway widths that exceed Street Design Guide require Technical Standards Modification Request. Provide Auto turn movements |
||
| 04/20/2026 | Site Engineering Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Permit: TD-DEV-0226-00050 – Maverik Convenience Store and Gas Station Location: 4502 S CAMPBELL AV Review Date: 4/20/2026 This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for waste management, Pedestrian Access, Hydrology -Retention/Detention Requirements, and all site standard code. Drainage Manual Link: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/cot-drainage… Design standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention Link: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/updated-rete… Overall, for application submittal requirements, see Administrative Manual Section 2-06 Site Engineering: 1. Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0226-00050, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2. Revise the sheet index to reflect all development package pages/sheets. This should be done for the bottom corner sheet xx of xx as well. This would mean the total page count should be XX of 41 based on what the current DP file shows. 3. To review for compliance with the bollards proposed along the NW & SW portion of the structure, ensure they are spaced no less than 4-ft and no more than 5-ft separate UDC 7.4.6. Provide a measurement call-out on the site plan (Sheet 7). 4. Provide the total Height information for the new building and canopy called-out on the Site plan (Sheet 7) 5. S Campbell Ave & E Benson Hwy both have future designations as Arterials per MS&R 10-8-25 amended map. Sight visibility triangles (SVT) will need to be shown for current and future ROW for all entrances/exits to the site. TSM 10-01.5.0 6. Please add general note “Any wastewater discharged into the public sanitary sewerage system shall meet the requirements of Pima County Ordinance No. 1991-140, or as amended.” AM 2-06.4.7.A 7. Provide the Zoning and Land Use General Note: “Any relocation or modification of existing utilities and/or public improvements necessitated by the proposed development will be at no expense to the public.” AM 2-06.4.7.D Pedestrian Circulation and Vehicle Use Area Comments: 1. Please verify provision of 60’ driveway throat length to parking from the south entrance to the site from S CAMPBELL AVE. Access Management Guidelines 5.11 2. Provide a keynote/call-out for all structure downspouts and sidewalk scupper locations on the site & grading sheets. This is to ensure compliance with building permit plan reviews. 3. Please provide dimension of pedestrian circulation path between proposed bollards and nearest obstructions to ensure minimum 4’ required path width is satisfied. 4. Revise ADA parking sign & post details page #29 (Detail B) to show the required minimum height to be 7 feet minimum. This is required when the ADA sign is placed within a pedestrian pathway. TSM 7-01.4.3.B Waste Management Comments: 1. Provide a trash enclosure detail that is compliant with TSM 8-01.0.0 This should include all necessary information as well as include the required minimum clear space. This detail should be comparable to figures found in TSM 8-01.9.0. It should contain all the related keynotes and details. 2. Revise trash enclosure details and the grading plan (Sheet 11) sheets to show all the trash enclosures ramps slopes being 2% away from enclosure as well as the enclosure slabs sloping 1% to the gate. TSM 8-1.0.0 3. Show/delineate a 28-foot by 40-foot clear space in front of the proposed dumpster to comply with waste access and maneuverability requirements in TSM 8-01.5.3. This should be shown on the overall site plan. Drainage Comments: 1. Provide the Drainage General note: “The developer, any successors and assigns, will hold the City of Tucson, its officers, employees, and agents harmless from any and all claims for damages related to the use of this development as shown hereon, now and in the future, by reason of flooding, flowage, erosion, or damage caused by water, whether surface flood or rainfall.” AM 2-06.4.7.B.1 2. Provide the Drainage General note: “Drainage will remain in its natural state and will not be altered, disturbed, or obstructed other than as shown on this site plan.” AM 2-06.4.7.B.3 3. Provide a descriptor box adjacent to the proposed basin (Includes water harvesting basins) and the stormwater chambers on the grading plan. Include a leader arrow to the basin or provide a label for the basin and reference the label on the top of the descriptor box. This can be done through an additional detail sheet or included on current basin detail sheet if the grading plans appear too narrow for such details. Include the following applicable information in the descriptor box: a. Total volume, cubic feet or acre feet; b. detention volume, cubic feet or acre feet; c. retention volume, cubic feet; d. first-flush retention volume, cubic feet; (It is understood these values do not account towards drainage requirements for the underground chambers, this is for documentation) e. Q100 in, cubic feet per second; f. Q100 out, cubic feet per second; g. Basin top elevation, feet; h. Basin bottom elevation, or grade elevation showing such, feet; i. 100-year water surface elevation, feet; j. 100-year ponding depth, (measured from the lowest elevation of the basin), feet. DSSDR 11.1.3. 4. Provide and label required setbacks of the water harvesting basin side slopes to the back of the parking lot vertical curb, trash enclosures, and sidewalk. See geotechnical report recommendations in Drainage section 4.6. 5. Demonstrate compliance with minimum freeboard requirements for all Detention/Retention basins per DSSDR 4.4.1.1 6. Demonstrate compliance with minimum freeboard requirements for all water harvesting basins. DSSDR 5.3.1.3 7. All Basins shall have a minimum of 1 sediment level measurement device, which can be incorporated into the weir or the side slope, or constructed as a separate stand-alone device. The device(s) shall be located where sediment is likely to accumulate. DSSDR 4.4.1.4 Provide a keynote/call-out and construction detail relating to the selected sediment level device. 8. Show that erosion protection is used for all inlet and outlet structures on the Grading sheet and details. The erosion protection shall extend below the finished grade of the basin floor and/or side slope to the appropriate design depth. DSSDR 4.8.1.4 Show this for all inlet & outlet structures as it appears erosion protection is not clearly shown to extend below finished grade across the basins shown. 9. Please label all proposed basin side slopes. All proposed basin side slopes shown on development plans need to follow DSSDR Chapter 4.7 Table 4.1 for Side Slope Stabilization requirements. 10. DRAINAGE NOTE: Rainwater Harvesting Basins VS RET/DET basins must be clarified/identified. This is due to the variation in standards/regulations that apply. Drainage Report Comments: 1. Revise section 4.6 – Rainwater/Stormwater harvesting basins are to be designed to retain no more than 9-inches – Refer to Comment #22 regarding the need for classification. DSSDR 5.3.1.2 2. Provide the curb-opening calculations as well as erosion protection (Riprap) calculations within the Report appendices. 3. Provide an inspection and maintenance protocol including frequency of inspection, a checklist of items to be inspected and recommended maintenance when an inspection identifies a maintenance requirement shall be prepared by an Arizona registrant. The protocol may be included in the project drainage report or prepared as a separate document. The protocol shall be reviewed and approved by the Floodplain Administrator prior to approval of the tentative plat or development plan. The protocol shall be delivered to the entity responsible for inspection and maintenance. An example of a detention basin inspection and maintenance checklist is provided in Appendix F. DSSDR 4.1.1 4. Provide a storage time discussion section within the drainage report that uses the results of the associated percolation testing performed from the Geotech report to demonstrate compliance with Storage Time Standards – DSSDR 4.5.1. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact Joe Macaulay at: Joe.Macaulay@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 04/21/2026 | Site Landscape Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT REVIEWER: CHAD KELLER, PLA SITE LANDSCAPE/NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION SECTION PROJECT: MAVERIK CONVENIENCE STORE AND GAS STATION ACTIVITY NO: TD-DEV-0226-00050 ADDRESS: 4502 S CAMPBELL AV ASSOCIATED PRE APPLICATION: TP-PRE-1025-00216 ZONING: COMMERCIAL ZONE (C-2) LAND USE: COMMERCIAL 2026.04.21 THE PROPOSED PLANS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR SITE LANDSCAPE, NATIVE PLANTS, AND RAINWATER HARVESTING, PER-THE-CITY OF TUCSON UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE (UDC), TECHNICAL STANDARDS MANUAL (TSM), AND ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL (AM). RESUBMIT REVISED DRAWINGS ALONG WITH A DETAILED RESPONSE LETTER, STATING HOW ALL SITE LANDSCAPE AND NPPO SECTION REVIEW COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED. SITE LANDSCAPE/NPPO SECTION COMMENTS: 1. Include the landscape plans and landscape details as part of the sheet index. 2. Include planting and irrigation detail sheets. 3. An irrigation plan, details and specifications are required per UDC Administration Manual 2-10.4.2.C and Technical Standards Manual Section 4-01.4.2, Irrigation Standards. Irrigation details can be found on the CoT website here: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Transportation-Mobility/Landscape/Landscape-Architects. For your reference/use in completing your landscape development package. 4. Example details: a. Automatic Controller: wall mount, or pedestal mount b. Backflow Preventer c. Irrigation pipe sleeving d. Irrigation trenching e. Drip control valve assembly f. Multi-outlet emitter g. Single outlet emitter h. End flush cap i. Rain shut off device j. ETC. 5. Please label irrigation meter as “irrigation only” on the irrigation schedule and on the plan point of connection location. See TSM 4-01.6.0. This is a Tucson Water requirement for future water use tracker. 6. Please show all irrigation sleeves for irrigation lines crossing hardscape. 7. Include any sheet specification/general notes required for proper implementation of the landscape material. 8. Include a commercial rainwater harvesting plan and calculations for meeting 50 percent of the plant water needs through rainwater harvesting. If an example plan is needed along with the approved spreadsheet for calculations, please reach out and I will provide copies. 9. On the commercial rainwater harvesting plan, please include spot elevations that match the civil grading plan. IE: curb cut inlet flowline and outlet flowline as well as a couple of spot elevations at the bottom of the water harvest infiltration area. Also show schematic flowlines with percent slope. This is for inspector reference. 10. Include calculation for landscape borders. State what is required and what is provided on site. 1 tree per 33 linear feet of frontage and 50 percent coverage with understory vegetation. 11. Include calculation for parking lot trees. Show the number of trees required and the number of trees provided to meet the standard of 1 tree per 4 parking spaces. 12. Any planting, irrigation or water harvest infiltration areas shown in the Right-of-Way requires permission from the Department of Transportation and Mobility (DTM). Please reach out to David Marhefka, PLA with DTM for coordination and approval to use the ROW. Once coordination with DTM has occurred, a letter should be provided. Include the letter with the next submittal. David.Marhefka@tucsonaz.gov 13. Include a construction detail showing root barriers for trees located within 5’ of hardscape areas. See Detail 402 located here: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Transportation-Mobility/Landscape/Landscape-Architects 14. City of Tucson Standard planting and irrigation details can be found here: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Transportation-Mobility/Landscape/Landscape-Architects. For your reference/use in completing your landscape development package. 15. 30 percent of the inventoried protected native plants need to be either preserved in place or transplanted on site. Please make sure that your mitigation quantities reflect the shortfall produced by only hitting the 24 percent shown on the plan. 16. Add a breakdown table of the total TOS and total Mitigation plants from the NPPO. The numbers are located in your calculation table, but for review purposes and for contractor implementation it is simpler if the breakdown is on both the NPPO and the planting plan. Clearly label all of the PIP and Transplants on the planting plan. 17. Include a summary breakdown for your Native Plant Preservation Ordinance calculations for each protected species inventoried on-site. *EXAMPLE SUMMARY FOR EACH PROTECTED NATIVE SPECIES TYPE INVENTORIED AND REQUIRED TOS AND REQUIRED MITIGATION: Species name: x Transplant on site (TOS) = x Mitigation Required = x *Transplants should be part of the planting scheme. Include a letter “T” with the symbol location on the plan. Thank you. Chad Keller, PLA Landscape Architect chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov 520.837.4923 |
||
| 04/23/2026 | Site Zoning Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Krista Hansen – Lead Planner PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: Maverik Convenience Store & Gas Station Development Package (1st Review) TD-DEV-0226-00050 (4502 S CAMPBELL AV – C-2) TRANSMITTAL DATE: 4/23/26 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is March 24, 2027. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) 1. COMMENT: The proposed plans require a lot line adjustment processed through the City prior to the approval of this development package (DP). Please apply for a separate lot line adjustment permit. 2. COMMENT: The proposed Cross Access Easement can be established through the lot line adjustment application. Upon approval, add the easement recordation number to the site plan. Proof of recordation is required prior to the approval of this DP. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet: 2-06.4.2.B - A brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a re-subdivision are to be provided. On re-subdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat; 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.B – Once the lot line adjustment is approved, provide the new legal description on the cover sheet. 2-06.4.2.D - The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx). 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.D – Revise the sheet index to include all 41 pages. 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0226-00050, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes Zoning and Land Use Notes 2-06.4.7.A.1 - List as a general note: "Existing zoning is ____." 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.1 – Add the general note listed above. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – The parking calculations reference Food Service. On the cover sheet, add “Commercial - Food Service, excluding Soup Kitchens subject to use specific standards 4.9.4.M.1 and 4.9.13.P” as a proposed use. 2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6– Add the following as a general note: a. “This site has been designed to comply with the requirements/standards of the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) overlay, UDC Section 5.4.” b. “This site has been designed to comply with the requirements/standards of the Gateway Corridor Zone (GCZ), UDC Section 5.5.” 2-06.4.7.B - Drainage Notes 2-06.4.7.B.1 - List the following notes on all plans/plats: "The developer, any successors and assigns, will hold the City of Tucson, its officers, employees, and agents harmless from any and all claims for damages related to the use of this development as shown hereon, now and in the future, by reason of flooding, flowage, erosion, or damage caused by water, whether surface flood or rainfall." 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.B.1 – As a general/drainage note, add the information listed in the standard above. 2-06.4.7.B.3 - List the following note on all development package documents: "Drainage will remain in its natural state and will not be altered, disturbed, or obstructed other than as shown on this site plan." 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.B.3 – As a general/drainage note, add the information listed in the standard above. 2-06.4.7.C - Streets and Roads Notes 2-06.4.7.C.2 - List the following note on all development package documents: "No structure or vegetation shall be located or maintained so as to interfere with the sight visibility triangles in accordance with Section 10-01.5.0, Sight Visibility, of the Technical Standards Manual." 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.C.2 – As a general note, add the information listed in the standard above. 2-06.4.7.D - Utilities Note All development package documents are to include the following note: "Any relocation or modification of existing utilities and/or public improvements necessitated by the proposed development will be at no expense to the public." 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.D – As a general/utility note, add the information listed in the standard above. 2-06.4.9.H - Proposed Traffic Circulation 2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.2 – Add the information as listed in the standard above. 2-06.4.9.H.4 - Indicate if existing streets are public or private; provide street names, widths, curbs, sidewalks, and utility locations, all fully dimensioned. 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.4 – On the site plan, please correct/add the following: a. Change Kino Blvd to Kino Pkwy. b. Benson Hwy has an existing ROW width of 150’. Correct site plan. c. Dimension existing sidewalks. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – On the floor plan, draw and dimension the area that is dedicated to Retail/General Merchandise Sales and to Food Service (kitchen/prep area/coolers, indoor/outdoor seating, etc.). In the Site Data table (sheet 7), provide the gross floor area (GFA) of each Use and calculate required parking separately. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided. 16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – In the Site Data table (sheet 7), add the required and proposed bicycle parking for both Uses (Retail/General Merchandise Sales and Food Service). Reference UDC Table 7.4.8-1. 2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. 17. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Dimension the setback of the proposed C-Store to the east property line. 2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual. 18. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R - Please provide dimension of pedestrian circulation path between proposed bollards and nearest obstructions to ensure minimum 4’ required path width is satisfied. ***For additional information on the any standard presented in this memo, please refer to the City of Tucson “Unified Development Code” – Administrative Manual Section 2-06 or Technical Standards noted in the comments. If you have any questions about this transmittal, contact Krista Hansen at Krista.hansen@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Corrected development package and comment response letter. To resubmit visit Tucson Development Center at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home. Instructions for resubmittal - www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/tdc-faq/new-pdfs/revisions-and-resubmittals.pdf. |
||
| 03/27/2026 | CDRC Review Coordinator Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC added Addressing, TAA, ADOT, TEP, PAG, USPS, and SWG to the workflow. Review request email sent to Addressing,TAA, ADOT, and TEP. FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. | ||
| 05/19/2026 | External Reviewers - Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | May 15, 2026 Ms. Shelly Sorensen, PE, PTOE Lokahi, LLC 10555 N. 114th Street, Suite 105 Scottsdale, AZ 85259 Re: Northwest Corner (NWC) of Benson Highway and Kino Parkway / Campbell Avenue Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) for Maverik Convenience Store – December 2025 Dear Ms. Sorensen: This letter is being sent to provide acceptance of the Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) dated December 12, 2025, and received March 4, 2026, for the proposed Maverik Convenience Store in the northwest corner (NWC) of Benson Highway and Kino Parkway / Campbell Avenue in Tucson, AZ. The proposed development is requesting three (3) access points: one (1) full access driveway and one (1) right-in/right-out driveway onto Kino Parkway, and one (1) right-in/right-out driveway onto Benson Highway. The proposed development would consist of a gas station with 12 vehicle fueling positions and a 5,637 square-foot convenience store. According to the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 12 th Edition, the proposed development is estimated to generate 2,440 total daily trips, with 279 trips occurring during the AM peak hour and 253 trips occurring during the PM peak hour. After accounting for pass-by trips, the development generates 598 new (primary) trips, with 67 trips occurring during the AM peak hour and 64 trips occurring during the PM peak hour Below you will find comments on the traffic study that should be noted but do not need to be revised: ● Page 3 - Proposed Development: The first sentence of the last paragraph should read as follows: “The third access point (Driveway C) is located along Benson Highway, approximately 475 feet northwest of Kino Parkway / Campbell Avenue.” ● Pages 6 to 8 - Figures 3 to 5: The driveway at Intersection 3 should be labeled “Driveway C”. azdot.gov 1 The following Off-Site improvements within City of Tucson right-of-way are recommended by this traffic study as a result of the Development: ● The construction of Driveway A, a full access driveway forming the west leg of the future signalized intersection of Tournament Way and Kino Parkway, approximately 595 feet north of Benson Highway. ○ The construction of a southbound right turn lane with 110 feet of storage at the intersection of Kino Parkway and Driveway A / Tournament Way. ● The construction of Driveway B, a right-in/right-out driveway onto Kino Parkway approximately 245 feet north of Benson Highway. ● The construction of Driveway C, a right-in/right-out driveway onto Benson Highway approximately 475 feet northwest of Kino Parkway / Campbell Avenue. The ultimate success of the Development will require coordinated efforts with ADOT, the City of Tucson, and the other nearby developments that will be accessing Kino Parkway at the future signalized intersection of Driveway A / Tournament Way, namely Parkside Reserve and Mosaic Quarter. If you have any questions, comments, or concerns regarding the mitigation measures or requirements necessary for approval of the TIS, please call me at (520) 388-4203, or email me at rfreije@azdot.gov. Sincerely, Richard S. Freije, P.E. Southern Regional Traffic Engineer, ADOT 1221 S. 2nd Ave. Tucson, AZ 85713 Office: 520-388-4203 rfreije@azdot.gov Attached is an Acceptance Letter for the Kino and Benson Maverik C-Store TIS. ADOT has no further comments. Thanks, Rick Freije CC: Jeremy Moore, PE, Southcentral District Administrator, ADOT Priscilla Thompson, PE, Assistant Southcentral District Engineer, ADOT Michelle Garza, Southcentral District Permits Supervisor, ADOT Allen Wallace, Southern Region TE Specialist, ADOT Blake Olofson, PE, PTOE, Traffic Engineering Administrator, City of Tucson Greg Orsini, PE, PTOE, Department of Transportation and Mobility, City of Tucson |
||
| 03/27/2026 | External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 04/30/2026 | External Reviewers - Pima County Addressing Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC Good afternoon, Pima County Addressing approves TD-DEV-0226-00050. Thank you, David Wilging Planner I - Addressing Division Pima County Development Services 201 N. Stone Avenue 1st Floor Tucson, Arizona 85701 520-724-6381 |
||
| 03/27/2026 | External Reviewers - Southwest Gas Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 05/04/2026 | External Reviewers - Tucson Airport Authority Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | May 1, 2026 Planning and Development Services City of Tucson 201 North Stone Avenue Tucson, AZ. 85701 RE: TD-DEV-0226-00050, 1st Submittal, Maverik AZ-0653 / 4502 S Campbell Av, Tucson, AZ. 85714, Received April 29, 2026 To whom this may concern, Thank you for the opportunity to comment on TD-DEV-0226-00050, 1st Submittal, a development plan for a new gas station and convenience store at 4502 S Campbell Ave. This development is located in the S.E. quarter of the N.E. quarter of Section 31, Township 14S, Range 14E, of the Gila and Salt River Meridian. The development site occupies parcel number 132-16-627A and 132-16-012Q, covers approximately 3.02 ± acres, and is zoned as Commercial 2 Zone (C-2). The nearest major roadway intersection is South Campbell Avenue and East Benson Highway, approximately 50 feet to the south of the subject development. This site does lie within the Tucson International Airport avigation easement requirements and public disclosure area, FAA traffic pattern airspace, and FAA Part 77 airspace. The Tucson Airport Authority does not object to this proposed project and is not requiring a resubmittal of this project. Although this project does not propose a change in plan designation or zoning the Tucson Airport Authority highly recommends the applicant add the following notes into the general notes of the revised development plan. This project is located approximately 2.5 miles north of Tucson International Airport and is within FAA traffic pattern airspace, an area which would be subject to aircraft overflight and noise due to being in close proximity to Tucson International Airport. The proposed notes would provide a means of assuring that future owners and tenants of the property are aware they are in proximity an airport and further assures the continued right of the City of Tucson, Tucson Airport Authority, and all persons lawfully utilizing the Tucson International Airport the right to utilize the airspace above or near the property. This would be accomplished through the property owner recording the Avigation Easement and providing the Airport Disclosure Statement to the new residents of all residential uses. The Tucson Airport Authority believes the proposed note helps to support the City of Tucson Airport Environs Overlay Zone and supports Plan Tucson – Land Use 26. 1. "That prior to the City's approval of the proposed development, the property owner must record the Avigation Easement that discloses the existence and operational characteristics of the Tucson International Airport to future owners or tenants of the property and further conveys the right to the public to lawfully use the airspace above the property. The Avigation Easement shall be recorded in a manner with the Pima County recorder which shall document it as having title liability. The content of such documents shall be according to the form and instructions provided.” The current property owner or person authorized to sign on behalf of the current property owner must complete, sign, and record the Avigation Easement. Please record the Avigation Easement with the Pima County Recorder’s Office. Then send a complete copy of the recorded easement document to Tucson Airport Authority by either email (send to srobidoux@flytucson.com) or to the mailing address provided below. Scott Robidoux Manager of Planning Tucson Airport Authority 7250 South Tucson Blvd, Suite 300 Tucson, AZ 85756” 2. Applicable to residential uses only “The property owner/developer/applicant must provide the Airport Disclosure Statement form, at time of sale, to the new property owners with all new unit purchases. In the event the development of any residential uses does not involve the sale of new units but is instead offering rental residential units to the public, the new tenant of the rental unit must be provided a copy of the Airport Disclosure Statement form. The intent of the Airport Disclosure Statement form is to educate and notify the new residents that they are living near an airport. The content of such documents shall be according to the form and instructions provided.” The property owner (for itself or its tenants) shall forward a signed copy of the Airport Disclosure Statement form to the Tucson Airport Authority within ten (10) days of signature, using the Scott Robidoux mailing address provided above. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this comment letter. I can be reached by email at srobidoux@flytucson.com or by telephone at 520- 573-4811. Respectfully, Scott Robidoux, C.M. Manager of Planning cc file |
||
| 05/13/2026 | External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | May 13, 2026 WO#T183161 City of Tucson Planning and Development Services Attn: CDRC Admin Team Dear CDRC Admin Team Subject: Maverik AZ-0653 TD-DEV-0226-00050 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted 4/29/2026. There are existing facilities within the development which are depicted upon the plan. No apprent conflicts with TEP overhead lines. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. To apply for electric service, please call the New Construction department at (520) 918- 8300. Please submit a final set of plans including approved site, electric load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans. If available, include a PDF version of the plans. Questions regarding Land, ROW, Easement, etc., please contact the TEP Land Department Liz Boehler Right of Way Agent Consultant 520-686-1341 Landreviews@tep.com Should you have any technical questions, please contact the area designer, Fred Quintero (520) 235-6329 fquintero@tep.com Sincerely, Design Admins Design Admins Tucson Electric Power |
||
| 03/27/2026 | External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 03/25/2026 | OK to Submit - Engineering Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 03/27/2026 | OK to Submit - Zoning Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 04/20/2026 | Traffic Engineering Review Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | I do not have any direct comments on the Traffic Statement. However, it is my understanding that the apartment complex being developed to the north and this gas station will be sharing a driveway that will access the Tournament Way traffic signal being put in by the Mosaic Quarter development team. Accordingly, I let a representative from MC Companies know that a new Traffic Impact Analysis would need to be produced that incorporates the Mosaic Quarter traffic as background traffic. Neither of the gas station nor apartment traffic documents incorporated anticipated traffic from the Mosaic Quarter development. Neither one included the neighboring property's traffic volumes, either, which will be necessary since they are to share a Kino Pkwy access point at the new signalized intersection. It is my understanding that CivTech, who put together the initial TIA for the apartment complex, will be doing this comprehensive traffic study that accounts for all the new developments and their cumulative traffic effects. Sheet 7 of plans shows the Layout Plan. The north end shows Right Turn Lane by Others. Assuming the apartment complex and gas station developers are working together, I will make the comment here that the ADOT interchange project has a 3rd southbound outer lane that drops north of this site. Because that lane is set to drop and the apartment complex/gas station driveway warrants a dedicated right turn lane, the third southbound lane should be continued and used as a right turn trap lane into this site, rather than that lane dropping, then tapering out again shortly after for this turn lane. This may take some coordination with ADOT project team. Sheet 8 of plans shows the Vehicle Turn Exhibit. It should be noted that the Mosaic Quarter plans show two WB to SB left turns out of Tournament Way onto Kino. The gas station/apartment complex design needs to take this into account. As designed, we need to know what the minimum clearance is between the opposing left turn vehicle paths. We would require a minimum 4 foot clearance (8 feet would be preferred). If this 4 foot minimum is not currently obtained, it could mean that the west side driveway needs to be shifted slightly north (and likely the median on the north side of the intersection modified, too) to obtain the required safety separation. |