Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: TD-DEV-0224-00054
Parcel: 117021920

Address:
941 N STONE AV

Review Status: Requires Resubmit

Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1

Permit Number - TD-DEV-0224-00054
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
04/02/2024 Commercial Plumbing APPROVED
04/05/2024 External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) APPROVED April 5, 2024
WO#T107483
City of Tucson
Planning and Development Services
Attn: CDRC Admin Team
Dear CDRC Admin Team
Subject: New 2-story multi-family residential
TD-DEV-0224-00054
Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed and approved the development
plan submitted 3/1/2024. There are existing facilities within the development which are
depicted upon the plan; there are possible conflicts. The new two story building may be
too close to existing overhead electric lines. Must maintain minimum 10 foot clearance
to lines to include during construction (scaffolding, ladders, cranes, booms, etc).
Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the
existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer.
To apply for electric service, please call the New Construction department at (520) 918-
8300. Please submit a final set of plans including approved site, electric load, paving
off-site improvements and irrigation plans. If available, include a PDF version of the
plans.
If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Should you
have any easement questions, please contact our land Resources Department,
TEPDEVREV@tep.com.
Should you have any technical questions, please contact the area designer,
Fred Quintero
(520) 235-6329
fquintero@tep.com
Sincerely,
Design Admins
Design Admins
Tucson Electric Power
04/16/2024 NPPO APPROVED Approved.
Thank you.
04/02/2024 ROW Engineering Review APPROVED No Comments

David Stiffey

David.Stiffey@tucsonaz.gov
04/01/2024 Site Engineering APPROVED
04/16/2024 CDRC Post Review Express PENDING ASSIGNMENT
04/02/2024 External Reviewers - Pima County Addressing REQUIRES RESUBMIT Good Afternoon,
Please see attached for TD-DEV-0224-00054 P24AD00181and respond to comments.
Thank you,
Marianna Kuglmeier
PLANNER
Pima County Development Services Department
201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor
Tucson, AZ 85701
(520) 724-6772
04/16/2024 Site Landscape REQUIRES RESUBMIT CDRC TRANSMITTAL
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
REVIEWER: CHAD KELLER, RLA
PDSD LANDSCAPE/NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION SECTION

PROJECT: NEW MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
ACTIVITY NO: TP-DEV-0224-00054
ADDRESS/PARCEL: 941 N STONE AV/ 117021920
ZONING: C-3 COMMERCIAL ZONE

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants, and water harvesting.

Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape/NPPO Review Section comments are addressed.

COMMENTS:
1. NPPP is approved.

2. UDC 2-10.4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data - All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan.

3. Ensure that Zoning, Engineering comments and concerns are addressed prior to landscape section approval.

4. Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0224-00054, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.3

5. Label sight visibility triangles and ROWs (existing and future) to all landscape plans.

6. Please label the project property lines on all landscape sheets.

7. The required number of trees have been provided for the parking area. It is the opinion/recommendation of Landscape/NPPO that an alternative be looked at for the Mexican Bird of Paradise placed at the southwest parking spaces. Due to its small stature at maturity, what are your thoughts on pruning maintenance for this plant to avoid overgrowth onto the sidewalk and into the parking area?

8. Please label irrigation meter as “irrigation only”. See TSM 4-01.6.0

9. Please show all irrigation sleeves for irrigation lines crossing hardscape.

10. Although there is a note to see civil plans for downspouts and curb inlets, please label all downspouts, splash pads and curb cuts on the commercial rainwater harvesting plan.

11. Please add notes for the depth of the water harvesting basins on the plan, (6-inch depth including decomposed granite and/or decorative rock.)

12. Please add the depth of the water harvesting basins on the water budget table.

If you have any questions about these comments, I can be reached at chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov
04/04/2024 Site Zoning REQUIRES RESUBMIT CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Wyatt Berger
Lead Planner

PROJECT: 941 North Stone
Development Package (1st Review)
TD-DEV-0224-00054

TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 4, 2024

DUE DATE: April 1, 2024

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC), Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06, and the Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

Per UDC Section 3.3.3.G.5.c, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year expiration date is April 4, 2025.

1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0224-00054, adjacent to the title block on all sheets.

2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.5 – The number of proposed dwelling units does not appear to correspond with the motor vehicle parking requirements provided on the cover sheet.

3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6 – Provide a general note stating that the project is designed to meet the overlay zone criteria for UDC Section 5.12, Downtown Area Infill Incentive District (IID). Remove the specific reference to UDC 5.12.16. A Special Districts application shall be applied for as a sub-record of TD-DEV-0224-00054 if the IID process will be pursued.

4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – If any additional applications or overlays are pursued, list the applicable case number adjacent to the title block on all sheets. Additionally, as a general note, provide the type of application processed or applicable overlay, a statement that the project meets the criteria and conditions of approval, the date of approval, what was approved, and any conditions of approval.

5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.d – Remove the reference to maximum site coverage calculation on the site plan. Per UDC Table 6.3-4.A, lot coverage does not apply to the proposed uses.

6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.A – As it appears a lot consolidation is proposed, provide an approved lot consolidation request processed through the Pima County Assessor’s Office.

7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Zoning acknowledges that a Parking Design Modification Request (PDMR) is intended to reduce the width of the parking area access lane to 22.8’. If the request is approved, provide a statement indicating what was approved and the conditions of approval, if any.

8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Demonstrate that an overhang of at least two and one-half feet is provided between the front of the south parking spaces and the pedestrian circulation area (UDC 7.4.6.H.1.a).

9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Per UDC 7.4.6.K, a street or alley cannot be used for maneuvering directly into or from any parking space located wholly or partially outside the public right-of-way. A variance granted by the Board of Adjustment is required for the two parking spaces to use the alley for access and maneuverability.

10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The two parking spaces accessed from the alley are required to be at least ten feet in width when the sides of the parking spaces abut a vertical barrier over six inches in height (UDC 7.4.6.D.2.b).

11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The calculations for the number of required motor vehicle parking spaces appear to be incorrect based on the number of residential units proposed.

12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Four motor vehicle parking spaces are proposed within the future right-of-way. Provide confirmation from the Department of Transportation and Mobility that Stone Avenue will not be widened to its proposed width. If Stone Avenue is widened, these four spaces cannot count toward meeting the required parking.

13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Please note that if Stone Avenue is widened to its proposed width, the short-term bicycle parking shown as Keynote 21 will need to be moved out of the future right-of-way.

14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Demonstrate how the short-term bicycle parking spaces comply with UDC 7.4.9.C.2.a.

15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – The bicycle parking requirements on the cover sheet indicate that nine extra spaces (long-term and short-term) are provided. Clarify the number of additional non-required short-term spaces proposed as only the required spaces are shown.

16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.I – The Major Streets and Routes Plan Map indicates a future right-of-way width of 120’ for Stone Avenue. Provide confirmation from the Department of Transportation and Mobility that Stone Avenue will not be widened to its proposed width. All site improvements will otherwise need to accommodate the future right-of-way width and street dedication.

17. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Zoning acknowledges that a Technical Standards Modification Request (TSMR) is intended to reduce the width of the pedestrian circulation path to less than four feet along the north façade of the existing building. If the request is approved, provide a statement indicating what was approved and the conditions of approval, if any.

18. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – The proposed pedestrian circulation path along the east façade of the existing building is partially within the future right-of-way. A TSMR will also be required to reduce the sidewalk to less than four feet in width if street dedication is required.

19. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.W – Demonstrate that the proposed accessible signs do not encroach within the required 2’-6” overhangs (UDC 7.4.6.H).

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Wyatt.Berger@tucsonaz.gov or at (520) 837-4951.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: A revised development package as well as a comment response letter. To resubmit, visit the Tucson Development Center Online at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home. The instructions for resubmittal can be found at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/tdc-faq/new-pdfs/revisions-and-resubmittals.pdf.
02/23/2024 CDRC Application Completeness Express REVIEW COMPLETED
03/01/2024 CDRC Review Coordinator Express REVIEW COMPLETED Review request email sent per ADOT, Addressing and TEP. CDRC sent FYI email to PAG, USPS, SWG.
04/02/2024 External Reviewers - Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) REVIEW COMPLETED Good Afternoon,
ADOT has no comments on this DEV.
Thank you for the opportunity to review.
03/01/2024 External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC sent FYI email to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required from the customer at this time.
03/01/2024 External Reviewers - Southwest Gas REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC sent FYI email to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required from the customer at this time.
03/01/2024 External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC sent FYI email to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required from the customer at this time.
04/02/2024 Fire New Construction REVIEW COMPLETED
02/27/2024 OK to Submit - Engineering Fast REVIEW COMPLETED
02/26/2024 OK to Submit - Landscape Fast REVIEW COMPLETED
02/29/2024 OK to Submit - Zoning Fast REVIEW COMPLETED