Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0225-00060
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/09/2025 | NPPO Standard | NOT REQUIRED | |||
| 03/18/2025 | Real Estate Standard | NOT REQUIRED | Please notify the Real Estate Division if any property rights need to be addressed. | ||
| 04/14/2025 | CDRC Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 04/14/2025 | Commercial Plumbing Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Provide backflow protection for the water fountain water supply (e.g. reduced pressure backflow protector). Reference: Section 423.1, IPC 2018. | ||
| 03/27/2025 | External Reviewers - COT Environmental Services Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | ES Comments: 1. Include a keynote within Site Plan page 4 of 11, calling out the trash/recycle enclosure area, and the proposed maneuvering and turning radii for service vehicle. This is shown but not clear on what it's intended to relate to. 2. Required to include provisions for recycle storage and collection. Clarify how plan to comply. Refer to TSM 8-01.1.0 & 8-01.4.0. 3. Dumpster/Enclosure detail on page 2, must show graphically and include the following note: One J Bolt secured to each gate and Qty of 4 ea. 1" diameter/6" long galvanized pipe embedded flush with top of concrete ramp, to allow doors to be anchored in the open and closed position. Refer to TSM 8-01.9.0 Figures 3A & B, double and single container enclosures. Feel free to contact me regarding my review comments. Andy Vera (520) 837-3798 Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 03/27/2025 | Fire New Construction Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Add note to plans stating specific work being conducted or requested, plans are dated 2021 and unable to determined new and existing work. | ||
| 03/19/2025 | ROW Engineering Review Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | TD-DEV-0225-00060 • 465 W SAINT MARYS RD 1. Call out Pima Association of Governments (PAG) Standard Detail 200 for the proposed sidewalk within the public rights-of-way. 2. Provide a general note indicating that any work within the public rights-of-way will require a Right-of-Way Permit from COT Department of Transportation and Mobility. If you have any questions, please contact Richard Leigh at Richard Leigh at richard.leigh@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 04/07/2025 | Site Engineering Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. See that zoning comments are addressed. Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 04/09/2025 | Site Landscape Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT REVIEWER: CHAD KELLER, RLA SITE LANDSCAPE/NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION SECTION PROJECT: DEVELOPMENT PLAN RESUBMITTAL WITH SITE MODIFICATIONS PER CITY REVIEW ACTIVITY NO: TD-DEV-0225-00060 ADDRESS: 465 W SAINT MARYS RD ZONING: O-3 OFFICE ZONE; INFILL INCENTIVE DISTRICT This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants, and water harvesting. Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all of the Site Landscape/NPPO Section review comments have been addressed. PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTS NOT ADDRESSED FOR SITE LANDSCAPE/NPPO SECTION: 1. For comments 2 and 3 below per the pre-application meeting on November 7, 2024, please provide a graphical shade study and a calculation chart that shows how the design has met or has attempted to make a reasonable effort to meet the shade requirements for the IID with regard to the pedestrian access paths/courtyard area. 2. Per UDC 5.12.8.B.2a. General IID Zoning Design Guidelines – Streetscape Design - Shade is required for 50% of all sidewalks and pedestrian paths. This can be waived or reduced where compliance is not feasible due to a project’s site location and/or building orientation and the applicant has made a reasonable attempt to comply with this standard. 3. Except as provided below, shade shall be provided for at least 50% of all sidewalks and pedestrian access paths as measured at 12:00 p.m. on June 21 when the sun is 80 degrees above the horizon. Shade may be provided by trees, arcades or canopies provided their location and design characteristics are compatible with the historic design context and the architectural integrity. The use of plantings and shade is permitted to meet this standard, with the approval of DTM. The shade provided may serve to meet this standard. - b. Exception - The PDSD Director may approve an IID Plan providing less than 50% shade, where compliance is not feasible due to location and/or orientation and the applicant has made a reasonable attempt to comply with this standard. Thank you. Chad Keller, RLA Landscape Architect chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov 520.837.4923 |
||
| 04/03/2025 | Site Zoning Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Crystal Classics – shed & site fence w/gates Development Package (1st Review) TD-DEV-0225-00060 TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 3, 2025 DUE DATE: April 8, 2025 COMMENTS: Resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is March 16, 2026. 2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.2.4 – Clearly indicated what is proposed on this DP. It is not clear why or what this was submitted for. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.2.4 – Update the design professionals stamps and the dates on the drawings. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.a – Up dated the building area to include the shed shown on the plan. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.c – As a shed has been added to the site provide a building area expansion calculation on the plan. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – A Granada Ave. is designated as a Collector on the COT MS&R map clearly indicate on the plan how a vehicle attempting to access the site will be able to turn around on site with out backing out into the right-of-way of Granda if the gates are closed. A vehicle maneuvering shall be on site. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – As vehicle parking requirements for an Administrative and Professional Office use is based on gross floor area, update the vehicle parking requirements to include the shed. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Per UDC Article 7.4.3.E.1 If an expansion is less than 25% or if a series of expansions cumulatively results in less than a 25% expansion in floor area , the requirements of this section apply only to the proposed expansion. That said provide the required 2 short- and long-term bicycle parking spaces to the site and update the calculation. Clearly show the short- and long-term bicycle parking spaces on the site and provide details that clear demonstrate how the requirements of UDC Articles 7.4.9.B, .C & .D are met. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Based on aerial photos there are two (2) shade sails located in the courtyard that appear sometime after 2020. Zoning was not able to fine approved permit/compliance documents for these shade sails. Show the shade sails on the DP and if applicable provide approved permit documents. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Zone1.desk@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: A revised development package as well as a comment response letter. To resubmit, visit the Tucson Development Center Online at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home. The instructions for resubmittal can be found at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/tdc-faq/new-pdfs/revisions-and-resubmittals.pdf. |
||
| 03/03/2025 | CDRC Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | As per Josh Garcia, the plan shouldn't reference the old Development Package number. It's okay to bring it in, but please make sure to remove the Development Package number on the next submittal. | ||
| 03/17/2025 | CDRC Review Coordinator Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC added ADOT, TEP, PAG, USPS, and SWG to the workflow. Review request email sent to ADOT and TEP. FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG | ||
| 04/08/2025 | Design Review Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | Please clearly indicate on the drawings and on the application what is actually being proposed for this site. If the Downtown Infill Incentive District (IID) is going to be used for redevelopment of this property, please submit a Design Package as a subrecord of this Development Package, following these instructions: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/3/pdsd/documents/submission-documents/special_districts_application_instructions_7.18.23.pdf. Here's an overview of the IID: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/3/pdsd/documents/planning-amp-zoning/iid-application-and-review-process.pdf. If you have any questions, please let me know: maria.gayosso@tucsonaz.gov. Thank you. | ||
| 04/07/2025 | External Reviewers - Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | Good Morning, ADOT has no comments on this DEV. Thank you for the opportunity to review. |
||
| 03/17/2025 | External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 03/17/2025 | External Reviewers - Southwest Gas Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 04/14/2025 | External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | April 14, 2025 WO#T145245 City of Tucson Planning and Development Services Attn: CDRC Admin Team Dear CDRC Admin Team Subject: Crystal Classics TD-DEV-0225-00060 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted 3/18/2025. There are existing facilities within the development which are depicted on the plan. There are no apparent conflicts at this time. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. To apply for electric service, please call the New Construction department at (520) 918- 8300. Please submit a final set of plans including approved site, electric load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans. If available, include a PDF version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Should you have any easement questions, please contact our Land Resources Department, LandReviews@tep.com. Should you have any technical questions, please contact the area designer, Fred Quintero (520) 235-6329 fquintero@tep.com Sincerely, Design Admins Design Admins Tucson Electric Power |
||
| 03/17/2025 | External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 04/09/2025 | Historic Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | This project is not in an HPZ. Its in IID/RNA. IID and RNA review may trigger historic. This project is located in an Archaeological Sensitivity Zone. An Archaeological Consultant/Monitor hired by the permit applicant is required to be on-site during any digging, unless a waiver is issued. Monitoring reports are to be submitted to the Historic Preservation Office, City of Tucson, P.O. Box 27210, Tucson, AZ 85726. Contact Michael.Taku@tucsonaz.gov with any historic questions. |
||
| 03/17/2025 | OK to Submit - Engineering Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 03/12/2025 | OK to Submit - Zoning Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 03/19/2025 | ROW Review | REVIEW COMPLETED |