Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.1
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0223-00148
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/03/2023 | NPPO | APPROVED | |||
| 03/16/2023 | Site Engineering | APPROVED | |||
| 04/07/2023 | CDRC Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 03/21/2023 | Commercial Plumbing | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. The maximum distance between cleanouts shall be 100-feet, measured along the developed pipe length from the upstream entrance of the cleanout (e.g. 100 feet – (Rim - Inv) equals the maximum developed length). Reference: Section 708.1.1, IPC 2018. 2. The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (1290-21, 2423.09’) is more than 12”below the first floor elevation (2425.20’). Backwater valves shall not be installed per Section 714.1, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
||
| 03/17/2023 | Signs | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | RE: existing freestanding pole sign review for change of use AT: 1900 E Grant / Starbucks Development package: TD-DEV-0223-00148 Reviewer: H. Thrall (Heather.Thrall@tucsonaz.gov) Date: 03/17/2023 Codes: Unified Development Code (UDC) 7A Sign Standards 1. There is an existing nonconforming pole sign at the east end of the site. While this is a change of use from retail to restaurant, and nonconforming pole signs shall either be removed or shall be brought into conformance with the code, there is another option here to consider. The sign qualifies for a Heritage Landmark Sign (HLS) process, given it may be restored, is older than 1974, has an irregular shape and contained neon for the original "El Rancho Market". The neon is said to remain intact under the present paneling on the sign faces. An HLS does not count toward the total number of freestanding signs, nor towards the location's allowed sign area. In addition, it may be that depending on design, it is possible to consider that a portion of the sign could have an adaptive re-use to include the new user - Starbucks, and retain character defining features and character defining text for the sign. In addition, the sign can be relocated elsewhere on the site, under certain criteria, under the HLS process. You may review 7A.10.5. of the UDC for Heritage Landmark Signs for additional criteria.: https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az_udc/0-0-0-27095 While it appears that this sign may be required to be removed from present location due to the drive thru lane position shown on the development package, it may be of interest to your client still to consider the HLS process for this sign and relocate it elsewhere onsite. If not, there most certainly may be others that have interest in the sign and would wish to be involved in preserving it. If your client desires to consider the HLS process, staff would facilitate the research into original documents for the sign permit and provide information for the historic review process for actual designation. If you wish to discuss the signage matter with me, and also discuss new signage proposed for the location, I may be reached directly at 520-837-4961 or by email at Heather.Thrall@tucsonaz.gov I would also be available to meet on Teams or Zoom with you, your clients and sign contractors as desired. |
||
| 03/20/2023 | Site Landscape | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PROJECT: STARBUCKS ACTIVITY NO. TD-DEV-0223-00148 ADDRESS/PARCEL: 1900 E GRANT RD/123-05-215A ZONING: C-1 This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting. Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments are addressed. COMMENTS: 1. Ensure you have approval from DT for any and all planting in the ROW. Reach out to David Marhefka (david.marhefka@tucsonaz.gov). 2. Correct Activity number across all sheets (TD-DEV-0223-00148) Admin Manual 2-06.4.3. If you have any questions about these comments, I can be reached at Matthew.Carlton@tucsonaz.gov or 520-837-4988 |
||
| 03/15/2023 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Wyatt Berger Lead Planner PROJECT: Starbucks Development Package (1st Review) TD-DEV-0223-00148 TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 15, 2023 DUE DATE: March 17, 2023 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC), Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06, and the Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Per UDC Section 3.3.3.G.5.c, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is March 15, 2024. 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1 – Provide the RLS number for the surveyor on the cover sheet as this number appears to be missing. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Add the development package case number, TD-DEV-0223-00148, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.W – The existing sign at the northeast corner of the site is not shown on the site plan. Clarify whether the sign will remain on the site. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Wyatt.Berger@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4951. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: A revised development package as well as a comment response letter. To resubmit, visit the Tucson Development Center Online at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home. The instructions for resubmittal can be found at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/website/Resubmittals.pdf. |
||
| 02/28/2023 | CDRC Application Completeness | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 03/13/2023 | CDRC Review Coordinator | REVIEW COMPLETED | external reviewers added , email requests send and fyi emails sent. | ||
| 03/17/2023 | External Reviewers - COT Parks & Recreation | REVIEW COMPLETED | Hello CDRC team, On behalf of the City of Tucson Parks and Recreation Department, I have no comments on the above development plan. Tom Fisher Project Manager City of Tucson Parks and Recreation Department 900 S. Randolph Way Tucson, Arizona 85716 (520) 837-8037 |
||
| 03/13/2023 | External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments | REVIEW COMPLETED | Fyi email sent per SOP | ||
| 03/13/2023 | External Reviewers - Southwest Gas | REVIEW COMPLETED | Fyi email sent per SOP | ||
| 03/13/2023 | External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) | REVIEW COMPLETED | Fyi email sent per SOP | ||
| 03/13/2023 | External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) | REVIEW COMPLETED | Fyi email sent per SOP | ||
| 03/13/2023 | Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 03/07/2023 | OK to Submit - Engineering | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 03/03/2023 | OK to Submit - Landscape | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 03/07/2023 | OK to Submit - Zoning | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 03/17/2023 | ROW Engineering Review | REVIEW COMPLETED | TD-DEV-0223-00148 1900 E. Grant Rd. Comments: 1. Any existing curb or sidewalk that is non-compliant with current standards will be modified or replaced to meet current standards. 2. Curb returns on an arterial street must have a minimum 25’ radius. 3. Curb returns on a residential street must have a minimum 18’ radius. 4. Concrete curb per P.A.G. standard 209. 5. Concrete curb access ramps per P.A.G. standard 207. 6. Where adjoining sidewalk from the property ties to sidewalk along the ROW frontage, a 60” X 60” ADA landing is required. Landings shall be 60” X 60” and not to exceed a 2% cross slope in all directions. 7. Protect in place existing streetlights. 8. Protect in place existing catch basins. David Stiffey DTM Project Coordinator David.Stiffey@tucsonaz.gov |