Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0224-00044
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/14/2024 | CDRC Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 06/10/2024 | Commercial Plumbing | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. An approved 2-way cleanout fitting is allowed to be used at the junction of a building drain and a building sewer; otherwise, cleanouts shall open to allow cleaning only in the direction of flow. Reference: Section 708.1.8, IPC 2018. [Initial comment: Provide a cleanout in the building sewer prior to entering the right-of-way. Reference: Pima County Standard Detail RWRD 401, 2015.] 2. Provide a letter from Tucson Water stating that the duplex can be served by two meters. [Initial comment: Verify that Tucson Water will allow the use of two water meters for the building.] |
||
| 06/14/2024 | NPPO | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Please see Site Landscape comments for requirements. Thank you. Chad Keller, RLA chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 06/05/2024 | ROW Engineering Review | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | TD-DEV-0224-00044 131 W. Pastime Rd. 2nd Comments, Comments: 1. Request NOT to install concrete sidewalk along the property frontage is accepted. This request is accepted due to the lack of existing sidewalk on the south side of Pastime and that there is an adequate and used pedestrian path (sidewalk) along the north side of Pastime Rd. The request, however, to not install the driveway apron is denied. 2. A New concrete driveway apron per P.A.G. standard 206 is required. David Stiffey DTM Project Coordinator David.Stiffey@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 06/14/2024 | Site Landscape | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT REVIEWER: CHAD KELLER, RLA PDSD SITE LANDSCAPE/NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION SECTION PROJECT: BUILD 2-STORY DUPLEX ACTIVITY NO: TD-DEV-0224-00044 ADDRESS/PARCEL: 131 W PASTIME RD/ 10602212A ZONING: R-2 RESIDENCE ZONE This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants, and water harvesting. Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape/NPPO Review Section comments are addressed. SITE LANDSCAPE/NPPO SECTION COMMENTS: NPPO EXCEPTION NOT SATISFIED: 1. Please provide an NPPO waiver for exception from the Native Plant Preservation Ordinance sealed and signed by a Registered Landscape Architect in the state of Arizona or one of the other plant experts referenced in UDC 7.7.5.D. Below are additional code references for applicant compliance: 2-11.3.0 PERMITTED EXCEPTIONS: Requests for exceptions from the Native Plant Preservation requirements in accordance with Sections 7.7.3.D.3 and .4 of the UDC are reviewed by the Planning and Development Services Department (PDSD). Submittals are required to document that the site does not contain, or the proposed project does not impact, Protected Native Plants. Submittal requirements shall consist of one or more of the following items: 3.1 An aerial photograph, taken within a maximum of three years of submittal, of the site at a minimum one inch equals 100 feet that delineates the site boundaries and clearly shows the absence of plants within those boundaries or a site plan that clearly shows that construction will not impact any plants. Any aerial photograph submitted, which was taken more than one year prior to submittal, shall be accompanied by a letter stating that the site is substantially unchanged from the date of the aerial photograph. 3.2 A signed statement from one of the plant professionals listed in Section 7.7.5.D, Professional Expertise, of the UDC who has visited the site and verified that Viable Protected Native Plants are not located on the subject site or 3.3 Other documentation acceptable to the PDSD Director, which clearly indicates that the site does not contain, or the project will not impact, Protected Native Plants. Such documentation includes, but is not limited to, photographs of the site taken from all sides of the property and a signed statement from the property owner that Protected Native Plants are not located on the subject site. 3.4 Based on factors such as the size of the site, site location, topography, and proximity to significant natural features, the DSD Director may require submittal of specific items above. 7.7.5.D PROFESSIONAL EXPERTISE: Preparation of all elements of the Native Plant Preservation Plan and on- site monitoring as required under Section 7.7.5.C.5, On- Site Monitoring, must be performed by a plant professional, such as: 1. An arborist certified by the International Society of Arboriculture; 2. A landscape architect; or, 3. A horticulturist, biologist, or botanist with a minimum B.A. or B.S. in an appropriate arid environment natural resource field. SITE LANDSCAPE COMMENTS NOT SATISFIED: 1. Ensure that Zoning, Engineering comments, and concerns are addressed prior to landscape section approval. 2. Label sight visibility triangles on all sheets. It is understood that the site is not changing the entry location, SVT’s are still required. Provide the SVT’s. 3. Label the Right-of-Way and/or the property line on all landscape sheets. 4. A landscape plan is required per 7.6.2.B.1-b. The Unified Development Code (UDC) requires all new development or an expansion of greater than 25% of an existing development to submit a landscape plan, UDC 7.6.2. Preparation of the landscape plan shall adhere to UDC 7.6.4 and Administrative Manual 2-10. 5. The landscape plan shall include a planting legend that identifies the plant botanical and common name, quantities per species, and size planted (gallon or box). 6. In the depressed landscape areas for water harvesting, add plant material (trees, shrubs, cacti, succulents, accents and groundcover) for heat island effect dampening. 7. Please provide a separate irrigation plan for the proposed plant material on-site. If you have any questions about these comments, I can be reached at chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 06/11/2024 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Nathan Herrera Lead Planner PROJECT: Development Package (2nd Review) TD-DEV-0224-00044 TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 11, 2024 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is February 12, 2025. 1. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided. COMMENT: The short-term bicycle parking is not identified on the site plan. Clearly identify on the Site Plan where the short-term bicycle parking is to be located. Zoning acknowledged that the long-term parking is to be housed within the units, but short-term parking needs to be located in a publicly accessible area, see UDC Article 7.4.9 for design requirements. 2. 2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. COMMENT: Per UDC 6.3-2.A the required setbacks in the R-2 zone for a multifamily use adjacent to a residential zone are the greater of 10 feet or 3/4 the height of the proposed building wall. COMMENT: With a proposed wall height of 17 feet the required setback to the eastern property line is 12 feet 9 inches, the proposed setback is 8 feet. COMMENT: With a proposed building height of 20 feet, the required setback to the western property line is 15 feet. The proposed setback is 12 feet. COMMENT: Zoning acknowledges that a Design Development Option application has been provided with the current Development Package submittal. Zoning cannot approve of the proposed duplex as shown, until the DDO process is completed and approved. For more information about the DDO process contact Wyatt Berger at wyatt.berger@tucsonaz.gov or Georgia Pennington at Georgia.Pennington@tucsonaz.gov If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Nathan.Herrera@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: revised Development Package along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. To resubmit visit Tucson Development Center at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home. Instructions for resubmittal - https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/pdsd/documents/tdc-faq/new-pdfs/revisions-and-resubmittals.pdf. |
||
| 06/13/2024 | Zoning Modifications - DDO | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | FROM: Georgia Pennington, PLANNER DATE: 6/13/24 COMMENTS: 1. The submitted DDO application is incomplete. On the "Project Description and Applicant's DDO Request page," state why the modification is compatible with the neighborhood. 2. The setbacks requested must match the site plan, you are requesting 10' when the building is 12' away. Please revise request. If you have questions about this transmittal, contact me at georgia.pennington@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 05/08/2024 | CDRC Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED |