Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.2
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0223-00141
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/03/2023 | CDRC Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 04/26/2023 | Commercial Plumbing | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. Show the proposed location of the water meter and the reduced pressure zone backflow prevention assembly. Reference: Section 107.2.6, IBC 2018. 2. The maximum distance between cleanouts shall be 100-feet, measured along the developed pipe length from the upstream entrance of the cleanout. Reference: Section 708.1.1, IPC 2018. 3. The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (2327.52') is less than 12” below the first floor elevation (2328.00’). Provide a backwater valve per Section 714.1, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson. Verify that no fixtures located more than 12” above the rim elevation of the next upstream manhole (i.e. fixtures located on the second floor) discharge through the backwater valve. |
||
| 04/25/2023 | Fire New Construction | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | -Include construction type. This will determine your fire flow requirement per IFC Table B105.1(2). Fire flow will dictate how many hydrants will need to be added. -Need additional hydrants per fire flow to comply with IFC 507.5.1. Shall be within 400' to the furthest portion of the building, as the hose lays. john.vincent@tucsonaz.gov 5203495581 |
||
| 04/18/2023 | NPPO | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | See Landscape Comments. | ||
| 04/24/2023 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Tucson codes and ordinances can be found online at https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/overview The Stormwater Detention-Retention Manual can be found online at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/updated-retention-detention-manual/updated-retention-detention-manual.pdf TD-DEV-0223-00141 Drainage Report: 1. Table 2 indicates that the post-development discharge is not reduced in every watershed. The site is located in a critical basin and post-development peak discharge rates for the 2-, 10-, and 100-year events shall not exceed 85% of pre-development discharge rates at the project boundary per Section 3.1 in the Stormwater Retention/Detention manual. 2. The critical basin map included in the submittal is outdated, from 2007. The site is located in the Kreuger Wash basin and is in a critical basin as identified by Pima County. 3. Provide figures similar to Tables 2.2 and 2.3 in the Stormwater Detention-Retention Manual to demonstrate that first flush requirements are being met and that the perviousness of each watershed is being accounted for. Site Plan: 1. A security barrier is required on the southern 1:1 grouted riprap bank of detention basin B per Ret/Det Manual Section 4.4.1 item 5. 2. Provide dimensions for detail Section D C1.06 that show the depth of soil on either side of the proposed retaining wall. 3. Minimum freeboard in detention basins is 6 inches per Ret/Det Manual section 4.4.1 item 1. Proposed freeboard in basin B is only 3.4 inches. 4. Include curb cuts in the curbs around the water harvesting areas to maximize water harvesting. 5. Show drainage patterns on the roof of the proposed building. 6. Provide waste stream calculations compliant with TSM 8-01.8. 7. From recent clarification from Environmental Services per TSM section 8, although recycling service isn’t required the site needs to provide at minimum the enclosure space for both solid waste and recycling. A single enclosure won’t be sufficient and a double enclosure or an additional single enclosure will be needed to meet this requirement. It is also important to point out per TSM section 8-01.4.I - required parking may be reduced for existing development when solid waste and recycle enclosures are provided. Lianne Evans lianne.evans@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 04/18/2023 | Site Landscape | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PROJECT: TWC TUCSON ACTIVITY NO. TD-DEV-0223-00141 ADDRESS/PARCEL: 1109 W GLENN/107-07-003D ZONING: I-1 This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting. Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape/NPPO Review Section comments are addressed. COMMENTS: 1. Ensure that Zoning, Engineering comments and concerns are addressed prior to landscape section approval. 2. Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0223-00141, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.3 3. Revise the Bluestake number across all sheets to reflect BlueStake in Tucson, not the Phoenix Metro area. 4. Provide a maintenance schedule for the landscape and irrigation for this project. UDC 7.6.8, Admin Manual 2-10-4.2.A.4 and Technical Standards 5-01.9 5. Include a construction detail showing root barriers for plants located near sidewalks and parking lots. (see Detail 402 located here: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/tdot/landscape-architects) 6. Include a construction detail showing a cage for the backflow preventer. (see Detail 412 located here: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/tdot/landscape-architects) 7. Label sight visibility triangles and ROWs (existing and future) to all landscape plans. 8. A separate irrigation water meter is required. Please label the new irrigation meter as “irrigation only”. UDC Technical Standards 4-01.-.2. A.1. 9. Please revise the Commercial Rainwater Harvesting Plan to better match the examples sent over to the landscape architect on the project. 10. Show all roof arrows on the Commercial Rainwater Harvesting Plan. 11. Show all curb cuts/downspouts/splashpads on the landscape and the commercial rainwater harvesting plan. 12. If using d.g at a 2” depth, ensure the rainwater harvesting basins are 8” in depth to account for the d.g. 13. You must have a permit from Department of Transit and Mobility for any planting being done in the right of way. Please reach out to David Marhefka (david.marhefka@tucsonaz.gov) if this is the case. 14. Revise NPPO table to closer match what was sent over to the landscape architect on the project. 15. Identify the onsite monitor for the NPPO on the plan set. If you have any questions about these comments, I can be reached at Matthew.Carlton@tucsonaz.gov or 520-837-4988 |
||
| 04/24/2023 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Wyatt Berger Lead Planner PROJECT: TWC Tucson Development Package (1st Review) TD-DEV-0223-00141 TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 24, 2023 DUE DATE: April 28, 2023 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC), Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06, and the Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Per UDC Section 3.3.3.G.5.c, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year expiration date is April 24, 2024. 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1 – Provide the email addresses of the owner, landscape architect, and architect on the cover sheet. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.B – The legal description on the cover sheet is incorrect and should instead be “S804.16’ M/L N854.16’ M/L W470.45 M/L NE4 SW4EXC N360’ W360’ THEREOF 5.71 AC SEC 35-13-13.” 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.D – Provide the page number and total number of pages within the title block on the landscape sheets (i.e., sheet xx of 20). 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Add the development package case number, TD-DEV-0223-00141, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Specify within the second note under “Permitting Notes” on the cover sheet that the proposed use of the site is “Construction Service” as defined within the UDC. State any use-specific standards that apply to this specific use within the I-1 zone. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6 – Provide a general note on the cover sheet that states “THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE CRITERIA OF UDC SECTION 5.4, MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONES (MS&R). 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.b – Include the area in square feet of proposed building coverage and vehicular use area on the cover sheet. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.B – Ensure all easements as described within the supplemental title report are drawn fully dimensioned on the site plan. Clarify whether any or all of these easements are not in use or have been abandoned. Provide the abandonment information, if applicable. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C – Ensure the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks are provided on the site plan. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – The proposed 8’-6” by 15’-6” motor vehicle parking spaces do not meet the intent of UDC 7.4.6.H.1. Demonstrate that a clearance space of at least four feet in width is provided for pedestrian access abutting the proposed motor vehicle parking spaces. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Ensure that the back-up spur located at the end of the row of parking near the site ingress and egress complies with UDC 7.4.6.F.4. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Provide details of both standard and handicapped motor vehicle parking spaces. Where provided, wheel stop curbing must be a minimum of two and one-half feet from the front of the parking space per UDC 7.4.6.H.3. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Keynote 5 on Sheet 2 states there is a short-term bicycle parking detail on Sheet 6; however, a short-term bicycle parking detail was not provided. Demonstrate that the short-term bicycle parking detail meets the requirements of UDC 7.4.9.C. Refer to UDC Figure 7.4.9-C for an example of a short-term bicycle parking detail. 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Indicate the location of the proposed long-term bicycle parking facilities and ensure the facilities meet the requirements of UDC 7.4.9.D. 15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.I – Show all right-of-way dedications on or abutting the site. The Major Streets and Routes Plan delineates a right-of-way width of 64 feet; proposed right-of-way width is 57 feet for Glenn Street. Contact Scott Weber (Department of Transportation and Mobility) at Scott.Weber@tucsonaz.gov to clarify the future right-of-way width of Glenn Street. Provide a copy of your email exchange with your next submittal. 16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Show a pedestrian circulation path to the solid waste and recycling enclosure along the south wall of the proposed building (TSM 7-01.3.3.b). 17. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.S - Show existing or proposed pedestrian circulation along the abutting right-of-way in accordance with TSM 10-01.0.0. 18. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.T – Provide details of the proposed refuse collection area in accordance with TSM 8-01.0.0. 19. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.V – Indicate as a general note whether mail service inside the building or through a gang mailbox. Indicate the location of any proposed gang mailboxes to assure there are no conflicts with pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping. 20. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.W – Provide a detail as well as indicate the locations of any handicapped parking signs to assure there are no conflicts with pedestrian accessibility. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Wyatt.Berger@tucsonaz.gov or at (520) 837-4951. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: A revised development package as well as a comment response letter. To resubmit, visit the Tucson Development Center Online at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home. The instructions for resubmittal can be found at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/website/Resubmittals.pdf. |
||
| 05/03/2023 | Traffic Engineering Review | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | TD-DEV-0223-00029 1109 W. Glenn St. Comments: 1. New 6’ wide Concrete Sidewalk per P.A.G. standard 200 is required along the property frontage of Glenn St. 2. New Concrete Driveway Apron per P.A.G. standard 206 is required. 3. 3’ minimum buffer between curb and sidewalk, unless ROW is limited. 4. At the point which your ADA path meets the new sidewalk in the ROW, a 60” X 60” ADA landing is required. Landings shall be 60” X 60” and not to exceed a 2% cross slope in all directions. 5. Correct the Near Side of the SVT to read, 265’. 6. Protect in place, existing power pole. David Stiffey DTM Project Coordinator David.Stiffey@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 04/04/2023 | CDRC Review Coordinator | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 04/27/2023 | External Reviewers - Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) | REVIEW COMPLETED | Jay Gomes <jgomes@azdot.gov> Good Afternoon, ADOT has no comments on this DEV. Thank you for the opportunity to review this item. |
||
| 04/24/2023 | External Reviewers - COT Parks & Recreation | REVIEW COMPLETED | Hello CDRC team, On behalf of the City of Tucson Parks and Recreation Department, I have no comments on the above development plan. Tom Fisher Project Manager City of Tucson Parks and Recreation Department 900 S. Randolph Way Tucson, Arizona 85716 (520) 837-8037 |
||
| 04/04/2023 | External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments | REVIEW COMPLETED | SENT FYI EMAIL PER SOP. | ||
| 04/04/2023 | External Reviewers - Southwest Gas | REVIEW COMPLETED | SENT FYI EMAIL PER SOP. | ||
| 04/04/2023 | External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) | REVIEW COMPLETED | SENT FYI EMAIL PER SOP. | ||
| 04/04/2023 | External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) | REVIEW COMPLETED | SENT FYI EMAIL PER SOP. | ||
| 03/29/2023 | OK to Submit - Landscape | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 05/03/2023 | ROW Engineering Review | REVIEW COMPLETED | TD-DEV-0223-00029 1109 W. Glenn St. Comments: 1. New 6’ wide Concrete Sidewalk per P.A.G. standard 200 is required along the property frontage of Glenn St. 2. New Concrete Driveway Apron per P.A.G. standard 206 is required. 3. 3’ minimum buffer between curb and sidewalk, unless ROW is limited. 4. At the point which your ADA path meets the new sidewalk in the ROW, a 60” X 60” ADA landing is required. Landings shall be 60” X 60” and not to exceed a 2% cross slope in all directions. 5. Correct the Near Side of the SVT to read, 265’. 6. Protect in place, existing power pole. David Stiffey DTM Project Coordinator David.Stiffey@tucsonaz.gov |