Permit Review Detail
Review Status: In Review
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0226-00031
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Review Status: In Review
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Commercial Plumbing Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | External Reviewers - Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | External Reviewers - Tucson Airport Authority Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | Fire New Construction Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | NPPO Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | ROW Engineering Review Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | Site Landscape Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | Site Zoning Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 10/26/2026 | External Reviewers - Pima County Addressing Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Report Date: 10/23/2026 Description : Addressing review TD-DEV-0226-00031 Address : 2800 36TH ST, TUCSON, , 85713 Record Type : Addressing Document Filename : Plan Set-2_Plan Set Reviewer Contact Information: Corrections in the following table need to be applied before a plan is approved Review Report - Resubmittal Requested Application Number: P26AD00813 Comment ID Comment Date Corrections Needed Page Ref Reviewer : Department Review Comments DSD Addressing 1 10/23/262026 Yes 2025_1222 - RIS STAR - DP XREFSheet 2 David Wilging : DSD Addressing Building One 2 10/23/262026 Yes 2025_1222 - RIS STAR - DP XREFSheet 2 David Wilging : DSD Addressing Building Two General Comments Pima County Public Works 201 N. Stone Ave. Tucson, AZ 85701 If you have any questions please call 520- 724-6490 for an appointment to discuss this notice. If following discussions with staff you still disagree with the below listed deficiencies, you may appeal to the Building Official in accordance with Pima County Code 15.04.060 by submitting the form posted on our web site with payment of appeal fee prior to permit application expiration. Disputes about the interpretation of the Zoning Code may be appealed to a Pima County Board of Adjustment under A.R.S. § 11 -816 and P.C.C. § 18.93.060. Please submit all plans, calculations and specifications to us electronically via the Digital Projects page in the online portal. Re-Submittal Procedures Please submit all documents using Citizen Access at permits.pima.gov (i.e. plans, drawings, calculations, quantities, exhibits, photographs, letters, etc.). 1. Please go to permits.pima.gov and login to your account to access review comments and resubmit. 2. If you have questions or need clarification regarding comments, please contact the reviewer. 3. Provide a response to each correction comment. 4. To resubmit, upload revised full plan set. Should the resubmittal not completely address this request for corrections, the application maybe denied requiring a new application and payment all applicable review fees in accordance withA.R.S. § 11-1605. |
||
| 10/26/2026 | Site Engineering Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Permit Activity Number: TD-DEV-0226-00031 (1st Review) Project: Development Package for new ground up classroom, common area, offices, storage, minor food service metal building structure with common material infill detached building addition to Rising Star Church Location: 2800 E 36TH ST Review Date: 10/26/2026 Reviewer: Marco Contreras – Engineering Associate Reviewer Contact Information: marco.contreras@tucsonaz.gov Related cases: Plan review for the above-referenced development package has been completed. This review was conducted for compliance with applicable development criteria including the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC), Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-6, and Technical Standards Manual (TSM) sections governing waste management, pedestrian access, hydrology – retention/detention requirements, and all applicable site standards. The following comments must be addressed prior to approval. To help facilitate a timely resubmittal, please provide updated plans and calculations along with a written response to each comment, indicating what action was taken and where the change can be found on the plans. Do not use revision clouds on resubmittal drawings — clouds are reserved for post-permit revisions only. Submit your response letter and updated plan set & reports as separate files. Applicable Code Links for quick/direct reference: City of Tucson Code: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Codes Floodplain Code: https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az/0-0-0-19333 Drainage Manual Link: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/cot-drainage-manual-searchable.pdf Design standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention Link: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/updated-retention-detention-manual.pdf City of Tucson Chapter 25: https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az/0-0-0-18593 Site Engineering Review Comments: 1. General note #25 – Revise the keynote provided, the City of Tucson adopted The IBC 2024 with ICC A117.1 2017 edition at the beginning of 2026 2. The provided plan set shows 4 sheets on the provided sheet index – but the actual plan set file only contained 6 sheets. Revise accordingly. 3. Waste stream calculations have not been provided. Provide the required waste stream calculations for the entire development. The calculations must be presented in table format and must: [TSM 8-01.8.0] a. Break down waste generation by use type and unit count (e.g., number of residential units, commercial square footage, etc.) using the generation rates prescribed in TSM 8-01.8.0. b. Identify the total estimated solid waste and recycling volumes generated by the development on a periodic basis (weekly or per collection cycle). c. Demonstrate that the number, size, and configuration of the proposed enclosures and dumpster containers are adequate to accommodate the calculated waste volumes between collection intervals. d. State how solid waste and recyclables will be handled and collected, including the proposed collection frequency. 4. Clarification required – site plan (Sheet 2) shows keynote #31 at the northeast corner of the proposed structure, but the linework gives no indication of a proposed sidewalk in this area. Revise accordingly. 5. Clarification required – the development package plan set includes both sheet 2 & 3 as “Site Plans” – Which one is to be the intended final site plan? 6. Clarification and revision required – the drainage statement claims the development is not subject to first flush retention requirements on the basis that the proposed expansion is less than 33% of the entire site from DSSDR 2.1.2.b. This would be an incorrect interpretation of what the code outlines. The code is stating that When expansion of existing development occurs, the first-flush runoff volume shall be calculated using: Only the impervious and disturbed area associated with the proposed expansion, when between 2,000 square feet and 1 acre of new development are proposed, or the new development is less than 33% of the entire site. a. It will be required that the development design be revised to include how the project will be addressing first-flush retention requirements based on the increase of impervious coverage as proposed. b. Ensure to update/revise the statement document to demonstrate how compliance is being met. |
||
| 10/23/2026 | CDRC Review Coordinator Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC Added Addressing, ADOT, TAA, PAG, USPS, SWG, and TEP to the workflow. FYI notice sent to PAG, USPS, SWG, and TEP. | ||
| 10/23/2026 | External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI Notice email sent. No further action is required. | ||
| 10/23/2026 | External Reviewers - Southwest Gas Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI Notice email sent. No further action is required. | ||
| 10/23/2026 | External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI Notice email sent. No further action is required. | ||
| 10/23/2026 | External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI Notice email sent. No further action is required. | ||
| 10/22/2026 | OK to Submit - Engineering Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED |