Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0226-00036
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/06/2026 | Site Landscape Standard | NOT REQUIRED | |||
| 03/16/2026 | External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | March 16, 2026 WO#T176892 City of Tucson Planning and Development Services Attn: CDRC Admin Team Dear CDRC Admin Team Subject: CHILD AND FAMILY RESOURCES PV SOLAR TD-DEV-0226-00036 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed and cannot approve the development plan submitted 2/17/2026. There are existing facilities within the development which are depicted upon the plan. POSSIBLE CONFLICTS WITH OVERHEAD POLE LINE ALONG TREAT AVE, PLEASE CONTACT TEP DESIGN IF RELOCATION IS REQUIRED Further: TEP Easements not shown on Development plan Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. To apply for electric service, please call the New Construction department at (520) 918- 8300. Please submit a final set of plans including approved site, electric load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans. If available, include a PDF version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Should you have any easement questions, please contact our Land Resources Department, LandReviews@tep.com. Should you have any technical questions, please contact the area designer, Martin Salazar (520) 305-6713 msalazar@tep.com Sincerely, Design Admins Design Admins Tucson Electric Power |
||
| 03/06/2026 | NPPO Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT REVIEWER: CHAD KELLER, RLA SITE LANDSCAPE/NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION SECTION PROJECT: INSTALLATION OF (2) NEW PV SOLAR CANOPIES ACTIVITY NO: TD-DEV-0226-00036 ADDRESS: 2800 E BROADWAY BL ZONING: COMMERCIAL ZONE (C-1) 03.06.2026 THE PROPOSED PLANS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR SITE LANDSCAPE, NATIVE PLANTS, AND RAINWATER HARVESTING, PER-THE-CITY OF TUCSON UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE (UDC), TECHNICAL STANDARDS MANUAL (TSM), AND ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL (AM). RESUBMIT REVISED DRAWINGS ALONG WITH A DETAILED RESPONSE LETTER, STATING HOW ALL SITE LANDSCAPE AND NPPO SECTION REVIEW COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED. SITE LANDSCAPE/NPPO SECTION COMMENTS: 1. The tree plans provided are great. We need one more item to be included in your submittal, the NPPO Waiver. The Waiver formalizes and meet the requirements set forth in the UDC. The following information is for your reference as to why the NPPO Waiver is required as part of the approval process. Copy the link below into your browser and you will find a fillable PDF that will need to be filled out and signed by one of the professionals listed in UDC 7.7.4.D. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/applicationsforms/nppoapp-2025-v.2-fillable-1.pdf 2. **A Native Plant Preservation Plan (NPPP) or a NPPO waiver is required per UDC 7.7. See UDC 7.7.3. Applicability; UDC 7.7.4 NPPO General Provisions and Standards; UDC 7.7.4.c. Plan Approval Prior to Permitting; UDC 7.7.4.d. Professional Expertise 7.7.5.c.5; also see AM 2-11.3.0 Permitted Exceptions. If applicable, the Planning and Development Services Department will provide the applicant with the NPPO waiver form upon request. NOTE: Items below require one of the plant professionals to review and produce and to sign off on all items required by the NPPO Ordinance, (see UDC 7.7.4.D below). - 3.1. An aerial photograph, taken within a maximum of three years of submittal, of the site at a minimum 1-inch equals 100 feet that delineates the site boundaries and clearly shows the absence of plants within those boundaries or a site plan that clearly shows that construction will not impact any plants. Any aerial photograph submitted, which was taken more than one year prior to submittal, shall be accompanied by a letter stating that the site is substantially unchanged from the date of the aerial photograph. - 3.2 A signed statement from one of the plant professionals listed in Section 7.7.4.D, Professional Expertise, of the UDC who has visited the site and verified that Viable Protected Native Plants are not located on the subject site. - 3.3 Other documentation, acceptable to the PDSD Director, which clearly indicates that the site does not contain, or the project will not impact, Protected Native Plants. Such documentation includes, but is not limited to, photographs of the site taken from all sides of the property and a signed statement from the property owner that Protected Native Plants are not located on the subject site. - 3.4 Based on factors such as the size of the site, site location, topography, and proximity to significant natural features, the PDSD Director may require submittal of specific items above. 3. **UDC 7.7.4.D. Professional Expertise: Preparation of all elements of the Native Plant Preservation Plan and on-site monitoring as required under Section 7.7.5.C.5, On- Site Monitoring, must be performed by a plant professional, such as: 1. An arborist certified by the International Society of Arboriculture; 2. A landscape architect; or, 3. A horticulturist, biologist, or botanist with a minimum B.A. or B.S. in an appropriate arid environment natural resource field. 4. **UDC 7.7.3.D. Exceptions to the Native Plant Preservation Ordinance; The provisions of this section do not apply to the following: A. Single-family residential development on lots recorded before March 24, 1997, or single-family residential development on a lot within a subdivision that is subject to an approved Native Plant Preservation Plan after the sale and development of a principal structure on that lot; B. Single-family residential subdivisions for which a tentative plat has been submitted or approved prior to July 1, 1997, per Article 8, Subdivision Standards, provided the plat is recorded within one year from the approval date of the final plat, infrastructure is in place, and 50% of the lots are developed within five years after July 1, 1997. C. **Projects on a site that does not contain any plant on the Protected Native Plant List as demonstrated by the applicant and subject to approval through procedures established at the Planning and Development Services Department (PDSD). This application can be submitted prior to an applicable review process and approved for an exception on the site. The approved exception is valid for up to one year from the date of the approval; or, D. **Projects on a site or parcel that contains Protected Native Plants that will not be substantially impacted by development on the site as demonstrated by the applicant per this section and subject to approval through procedures established at the PDSD, provided that construction occurs per the approved plan. Thank you. Chad Keller, PLA Landscape Architect chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov 520.837.4923 |
||
| 02/17/2026 | Site Engineering Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Permit Activity Number: TD-DEV-0226-00036 (1st Review) Project: INSTALLATION OF (2) NEW PV SOLAR CANOPIES Location: 2800 E BROADWAY BL Review Date: 2/17/2026 Reviewer: Marco Contreras – Engineering Associate - Site Engineering *This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-6 and Technical Standards Manual (TSM) Section for waste management, Pedestrian Access, Hydrology -Retention/Detention Requirements, and all site standard code. * City of Tucson Code: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Codes Drainage Manual Link: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/cot-drainage-manual-searchable.pdf Design standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention Link: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/updated-retention-detention-manual.pdf Site Engineering Review Comments: 1. Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0126-00002, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2. Provide the Zoning and Land Use General note: “The developer, any successors and assigns, will hold the City of Tucson, its officers, employees, and agents harmless from any and all claims for damages related to the use of this development as shown hereon, now and in the future, by reason of flooding, flowage, erosion, or damage caused by water, whether surface flood or rainfall.” AM 2-06.4.7.B.1 3. Provide the Zoning and Land Use General Note: “Drainage will remain in its natural state and will not be altered, disturbed, or obstructed other than as shown on this site plan.” AM 2-06.4.7.B.3 4. Provide the Zoning and Land Use General Note: “No structure or vegetation shall be located or maintained so as to interfere with the sight visibility triangles in accordance with Section 10-01.5.0, Sight Visibility, of the Technical Standards Manual.” AM 2-06.4.7.C.2 5. Provide the Zoning and Land Use General Note: “Any relocation or modification of existing utilities and/or public improvements necessitated by the proposed development will be at no expense to the public.” AM 2-06.4.7.D 6. To review for compliance with UDC 7.4.6.F.2 & UDC 7.4.6.E.2. It is required that the required the canopy either follow the required height clearance of 15 – feet or be setback one foot or greater from the PAAL. Provide a height call-out showing the clearance or show on the site plan that the 1-foot setback is addressed. FOR PERMIT RESUBMISSION, IT IS REQUIRED THAT: Corrected/Revised Plan set and a detailed response letter document that clearly shows how you addressed all of Site Engineering’s and other reviewers’ comments for the completed review cycle. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact Marco Contreras at Marco.contreras@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 03/11/2026 | Site Zoning Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL FROM: Bobby Parsons PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: 2 New Solar Canopies - 2800 E. Broadway Blvd. Tucson, AZ 85716 Development Package (1st Review) TD-DEV-0226-00036 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 3/11/2026 DUE DATE: 3/10/2026 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is February 13, 2027. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet: 2-06.4.2.D - The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx). 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.D – Sheet 1 refers to page 1 of 4 however there are 6 sheets with this submittal. Please ensure the page number and total number of pages correctly reflect what is submitted as noted by the standard above. 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package number, TD-DEV-0226-00036, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 2-06.4.5 - When the development package documents consists of more than one sheet, a sheet index (a legible drawing of the site showing the area represented on each sheet) is to be placed on the cover sheet or the second sheet. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.5 – The sheet index provided refers to only 4 sheets however there are 6 sheets included with this submittal. Please ensure the sheet index correctly reflects what is being submitted as noted by the standard above. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. Zoning and Land Use Notes 2-06.4.7.A.2 - List the gross area of the site/subdivision by square footage and acreage. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.2 – Please list the gross area of the site by square footage and acreage as noted by the standard above. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Please include the existing and proposed use of the property as noted by the standard above. In the previous Development Package for this site (DP18-0086), the existing and proposed use was classified as Administrative & Professional Office. The Use Specific Standards associated with Administrative & Professional Office in the C-1 zone are 4.9.13.O. Please update the notes to include this information. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 2-06.4.8.A - Provide site boundary/subdivision perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or other functional reference system. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.A – The property dimensions provided are incorrect. The Southwest and Northwest property corners are radiused and not shown correctly on the site plan. Please refer to the Pima County Assessor’s Record Map M07046 located in the following link for the correct property dimensions: https://www.asr.pima.gov/ParcelData/Map/Arm/MP07/M07046_B0B.PDF. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 2-06.4.9.H.4 - Indicate if existing streets are public or private; provide street names, widths, curbs, sidewalks, and utility locations, all fully dimensioned. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.4 – Indicate both S. Treat Avenue and E. Broadway Boulevard are both “Public Streets” as noted by the standard above. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Per Site Engineering comments, “To review for compliance with UDC 7.4.6.F.2 & UDC 7.4.6.E.2. It is required that the the canopy either follow the required height clearance of 15’ or be setback 1’ or greater from the PAAL. Provide a height call-out showing the clearance or show on the site plan that the 1-foot setback is addressed.” 2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – UDC 6.4.5.C.2.b states “For nonresidential and multifamily development abutting a local street, the minimum required street perimeter yard is 20’ as measured from the property line. S. Treat Avenue is considered a local street. The proposed “Canopy 1” is only 8.34’ from the property line. Either move the canopy to meet the minimum street setback or apply for a Design Development Option (DDO) to reduce the minimum required street setback to 8.34’. Please apply for your DDO as a sub record (zoning modification) in the permit workflow. The DDO application and requirements can be found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Planning-Zoning-Applications/Zoning-Administration. If you have questions about the DDO application or process, please contact Mark Castro at Mark.Castro@tucsonaz.gov. ***For additional information on the any standard presented in this memo, please refer to the City of Tucson “Unified Development Code” – Administrative Manual Section 2-06 or Technical Standards noted in the comments. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/all-codes-plans-determinations *** If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact Bobby Parsons at Robert.Parsons@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package and comment response letter. To resubmit visit Tucson Development Center at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home. Instructions for resubmittal - https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/website/Resubmittals.pdf. |
||
| 02/11/2026 | CDRC Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 02/17/2026 | CDRC Review Coordinator Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | EXTERNAL REVIEWERS CDRC added: , TEP, DESING PROF, SWG, USPS, and PAG to the workflow. Review request email sent to, TEP, and FYI email sent to, SWG USPS PAG. |
||
| 03/10/2026 | Commercial Plumbing Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 02/18/2026 | Design Review Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | This is not a Sunshine Mile District (SMD) project with an approved Design Package. | ||
| 02/17/2026 | External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 02/17/2026 | External Reviewers - Southwest Gas Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 02/17/2026 | External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 03/10/2026 | Fire New Construction Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 02/13/2026 | OK to Submit - Engineering Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 02/13/2026 | OK to Submit - Zoning Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 03/10/2026 | ROW Engineering Review Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 02/20/2026 | ROW Review | REVIEW COMPLETED |