Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: In Review
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0226-00046
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Review Status: In Review
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/10/2026 | External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) Standard | NOT REQUIRED | Hello, This appears to be a residential, currently, we do not review residential. Patty Lopez Tucson Electric Power T&D Design |
||
| N/A | Commercial Plumbing Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | Fire New Construction Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | NPPO Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | ROW Engineering Review Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | Site Landscape Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | Site Zoning Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 03/12/2026 | Site Engineering Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Permit Activity Number: TD-DEV-0226-00046 (1st Review) Project: New Home within AE Floodplain Location: 939 E CADDIE ST Review Date: 3/12/2026 Reviewer: Marco Contreras – Engineering Associate - Site Engineering Related Cases: TC-RES-0825-04232 *This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-6 and Technical Standards Manual (TSM) Section for waste management, Pedestrian Access, Hydrology -Retention/Detention Requirements, and all site standard code. * City of Tucson Code: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Codes Floodplain Code: https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az/0-0-0-19333 Drainage Manual Link: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/cot-drainage-manual-searchable.pdf Design standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention Link: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/updated-retention-detention-manual.pdf Site Engineering Review Comments: 1. The site located at 939 E CADDIE ST is located entirely within a FEMA AE Floodplain associated with the High School Wash. It will be required that a floodplain use permit be submitted for work within the floodplain related to this proposed development and the Elevation Certificate Process. This can be submitted within the sub-records of the development package. a. Provide the general note, “This project is subject to floodplain compliance, A floodplain use permit and/or finished floor elevation certificates are required.” AM 2-06.4.7.B.2.b b. Provide the Floodplain Use case number, when created, adjacent to the related cases section of the cover sheet. 2. Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0226-00046, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 3. Provide the Basis of Elevation and Basis of Bearing 4. Per AM 2-06.4.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines. 5. Provide a cross section detail showing the elevation extent of the proposed pad, proposed natural grades, and existing grade elevations. 6. The plans show a proposed fence – provide a detail showing the material type & height – If it is simply a chain link fence or wrought iron then nothing further is required a. If it is corrugated metal fence this would require that a sufficient clearance (up to the base flood elevation) from natural grade and up (To the BFE) be clear to allow for proper flow for the entirety of the fence line. b. If it is a CMU wall - Provide details regarding this fence, as well as any details required such as flood venting necessary in the event it is a CMU wall proposed – ensure that this fence/wall was included when modeling for encroachment analysis ii. If CMU wall, the analysis should review both with the wall there and if it wasn’t there – most conservative results will be used for review analysis. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact Marco Contreras at Marco.contreras@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 03/06/2026 | CDRC Review Coordinator Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC added TEP to the workflow. Review sent to TEP | ||
| 03/04/2026 | OK to Submit - Engineering Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 03/06/2026 | OK to Submit - Zoning Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 03/16/2026 | ROW Review | REVIEW COMPLETED |